[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Understanding more on how courts today are extending admiralty jurisdiction in Tyranny

  • From: Brian Robertson <cueballx26@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:26:42 +0000

Based on my research, and have had attorneys actually agree. Everything is a 
contract. Every word said by every actor.


On Feb 11, 2021, at 20:24, Schaefer Carl <schaeferfreight@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


My point is, they are just doing business. That is all. They are making offers 
to contract. If you allow them to inspect your truck or car, they presume you 
agree, but now you know they are not authorized, so you demand to see their 
fictitious name certificate, them won't be able to produce it, so you tell 
them, sorry but you are not authorized to sell dounuts or lemonaide in this 
state, without registration first.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy Tablet


-------- Original message --------
From: Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2/11/21 7:45 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Understanding more on how 
courts today are extending admiralty jurisdiction in Tyranny

Carl
You starred the officer said he was not doing business, but you explained he 
was. Would you give detail of that explain?
On Feb 11, 2021, 3:32 PM -0700, M Schaefer Carl <schaeferfreight@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
wrote:

You

Other related posts: