i do no thinks he does...Bouviers 1856 says one is a CITIZEN at borne...
i am a Citizen of Pennsylvania since being born on Philadelphia. (my current
understanding)
not sure i need to say i am a national unless i am a New jersey national
whereupon i live now....
comments please??
________________________________
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jb
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 1:41 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: To: administrating
Since when does a child born on the land have to sign yet another contract. Lol
On May 27, 2021, at 1:37 PM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
National until one signs? National is a reference to the country your born in.
My birth in the United States of America made me a national. Being a national
make me a free citizen or inhabitant? No, not really.
Being a free citizen or inhabitant make me what?
The articles of confederation is an agreement between individuals/nations/we
kings. Your membership requires one honoring obligations of the compact. If
your a criminal, your not a member. Your not defending all members life,
liberty, and property, your not a member. You do not go to a trial by jury and
where most Americans fail. Your not a member. Being a member is a free citizen
and inhabitant.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:21 AM Joe Skelton
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
You are not a National until you sign a social compact agreement and then take
an oath of affirmation to the country that you want to become a National to.
Look up the Law of Nations and the Articles of Confederation. You are only an
inhabitant until you take this oath.
On Thursday, May 27, 2021, 10:17:02 AM CDT, Joe Skelton
<jskelton101@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jskelton101@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I do not believe this is acurate.
On Thursday, May 27, 2021, 08:40:59 AM CDT, Jb
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
You do know he doesn’t answer.
On May 27, 2021, at 7:13 AM, les954@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:les954@xxxxxxxxx>
(Redacted sender "les954" for DMARC)
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Ask the owner of the flag if you have questions. His name is :Russell-Jay:
Gould.
His documentary about the flag
LAST-FLAG-STANDING: Russell-Jay:
Gould.<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FfpFzt77huxc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4e9f438ee37b436411f308d92136b522%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577341124063094%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BuUvvlDLORJlwlQYx7qGrD7xmO%2FhDvMCltl9e7mYP8U%3D&reserved=0>
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FfpFzt77huxc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4e9f438ee37b436411f308d92136b522%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577341124063094%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BuUvvlDLORJlwlQYx7qGrD7xmO%2FhDvMCltl9e7mYP8U%3D&reserved=0>
LAST-FLAG-STANDING: Russell-Jay: Gould.
ent from Yahoo Mail on
Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.onelink.me%2F107872968%3Fpid%3DInProduct%26c%3DGlobal_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers%26af_wl%3Dym%26af_sub1%3DInternal%26af_sub2%3DGlobal_YGrowth%26af_sub3%3DEmailSignature&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4e9f438ee37b436411f308d92136b522%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577341124073091%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Aq17arASti0%2FEvlo45JUH7iIecmPmtmSqJ6ptaEenz8%3D&reserved=0>
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:40 PM, Joe Skelton
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The stars and stripes flag is a military flag of war. It is a company flag and
not a flag of the country. Research it.
On Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 02:22:33 PM CDT, Bill
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Citizen is defined in blacks 5th as (a member of a political society). What
society do you belong too?
On Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 12:10:43 PM CDT, Paul M
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I do not comprehend the claim that A1S8P17 has anything to do with sovereignty.
As I read it it deals with the 10 sq miles for the seat of government and the
erection of forts and other needful buildings.
If a claim is made about being a Citizen, look at Article 2, sec 1, par 5 - No
person except a natural born Citizen ...
ART IV The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and
Immunities of Citizens in the several States
I AM a Citizen of the State of my Birth, as per the notes of births in our
family Bible and the Department of Commerce Certificate of Live Birth.
On Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 11:53:48 AM CDT, Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hello Win:
I love it when posters include Case Law Cites...
Because, as you know whenever you go in to the current imposter courts,
this is the information they seem to respond to..
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
Rt 1 Box 231
Albertville MN 55301
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended only
for the use of the person or entity named above and is privileged and
confidential. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
other than to the person or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
by phone and by replying to this message and then delete the message and any
attachments from your system.
On Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 7:28:11 AM CDT, Winningham Fearn
<winfearn@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:winfearn@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Downes v Bidwell 182 US 244 (1901) the Supreme Court said that the District of
Columbia and the Territories do not have access to Article 3 in the
Constitution and then Congress passed the Code of Law for the District of
Columbia 31 Stat 1189, which ultimately became United States Code that set up a
Supreme Court for the District of Columbia, so there are at least 2
Best Regards,
Win
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:30 AM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Quote: This is the actual Supreme Court of the United States which over-stands
all inferior courts including "The United States Supreme Court", "the United
States Supreme Court" and the "UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT".
You saying we have three supreme courts now? I only know of one; or at least
active one. I only know of one court that has more power then the Supreme
Court. Because it is not a private corporate court. I would like to know the
Supreme Court differences?
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:37 PM Mike
<leatherlips1@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:leatherlips1@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
In the case of Yick Wo v Hopkins and Woo Loo v Hopkins, 188 US 356 Mr. Justice
J. Matthews, delivering the decision it says: “Sovereignty, itself, is, of
course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law, but in our
system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government,
sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government
exists and acts.”
11 Am Jur §§2, 3, and their footnotes
§ 2. Definitions of Constitution; Constitutional Law. – A Constitution is a
system of fundamental laws or principles for the government of a nation,
society, corporation, or other aggregation of individuals and it may be either
written or unwritten.fn1 In the United States, the word “Constitution” as
applied to the organization of the Federal and state governments, always
implies a writing and it is understood in the further restricted sense of an
enactment by the direct action of the people providing for the form of
government and defining the powers of the several departments, thus creating a
fundamental law which is absolute and unalterable except by the authority from
which it emanated.
Fn2 A state Constitution has been aptly termed a legislative act by the people
themselves in their sovereign capacity and, therefore, the paramount law. It
has again been defined to be “an act of extraordinary legislation by which the
people establish the structure and mechanism of their government.”
Fn3 In short, the Constitution is the charter creating the government. Fn4
These principles rest upon the fundamental conception of a supreme law,
expressed in written form, in accordance with which all private rights must be
determined and all public authority administered. Fn5
§ 3 says: Statutes are enactments and rules for the government of civil
conduct, promulgated by the legislative authority of a state. It is an
important characteristic of such laws that they are tentative, occasional, and
in the nature of temporary expedients.
In fn1 it says: What is a Constitution? It is the form of government,
delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles
of fundamental laws are established. Vanhorne v. Dorrance. The Constitution is
the fundamental law of the state, in opposition to which any other law or any
direction or order must be inoperative and void. Asplund v. Hannett.
In fn2 it says: In our system of government a written Constitution is the
highest expression of law.
The Constitution is a common law document. Is this court going to overrule the
Am Jur information provided, and ignore the higher law of the constitution, and
superior courts? Can you create law from the bench so you can ignore this
information?
Terry v Ohio, 392 US
1<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fmaps%2Fsearch%2F392%2BUS%2B1%3Fentry%3Dgmail%26source%3Dg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4e9f438ee37b436411f308d92136b522%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577341124073091%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=yAGKRIhedI1oG9Ulh2C2eD7xW0brSvf8O8INT6gfTcM%3D&reserved=0>,
40 “The doctrine of Sovereign Immunity is one of the Common-Law immunities and
defenses that are available to the Sovereign.”
Perry v United States 294 U.S. 330 “The sovereignty of the United States
resides in the people, and Congress cannot invoke the sovereignty of the people
to override their will as declared in the Constitution.”
“The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure,
absent contract.” See Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S.
(19<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fmaps%2Fsearch%2F60%2B%250D%250AU.S.%2B(19%3Fentry%3Dgmail%26source%3Dg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4e9f438ee37b436411f308d92136b522%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577341124083090%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=s85ExbT3mOB0uOQVzfJ3LQsH5r2ib9f2S4jk4hDTAEw%3D&reserved=0>
How.) 393.
“…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He
is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.”
Cruden vs. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E.70.
“THE COMMON LAW IS THE REAL LAW, the Supreme Law of the land, the rules,
regulations, policy and statutes are not the law” Self v Rhay, 61 Wn 2nd 261
“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a
creature of the MIND ONLY with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having
neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining
parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that NO
government, as well as any law agency, aspect, court, etc., can concern itself
with anything other than Corporate, Artificial Persons and the Contracts
between them.” (emphasis added). S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s
Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United
States 1795, [Not the “United States Supreme Court” -ed.]
This is the actual Supreme Court of the United States which over-stands all
inferior courts including "The United States Supreme Court", "the United States
Supreme Court" and the "UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT".
From: Paul M (Redacted sender "willys59sw" for
DMARC)<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 5:27 PM
To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I would like to know exactly where this information is located. several have
stated this idea, but where can I find it in writting?
On Sunday, May 23, 2021, 11:10:14 AM CDT, Jb
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
May we note that these codes statues, rules, regulations under the inc UNITED
STATES only effects the citizen with contract aka straw man while the man/woman
goes for the ride when it make jointer with the all caps name. As for the
Citizen of USA republic we are not Under that jurisdiction and those laws,
rules, regulations and statutes of of none effect because they are not positive
law. The local cops for example run under a corporation of the city or county
and dictate their rules and so called laws which are under color of law. These
are private laws and not of the land/republic of the dejur United States of
America,republic
On May 23, 2021, at 10:02 AM, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
More in depth understanding
we the people created the Articles of Confederation which is a private
membership association. States that members will fight for each other's life,
liberty, and property. One has to be a free citizen or inhabitant. Criminals
are not allowed neither are United States Citizens. Disputes between members
will be settled by a trial by jury. The jury could be an assembly or one of the
professional arbitration organizations. Read all the rules in the Declaration
of Independance, Northwest Ordinance and articles of confederation to
understand membership rules. I would love to hear some discussion on what
rules are.
We the people then created the Constitution of the United States of America
which the United States came from. Then a Corp called the United States of
America Corp came into existence and created by the United States. Very
fraudulent as it is a private membership association that claims to be
government but is not. Everyone of these courts from the city to supreme are
members to the private Association. Under the jurisdiction of the United States
of America corp. and why one should file with the United States court of
federal claims that one of their CORPORATIONS is acting out of the
constitutional provisions we the people agreed to with the United States.
United States of America Corp. is United States property and we the people
have an constitutional agreement. Now if your neighbors employee started
plowing your ready to harvest wheat field. You would tell employee to stop and
tell him your going to have a conversation with the owner of the employee. Same
with United States that created the United States of America Corp.
We the people contract is with the United States and not with the corporations
it created. So every so called contract United States of America Corp creates
with we the people is void for violation of claiming members that are not
members. They do it on presumption and assumption. That is fraud. So when one
claims their proper jurisdiction the CORP Membership Association has to cease
and treat one differently.
Corp under common law is allowed to violate the law as long as Corp can pay
the bill and employees go to jail. Employees going to jail is determined by
United States rules. So United States applies codes as United States officials
decide how and when the codes apply.
That is how I see the structure.
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 7:21 AM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
As a libertarian I do not believe in copyrights. So use, publish, pass along as
one wishes. Let the best wo/man win or perfect.
I'll post a couple of different ways I know works and one can choose.
Your name, am a United States of America National
Not United States Citizen (might be able to leave this off)
Article 1, section 8, clause 17
Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
Attach to document
Most complicated
The Constitution of the United States of America
Article 1, section 8, clause 17
Your name is a American National
Not an United States Citizen
Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
Sign it and can sign under penalties and perjuty.
Trying or experimenting with this. A small card or just paper to give officer
with only first and middle name on card or paper.
The first statement above and adding. "Matters will be settled in United States
court of Federal Claims for violating my liberties".
See how Officers react to that. Hoping it would work as a drivers license or in
other situations of ID. Probably laminated etc to look more official? If it
works.
Loving and striving for life, liberty and property. I promised to defend as a
private member of the articles of confederation that I encourage others to join.
Also wondering and trying to find out:
When sending and clarifying jurisdiction on the ticket if one can send the bill
at same time and get there membership court to honor it. Hope to find out soon.
