after i posted i got this same .... message from tiajoli@phillipshq
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:09 PM jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx <jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Charley
what can one do about old tickets..in which the the judgements were
guilty and there have been warrants out for several years..?? i do not
want to pay.. (thousands) Is there any recourse?
crooked judge and got sandbagged and steamrolled .. they want no one
off the plantation... and their hands on that cash. Its *their *court..
but i would very much like these cleared off the record... all at the
same municipal court.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:12 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Vinner
The passport jurisdiction of Canada, and other places would apply in that
jurisdiction and agreements they have with United States jurisdicton. We
know diplomats of other jurisdictions give leniency or revised rules. Most
are required a driver's license. So I doubt it would work.
Mike, Fred, Roy, and J_B
To understand judges watch other sovereign you tuners in court. One of my
favorites are Marc Stevens. His approach is show me the constitution
applies to his client. The answer from judge is this is an administrative
court and constitution does not apply. The judge goes on to state. Give me
the evidence. To which Stevens always tells the judge the prosecutor must
prove. To me this is an circular argument and one will lose because it's
the prosecutor holding a administrative court before the judge.
Your sent a notice and demand (citation) to come to their administrative
court. That administrative court is for legislative law and
their government courts. Municipal court to supreme court are
administrative to settle Government issues.
We all can read the bill of rights and realize and know there is common
law, admirality law, maritime law and some speciality laws as military law.
To me the question is how to switch the admirality administrative court
to common law court. Can we switch the court? I believe one can and as I
study this more and more or all points to article 1, section 8, clause17 as
it shows the limitations of that admirality legislative court. It does not
state what court your in but that your not in theirs. That is all that
really matters anyhow.
Someone posted this on this forum which I believe is When National
constitutionality comes before the judge. He must honor due process of law
or lose his bonding. This is handled by the internal functions of the
corporation and bonding company.
5.4 - Bonding of Judges
A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed
unbondable:
1. if he fails to protect the U.S, national constitutionally guaranteed
remedies of due process and the equal protection of the laws of any citizen
appearing in his court of law, or of any citizen appearing in any court of
the county in which he works whose case may come to his attention by any
means.
Without a bond. One cannot hold a valid court. Will say this is what I'm
finding that works. Just more information keeps coming forth that seems to
validate the idea.
Again if one uses their court cases. They are still in their
administrative court. I'm going to keep using article 1817 and that I'm not
an United Stars Citizen but a state national. I'm trying to find a way to
settle compensation outside the court. A friend was given a document that
comes from state battorney general in Colorado with a different address to
settle claims against officers or employees that have caused harm. I assume
every state has this.
The attorney general sends it to insurance to review and settle. That
sounds more common law to me. We settle with individual or their
insurance. Will see.
On Feb 23, 2021, 10:09 PM -0700, Roy Vinner <littlefilbert@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
Charley,
I wonder whether a foreign passport will work as well instead of a State
national passport? A Canadian or a European passport, perhaps?
On 2/21/2021 9:26 PM, Charley Dan wrote:
J_B
Proof? Well I've told close to eighteen now and Worked perfectly. So they
say.
When I got stopped here is my experience. I gave my normal passport. He
gave me a ticket.
I sent to the court as I told you. Two days after court hearing the
judges personal clerk sent me a note saying a live warrant was issued and
then offered me two court dates a month away. I sent back the same note of
article 1817 and I'm a national. Four business days later I called the
court and no warrant to be found.
I'm filing with the court for recompense. I've not had luck with remedy
though.
Proof beyond that? "If you cannot take a man's word. Then it's not worth
listening to him." The Constitution is the SupRene law (article 6) of the
land and article 1, section 8, clause 17 states the limited jurisdicton of
the United States.
