[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: UCC Code who..

  • From: NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 16:41:57 +0000

Could the UCC have excised it at some point?

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

From: J_B<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 11:36 AM
To: 
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: UCC Code who..

yeah I've spent the last hour looking for The Uniform Commercial Code  Volume 
1, Section 103.6  .6 doesn't exist.  Question for all:  was it moved or revised 
like 1-307 which was moved in 2004 to 1-308?

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 9:51 AM Charley Dan 
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Then I know not where the code can be found
On Nov 10, 2021, 6:41 AM -0700, NELSON DICE 
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>>, wrote:

Thanks. I must be dense.

I do not see anywhere a
UCC 1-103.6 STATES, "codes are complimentary to common law which is still in 
affect"
anywhere......

It stops at 103 a3 or b

From: 
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
 on behalf of Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 8:02 AM
To: 
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>;
 
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: UCC Code who..

Only for you Nelson, only for you would I research and find a 
copy.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcopy.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C1aa22495a87049b99e8408d9a46837d3%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637721589997320886%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=4w%2BzQCML0jbtpR2ihANYaDTJB7JRnPd%2Bj87ZwMyNAeU%3D&reserved=0>
 Texas.:-). 
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/sdocs/businessandcommercecode.pdf<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatutes.capitol.texas.gov%2Fdocs%2Fsdocs%2Fbusinessandcommercecode.pdf&data=04%7C01%7C%7C1aa22495a87049b99e8408d9a46837d3%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637721589997330876%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DwrFfZUu0ObRGpoZ3lnvjqOITYXMDF%2BZ4oJK62oz%2Fo0%3D&reserved=0>
On Nov 10, 2021, 4:24 AM -0700, NELSON DICE 
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>>, wrote:


Charley, or anyone



Can someone provide the link to UCC 1-103.6  quote ?



I cannot locate it easily.





From: Charley Dan<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 5:23 PM
To: 
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: UCC Code who..



I flat out do not use it. After all UCC 1-103.6 STATES, "codes are 
complimentary to common law which is still in affect"
So common law-contract is superior to UCC. Need one say more?

On Nov 9, 2021, 2:35 PM -0700, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
wrote:

UCC Code who..



United States Code.  it's their corporate by-laws

It's for we the people to hold them accountable







Forgot who said in this chat they didn't like it or try not to use it.



this message is for you then.



PNG image

Other related posts: