NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged toshare and post it to social media as widely
as possible in your own interest and that of the rest ofWe the People; e.g.,
click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them.
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
tel. (718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
James V. Grimaldi,Coulter Jones,Joe Palazzolo
The Wall StreetJournal
James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx, Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx, Joe.Palazzolo@wsj.comand Top
media outlets and Sen. Elizabeth Warren Dear Messrs. Palazzolo, Jones, and
Grimaldi, I read with great interest your article “131 Federal Judges Broke
the Lawby Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest”,first published on
September 28, 2021. It reminded me that Senator Elizabeth Warren was the first
and stillremains the only politician who dare denounce −during the presidential
campaign,see her “I have a plan for the Federal Judiciary too”− federal
judges’widespread practice of not recusing themselves from cases in which they
have afinancial interest in one of the parties so as to ensure what she called
their “self-enrichment”.Sen. Warren has explained that federal judges engage in
such conduct inreliance on their unaccountability. Was it only a felicitous
coincidence that just 5 days later, on October 3, theInternational Consortium
of Investigative Journalists published its massive PandoraPapers of 12 million
leaked documents revealing how the powerful and the richuse tax havens to
conceal assets, evade taxes, and launder money, all of whichconstitutes
criminal activity? In reaction to the above and the other facts stated below,
Irespectfully submit to you hereby a proposal for a joint investigation
togetherwith other top media outlets, Sen. Warren, and me into judges’ abuse of
powerand financial criminality. I look forward to hearing from you at your
earliest convenience. Sincerely, Dr. RichardCordero, Esq.
Judicial DisciplineReform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloudstorage accounts described at
* >ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G, whenemailing him, copy the above bloc of
his email addresses and paste it in theTo: line of your email so as to enhance
the chances of your email reaching himat least at one of those
addresses.******************************************************
Proposal to top media outlets and a VIP that have exposed
judges' abuse of power, their self-enrichment, and tax havens,
–The Wall Street Journal, Thomson Reuters,TheBoston Globe,
Senator Elizabeth Warren, and the International Consortium of Investigative
Journalists–
to combine their expertise and means to investigate judges’ financial
criminality and
to that end hold
unprecedented citizens hearings
where abusees provide investigative leads as they tell the national public
their stories, and
together with lawyers and their clients
harmed by judges who failed to recuse themselves due to their conflict of
interests
collectively demand compensation from judges and their judiciaries
by turning against them their own Catholic Church pedophilic jurisprudence
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-media_to_investigate_judges_financial_criminality.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgtel. ;
(718)827-9521Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx ,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
A. Proposal for a joint investigation into judges' conduct and its potential
for transformative change
1. This is a proposal for top media outlets and a VIP that have dare expose
tax havens and judges’ abuse of power and self-enrichment – the International
Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), The Wall Street Journal (WSJ),
Thomson Reuters, Boston Globe, and U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren– to combine
their expertise and means to: a. investigate judges’ financial criminality
consisting, among other things, in their failure to recuse themselves from
cases in which they have a financial interest, conceal assets, evade taxes, and
launder money; b. ask abusees for copies of the complaints that they have
filed and may file against judges, which abusees can freely share and publish
as an exercise of their and the rest of We the People’s most cherished rights,
namely, those guaranteed under the 1st Amendment to theConstitution of “freedom
of speech, of the press, the right of the people peaceably to assemble [in
person, by email, mail, and on social media], and to petition the Government
[of which judges constitute the Third Branch] for a redress of grievances [as
by paying abusees compensation]” c. hold unprecedentedcitizenshearingstogether
with students(OL:115) and professors at journalism, law, business, and
Information Technology schools, so that abusees may tell their stories
ofjudges’ abuse of power to the national public at media stations, university
auditoriums, and everywhere else via video conference, thereby providing
investigative leads; making it possible to analyze their independent stories
forpattern evidence; and informing and outraging the People, the only entity
strong enough thanks to its voting power to compel politicians in, or running
for, office to officially investigate, or promise to investigate, judges; d.
facilitate the joining of abusees and lawyers and their clients harmed by
judges who hid their financial interest in their cases in collectively
demanding compensation from judges and their judiciaries by invoking, among
other grounds, their own Catholic Church pedophilic jurisprudence: ‘too big to
fail to know’, too many pedophilic priests and acts for the Church not to know
them. 1) A principal is liable for the acts of its agent, whether it had actual
knowledge of the agent’s malfeasance or it has imputed knowledge because if it
had proceeded with due diligence to discharge its duty to control its agent it
would have known; 2) The judges’ decisions have caused the Church to pay more
than $2 billion to the victims of priests and of its cover-up of their crimes.
As a result of “lookback” laws adopted in at least 15 states to lift or extend
the statute of limitations for victims to sue, some 5,000 new cases could force
the Church to compensate the victims with more than $4 billion. 3) As the
Catholic Church so the Federal Judiciary: A corollary of the equal protection
clause is “Nobody is above the law”. So everybody is subject to the same
punishment for committing acts that require others to be protected. e. appeal
to the members of the Biden Commission for reforming the Supreme Court (see
their bloc of email addresses below) and politicians likely to participate in
the primaries for the mid-term elections to demand the reform of all the courts
of the Federal Judiciary, the model for its state counterparts. 1) Current
judges and former judges who now are Supreme Court justices abusively
self-ensure their unaccountability –theydismiss 100% of complaints filed
against, and by law(28 U.S.C. §351) necessarily with, them; anddeny 100% of
petitions to review their dismissals–; and foster it through pervasive secrecy
–they hold all their adjudicative, policy-making, administrative, and
disciplinary meetings behind closed doors–. 2) Thanks to this self and
‘unequal protectionfrom the law”, judges risklessly coordinate their abuse of
power and criminal acts to the point of turning them into
theirinstitutionalized modus operandi. So they run the Federal Judiciary as a
racketeering enterprise. 3) I haveproposed that the commissioners and
politicians make the exposure of judges’ abuse of power the key issue of their
report and their electoral campaign, respectively. f. promote what 34 states
have called for since April 2, 2014, thus meeting the requirements of Article V
for amending theConstitution: a constitutional convention. That call the
congressional and party leadership will never heed because it threatens its
privileges and power. However, such convention, especially a runaway one
overtaken bythe People, will make it possible to cast aside a 232-year old
Constitution written by the long since dead hand of only landed, educated,
white men. They will replace it with a new constitution addressing the needs of
today’s People of both genders and all races, ethnicity, educational levels,
sexual orientation, wealth, and power. 2. Hence, this is a proposal for the top
media outlets and the VIP that have dare expose judges and tax havens to
rehabilitate themselves by shaking off the label “the enemy of the people”
pasted on them and the rest of the media. They can set in motion a process that
while benefiting them commercially because “scandal sells”, turns them into the
engine that drives transformative change in American politics and society. That
will be the most practically meaningful, long-term, and historic accomplishment
of theirs and the other outlets of the media. For their feat, they will become
nationally recognized as the Champions ofthe People.
B. A proposed plan of investigation 3. During my research and writing on judges
and their judiciaries, I have gathered many investigative leads. I have
arranged them in a concrete, feasible, two-pronged plan of investigation:
Follow the money! and Follow the wire! (OL:194§E) I propose that we jointly
implement it on the strength of the expertise gained by the media that have
investigated judges and tax heavens.
1. Financial disclosure report
4. Federal judges are required under theEthics in Government Act of
1978(jur:65fn107d), to file mandatory annual financial disclosure reports(id.
jur:102§a and 213b). 5. They need not worry about the accuracy and completeness
of their reports, for they do not file them with an independent body of
accounting and investing professionals. Rather, they are filed with other
fellow judges who are members for three years of the Committee for Financial
Disclosure of theJudicial Conference of the U.S. The latter is presided over by
the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who appoints all committee members, and
includes all the chief circuit judges, and representative district, bankruptcy,
and magistrate judges. 6. The Committee meets, of course, behind closed doors.
Its members are also subject to the same duty to file their own financial
disclosure reports. Hence, they have every interest in being as indulgent with
the filers as they want the filers and their friends to be eventually with them
when they become Committee members. As a result, these reports are risklessly
drawn up and filed pro forma, containing incomplete and misleading material
information. 7. They are easy to come by now thatJudicialWatch.org downloads
them in bulk from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and makes them
available for free. Their analysis can provide significant investigative leads.