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 12:46 AM Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Charley, if at all possible, could you attach that short 1;8;17 rebuttal you
posted to the group, I think it was yesterday. I thought I had it but I can't
find it now and I love the way you had put it all so succinctly. I would like
to save it for future reference. Thank you in advance Charley.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 5:43 PM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The thugs give citation with a court date. Immediately make a copy and put/
blank piece of paper. The article 1817 statement and to dismiss the case. That
stops the judge from doing anything further with the complaint. One could stop
there and wait for next move. Or if one is more aggressive. immediately send to
the United States federal claims court with a statement that I've posted here
from David Lester straight to be reimbursed for damages. The federal court is
the United States and not the United States of America Corp. That your dealing
with. That court will take care of who gets to pay and crimes. Just file what
happened and swear under oath.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 6:14 PM Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Thanks Charley. Good stuff.
Only one question. You can post your business as you suggest and the thugs
still come in and start acting like they own the place. Are you saying don't
waste your time responding to some corporate agent health looser fines and
other acts of trespass, just put in a claim to the United States Court of
Claims? Please clarify.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:57 AM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
In Colorado some politician's have told their favorite business to just say
your a private business. So others jumped on. Some learnt from our smoke dope
emporiums. It all comes back to the constitution.
Article1;8;17 makes it clear the government authority is only land they own. No
where else in the constitution does it ever mention"We the People" surrendered
anything in relation to our relationship to each other and the government
controls it.
Article 6 says previous agreements are honored. The Articles of confederation
is one of those documents. That document created United States of America a
country and the PMA or common law trust agreement that states that the free
citizen and inhabitant members will agree. To this in order to belong.
Otherwise your not a member. Read the terms in that agreement, Northwest
Ordinance and Declaration of Independance included. The great rule for business
there is members promise to file claims with the other member and they both
agree a jury of members will decide. Not the private government courts. One
could hire a common law arbitration panel to do this or an assembly if they are
professional enough.
That is why the statement I tell people to use for traffic tickets should be
posted on their business door.Add to it that we are a private business and
government does not oversee our operating procedures.
All government agents send notice to this address and welcomed to do only
private business here.
Out of courtesy one could send that same notice to the nearest policing agent.
This sign is a warning sign and if an agent comes in and starts walking as if
he owns the place. The owner needs to tell him to leave and if one does not.
Send a claim to the United States Court of federal claims. That will be
financial trespass recovery. It is their duty to apply criminal charges as they
see fit. That is how you tell them to pound salt. Go another step and tell them
to take their taxes and shove it. Or an agreement you will pay this percentage.
Because they say you volunteer. It's like a church everyone pays as they see
fit and all get the same services. At least till rules change.
Now for Minnesota. I've got no clue unless your talking about the one that
hired that group and I'll say. Good luck because there approach I have no clue
except to say. They are not in the private of the articles of confederation.
They are fighting in the legislative law. Need to send damages to the United
States Court of federal claims.
I know, I know, saying this makes everyone say. "No way charley. I've been
fighting and tried it," and I'll tell you to look closer to what I'm doing. It
works. For the restaurant in Minnesota. If she calls me. I'll take a percentage
but it will end and she will tell them to go pound salt. She can recover all
damages if she has documented them.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:52 AM Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Charley, when you say ma and pa became private businesses, how did they do
that? How do they tell the government lackeys that they have no authority over
a private business? Isn't there some lady in Minnesota that is suing the phony
corporate STATE OF MINNESOTA on this very issue. How are the other mom and pop
businesses going private w/out all the court battles? If businesses can learn
how to do this they can tell the corporate governments to pound salt. Can you
give us a view of how this is done?
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:47 AM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Convention of states is the worst concept to do in these troubled times and
truthfully anytime. When Americans wake up and realize how they have twisted
and abused the constitution under or watch. Just time to tell them no in the
courts. Articles of confederation are a common law trust but better then the
ones formed today. Many clubs have created their own and government cannot
touch them. Period. During the pandemic here many restraints. Ma and pa became
private business and stayed open. Private business is a form of common law
trust. Wake up and realize how powerful the condition is and just say no
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:36 PM Shining Emperor
<nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Don,
Your conclusions are correct of Rothschild CFR....influence, infiltration or
blunt 'ownership ' since Rothschild bought Is-ra-el years ago. Current Israel
jewelry are fake Jews converts, not Israelites mentioned in the Bible.
