NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social
media as widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the
People; e.g., click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New. The article below had a consistent format
when sent. If it shows irregularities when received, they crept in during
transit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them.
The folly of improvising yourself as a lawyer
to appear in court pro se
lets abusers take advantage of their power and superior knowledge to
wipe you out!Your failure to read
lets your ignorance and laziness make you
a whiner of your own doing:
what you got...you had it coming!Securing legal assistance is not cheap,
but if the assistance is honest,
it includes tough love as a bonus of great value. By Dr. Richard Cordero,
Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, EnglandM.B.A., University of Michigan
Business SchoolD.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial Discipline ReformNew York
Cityhttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx
, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx Dear
Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, Thank you for your replies. A. What work you
already did as a pro se and what work you are requesting from me
1. You wrote in your reply, “Can't wait to work together”. 2. What kind of
work are you requesting me to do for you? 3. Did you actually read my email to
you and the accompanying article below all the way down where I stated the
following?: If you do not read the article though written for your benefit by a
lawyer, how are you in a position to criticize judges for not reading your
briefs and applications, though written by pro ses only to make things harder
for the judges by requiring that they learn the facts of your cases and apply
the law to them while respecting its due process and equal protection
requirements? 4. Is it possible that you never read the briefs served on you
and the court, or the rulings and decisions of the judges; and that you never
read before signing the papers, such as contracts and leases, prepared and
submitted to you by the opposing party, for so that you are not in a position
to allege that they violated the law or any agreement with you?
B. Researching the law to know your rights and duties and determine whether you
were abused
5. As for the law, did you read and argue the applicable law? Did you research
it in the following representative sources? (Cf. Appendix 6§C, which is
frequently updated; hence, numbers of headings and paragraphs are approximate.)
1. Treatises
125. Start your law research here to gain an overview ofthe subject:
https://store.legal.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/Legal-Encyclopedias/American-Jurisprudence-2d/p/100027544,
covering state and federal,civil and criminal, substantive and procedural law
2. Law reviews and journals
130. Gain a narrower and more specializedunderstanding of particular topics;
https://store.legal.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/Law-Reviews-and-Journals/Law-Reviews--Journals-Westlaw-PROtrade/p/104937407
3. U.S. Constitution 131. U.S. Constitution, Preamble: “We the People of the
United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice”;
http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/docs/US_Constitution.pdf 132. U.S. ;
Constitution, Article III, The Judicial Power.
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/docs/US_Constitution.pdf 4. U.S. Code
(compilation of all federal, as opposed to state, laws) 133.
https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml
134. E.g., US Code, Title 11 (11 USC), Bankruptcy Code; id.
135. E.g., US Code, Title 18 (18 USC), Criminal Code, containing all federal
criminal laws; id....5. The law organizing the Federal Judiciary 139. U.S.
Code, Title 28 (28 USC), The Judicial Code;
https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml
140. http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/docs/28usc.pdf 6. Federal rules ;
of procedure applicable in all federal courts 141. U.S. Code, Title 11,
Appendix (USC 11a) containing the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure;
https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml 142. U.S. Code, Title 18, ;
Appendix (USC 18a) containing the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; id. 143.
U.S. Code, Title 28, Appendix (USC 28a) containing the Federal Rules of Civil
and Appellate Procedure and Evidence; id. 144. Cf.,
https://store.legal.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/Statutes/Federal-Civil-Judicial-Procedure-and-Rules-2021-revised-ed/p/106721176?trkcode=recsrpl&trktype=internal&FindMethod=recs
7. Rules of procedure specific to each federal court 145. E.g. Local rules
and internal operating procedure of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit; https://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/clerk/case_filing/rules/rules_home.html
8. Code of Federal Regulations153. Regulations adopted by the
federaladministrative agencies that implement and enforce the applicable law;
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/cfr/
9. Bills pending (in committees and on the floor of theU.S. Senate and House of
Representatives)...