2. The FBI reports on vetting judicial candidates
8. Candidates for judicial office are vetted by the FBI. Wielding its subpoena,
contempt, and indictment powers, it can obtain a candidate’s bank account
statements, property reports, and other financial information that is not
public. The media lack all those powers. 9. The FBI judicial vetting reports
are for the eyes of the president as he reviews candidates and chooses whom to
nominate; and his staff and senators who are “shepherding” them through the
confirmation process. 10. Nothing would put to the test President Biden’s
claim that he runs a transparent administration, wants in good faith to reform
the Supreme Court, and condemns tax heavens than for the media to publicly
demand that he authorize the release of all FBI vetting reports on all judges
and justices.
3. A constitutional crisis resulting from investigating judges
11. In the wake of the Pandora Papers,being in favor of releasing those
reports, never mind doing so, will amount tothe presidency and Congress
investigating judges and their Judiciary for financialcrimes, e.g., running a
bankruptcy fraud scheme as a principal source ofillegal funds.
12. The Attorney General leading the Department of Justice and its FBI is
formerChief Judge Merrick Garland of the Court of Appeals for the Districtof
Columbia Circuit. Will he dare investigate his formerpeers at the risk of being
incriminated by the investigation andeven by them as they trade up in plea
bargaining: ‘I’ll give you a bigger fish,the AG, if you show leniency to me’?
Will he be forced to recuse himselfbecause he cannot be loyal to DoJ and those
peers at the same time?
13. A constitutional crisis can ensuethat reveals the connivancebetween
appointing-politicians and ‘theirappointed men and women on the bench’ as well
as the devastating power ofretaliation that judges can wield to force
politicians to hold themunaccountable; e.g., declaring unconstitutional one law
after another untiltheir whole political agenda on which they were elected is
doomed.
4. Federal judges' means of engaging in financial crimes 14. Federal judges
have the expertise and control needed to run one of the largest digital
networks in the country. It handles the filing, retrieval, and storage of
hundreds of millions of briefs, records, applications, dockets, docket entries,
calendars, orders, decisions, etc. Do judges misuse their digital network to
transfer illicit funds between their point of origin, tax havens, and money
laundering investments? 15. Moreover, they wield the power to approve or deny
the intelligence agencies’ secret requests for secret orders for secret
surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA; 50 U.S.C
§§1801-1885c). They approve 100% of those requests(OL:5fn7)...as part of a quid
pro quo? 16. TheFollow the money! and Follow the wire! investigations should
answer these questions.
C. A proposal for the publication of articles
17. I have posted many of my articles(clickand scroll down to Appendix 6§A) to
my website Judicial Discipline Reform
athttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. They have attracted so many ;
webvisitors and the latter have reacted to them so positively that39,866+ have
become subscribers to the site as of October 10, 2021(Appendix 3). a. How many
law firms, never mind lawyers, do you know who have a website with so many
subscribers? b. You can for free join the subscribers thus: go to mywebsite
<left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New. 18. These articles
are based on my three-volume study of judges and their judiciaries. They are
all the product of my professional law research and writing, and strategic
thinking. The study is titled and downloadable for free thus: Exposing Judges'
Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability and abuse reporting* † ♣ ♣Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>from
OL3:1144-1360+ 1) To open and navigate through those volumes, downloadAdobe
Acrobat Reader for free. 19. Given the proven readership attraction of my
articles and the solid study that provides their basis, I propose the
publication of one or a series of the articles that I have already written, so
they are available for review, as well as others that I can write on
commission(cf. see a list of possible subjects atAppendix 6§B). This article is
an example of their tenor, format, and quality. 20. I draw particular attention
to two articles because they would outrage a substantial segment of the
national public at judges’ abuse of power and accomplish what is indispensable
for becoming a memorable publication: They would cause people to take action in
their own interest as they self-assertively shout the rallying cry so
expressive of theirMeToo!, BLM, and anti-police brutality mood and their demand
for socio-economic equality: Enough is enough!
We won’t take any abuse by anybody anymore...not even from judges!
