Please feel free to repost the text or the meme or both.
Thanx in advance
NH Audit Judicial Conduct Committee & Family Court & Comité de Conducta
Judicial de Auditoría de NH y Tribunal de Familia & NH审计司法行为委员会和家庭法院
https://www.change.org/p/nh-legislative-audit-division-audit-the-nh-judicial-conduct-committee?utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=custom_url&recruited_by_id=b3dcfe60-1c9d-11eb-858d-313cd31d7c11
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021, 4:59:06 PM CDT, Julie Belshe
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Acknowledge. Thank you.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, March 26, 2021, 1:42 PM, cordero
<dr.richard.cordero_esq@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTE:I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widelyas
possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People;e.g., click
“Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<leftpanel ↓Register or +New or
Users >Add New. You can make the facts and strategic thinking
prevail upon the tried and failed practice of
filing in court to ask judges to incriminate and remove their fellow judges
at the risk of being retaliated against by them:
Prepare your opportunity
to tell your story to the national public through
The Guardianship Abuse Symposium
and
the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings
By
Dr. RichardCordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx DearMrs. Lund, Att. Rodriguez, Mrs. Kidd, Mr. Altman,
and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, It is with greatpleasure that I have
received your emails after such a long time withouthearing from you. About
your cases incourt, kindly notice that Judge Alex Kozinski was on the federal
bench for 35years, 32 of them on the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit;
and was even thechief judge of that Court from November 2007 to December 2014.
For all thattime, he was known to sexually harass court clerks and externs.Yet,
he was protected by his peers and colleagues. But then The New York Times and
The New Yorker published on October 5and 10, 2017, respectively, their exposés
of Harvey Weinstein’s sexual abusefor over 30 years. Within a week the
MeToo!movement erupted worldwide. Supreme Court ChiefJustice John Roberts,
Jr., received around 700 letters from former andcurrent clerks and externs
complaining about sexual harassment by judges,including Judge Kozinski. Only to
avoid therisk of being swept by the MeToo! movementof intolerance of enablers
of sexual harassers did Chief Justice Roberts issuean order on or around
December 15, 2017, referring Judge Kozinski to the JudicialCouncil of the
Second Circuit for investigation. The Chief Justice realizedthat an
investigation by Judge Kozinski’s own peers and colleagues in the NinthCircuit
would have detracted from “confidence in the impartiality of theproceedings”;
in other words, it would have been suspected of being a whitewash resulting
from judges judging judges. Rather than face aninvestigation by the Second
Circuit, Judge Kozinski resigned barely three days later on December 18,2017,
with immediate effect. The investigation stopped. Judge Kozinski did nothave to
compensate any of his victims. Instead, he began collecting his fullpension
from the Federal Judiciary. Judge Maryanne TrumpBarry, the sister of President
Donald Trump, on February 11, 2019, resigned onFebruary 11, 2019, upon learning
10 days earlier that she was beinginvestigated for her participation in her
father’s distribution of his assetsto his children through a fraud scheme
involving shell companies to evadeinheritance tax. The investigation stopped.
She is simply collecting herpension. I have writtenabout this many times
before. But I suspect that you did not read my emails and,if you did, failed to
apply their information to your cases. In fact, allfederal chief circuit
judges dismiss100% of complaints filed against their peers and colleagues; and
deny100% of petitions to review those dismissals.This is a fact established by
the judges themselves in their officials statistics submitted to Congress in
the Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts.
Now judges have a protectorat the highest place: The attorney general
nominated by President Biden andconfirmed by the Senate is none other than
JudgeMerrick Garland, who was chief judge of the Court of Appeals for
theDistrict of Columbia Circuit until his seven-year term ended on February
11,2020. He dismissed 100% of complaints against his peers in the Court
andcolleagues in the District and participated in the denial of 100% of
reviewpetitions concerning the 478 complaints filed during 1oct06-30sep17
11-yearperiod. It follows that thejudges in your cases will be protected by
their peers and colleagues. AttorneyGeneral Judge Garland will not have the
Department of Justice investigate anyof them, for the investigation could get
out of control and investigate him tooand investigated judges could incriminate
him in exchange for leniency by the investigating authorities. The most that
canhappen is that your judges opt to resign and collect their pension. You will
beleft burdened with the enormous amount of effort, time, and expenses that you
lave already invested up to now.