11. U.S. Supreme Court cases, rules of procedure, and case statistics...12.
Cases in the lower federal courts...13. Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts (provides only administrative services to the federal courts. e.g., the
collection of federal courts statistics)
...
173. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO); https://www.uscourts.gov/ ;
174. Annual Report of the Director ofthe Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts, filed with Congress as a publicdocument; the Director is appointed by
the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court;
https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/analysis-reports/directors-annual-report
...
17. Sources of state legal authority a. State constitution and laws...b.
Uniform laws (among the states)...c. Restatement of laws...d. Treatises and law
reviews and journals
... e. Rules of procedure applicable in all the courts of the state...f.
Rules of the specific court where a brief is being filed...g. Rules of the
state chief administrative judge...h. Regulations of the state administrative
departments and agencies
...i. State cases... C. The standard of reasonableness and what I request from
you 6. Researching the appropriate legal authorities is the kind of
professional, demanding, and time-consuming work that justifies my fees. 7. To
expect that I be available for free consultation –never mind writing briefs– on
your behalf is not reasonable. 8. People stand in court in a weak position if
their dealings with the opposing parties and the judges have been rendered
defective and liable to be used against them by their failure to meet the
standard that the law, in general, and the law of torts, in particular, expect
of every party, juror, and witness, namely, ‘a reasonable man and woman
applying common sense’. 9. Often, pro ses realize only too late that it was a
folly to pretend that they could improvise themselves as lawyers...without even
researching the law!, let alone applying it to their dealings and their written
and oral presentations of their case. 10. Hence the justification for my
attorney’s fee. It is $350 per hour plus all necessary and incidental expenses,
including, but not limited to, access to specialized databases, books,
transportation, room and board, communication, etc. A minimum retainer of
$7,500 –which may fluctuate upwards depending on the work requested- is paid in
advance, from which my attorney’s fee and expenses are deducted. 11. A flat fee
arrangement is available upon agreeing on a specific piece of work. D. Every
meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money DONATE
to support the professional law research and writing,
and strategic thinking of
Judicial Discipline Reform You may make a deposit or an online transfer to
Citi Bank, routing number 021 000 089, account 4977 59 2001
through Zelle
through Paypal
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ
or
by mailing a check to the address below. I look of forward to hearing from you.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it. Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero,
Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx*********************************************
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People;
e.g., click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New. The article below had a consistent format
when sent. If it shows irregularities when received, they crept in during
transit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them.
Politicians-judges connivance
enables judges’ riskless abuse of power;
critical analysis is needed to expose it; and
the most opportune time to do so is
nowhttp://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_politicians-judges_connivance.pdf
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, EnglandM.B.A.,
University of Michigan Business SchoolD.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial
Discipline ReformNew York
Cityhttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx
, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx Dear
Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, Thank you for your emails and your kind words
about my work.
A. Your problem with law-disregarding judges and what your “proposed solution”
reveals about you 1. You stated that “We have located many conflicts of
interest [concerning] unlawful foreclosures and evictions in U.S. courts”. Your
“proposed solution” is for “a Federal Law to be passed to deal with the above
issues immediately”. 2. Your statement gives you away as a pro se. It will be
used by judges and opposing counsel to abuse you too, for it makes applicable
the corollary to the aphorism “KNOWLEDGE IS POWER”: Ignorance is open season
for being abused. 3. My comment on your statement may make you and others angry
at me. But such anger does not help anyone in any way whatsoever. 4. Rather, my
comment is constructive. It points to defective analysis of which you must be
made aware so that you can correct it in your own interest and that of
everybody else. 5. Which lawyer do you think cares more about you than about
his pocket, the one who tells you what you need to hear at the risk of losing
you as a client or the one who to secure his attorney’s fees from you tells you
what he thinks you want to hear, even if misleading or false, at the risk of
your losing yet more effort, time, money, and esteem among your fellow members?
Are you looking for an honest lawyer or a self-serving sycophant?