On Thu, May 20, 2021, 10:30 Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hello
I apologize in advance if this topic does not belong here.
I have reached the conclusion that the current "Convention of States" Movement
is being
funded and run by Rothschild's "Council on Foreign Relations". The CFR was
founded by
Rothschilds frontmen Rockefeller, Warburg and JP Morgan in 1821. Its agenda
includes
achieving the New World Order, One World Government and generally advancing the
Progressive Globalist Agenda.
While I originally support the Convention of States, I changed my mind do to the
great involvement of CFR member Pete Hegseth.
[Inline image]
Since Rothschilds Progressive Globalist Insurgency is the cause of our run away
rogue government, logic says their CFRs involvement in the Convention of States
is an ill omen
Many speak of their concerns of a run away Covention of States repealing the
entire Constitution, which is what the Progressive Globalists want..
SO MY QUESTION IS, DO ANY OF YOU HAVE BETTER PROOFS THAN
I OF THE ROTHSCHILD'S CFR'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE "CONVENTION OF
STATES MOVEMENT.
To give some sense of urgency, my understanding is only 38 states must ratify
the
call for a convention of states. And they already have 30 states that have
voted in favor.
[Inline image]
I would appreciate your input.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 9:45:13 AM CDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
State citizen is a word to avoid. It has to many connotations. I'm a United
States of America national. Yes, one either studies to know the ins and outs or
you are always at the mercy who will defend you. For Anna. issue appears often
that she takes others people's words how to do something without knowing the
individual or method proven. So she has a hit and miss situation. Eventually
she will have it right. Glad to see the resistant she brings.
Many will not represent you as a lawyer in court proceedings which is paperwork
with their signature on paper. Because they get this little notice in the mail
that says; you have been reported for practicng law without registration and
they are investigating. Since very, very few know how to win in court. They
have no answer for this which is always a jail sentence if not defended
properly for so called practicing law. Which is where they should go for saying
they know but do not. The nice part of the notice is it comes from the state
Supreme Court and where it will be heard. State Supreme Court has Original
jurisdiction between a free State and State of state situations. All other
courts have general jurisdiction. What happens in all other courts depends on
them. Wither they choose to support the state or your position. A risk they
will take. Yes, even risk going to jail. Here is the position to take from my
experience of what works efficiently and consistently and my approach in a
"kis" method. Or as simple as one can make it.
The officer on the street approach. Staying cool is the best along with a
printed letter. I'll print as a two part bUT use as one letter you should
hand officers. Especially if you do not intend to give them your name. To
officers a name Is very important. Once they get that they can go to their
computer and have your state and federal history. Personally my view of
your/officer history of me is changing till you know who I really am. If
officer loses you in the system. They will spend hours putting your profile
back together. The best I can tell is most of this information is not shared
across state lines. If one gets a national passport;. That will be shared as it
is a United States recognized document. Giving them a regular and even expired
passport will be in all state systems and that gives identification without
address. If the officer really needs an address they can fill out form to get
it from the United States. They are satisfied with that. Even if you move the
address is then unknown till someone retrace or connects you to it. Personal
experience they will not arrest with that passport but you may still get a
ticket. FBI will keep that data and confidently for the most part.
To handle a ticket. Part one.
"The Constitution of the United States of America; Article 1, section 8, clause
17: I'm a United States of America national and NOT an United States Citizen."
Court will often send another letter and sometimes even saying a warrant but
have not heard from anyone of them acting on it. The same happens with a
national passport. I personally travel with a regular expired passport. If they
lose you in the system. They will spend hours or days to reconstruct who you
are. That is tying you to every thing they have on you from a drivers license
perspreactive.
