Whatever, they will arrest you. Sometimes they will come for you immediately.
Other times they will wait till the next time they happen to encounter you and
it shows up on the computer. In Colorado right now they give tickets and not so
quick on arrests because the jails are full.
What is color of law? Everything they do is color of law if your not in their
jurisdiction. As a state national they need to present to you and affadavit of
harm you did to the man making the claim. Plus a warrant from a judge who
granted it. Most of them would come because you were sent an affadavit signed
by a man staying how you harmed him. Or a court date and did not show up..
On Feb 25, 2021, 2:51 PM -0700, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
based on the following said from Winningham Fearn
" I guarantee you that their statutes will say that a Warrant is a paper in
writing that is signed by a Judge, therefore what they are telling you is
that it is a capias and they are calling it a warrant. That is a color of law
warrant, and that is a felony for them to violate your rights under the color
of law"
then someone explain to me what an actual "warrant" is then if from what i
read above capias seems to be different? and how we tll the difference for
example if you dont show up to court for a ticket/citation whatever the
excuse may be. As it says there might be a warrant put out depending on what
the judge would do *this is on the back of the ticket. Now other thing to
note is if you answer the ticket before the court date via a Whit and still
dont show up is it legal for them to put a warrant for failure to appear
*(yes i now it depends what you put on the Whit such as invalidating their
jurisdiction to begin with) I guess im poking at the notion of if the judge
wants to strong hand you to see if they can get away with it; certainly they
could but would they for small stuff such as speeding ticket .. move over law
ticket, parking ticket, things which dont involve injury or so-called
federal offenses.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 6:34 PM Winningham Fearn <winfearn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I guarantee you that their statutes will say that a Warrant is a paper in
writing that is signed by a Judge, therefore what they are telling you is
that it is a capias and they are calling it a warrant.
That is a color of law warrant, and that is a felony for them to violate
your rights under the color of law
Best Regards,
Win
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:25 PM jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx <jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Oh yeah..thanks soo much! !!
I asked for a copy of the warrants and court said there is no paper
copy in existance. this was long ago.. i was going to see if they
were legally done....(anyway).. but there is a Warrant list. on the
City website.... I can check there and see if they disappear.. I
doubt they will write me....in the ALL CAPS NAME...which i have
returned that mail.... in the past. All i have tried before has
failed....and its been alot. I'll let you all know...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:53 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Jonbondo
Recently a fellow had the same situation. That is outstanding
traffic warrants in Colorado and new Mexico. He sent to the court
clerk where they were created "article 1, section 8, clause 17
I'm not an United States Citizen and I (your name) a state
national. They disappeared. After sending letter one can wait a
few weeks and usually the court will tell you if there is a
warrant exists. The reason for this is that your stating the
jurisdiction your in. Jurisdiction can be challenged at anytime.
Even after conviction.
On Feb 24, 2021, 3:38 PM -0700, jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx
<jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
after i posted i got this same .... message from
tiajoli@phillipshq
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:09 PM jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx
<jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charley
what can one do about old tickets..in which the the
judgements were guilty and there have been warrants out
for several years..?? i do not want to pay.. (thousands)
Is there any recourse?
crooked judge and got sandbagged and steamrolled .. they
want no one off the plantation... and their hands on that
cash. Its their court.. but i would very much like these
cleared off the record... all at the same municipal
court.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:12 AM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Vinner
The passport jurisdiction of Canada, and other places
would apply in that jurisdiction and agreements they
have with United States jurisdicton. We know diplomats
of other jurisdictions give leniency or revised rules.
Most are required a driver's license. So I doubt it
would work.
Mike, Fred, Roy, and J_B
To understand judges watch other sovereign you tuners
in court. One of my favorites are Marc Stevens. His
approach is show me the constitution applies to his
client. The answer from judge is this is an
administrative court and constitution does not apply.
The judge goes on to state. Give me the evidence. To
which Stevens always tells the judge the prosecutor
must prove. To me this is an circular argument and one
will lose because it's the prosecutor holding a
administrative court before the judge.
Your sent a notice and demand (citation) to come to
their administrative court. That administrative court
is for legislative law and their government courts.
Municipal court to supreme court are administrative to
settle Government issues.
We all can read the bill of rights and realize and know
there is common law, admirality law, maritime law and
some speciality laws as military law.
To me the question is how to switch the admirality
administrative court to common law court. Can we switch
the court? I believe one can and as I study this more
and more or all points to article 1, section 8,
clause17 as it shows the limitations of that admirality
legislative court. It does not state what court your in
but that your not in theirs. That is all that really
matters anyhow.
Someone posted this on this forum which I believe is
When National constitutionality comes before the judge.
He must honor due process of law or lose his bonding.
This is handled by the internal functions of the
corporation and bonding company.
5.4 - Bonding of Judges
A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded,
and shall be deemed unbondable:
1. if he fails to protect the U.S, national
constitutionally guaranteed remedies of due process and
the equal protection of the laws of any citizen
appearing in his court of law, or of any citizen
appearing in any court of the county in which he works
whose case may come to his attention by any means.
Without a bond. One cannot hold a valid court. Will say
this is what I'm finding that works. Just more
information keeps coming forth that seems to validate
the idea.
Again if one uses their court cases. They are still in
their administrative court. I'm going to keep using
article 1817 and that I'm not an United Stars Citizen
but a state national. I'm trying to find a way to
settle compensation outside the court. A friend was
given a document that comes from state battorney
general in Colorado with a different address to settle
claims against officers or employees that have caused
harm. I assume every state has this.
The attorney general sends it to insurance to review
and settle. That sounds more common law to me. We
settle with individual or their insurance. Will see.
On Feb 23, 2021, 10:09 PM -0700, Roy Vinner
<littlefilbert@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Charley,
I wonder whether a foreign passport will work as well
instead of a State national passport? A Canadian or a
European passport, perhaps?
On 2/21/2021 9:26 PM, Charley Dan wrote:
J_B
Proof? Well I've told close to eighteen now and
Worked perfectly. So they say.
When I got stopped here is my experience. I gave my
normal passport. He gave me a ticket.
I sent to the court as I told you. Two days after
court hearing the judges personal clerk sent me a
note saying a live warrant was issued and then
offered me two court dates a month away. I sent
back the same note of article 1817 and I'm a
national. Four business days later I called the
court and no warrant to be found.
I'm filing with the court for recompense. I've not
had luck with remedy though.
Proof beyond that? "If you cannot take a man's
word. Then it's not worth listening to him." The
Constitution is the SupRene law (article 6) of the
land and article 1, section 8, clause 17 states the
limited jurisdicton of the United States.