B. Self-contradictory: your solution to judges' disregard for the law is yet
another law 6. On the one hand, you complain that “courts are not following the
rules of evidence"; fail to “address properly jurisdiction and standing when a
case is filed”; and ‘judges and bankruptcy trustees have a conflict of
interests [between their official duties, which require their impartiality,]
and their own interest in one of the creditors or other parties’.
7. Your solution is to lobby Congress for a federal law that addresses these
issues. 8. The conflict lies in your reasoning: Since you complain about
judges’ and trustees’ disregard of the law, what form of reasoning allows you
to expect that they would not likewise disregard the federal law that you want
to address these issues? Your statement is self-contradictory. It shows lack of
critical analysis. 9. It follows from your own statement that a solution to
'unlawful foreclosures and evictions" cannot possibly be passing yet another
law. C. No new law is passed “immediately” in Congress 10. You insist three
times that such federal law must be passed “immediately”. You insistence
betrays your lack of knowledge of judicial and legislative procedure and
current circumstances: 11. Congress passes fewer and fewer laws because it is
not only divided, but also polarized. Neither Democrats nor Republicans want to
be seen reaching a compromise, never mind giving a legislative win to the
others, lest they be accused by their followers of having caved in to the other
party. 12. Congress is embroiled in a tug of war over a handful of issues,
namely, infrastructure; voting rights; immigration; the pullout from
Afghanistan; and Covid vaccination, mandates, and going back to school or the
office. Congress has hardly any time or attention for a new law. 13. In fact,
Congress already failed to extend the moratorium on evictions issued originally
by the Center for Disease Control (CDC). At present, there is not even
discussion on extending the moratorium again, let alone a bill with the text
that can make for acrimony and protracted debate among members of Congress and
even within each party, for "the devil is in the detail". Congress has also
failed to adopt provisions regulating how Covid-related foreclosures can take
place. 14. On April 9, 2021, the formation of the Biden Commission for the
reform of the Supreme Court was announced. The Commission is required to submit
its report within 180 days. Once its report is out and regardless of its
non-binding recommendations, one issue will explode and dominate the attention
of politicians and the public at large: the battle over increasing the number
of justices from 9 to 15. Its overwhelming importance is obvious: The party
that nominates and confirms the higher number of justices has a grip on power.
15. The start of 2022 will set off the primaries in earnest. Politicians and
their parties will be jockeying for position because in the mid-term elections
the stakes will be very high: the control of Congress and, thus, the agenda
that will be pursued during the second half of the Biden presidency.
Campaigning in the primaries will make it even more unlikely for politicians to
want to be seen compromising. 16. Politicians will not write a bill of law,
hold hearings thereon, debate it in Congress, vote on it, and sign it into law
if it even hints that they suspect judges of engaging in unlawful activity.
Politicians who dare express their suspicion would become mortal enemies of
judges and provoke the latter’s devastating power of retaliation (but see Sen.
Elizabeth Warren’s daring denunciation). A single federal judge can: a. declare
a law central to a party’s agenda unconstitutional; b. suspend nationwide the
executive order of a president; and c. refuse to dismiss a complaint alleging
that a politician violated campaign contributions and election laws, and use
rulings and jury instructions to steer a trial toward finding the politician
liable or guilty. 17. Politicians recommend as judicial candidates, endorse,
nominate, and confirm people who have demonstrated that they know how the power
game is played. After that, politicians protect them no matter what as “our men
and women on the bench”. Thereby they avoid judges’ retaliation. 18. A law, by
itself, solves no problem: It is nothing but blotches of black ink on white
paper. It needs judges to apply it. 19. Judges will interpret and apply any
“federal law on foreclosures and evictions” however restrictively or
expansively they feel it necessary to protect and maintain the gains and
convenience that they have secured for themselves and their
cronies(jur:32§§2-4) by disregarding current law. Judges do so because they are
held by politicians unaccountable and allowed to apply any law however they
want. See the sham congressional hearings on judges’ abuse; and Chief Justice
John G. Roberts, Jr.’s subservient performance at the impeachment trial in the
Senate. 20. Consequently, to assume that the “solution” to the problem of
unlawful foreclosures and evictions is for “a federal law to be passed
immediately” betrays an astonishing degree of ignorance of how Congress and the
Judiciary work and the connivance between their members. 21. Such a “solution”
warrants the application of Einstein’s aphorism: “Doing the same thing while
expecting a different result is the hallmark of irrationality”. This is so
because it reveals ignorance of a fundamental law of both the physical and the
human worlds: cause and effect. The same cause produces the same effect.
