Just off the top?. Some top
I wouldn't classify them (anyone's style differences or, limitations?. Like,
who hasn't got them, relative to what, truly matters, if not defines the
matter) as mistakes, if we learn and further develop, justice (as evolve) from
them, as by as much, as to how as much works if not of keeping our "eye on The
ball," (So to Speak) and The concept, (of Understanding, more) and thing that
matters, to what is if not actually, corrects, or improves as for what truly
defines of the more, reasonable.. . Consider them as "irregularities," (often,
worthy of further analysis, but what else) of a mission of such, perfection.. .
Beware any programming (including lies, typically of politics or the political,
[usually, as not of the duly elected, of Freedom] when organized) not for our
cognitive development(s), in such regard.. . Or what?.
I'm not signing any petition towards a right to our conscience (or any other
legislation, or commitment, otherwise..) because the right to "communicate" (in
whatever Fing language?!.) is all we need, for as much, if not for everything,
to keeping things simple for an even greater understanding, if not to a,
bulleted format.. .
I do strive towards or by the, line of least resistance or, greatest benefit,
(reason) in such respect. Take from it what actually gives us, including you,
"everything," of a sort.. .
Michael Glavic
Champion of as much
- Just do what's reasonable as for you, of as much as of, everything, (two
sides of the same coin, or what) what is achieved by "justice," or the logical,
of serving as much, and don't go looking for a, "fight," or worse (Or get that)
That might mean, if not should... don't challenge the abusive if not criminal
authority for the sake of doing that, (how it, operates) what hope there is of
reasoning with the, jungle, (creep?) that's about such, challenges... but for
how justice works, getting to even the most seemingly insignificant if not vile
being(s) in such respect, how it does, or works.. . I understand this is how
intelligence, vs., politics, actually works, for what is best in such regard..
. The real choice is ours, Thereof, and it doesn't have to be any more
complicated than that, what as much, exposes, that the truth or light can and
will prevail, (of the evidence that matters) how it does
This is not meant to be compared to anything else, (whether it can or not) but
for "justice," (for one and all) and I figure/understand justice will come of
as much, not thinking or behaving it can, otherwise.. Of such practice I Go
P. S. I think Richard (Dr.) Cordero is on the right track challenging phony
justice, (what should not be tolerated, for any kind of phoniness, to as much)
that defers to politics and the political (if not worse) that
incapacitates/placates, (if not especially intimidates) of its confusing,
people (often, if not typically of its, highfalutin and/or obfuscating style,
encompassing abusiveness, [process abuses coming to mind] otherwise) from
actually doing the right thing (justice!) and serving justice, if not, merely
accordingly.. .
I go for the actual thing, if not to the heart and mind of the matter in such
respect, what else there might be to, thinking, about as much, etc., hopefully,
(So hopefully!) God and or whatever is listening, and responding in such
regard (How little I calculate, prayers, etc., are worth, not So, true or
honest..) You might want to include more things if not bigger things in
your/the "big/bigger picture" in such respect, what little you have to lose by
as much, (having tried so much, less?) how else, if not whatever else, you
should expect to, gain, my figuring understanding is the world or of the world
in such regard
Why people don't think as much... or have seen, been aware of such, "choices,"
(whatever, might be better?! Logically) I very much understand to be,
"evidence" of our problems and/or limitations, towards how I deal with as much.
Of such choices and law, etc., Am I! (Like as much or, not?.
I figure I can and do "neutralize" all that is less, if not inferior, by as
much.. .
Please excuse (get beyond) any, seeming, irregularities for the
"perfection(s)" of as much, (including you? Where So, true) and not the
politically bastardizing if not, truly worse, and not typically receptive (open
minded) if even, tolerant and understanding in such regard. This ain't no
measly language demo.. .
