W. W. Cargill Co. v. Minnesota :: 180 U.S. 452 (1901) :: Justia US Supreme
Court Center<https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/180/452/>
[https://justatic.com/v/11111111100358/shared/images/social-media/law.jpg]<https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/180/452/>
W. W. Cargill Co. v. Minnesota :: 180 U.S. 452 (1901) :: Justia US Supreme
Court Center<https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/180/452/>
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version
of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general
informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments,
verdicts or settlements.
supreme.justia.com
Now here is the correct quote from the case "(3) That an acceptance of a
license, in whatever form, will not require the licensee to respect or to
comply with any provisions of the statute or with any regulations prescribed by
the state Railroad and Warehouse Commission that are repugnant to the
Constitution of the United States."
This case is SPECIFIC to THAT commission and cannot be used as "proof" of
anything else, the specificity of the judges TELLING you which commission is
involved shows that and is THEIR way to limit the impact of the case on any
other commission or agency ...hence YOU must prove up YOUR case against the
department or commission that is coming after you....
Whoever wrote the "quote" has NO IDEA what is involved in researching a case
nor how to present it in court documents. Any you wonder why judges do not
like Pro Se's....
________________________________
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 2:37 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Traffic tickets won under
common court law instead?
"The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the
licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the
statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the
Constitution of the United States." W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA,
180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 2:17 PM Fred Wind
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I'm trying to get the system to explain how an official from the executive
branch(cop) can issue a judicial summons ( so far no luck)
In nj no signature is required on a ticket so it seems ACCEPTANCE is
consummating the contract (ticket) but you have 3 days (72 hrs) to reject it,
however the process to reject it seems simple enuf, depends on how corrupt the
court is to process it or not
Sent from Yahoo Mail on
Android<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:47 AM, Shanquil
<shanquil@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:shanquil@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Is there a way to erase all traffic tickets and other records with the DMV? I'm
trying to assist someone with Commercial Drivers License that is being
penalized for what happens when he is driving a regular vehicle. Now he can no
longer drive and make a living for him and his family. If anyone knows of a way
please share 🙏🏾....
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 8:35 AM Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
No clue what to look up and we are talking about tickets which I seem to be
getting mixed review as supposedly it’s not a contract. Yet it’s written like
one with signature for you and the cop. At least then new Herman printed
tickets have spot for the pig to sign
On Feb 22, 2021, at 4:56 AM, Mike
<leatherlips1@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:leatherlips1@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
any contract where they do not give full disclosure is void. you can be the
agent for the fiction all cap name. You can also put By: in front of your
signature. Look it up.
From: Garrison Michael (Redacted sender "lexluther1776" for
DMARC)<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 1:47 PM
To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Traffic tickets won under
common court law instead?
If you show them a Drivers License with your signature on it then you
"Contracted" to be a Surety for ALL Debts charged to your Corporate
Entity/Strawman's Account (SS# & License No.) since it's registered to operate
& use the Public Streets for profit. It's really hard to prove that the Picture
& Signature is NOT Yours since ONLY the man can have one, so, the "presumption"
that you are the man responsible to pay for the debt charge is great, and now
it's up to you to prove otherwise in front of one of their Administrative
Officers. "Good Luck" it possible, but with "You the man" providing the proof
they need to "PROVE" you obligated to "pay" it becomes really hard. There is a
way around it all but then it takes action pro-actively rather than
re-actively...
I hope that helps explain things somewhat....
"Garrison"
On Sunday, February 21, 2021, 02:09:09 PM CST, J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
purchase of what? sorry a bit confused.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 2:45 PM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Personal view
Traffic ticket is a notice and demand. Notice of infraction and demand for x
amount.
The question is if they have the right jurisdiction or individual. Are you a
United States property/citizen or are you a state national. They assume you are
citizen and till clarified you are what they say you are. You must show them
the law/constitution that clarifies what an United Stares citizen/property
requirements are. Purchase is required.
On Feb 21, 2021, 12:03 PM -0700, J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>>, wrote:
Traffic tickets won under common court law instead?
Or via the fact its a contract to do business and fought under the admiralty
flag kangaroo courts
since under the Constitution, there needs to be an injured party. There is
none in this case of a ticket/citation. anyone here fights a traffic ticket
under common law court or even with kangaroo court under the fact the ticket is
to do business with the Cooperation *your fake name. A ticket is a contract
even though some lawyers online say it's a summons. But everything on the
ticket is printed out via thermal printer all caps.