22. You can learn below the different things –i.e., concrete, realistic, and
feasible actions– that you can do and reasonably expect a result that is
different but in harmony with your objectives, if you...
D. Read, write, and share with a view to telling the national public your
story of abuse by judges 23. Far from the ‘solution’ being for you to be angry
at me, you and your fellow members should use the above analysis to determine
yourselves to acquire 'knowledge that is empowering'. 24. That calls for you to
READ my article hereunder and those referred to there and here(cf. Appendix 6).
They are based on professional law research and writing, and strategic
thinking; and intended to assist those who like you have fallen prey to judges’
abuse of power. These articles have as their foundation my three-volume study
of judges and their judiciaries, which is titled and downloadable thus* † ♣:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability andConsequent Riskless Abuse of
Power:Pioneering the news and publishing field ofjudicial unaccountability and
abuse reporting* † ♣ a. Many of my articles are posted to my website Judicial
Discipline Reform at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. They have ;
attracted so many webvisitors and the latter have reacted to them so positively
that 39,501+ have become subscribers to the site as of September 4,
2021(Appendix 3). 1) How many law firms, never mind lawyers, do you know who
have a website with so many subscribers? 2) You can join the subscribers thus:
go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or +
New or Users >Add New. 25. The below article points out that by applying
the two-phase method you can WRITE in up to 500 words your story of judges’
abuse of power that you have suffered or witnessed. It aims to teach how to
include information that makes your story accurate, significant, and verifiable
so that it persuades journalists and other investigators to follow it leads in
their own commercial and reputational interest of selling copy and winning a
Pulitzer Prize. 26. The article also shows how you, your fellow members, and
all other abusees can take advantage of this most opportune time to SHARE your
stories with the Biden Commission as well as the journalists, students, and
professors who are called upon to hold the proposed unprecedented citizens
hearings where all of you may have the opportunity to tell your stories to the
national public.
a. Sharing is facilitated by the following two blocs of the email addresses of
the Biden commissioners, and of academics and journalists. Place in your email
containing your story and the article hereunder the following blocs in the To:
and the cc: boxes, respectively: To:
[commissioners]cristina.rodriguez@xxxxxxxx, robert.bauer@xxxxxxx,
kandrias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack.balkin@xxxxxxxx, RBauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
baude@xxxxxxxxxxxx, madams@xxxxxx, charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
acrespo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wdellinger@xxxxxxx, ecb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
justin.driver@xxxxxxxx, rfallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, heather.k.gerken@xxxxxxxx,
ngertner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgoldsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tgriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tgrove@xxxxxxxxxx, bhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lacroix@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
lemos@xxxxxxxxxxxx, levi@xxxxxxxxxxxx, trevor.morrison@xxxxxxx,
cnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rick.pildes@xxxxxxx, mramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
krooseve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, bross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, d-strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
tribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, awhite36@xxxxxxx, kewhitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
michael.waldman@xxxxxxx, caroline.fredrickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
development@xxxxxxxxxxxx, staff@xxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx ,
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, cc: [journalists and
academics]john.shiffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
blake.morrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, marketresearch.thomsonreuters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “Todd
Wallack” <twallack@xxxxxxxxx>, “Brian McGrory Editor”
<brian.mcgrory@xxxxxxxxx>, patricia.wen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
newstip@xxxxxxxxx,charles.ornstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tracy.weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
spotlight@xxxxxxxxx, “Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon Duff”
<gpduf@xxxxxxx>, “Veterans Today Managing Editor Jim W Dean”
<jimwdean@xxxxxxx>, ajaffe@xxxxxxxxxxx, Thehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
ijerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, newsletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mderienzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
emily.holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, NTotenberg@xxxxxxx, ryan.grim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Laura.Crimaldi@xxxxxxxxx, inytletters@xxxxxxxxxxx,