Of such, "Communication," I Go, God willing, if not driving, So, but how else
I have no problem, relatively speaking (being driven) with as much
If "God" isn't about justice, it's about nothing (to me) If we're, as with
everything... not about justice, we're/everything, is about nothing (to me) I
Go for the something that matters, and is meaningful/logical/harmonizing in
such respect, understand as much or, not.. . I understand I'm (if not whatever
else) going somewhere meaningful in such respect and, shaping/helping create
the world as best I can, in such respect, that also if not especially involving
"a lot of work," why you might not hear from me any more than you do
Maybe all the work I "curse" (yes) having to do (of greater complexity, than I
Feel it should be...) is working in such regard.. . "Honesty" works, me thinks,
So far
Here's hoping So, or, hell perhaps awaits me, my thinking, that's not,
logically likely, if God ain't some, political thing, and how could It/that be,
ain't no question for me, So alone, and understanding, if not also,
challenging.. . I also ask for forgiveness (if not merely, feeling it, feeling
sorrow or remorse) in such respect and, So far, seeming to get It, from that
which matters in such respect
Of such imperfections or irregularities, (Etc.) Am I..
"Justice" Blesses
I Say So.
On Thursday, June 3, 2021, 03:35:19 a.m. EDT, Shining Emperor
<nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Change you habits into concise bullet points or you list all audience.😉
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, 15:55 Don Mashak <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Emperor: Yes, your majesty... (intended with playful, friendly sarcasm, not
irritation)
It is hard to distill a lifetime of acquired knowledge in a few paragraphs,and
then explain it in the context of the current debate..
But I will try,
And feel free to remind if I am not concise enough in the future.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Wednesday, June 2, 2021, 5:39:11 PM CDT, Shining Emperor
<nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don:
You SEEM READ A LOT OF IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE.
SUMMARIZE, SUMMARI
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:47 PM Don Mashak <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
People underestimate just how vicious those in government are about protecting
theirunconstitutional criminal conspiracy.
Those willing to openly expose and oppose the corruption in general, let alone
the Progressive
Globalist Insurgency, are retaliated against. Those who don't make waves,
don't get this treatmentand find it hard to believe this reality exists.
Cordero is taking on the heart of the Progressive Globalist Insurgency... The
judges and the BAR.You can bet they are creating a huge, bogus COINTELPRO Style
operation against him. Youcan read about FBI COINTELPRO operations in the
circa 1980 final report of the US Senate ChurchCommittee.... so this is
documented fact from sworn testimony before the US Senate and likelyunderstates
the evil done through COINTELPRO operations...
Church Committee Final Report, Book III, 1976 - Defending Rights & Dissent
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Church Committee Final Report, Book III, 1976 - Defending Rights & Dissent
Take a deep dive into the observations of Senate staff regarding FBI tactics
toward civil society. Direct link: ...
|
|
|
I don't understand how our government can be so widely known as corruption, yet
people are so
quick to believe the government when the government says someone who is
exposing their corruptionshould not be listened to for various alleged
character flaws.
Think about it folks, if government discredits everyone who exposes and opposes
them, how willwe ever restore the American Republic?
Often the Government's first act of defense is to make its enemies look foolish
over trivial proceduremistakes... We all must realize that restoring the
Republic is going to be a learning process, andanyone trying to change the
system is going to make mistakes because no one in governmentwill teach them
the way....
Mr. Cordero has been persistent for 5 or more years in taking on the legal
establishment.I am sure he has made mistakes but learned along the way. I am
confident Mr. Cordero isa reliable patriot who is truly trying to redress major
problems with the US Legal System.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Monday, May 31, 2021, 11:12:28 AM CDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
Not official, but for what It's worth, (as for) as of and how It works (So
truly..) So certainly beyond our language, (and related limited conceptuality,
if not abuse) etc., of communication, (encompassing reason) otherwise (Or what,
you otherwise? .. . Do, do? Doh, doh? .. . Just Get It, how you should, if not,
do.. .
I recognize Richard Cordero as a legitimate, (truly valid) judge, of
"reason"/Champion of Justice.. . I consider Richard a champ in such respect,
in saying, So
Anyone who goes elsewhere for their grievances against Dr. Cordero, (if not me,
in such respect... Hello, group? or not) is conceding to another authority if
not to the political, of my if not our discontent (of the contradictory, as to
our confusion and disorder/s) if not, of the more serious issues, and is
ignorant if not, guilty of as much.. . Of such analysis and analytical
qualities, and identity/existence, am I
Figure I help (how one helps) do The "conceptual" to all, understanding and
(corresponding) Justice in such respect, something I encourage more if not all
of us do in such respect.