Recently in Colorado it appeared the statement failed but upon further
investigation the case was closed and they opened another case with new case
number, added two more charges without notifying the individual. They then
handcuffed him then stopped for issues involved. That is fraud they were
counting on it not to be recognized. It shows to what crooked schemes they
will go to. Most send another notice and then answer with statement again to
cancel it. These crooks are willing to risk jail time in betting on your
ignorance.
To make the above quoted statement more solid, add the following on a piece of
paper to hand the officer. It will take care of issues like above mentioned.
Part two:
"This national belongs to the best PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP CLUB: Articles of
Confederation and only nationals are allowed. United States Citizen's are
exempted. We protect life, liberty, and property of members and if you decide
to violate the private it is $500,000.00 dollars per occurrence for doing so.
Before interaction, give me your Business card of your private corporate
identification. Without it is another $500,000.00. Other charges may apply. "
One could make it $200,000.00 for each question or demand but without video
hard to prove. I suspect they would try to destroy your recordings. So be
careful if you go that route. They hate evidence of the facts. So I stay with
the obvious facts that can be proven easily.
Now if officer does not give you a business card and often they will not
because it is proof positive of the fact of what is going on and will be used
in court as an exhibit. They are considered out of uniform for not surrendering
it upon request. This letter with both qoute parts will be your exhibit in
court along with business card or lack thereof.
In court which is really just paper work sent to court clerk. That is your
court of record. Not to agency, but court clerk. So back to that first letter
on being a non-registered lawyer and they are investigating. I would not answer
it as it is not yet assigned a case number to send your response to court clerk
for your court recording. Wait for them to actually file charges before
replying. Then one can start their court record.
Most likely the general courts of jurisdiction will not grant you the money of
that large sum. They will ignore it or rule against you with an actual warrant
and arrest you. They will protect that money on a bet you do not know how or
procedure to get the money. They think you will persist in trying to get their
approval which they will not grant.
This is where the United States Court of Federal Claims comes in. This is the
court of redress for United States injuries. All governments are under the
United States authority. One can seek redress in all courts but this one is
the constutional one mentioned in the constitution. It sits right across the
street from Congress. My understanding is that from time to time they have to
go to Congress to get approval. Otherwise that court has prior approval to a
limited amount.
This letter needs written from the perspective of the contract states and here
is the damages. David Straight has a very simple format for this that I like.
Including property taxation reimbursement and ending property taxation.
Understanding of what is going on. We nationals have a private membership
association as they call it today. Back in colonial times it was seen as a
common law trust which is private when not done with the state registrar. That
trust is the articles of confederation, declaration of independance and
northwest ordinance. Who can belong, free citizens/nationals. What is the
purpose, to protect life, liberty, and property. What are the rules, they are
decided by a trial by jury with a claim of injury. Not due process of law in
their jurisdicton. Due process of law is a deceptive phrase. Due process in
their corporation or your association?
PMA have long been established across the country. The Boy Scouts got around
the gay issue with usage of PMA. Jaycess use it. Many golf courses use it and
why some kept blacks from entering. (I do not approve but it does show how
powerful the PMA is). In Colorado all but one vapor and drug emporium are PMA
and were that before the state started granting license. It was PMA that
changed Colorado and goverment said we better get involved and now are trying
to license them. As the leader of that situation states; when the state license
proves more lucrative to my bottom line. Then I'll get licensed. They also have
their own banking system because United States of America Corp. did not approve
the'joint smoke' so they could not use a regular bank.
Another deceptive phrase; private membership association. Which association is
the question. Private corporate registered with the state or common law trust
association?
Now comes the officer of the court (any oath taker). Since the Clearfield
doctrine of 1943 and Judges blue book which is a judges handbook on issues
that states the United States of America corporation is a 'private foreign
corporation'. Foreign to the constitution and a private membership association.
With all that understanding the point is that you want the officers business
card as he just identified his PMA to which you are not a member. It's a
corporate private association to which you and I can choose to belong by
acceptance. They need to prove you are a member. Claiming you are not as
illustrated above (quotations phrase) ends that controversy.
Because they never tell you this in your Miranda rights it is fraud.
All contracts not clearly revealed are fraud. There contract of how many
agencies (6,000)- How can anyone know the contract? Why each agency is a
separate acceptancen contract to their PMA.