1. Judges' failure to read most briefs
a. Themath of abuse analyzes the ratio of the number of cases, motions, and
applications per panel of a court and shows that judges do not read the
overwhelming majority of briefs; this math is implicitly verified by
theofficial statistics(OL2:457§D) of the Federal Judiciary. 1) Yet, judges
keep requiring them although they know that they will have their clerks dispose
of them by rubberstamping a 5¢ out-of-court dumping form where the only
operative word is “denied”, if it concerns a substantive as opposed to a
clerical motion, or “affirmed”, if it concerns an appeal. 2) That is how
clerks, who have no judicial power and cannot receive it by delegation, are
used to maintain the status quo. 3) Upon parties learning that the judges made
them waste $1Ks and even $10Ks to research, write, print, bind, serve, and file
briefs that the judges knew they would not read, the parties will be outraged!
They will want to be informed by us how they can join in collectively demanding
compensation.
2. Judges' interception of people's communications
a. My statistical analysis shows that judgesintercept people’s email and mail
to detect and suppress those of their critics. What an outrageous deprivation
of their First Amendment rights! Such interception isillegalunderTitle 18of the
U.S. Code section 2511 (18 U.S.C. §2511). Victims can likewise demand
compensatory and punitive damages as well as an official investigation of
judges’ means of interception.
D. A proposal for the commercial development of a website with 39,866+
subscribers
21.The readers of my articles and the subscribers to my website, whose number
is fast approaching 40,000, can be treated as the initial client base of a
website developed from a free informational platform into a for-profit service
center. These subscribers are highly educated and well-off people willing to
read the kind of intellectually demanding long form articles published byThe
Wall Street Journal, Reuters, The Boston Globe, ICIJ, and the likes ofThe New
York Times, The Washington Post, The New Yorker, etc. 22. These readers and
subscribers can be reasonably expected to be willing and able to pay for a host
of services such as: a. obtaining legal advice on being compensated for the
harm that judges and their Judiciary have caused them; b. forming, or joining
others in, a local chapter of victims of the same judge or the same court so
that they can collectively demand such compensation; c.applying thetwo-phase
method for writing in up to 500 words their story so that it contains the kind
of facts and data that can be used as leads for further investigation by
journalists and for auditing many independently submitted stories in search of
patterns of judges' coordinated abuse of power as opposed to the conduct of
separate rogue judges.
23. Many other servicesthat can be offered to visitors to, and clients of, the
website are describedin my business plan; e.g., a clearinghouse for complaints
against judges; and a research center for auditing judges’ writings using
computer-assisted statistical, linguistic, and literaryanalysis. 24. As an
example of the kind of valuable information that visitors and clients can
receive at a furtherdeveloped website, there follows the blocs of the email
address of the members of the Biden Commission and of journalists to whom those
who have suffered or witnessed judges' abuse of power and/or financial
criminality can send their stories by placing those blocs of email in the To:
and the cc: boxes, respectively, of their email containing their story:
To:[commissioners]cristina.rodriguez@xxxxxxxx, robert.bauer@xxxxxxx,
kandrias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack.balkin@xxxxxxxx, RBauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
baude@xxxxxxxxxxxx, madams@xxxxxx, charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
acrespo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wdellinger@xxxxxxx, ecb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
justin.driver@xxxxxxxx, rfallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, heather.k.gerken@xxxxxxxx,
ngertner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgoldsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tgriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tgrove@xxxxxxxxxx, bhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lacroix@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
lemos@xxxxxxxxxxxx, levi@xxxxxxxxxxxx,staff@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
trevor.morrison@xxxxxxx, cnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rick.pildes@xxxxxxx,
mramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx, krooseve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,bross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
d-strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxx, tribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, awhite36@xxxxxxx,
kewhitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
michael.waldman@xxxxxxx,caroline.fredrickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,development@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx , Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, cc:[journalists
and
academics]James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx,Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx,Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx,john.shiffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,michael.berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,blake.morrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,marketresearch.thomsonreuters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
“Todd Wallack” <twallack@xxxxxxxxx>,patricia.wen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “Brian
McGrory Editor”
<brian.mcgrory@xxxxxxxxx>,newstip@xxxxxxxxx,spotlight@xxxxxxxxx,charles.ornstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tracy.weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
“Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon Duff” <gpduf@xxxxxxx>, “Veterans Today
Managing Editor Jim W Dean”
<jimwdean@xxxxxxx>,ajaffe@xxxxxxxxxxx,Thehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ijerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,newsletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,NTotenberg@xxxxxxx,drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mderienzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,emily.holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxx,ryan.grim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Laura.Crimaldi@xxxxxxxxx,inytletters@xxxxxxxxxxx,info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Evan.Allen@xxxxxxxxx,info@xxxxxx,Elizabeth_Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ginger.thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mcnulaj@xxxxxxxxxxx,MCoyle@xxxxxxx,communication@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
aglantz@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
joepatrice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,aturturro@xxxxxxx,Opencourt@xxxxxxx,letters@xxxxxxxxxxx,contact_us@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Matt.Rocheleau@xxxxxxxxx,oped@xxxxxxxxxxx,jmaxeiner@xxxxxxxxx,
Jackie.Botts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,hello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Jaimi.Dowdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Vernal.Coleman@xxxxxxxxx,Brendan.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx,