I encourage us to go to "Richard" for any questions we might have on justice if
not the law (which he also seems, eminently qualified for...) in such respect,
as to be true to as much and not of the problem, in practice or, of reality,
vs., what ain't, So true
If you wish or prefer, you can forget about me, otherwise, or get the help you
figure I can give, if not merely to you in such respect, never-the-less, or of
the lesser, I So hope, and, Go.. . If you have "partner," in life who doesn't
recognize if not see "you" in such respect but would defer to politics or the
law, otherwise... reconsider (better consider) who you're partnering with in
such regard, and Go (if not leave them, if not merely to The greater extend)
"wisely," how you can, for what is best if not the truly meaningful is about
I Go, accordingly, of such test and recognition, of such, authority, entailed
by practicing as much as of such information and being, Informed.. . yeah/yes,
of Communication, (as for Justice, true/real communication all ways being for
justice) Etc., but what else. For what "matters," and should.. . I find most
(of the political?.) don't even communicate, in such respect, and behave,
accordingly.
Speak with "Richard" if you're still not sure about me.. .
Michael Glavic
So, Champion of Justice, if not merely of such, justice.. .
I So Get It and Serve, "oh," and Test, for what I'm interested in and
understand that I need to be informed about, to be truly Informed (True) and
all that I can be, Etc. It might (Should? Logically?.) include you, too, in
such respect. Here's, So hoping So, and for much more, related if not intrinsic
to as much.. .
Yeah, this stuff takes time, focus or a commitment to as much, (Such, justice)
I'm very sure, and on my way, more than I, ever realized before.. . I So, feel
and think, and "do," beyond the pale, (if not merely of my share) for what as
much is worth, believe So or, not.. . Figure "The" choice (of choice) is
y/ours, Thereof
I Do.. I figure, someone needs to speak as such level, (to such, choice/s) and
it may as well be me, if not merely me, too.. .
It may cost you to get more out of me.. . Be nice? Be "Nicer," or Smarter, and
Just
BWE On Thursday, May 27, 2021, 10:02:55 p.m. EDT, cordero
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTE:I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email
You areencouraged to share and post it to social media as widely as
possible in yourown interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g., click
“ReplyAll” and send.
To subscribeto articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register or +New
or Users >Add New.
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D.,University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx Whyno credibility can be assigned to
either Attorney GeneralJudge Merrick Garland,
who pretends that in his DoJ’s police departmentinvestigations
“We will follow the facts and the law wherever they lead”,
for he violated the law when
he dismissed100% of complaints against fellow judges,
thus covering up their abusecomplained about; or the Biden Commission on
reforming theSupreme Court,
whose overwhelming majority of members are
former law clerks to justices andjudges,
bound by the confidentiality agreement that they signed with them; and
law professors,
whose schools compete for the prestige of having justices andjudges
accept their students as clerks,
teach as adjunct professors, and
serveon their boards and moot courts Commissioners compromisedby a conflict of
interests
will produce an inherently biased, unreliable, and theoretical report; and make
it necessary forstudents and journalists to hold
unprecedented citizens hearings Meantime, learn how to ask the Commission to
let the national public hear your story of abuse by unaccountable judges and
how to write it in up to 500 words
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Biden_SCt_reform_Commission.pdf
Professor Michael Ramsey
Member of the Biden Commission on reforming the Supreme Court,
the other Commission members;
professors, students, journalists, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries Dear
Prof. Ramsey, Commission members, professors, students,journalists, and
Advocates, Thank you, Prof.Ramsey, for your reply to thearticle that I emailed
to each commissioner and the public at large, whichbears the following
summarizing title: Candidate Biden had announced
the nomination of a commission to reform the court system;
President Biden has formed
a commission only to enlarge the Supreme Court and limit justices’ terms. Has
Attorney General Judge Merrick Garland prevailed
to reduce the commission’s scope so as to prevent any investigation intojudges’
conduct,
which would have exposed his unlawful 100% dismissal of complaints
againstfellow judges and
the consequent cover-up of his and their underlying abuse of power? Exposing
the connivance between the President and the Federal Judiciary
can bring down, not just a president, but rather a branch:
an unaccountable Judiciary risklessly running as a racketeering enterprise.