Moreover, you will have to incur even more ifnew judges are appointed to your
cases and you decide to continue your battle. The new judges will doom it to
end up with the same result so that you and everybody else receive a message
that is painfully clear even now: "Don't you ever mess with us! We are Judges
Above the Law."
Those are thefacts.
Nevertheless, one Advocate wrote, “To avoid wasting time with you all trying to
"reinvent theWheel," I attach for your information and use my recent SCOTUS
filings”. As itis, the Supreme Court takes up only 1 out of 93 petitions for
review, i.e.,petitions for certiorari. It is certainly nota petition that asks
the justices to investigate, incriminate, and removefellow judges that will
persuade them to grant it. Therefore, you arein fact ‘wasting your time and
everybody else’s and reinventing the wheel’ whenyou expect judges to stop
covering for each other and themselves as they havedone in hundreds of
thousands of previous cases...or did you think that yourpetition is the first
one ever invented to roll into a court filing room or theone invented with the
most knowledge of the law and experience of courtprocedure? To think that
youwill cause judges to ‘throw fellow judges under the bus’ and order them
tocompensate you is a fantasy concocted by wishful thinking. That is the
antithesis of strategic thinking based on facts learned through law research
and reading.
Instead, you can dosomething that will make good use of your effort, time, and
money: Join us! Read the article below; Attend the Guardianship Abuse
Symposium; Promote the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings; and
Contribute to launching a MeToo!-like generalized media investigation of
judges’ abuse ofpower:
Share my articles widely and post them to social media, such as:
Facebook
YoutubeLinkedInInstagramGoogle plusPinterestRedditSnapchatWhatsAppTwitter:
Guardianship AbuseSymposium April 11-12 via Zoom opportunity to prepare to tell
at first-evercitizens hearings your story of abuse by judges that you have
suffered orwitnessed & be compensated
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-exposing_judges_power_abuse.pdf
Everymeaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued,let alone advanced, without money: Lip service advances
nothing;
it only maintains the current abuse.
Putyour money
where your outrage at abuse and
passion for justice are.
Donate
to
Judicial DisciplineReform
throughPaypal
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ
by making a deposit or an online transfer to
Citi Bank, routing number 021 000 089, account 4977 59 2001 or by mailing a
check to the address below. Daretrigger history!...and you may enter it.
Sincerely, Dr.Richard Cordero, Esq.
JudicialDiscipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email ande-cloud storage accounts described at
*>ggl:1 etseq. and †>OL2:1114§G, when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his
emailaddresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to increase the
chancesof your email reaching him at least at one of those
addresses.********************************************
NOTE: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely as
possible in your own interest and that of the rest ofWe the People; e.g., click
“Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go
tohttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org<left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New.
Take advantage of the opportunity to tell the national public
your story of abuse of power by unaccountable judges
that you have suffered or witnessed
by contributing to:
TurningThe Guardianship Abuse Symposiumintothe event that launches the
formation of acivic apolitical nondenominational single issuemovementfor
judicial abuse of power exposure,compensation of abusees, and transformational
reform
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Guardianship_Abuse_Symposium.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A.,La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., is a presenter at, and
interested in the broadest and long-term success of,The Guardianship Abuse
Symposium
April11-12, 2021, via Zoom
organized by
Dr. Sam Sugar, MD
Founder and President of
Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship (AAAPG)
ssugarmd@xxxxxxx , drsam@xxxxxxxxx , info@xxxxxxxxx“Whatever the future of our
movement turns out to be,
it must evolve, itmust unify, it must act with purpose, structure, and
planning.”
Dr. Sugar inhis email under the subject line “Guardianship Terrorism”
of December 9, 2019,to Dr. Cordero.