E. Articles of the top media outlets and the VIP supporting the proposal 25.
The following articles are the most recent ones on which this proposal is
founded: 26.The Wall Street Journal published on September 28, 2021, its
article “131 FederalJudges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a
Financial Interest”; by James V.Grimaldi, Coulter Jones, Joe Palazzolo.
a.James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx b.Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx;reach Mr. Jones at
212-416-3778 c.Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx 27. Thomson Reuters, a worldwide news
organization with more than 2,500 reporters and over 600 photojournalists,
investigated judges of the state judiciaries. In its three-part report “The
Teflon Robe”, the first of which appeared on June 30, 2020, it described its
finding of “hardwired judicial corruption”, that is, corruption that is so
intertwined among judges and between them and the commissions that are supposed
to oversee their performance as to constitute part of their institutionalized
modus operandi. This is the most opportune time for Reuters to heed theproposal
that I made to it to extend its investigation to unaccountable federal judges
and their consequent riskless abuse of power. 28.The Boston Globe, the main
newspaper in Massachusetts and a reputable one, published on September 30,
2018, its report “Inside our secret courts”, in whose “private criminal
hearings [conducted even by clerks with no law degree] , who you are –and who
you know– may be just as important as right and wrong”. 29. Senator Elizabeth
Warrendare denounce during her presidential campaign in her “I have a plan for
the Judiciary too”, the systematic failure of federal judges to recuse
themselves from cases in which they hold a financial interest in the company of
one of the parties before them. They resolve the ensuing conflict of interests
by favoring that party so as to maintain or increase the value of their
interest. Sen. Warren identified the circumstance enabling federal judges to
commit such abusive self-enrichment to be their unaccountability. I proposed to
her a plan of investigation. 30. The International Consortium of Investigative
Journalists (ICIJ), in Washington, D.C., published on October 3, 2021, the
Pandora Papers, that is, close to 12 million financial documents leaked to it.
“MORE THAN 600 REPORTERS AROUND THE GLOBE WORK WITH ICIJ ON THE MOST EXPANSIVE
LEAK OF TAX HAVEN FILES IN HISTORY”. These documents are connected to “the 14
offshore firms at the heart of the Pandora Papers investigation”. ICIJ
describes its work thus: a. “The largest investigation in journalism history
exposes a shadow financial system that benefits the world’s most rich and
powerful. Offshore havens and hidden riches of world leaders and billionaires
exposed in unprecedented leak. ThePandora Papers reveal the inner workings of a
shadow economy that benefits the wealthy and well-connected at the expense of
everyone else”;. b. In April 2013, ICIJ published its “Offshore Leaks” report
involving over 130,000 accounts held in offshore tax havens. I made a proposal
to it for a joint investigation to determine whether judges were concealing
ill-gotten assets in such type of offshore accounts. 31. Some of the above
articles arecollected in thefinancially conflicted judges file.
F. My offer to present this proposal
32.I offer to make a presentation on this proposalvia video conference and, if
it is to take place here in New York City, in person. To schedule it anddiscuss
its terms, please get in touch with me using my contact information below.
33. Preview my presentation by watching myvideo and following it using its
slides in pdf.
G. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
DONATE
to support the professional law research and writing,
and strategic thinking of Judicial Discipline Reform You may make a deposit or
an online transfer to
Citi Bank, routing number 021 000 089, account 4977 59 2001 through
ZellethroughPaypalhttps://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJor
by mailing a check to the address below.
| Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it. |
Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at
* >ggl:1 et seq. and† >OL2:1114§G, when emailing him, copy the above bloc of
his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance
the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those
addresses.*************************