Pitchinga story with Pulitzer Prize potential In your reply, you pointed out
the issues of resending the article andits credibility thus: DearDr. Cordero,
thanks for submitting your comments to me as part of the Commissionon the
Supreme Court. However, this is the third time you have sent me theessentially
identical email. If you persist in this approach, I will haveto regard your
communications as spam. I might add, also, that this approach isnot one that
enhances your credibility.
Best regardsMichael Ramsey My credibility is determined, not by the number of
times that I email an article, but rather by the quality of my law research and
writing, and strategic thinking, on which depend the reliability,
understandability, and insight of its contents. I respectfully invite you to
assess them by reading the new article hereunder.
A. Introduction: aCommission that runs away to write a new constitution 1. You,
the commissioners, can follow theprecedent for ‘a Commission that runs away’
from its mandate: The Articles ofConfederation adopted in 1777 by the former 13
colonies and by then independentstates entered into effect in 1781. They proved
to be unworkable. So in 1787, thestates chose delegates to convene to propose
amendments. The delegates,including George Washington, presiding over the
amending convention, and James Madisonand Alexander Hamilton, tried
unsuccessfully. Instead of becoming stuck with adoomed mandate, the delegates
took a courageous and historic decision: Theycast the Articles of Confederation
aside and wrote a totally new constitution. Itcame into force in 1789 and has
been in effect ever since. 2. That was 232 years ago! That Constitution
waswritten by only free white landed men. They had a mentality
completelydifferent from ours, for they lived in a world completely different
from thepresent one: a pre-industrial one that had no running water,
electricity,electronic devices, cars, trains, never mind airplanes; no
universal suffrage,education, health care, employee or tenant rights, etc.
Since then, that Constitution has beendistorted to make it fit by force an
evolving world. 3. It is an anachronistic document. It represents‘the dead
man’s hand’ governing us from a world that passed away a long timeago. A dead
man, not just a dummy, his lips have been manipulated by ventriloquistson the
bench and lawyers before them to say things so repugnant to him and
hiscontemporaries born centuries ago that none of them would have said even
undertorture that what they said in writing was ever intended to mean it: There
is aright to abortion, same-sex marriage, freedom from slavery, privacy… “The
horror of it! May theLord punish you in everlasting hell. Its fire sheds light
so bright that itallows of no ‘penumbra’ where those rights could have been
hidden. Only in thedarkness of ignorance and dishonesty could disingenuously
‘enlightened’ menpretend that our Constitution contains those rights anywhere.”
4. The Commission can end this ventriloquistfarce. It can make us, We the
People,the Masters of our Words by drafting a new constitution. That willallow
us to speak for ourselvesand to our needs. 5. The commissioners should muster
the courage to run away from theirmandate, to wit, to study ways of reforming
the SupremeCourt. If they do, they will not run alone. Rather, they will take
the lead of the 34 statesthat since April 2, 2014, have petitioned Congress to
call a constitutionalconvention, as provided for by the amending provisions of
Article V of the Constitution. 6. The commissioners would be wise to run away
from their mandate because they cannot fulfill it honestly: An attempt to
fulfill it is anexercise in providing cover to a political party’s
predetermined decision to‘pack the Court’ by increasing the number of justices
and reducing their termin office in order to reestablish the balance of power
in the Court. It isfanciful to think that the commissioners could demonstrate
such wisdom in their study asto persuade that party to desist from its
decision. The commissioners will end up being thatparty’s dummy.