What follows is a proposal harmonious with those requirement for forming our
movement.
It is based on Dr. Cordero’s study of judgesand their judiciaries:
Exposing Judges'Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † ♣
Articles based thereon are posted tohttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;
They have attracted so many webvisitors that
37,468+ have become subscribers to the site.
Join them for free:go to the homepage <left panel ↓Register
or
+ New or Users >Add New.
Overview of the
Presentationhttp://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Guardianship_Abuse_Symposium_slides.pdf
A. Yet another symposium
v.
the beginning of amovement
B. Advertising theSymposium and the unprecedented citizens hearings
C. Increasing audience; financing Symposium
D. Prolonging theimpact of the Symposium
E. Requested action byeach presenter
F. Every meaningfulcause needs donations
A. Yet another symposium v.
the beginning of a movement
1. Zero progress in holding judges accountable
2. Einstein: Doing the same thing while expectinga different is the hallmark of
irrationality
3. Congressional & judiciary sham hearings
4. Rep. J. Nadlercontrasted with Sen. E. Warren
5. Movementprecedents: Tea Party; MeToo!; BLM;police brutality protests;
socio-economic equality6. Out-of-court inform & outrage We the People
B. Advertising theSymposium and
the unprecedented citizenshearings
1. held by media &universities to hear abusees
2. Journalists: scandal sells; Pulitzer;clean name
a. AG Garland dismissed 100% of complaints
b. Biden’s judicial systemreform commission
3. Abusees: write, send, and tell your story
a. join a collective demand for compensation
4. Universities: policy influencer & powerhouse
a. attract deans, professors,and students
C. Increasing audience; financing Symposium
1. using entities asgateways to their members
a. university pressoffice; student classofficers and organizations; peers at
otheruniversities
b. the consortium Academia
c. press clubs; tips@media;press releases
d. professional schools accrediting entities
e. AARP; publicdefenders; bar associations
2. Strength innumbers: word of mouth; going viral
3. DevelopingJudicial-Discipline-Reform.org
D. Prolonging the impact of the Symposium
1. Continued advertisingafter the Symposium
2. 2,400+ law professors &2,000+ mothers in thelegal profession v. Kavanaugh in
NYT
3. Lawyers DefendingAmerican Democracy; CLEs
4.Harvard & Yale students v. Kavanaugh now to research,write theses,call for
articleson judges’
a. interception ofemails and mail
b. failure to readmost briefs
c. filing fraudulent financial disclosure reports
5.Promoting virtual/physical tour of presentations that identify what is in it
for sponsors, media,audience
6. Making allies: enemy of my enemy is myfriend
a. the dissatisfied 50%: parties who lost incourt
b. offering issue to politicianssearching for one
c. forminglocal chapters of abusees to demand compensation, assisted and
reported on by:
d. unemployed lawyers and law students
e. journalism & business students: team course and Judiciary as racketeering
enterprise
f. a consortium of InformationTechnology experts to examine theJudiciary’s
network
E. Requested action by each presenter
1. Statement of level ofcommitment
2 Division of labor;specialization; delegation
3. Organize ourpresentation to your students and faculty; and colleagues and
guests
4. Set the example: hold citizenshearings
5. Concerted effort to have Emile Zola’s I accuse!- & MeToo!-like article and
press conference to spark a generalizedmedia investigationofjudges
6. Search for DeepThroatjudges & clerks
7. Monthly meeting of presenters and supporters
F. Opportunity for you to tell your story of abuse by judges
1. If you are a victim of, or a witness to, judges' abuse of power, send your
story to the news organization Reuters, which has asked its readers to send
their stories to it.
2. To learn how to write your story in only up to 500 words and to find the
email addresses where you must send it
seehttp://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_your_story_for_Reuters.pdf
section G. 3. "Less is more". You will not be writing a brief for a court.You will be writing for the journalists at Reuters and other media outlets. If
Attachment:
NHAuditJudicialConduct&FamilyCourt04072021.jpg
Description: JPEG image