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Evan.Allen@xxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxx,
Elizabeth_Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ginger.thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mcnulaj@xxxxxxxxxxx, MCoyle@xxxxxxx, communication@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
aglantz@xxxxxxxxxxxx, joepatrice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxx, aturturro@xxxxxxx, Opencourt@xxxxxxx,
letters@xxxxxxxxxxx, contact_us@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Matt.Rocheleau@xxxxxxxxx, oped@xxxxxxxxxxx, jmaxeiner@xxxxxxxxx,
Jackie.Botts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Jaimi.Dowdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Vernal.Coleman@xxxxxxxxx, Brendan.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx,
Andrew.Chung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lawrence.Hurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Andrea.Januta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
b. In addition to sharing the article with all your friends, relatives, and
colleagues, post it to social media such as the following so that it goes
viral: Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Plus,
Pinterest, Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsApp, Twitter
Send this tweet: Request that the Biden Commission on Supreme Court reform,
students & journalists hold citizens hearings where people tell the national
public their story of judges’ abuse of power;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_citizens_hearings_by_students&journalists.pdf
E. Professional assistance reasonably requested in exchange for compensation
27. I can assist you and your fellow members. But I cannot assist either you or
everybody else who contacts me by email, mail, and phone asking me to do so pro
bono. To expect that I should give my expertise, effort, and time in return for
nothing is neither reasonable nor fair. 28. So, kindly be advised that my
attorney’s fee is $350 per hour plus all necessary and incidental expenses,
including, but not limited to, access to specialized databases, books,
transportation, room and board, communication, etc. A flat fee arrangement is
available upon agreeing on a specific piece of work.
F. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money DONATE
to support the professional law research and writing,
and strategic thinking of
Judicial Discipline Reform You may make a deposit or an online transfer to
Citi Bank, routing number 021 000 089, account 4977 59 2001
through Zelle
through Paypal
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ
or
by mailing a check to the address below. I look of forward to hearing from you.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it. Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero,
Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at
* >ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G, when emailing him, copy the above bloc of
his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance
the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those
addresses.***************************
| Using your story of abuse of power by judges
to encourage university students and journalists
to expose the refusal of
the Biden Commission on the reform of the Supreme Court to hear abusees on
the practice of abuse by justices and judges
while hearing only professors on the theory of constitutional law; and
to hold the proposed
unprecedented citizens hearings
through which the national public will be
informed of, and outraged at, unaccountable judges’ riskless abuse of power, and
given the opportunity to collectively demand compensation
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_citizens_hearings_by_students&journalists.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, EnglandM.B.A.,
University of Michigan Business SchoolD.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial
Discipline ReformNew York
Cityhttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx
, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx I thank you
and all those Advocates who replied to my article on the two-phase method for
writing in up to 500 words your story of the abuse by judges that you have
suffered or witnessed, for instance, as a party or while clerking for judges or
reporting on their courts and decisions. Abstract: This article describes
concrete, reasonable, and feasible steps that you can take toward the objective
of enabling people to tell the national public their stories at a public
meeting of the Biden Commission for the reform of the Supreme Court, and at the
proposed unprecedented citizens hearings to be organized by university
students, professors, and journalists and held all over the country at their
university auditoriums, media stations, and via video conference. Story pitch
and its foundation: Also, I am pitching this story as well as a series of
analytical pieces on judges and their judiciaries, which are already written
and available for your evaluation(Appendix 6). I can write articles on
commission. All are supported by my three-volume study on this subject based on
professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking. The study is
titled and downloadable thus: ...[text of the article] |