Taken care of. Good though. I chose a quicker method. No need to show up for
court and exercised “right of avoidance”
On Mar 10, 2021, at 4:08 AM, Alla Miyets (Redacted sender "amiyets" for
DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I has similar ticket but not the school zone. They sent me the ticket with
two pictures and I was able to calculate the speed that the car was going
which was below the speed they stated on the ticket. Share the outcome of
your case.
On Tuesday, March 2, 2021, 11:26:03 PM EST, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i took care of this mess. it was a video and picture. The video shows
drivintg cant tell how fast unless u know the distance the object is going
and how long it takes to travel such. now i wait on them. The ball is in
their court to prove Jurisdiction
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:28 PM Alla Miyets <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Do you have two images of your car moving? I can see only one. They usually
provide two to prove that the car was SPEEDING. Also did the picture of the
plate came out clear enough to understand the number without any doubt?
On Friday, February 26, 2021, 09:21:03 PM EST, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OH boy! it's just not my month.. 2nd infraction from the Pigs see photo below
*Take notice they use a company to process these tickets( Ticket not directly
from a Cop * beside the point* no photo or video of who is driving the
vehicle and i assume the cop wasn't present even though it says on the
notice. see back of fake ticket Doesn't appear to be a standard ticket of
summons. On Back, Says to contest.. yad yada. so long story short How does
one address Jurisdiction again without going physically to court before the
Black-robed Administrator or so-called Judge?
Think its Obvious I dont send Notice: "Article 1, section 8, clause 17; I am
a state national and not a United States Citizen" to
Secure.speedviolation.com 1 obvious way is to write an affidavit affirming I
wasn't driving the car but rather not do such because that would put me in
their jurisdiction.
see attached images Zoom in if need be, I marked places where its address in
ALL CAPS NAME *Straw Man. says on back "You are the registered owner of
the vehicle described.... These recorded images constitute prima-facie
evidence of a violation of the Georgia law ...blah blah. meaning unless I
say to the contrary then it stands.
photos too big to attach so its linked here
https://postimg.cc/gallery/ZNL194Q click on each to make photo larger
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 3:38 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Purchase of what?
Article 1, section 8, clause 17 " the jurisdiction of the United States is
land they purchase" goes on to state for specific purposes. The United States
assumes your their chattel/purchased slave till you claim otherwise.
Voluntary subject because one is ignorant. That is why I state if you get a
traffic ticket. Just make a copy, write this on ticket or arched paper to
send to clerk of that court.
"Article 1, section 8, clause 17; I am a state national and not an United
States Citizen."
Then go your merry way. I've never had or heard a judge doing anything. A
judge once notified of your national position he has to grant your court or
lose his bond. According to 5.4that some posted on bonds on this forum. All I
know is the case ends. I'm trying to use this approach to find remedy. I know
the courts stop any action.
On Feb 21, 2021, 1:07 PM -0700, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
purchase of what? sorry a bit confused.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 2:45 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Personal view
Traffic ticket is a notice and demand. Notice of infraction and demand for x
amount.
The question is if they have the right jurisdiction or individual. Are you a
United States property/citizen or are you a state national. They assume you
are citizen and till clarified you are what they say you are. You must show
them the law/constitution that clarifies what an United Stares
citizen/property requirements are. Purchase is required.
On Feb 21, 2021, 12:03 PM -0700, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Traffic tickets won under common court law instead?
Or via the fact its a contract to do business and fought under the
admiralty flag kangaroo courts
since under the Constitution, there needs to be an injured party. There is
none in this case of a ticket/citation. anyone here fights a traffic
ticket under common law court or even with kangaroo court under the fact
the ticket is to do business with the Cooperation *your fake name. A
ticket is a contract even though some lawyers online say it's a summons.
But everything on the ticket is printed out via thermal printer all caps.