Also, officers of the court have no standing or authority because a corporation
(United States of America Corporation) cannot be approved by a corporation
(United States) whose charter (constitution) does not grant to be an PMA; in
violation of the original charter.
That is as simple as I can make it. As a lawyer Charles does sign all papers
for his clients because my clients have to agree to be members of the PMA:
articles of confederation. I do not operate in their corporate PMA: United
States of America corporation or whatever they claim to be now as Anna states
they have been this and that and something else for years. Who knows, they may
be many PMA's. When Glenn gets riled about their priestly fraud. He has every
moral and ethical right to do so. When the bible states their is not one
righteous. Government proves it in magnitude proportion.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:08 PM Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division)
<Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The ultimate responsibility (for one's own remedies) rests within ourselves to
do our own due diligence and research/homework/field-testing/etc., anyway.
Sure, the so-called «gurus» can give us some ideas as to what to look at, but,
in the end, you should never blindly follow what anyone else says/claims (and
anybody who claims to «know everything» is automatically leading their
«followers» down a dangerous «cult-style» path of «dogmatic-followership»). The
guru still cannot «do your push-ups» for you in order for your «muscles» to get
stronger (metaphorically).
Some «remedies» do seem to be more consistent than others. Amongst the more
consistent ones seem to be the following...:
➤ Pre-emptive ESTOPPEL Notices
➤ Asking them questions that are «self-incriminating» if/when you are
confronted without cause*
➤ Printed NOTICES (warnings) that you can put on your front door, car-window,
covering the VIN-plate, etc.
➤ Compelling letters that demonstrate your «intellectual-superiority» over them
(this is a much more «advanced» way of handling things which takes far more
effort than some of the quicker «remedies» listed above as this particular
method requires a great deal of knowledge about psychology, the sciences, etc.,
and your ability to quote-reference from several «scientific» publications,
even to the point of providing the specific ISBNs so that there can be NO DOUBT
as to the «legitimacy» of the information where they cannot «claim» that you
were just «making stuff up» [most of them are «idiots» anyway who have never
read more than one non-fiction book in their whole entire lives if any]).
Ultimately, you are still dealing with what is essentially a «psychological
chess-game» (metaphorically speaking), when interacting with any part of the
«courts» related legalese-system (whether it be the cops out on the streets
trying to extort every penny out of you before you can even earn a penny or the
liars in the court-houses or otherwise).
On 2021-05-18 3:28 p.m., J_B wrote:
yes beware of ana.. shes hit or miss on her things but then again could be
people not knowing how to apply what she says in combination with crooked judge
hat wont follow it and therefore gives the image of false information
you want to be a state citizen
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:25 PM Joe Skelton
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
This sounds like some more of Anna's BS
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021, 02:49:21 PM CDT, The Moab
<g2themoab@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:g2themoab@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
All born in the United States are initially Nationals. It does pertain them,
please research passport legal help for American National.
by : Hernandez-Jr: Gregorio
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED without Prejudice Confidentiality Notice: This private
electronic correspondence, including any/all attachment(s) are limited for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or
Confidential Information.
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT. NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.
Information in this or any following correspondence is not to be construed as
legal advice. [Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC §§ 2510 et seq]
On Tue, May 18, 2021, 1:18 PM Paul M
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
this refers to a "national of the US" Not a State Citizen of a State of the
Union. So how does it apply to my Citizenship? A State Citizen born on the soil
of Oklahoma?
On Sunday, May 16, 2021, 2:24:53 PM CDT, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/878<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.cornell.edu%2Fuscode%2Ftext%2F18%2F878&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4e9f438ee37b436411f308d92136b522%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577341124083090%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=bYsY0YwmaDioDo7kuEobRrBaxdlaWJQ7qJW6DZFCMTo%3D&reserved=0>
Get Outlook for
Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4e9f438ee37b436411f308d92136b522%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637577341124093078%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=oZrIQzb0OfxtSIoLIWKudmjWgikQ6rBtuvuo3dL4DQY%3D&reserved=0>
--
Life in one word--LOVE