7. What is more, the commissioners cannot fulfill their mandate because the
overwhelming majority of them were law clerks tojudges, even to Supreme Court
justices, and are law professors. As discussedbelow, to be allowed to clerk for
them, they had to sign the judges' confidentialityagreements; and to obtain
from them the glowing letters of recommendation thatwould make or break their
careers they did anything and everything that thejudges and justices asked them
to do. 8. As law professors they are under pressure fromtheir schools never
ever to speak ill of federal judges, who have alife-appointment; the long
memory to hold grudges that goes along with it; andcrushing power of
retaliation as individuals and as a class; e.g.:
a. Federal District Judge Gonzalo Curiel was presiding over the Trump
University case. In June 2016, Candidate Trump did not like one of his
decisions and referred to him disparagingly as "the so-called judge of Mexican
heritage", who could not be impartial because Trump wanted to build a wall
between the U.S. and Mexico. He kept campaigning on issuing a ban on Muslim
immigration travel. Upon receiving the votes of more than 62.5million voters
and becoming president, he issued that ban as one of his first executive orders
in 2017.
b. Yet, Federal DistrictJudge James Robart of Seattle, Washington State,
suspended President Trump's Muslim travel ban nationwide and a panel of three
circuit judges –although twowould have sufficed– sustained the suspension
nationwide. As then-Judge, now-Justice Neil Gorsuch put it: "An attack on one
of our brothers and sisters of the robe is an attack on all of us". What an
unambiguous, unabashed expression of judges' gang mentality!
b. Subsequently, federal judges and even justices together with their state
counterparts ruled against or dismissed at least 86 cases filed by Trump and
his allies challenging the 2020 presidential election results. 9. It follows
that the commissioners have a conflict of interests: To propose ways of
reforming the Supreme Court, they would have to apply the practical model used
by Congress: It investigates theissue claimed to need legislation, e.g., by
holding public hearings thereon;makes findings of facts; and relies on them as
the justification for writing abill of law. 10. The commissioners cannot
expose the conductin practice, rather than in theory, of judges without
revealing that the judges for whom they clerked committed illegal andunethical
acts and improprieties(Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges, Canon 2, which enjoins
judges 'to avoid impropriety and even the appearance of impropriety'). The
judges engaged in such conduct under cover of theirconfidentiality agreement
with the clerks and their dismissal of 100% of complaints againstthem,
discussed below. Judges’ abuse of power is riskless. By contrast, for the
commissioners to expose it isfraught with risk. They are compromised. 11. The
commissioners can honestly resolvetheir conflict of interests by ‘running away’
from a mandate that is adishonest attempt at political manipulation rather than
an honest means ofjustice reform. They can write a new constitution. Therein
they can enable the People tostrip their judicial public servants of
self-ensured unaccountability and holdthem to the same equaltreatment of
compensation for being abusive or incompetent as judges do police officers,
priests, lawyers, doctors, and everybody else...except themselves. 12. If you,
the commissioners, do so, you willnot continue to be former clerks and
professors among thousands of them, butwill become the ‘parents’ of a historic
constitution that brings abouttransformative change in the system of justice:
the system that goes in comesout a different one appropriate for those living
today. That will earn you recognitionhere and abroad as the Peoples’Champions
of Justice. B. Resending an email to overcome the interception by judges
ofpeople’s emails and mail to detect and suppress those that are critical
ofjudges 13. We all suffer from informationoverload. Nobody can read all the
emails that they receive. That is why senders,including me, resend their
emails: to increase the odds that recipients willread their emails. Publishers
too ‘resend’their articles when they publish them, not in dailies, but rather
in weeklies,monthlies, or periodicals on display in the stands for two, three,
or fourmonths, as professional journals are. TV operators‘resend’ reruns to
distribute and lower their cost per broadcast. Similarly, Iresend my emails to
distribute the enormous investment of time andeffort needed to research, write,
and self-edit them. 14 The very first words of my articles make upa note
encouraging recipients to acknowledge receipt of the article thereunder.If I do
not receive such acknowledgment, I resend them the article. 15. By far the
most important reason for myresending my articles is the factual and
statistical probable cause to believethat federal judges intercept the emails
and mail ofpeople to detect and suppress those of their critics. 16. The
judges’ motive is to prevent criticism oftheir abuseof power from so outraging
the public as to force both law enforcement authorities, e.g., the FBIand its
state counterparts, to investigate judges; and Congress to conduct hearingsthat
can lead to legislation holding judges accountable.
