Yes I figured that I just wrote it that way. Seems I states it in the wrong
context. Let’s try again. Proper way to notify Court of article 1, section 8,
clause 17 I'm not an United States Citizen and I (your name) a state national.
so the outcome will default
On Feb 24, 2021, at 7:52 PM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Written correctly? One does not need to motion for Dismissal because it was
null and void for lack of jurisdiction from the beginning. If one wants to
they can and does not hurt either.
On Feb 24, 2021, 5:34 PM -0700, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Example of one written correctly for the court clerk to give point of fact
of jurisdiction,article 1, section 8, clause 17 I'm not an United States
Citizen and I (your name) a state national. and that the citation be
dropped
From what I’ve read things need to be written correctly or it won’t except
it or something on those lines
On Feb 24, 2021, at 6:53 PM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Warrant is bringing one in for prosecution as a suspect and capias is
bringing you in for failing to follow the orders of the court. Color of
law? Strictly depends if the officer used the law in a crooked manner.
Could be an off duty officer at an sporting event but trying to flex his
authority by using the codes. Or color of law can be because your in the
wrong jurisdiction. So the wrong laws are being used against you.Either way
it must be proven by you in court which could be just exchange of papers
filled with the clerk of that court.
On Feb 24, 2021, 4:32 PM -0700, Winningham Fearn <winfearn@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
I guarantee you that their statutes will say that a Warrant is a paper in
writing that is signed by a Judge, therefore what they are telling you is
that it is a capias and they are calling it a warrant.
That is a color of law warrant, and that is a felony for them to violate
your rights under the color of law
Best Regards,
Win
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:25 PM jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx <jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Oh yeah..thanks soo much! !!
I asked for a copy of the warrants and court said there is no paper
copy in existance. this was long ago.. i was going to see if they were
legally done....(anyway).. but there is a Warrant list. on the City
website.... I can check there and see if they disappear.. I doubt
they will write me....in the ALL CAPS NAME...which i have returned that
mail.... in the past. All i have tried before has failed....and its
been alot. I'll let you all know...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:53 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jonbondo
Recently a fellow had the same situation. That is outstanding traffic
warrants in Colorado and new Mexico. He sent to the court clerk where
they were created "article 1, section 8, clause 17 I'm not an United
States Citizen and I (your name) a state national. They disappeared.
After sending letter one can wait a few weeks and usually the court will
tell you if there is a warrant exists. The reason for this is that your
stating the jurisdiction your in. Jurisdiction can be challenged at
anytime. Even after conviction.
On Feb 24, 2021, 3:38 PM -0700, jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx
<jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
after i posted i got this same .... message from tiajoli@phillipshq
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:09 PM jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx
<jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charley
what can one do about old tickets..in which the the judgements were
guilty and there have been warrants out for several years..?? i do
not want to pay.. (thousands) Is there any recourse?
crooked judge and got sandbagged and steamrolled .. they want no
one off the plantation... and their hands on that cash. Its their
court.. but i would very much like these cleared off the record...
all at the same municipal court.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:12 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Vinner
The passport jurisdiction of Canada, and other places would apply in
that jurisdiction and agreements they have with United States
jurisdicton. We know diplomats of other jurisdictions give leniency
or revised rules. Most are required a driver's license. So I doubt it
would work.
Mike, Fred, Roy, and J_B
To understand judges watch other sovereign you tuners in court. One
of my favorites are Marc Stevens. His approach is show me the
constitution applies to his client. The answer from judge is this is
an administrative court and constitution does not apply. The judge
goes on to state. Give me the evidence. To which Stevens always tells
the judge the prosecutor must prove. To me this is an circular
argument and one will lose because it's the prosecutor holding a
administrative court before the judge.
Your sent a notice and demand (citation) to come to their
administrative court. That administrative court is for legislative
law and their government courts. Municipal court to supreme court
are administrative to settle Government issues.
We all can read the bill of rights and realize and know there is
common law, admirality law, maritime law and some speciality laws as
military law.
To me the question is how to switch the admirality administrative
court to common law court. Can we switch the court? I believe one can
and as I study this more and more or all points to article 1, section
8, clause17 as it shows the limitations of that admirality
legislative court. It does not state what court your in but that your
not in theirs. That is all that really matters anyhow.
Someone posted this on this forum which I believe is When National
constitutionality comes before the judge. He must honor due process
of law or lose his bonding. This is handled by the internal functions
of the corporation and bonding company.
5.4 - Bonding of Judges
A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be
deemed unbondable:
1. if he fails to protect the U.S, national constitutionally
guaranteed remedies of due process and the equal protection of the
laws of any citizen appearing in his court of law, or of any citizen
appearing in any court of the county in which he works whose case may
come to his attention by any means.
Without a bond. One cannot hold a valid court. Will say this is what
I'm finding that works. Just more information keeps coming forth that
seems to validate the idea.
Again if one uses their court cases. They are still in their
administrative court. I'm going to keep using article 1817 and that
I'm not an United Stars Citizen but a state national. I'm trying to
find a way to settle compensation outside the court. A friend was
given a document that comes from state battorney general in Colorado
with a different address to settle claims against officers or
employees that have caused harm. I assume every state has this.
The attorney general sends it to insurance to review and settle. That
sounds more common law to me. We settle with individual or their
insurance. Will see.
On Feb 23, 2021, 10:09 PM -0700, Roy Vinner
<littlefilbert@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Charley,
I wonder whether a foreign passport will work as well instead of a
State national passport? A Canadian or a European passport, perhaps?
On 2/21/2021 9:26 PM, Charley Dan wrote:
J_B
Proof? Well I've told close to eighteen now and Worked perfectly.
So they say.
When I got stopped here is my experience. I gave my normal
passport. He gave me a ticket.
I sent to the court as I told you. Two days after court hearing the
judges personal clerk sent me a note saying a live warrant was
issued and then offered me two court dates a month away. I sent
back the same note of article 1817 and I'm a national. Four
business days later I called the court and no warrant to be found.
I'm filing with the court for recompense. I've not had luck with
remedy though.
Proof beyond that? "If you cannot take a man's word. Then it's not
worth listening to him." The Constitution is the SupRene law
(article 6) of the land and article 1, section 8, clause 17 states
the limited jurisdicton of the United States.
