I received your email
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021, 8:48 PM cordero <dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
*NOTES*: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this
email.
You are encouraged to *share* and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of *We the
People*; e.g*., click “Reply All” and send*.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register or
+ New or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it
shows irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are
beyond my control. Kindly overlook them.
*WEBINAR*
* on exposing judges’ abuse of power and financial criminality*
and
*WORKSHOP*
*for learning to write in up to 500 words your story of judges’ abuse and
criminality that you have suffered or witnessed **(see the article
thereon infra and at OL3:1329
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf>)**
and*
*send it to the Biden Commission on reforming the Supreme Court *
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-
*Biden_SCt_reform_Commission*.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Biden_SCt_reform_Commission.pdf>
*and to journalists, students, and professors who can hold *unprecedented
citizens hearings
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_
*citizens_hearings_by_students&journalists*.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_citizens_hearings_by_students&journalists.pdf>
* where people can tell their stories to the national public and so inform
and outrage the public as to stir it up to take action, and cause abusees
to collectively demand compensation from judges and their judiciaries by
applying judges’ own decisions that have held the Catholic Church liable
for its handling of pedophilic priests *
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_
*webinar_judges_abuse_compensation*.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_webinar_judges_abuse_compensation.pdf>
*Dates: November 7 and 14, 2021 03:00 p.m. EST (US and Canada)*
Join Zoom Meeting sponsored by American Property Owners Network
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87162116410?pwd=SmhCWjdYd2FCSXFsOU9CelRwajhVdz09
Meeting ID: 871 6211 6410
Passcode: 082239
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,87162116410#,,,,*082239# US (San Jose)
+12532158782,,87162116410#,,,,*082239# US (Tacoma)
Dial by your location
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 929 205 6099 US (New
York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
Meeting ID: 871 6211 6410
Passcode: 082239
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbOEOTZQ7Z
**************************************************************
*Proposal for a webinar on the implications for lawyers, their clients,
and pro ses of recent exposure by top media of judges’ abuse of power and
concealment of financial interests: collective demand for compensation by
applying judges’ own decisions on Catholic Church pedophilia liability and
the principle “*[dishonesty] *Too big *[for the judiciaries]* to fail to
know”;*
* and the expansion by Continued Legal Education companies of their
business by promoting the holding of *unprecedented citizens hearings
*http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/>OL2/DrRCordero_webinar_judges_abuse_compensation.pdf
*
By
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.*
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Continued Legal Education companies, Lawyers, Clients, Pro ses, Media
Outlets and Journalists, Graduate Schools, Professors, and Students, and
Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Kindly find below my proposal for a webinar-cum-workshop that is founded
on current extraordinary journalistic articles published by top media
outlets; a professional study of judges and their judiciaries; and my
website, namely, *Judicial Discipline Reform*, at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>, which as of today, November
6, has 40,155 subscribers.
Do you know of any law firm, let alone a lawyer, who has a website with so
many subscribers?
I bring to the table something found of value by the highly educated and
well-off people who read law journals and long-form articles, like the
one below.
The proposed webinar will appeal to them because it lays out a concrete
and realistic strategy for obtaining what lawyers, their clients, pro
ses, and everybody else want: compensation for the waste and harm that
have been inflicted on them.
Therefore, I look forward to discussing this webinar-cum-workshop
proposal with you and your colleagues, similar to the one sponsored by
American Property Owners Network advertised hereabove.
A. Proposal for a webinar on compensation for judges’ harmful conduct
1. The first part of this webinar deals with the exposure by top media
outlets and a VIP of judges' abuse of power
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judicial_abuse_forms.pdf>
and concealed financial interests in cases before them and how lawyers,
their clients, and pro ses can collectively demand compensation by applying
the judges’ own decisions on Catholic Church pedophilia liability; and a
principle with a very familiar ring to it: *“*[dishonesty] *Too big *[for
the judiciaries]* to fail to know”*; while Continued Legal Education
companies (hereinafter CLEs) can expand their business by facilitating such
demand.
2. Indeed, *The **Wall Street Journal*, in its article “131 Federal
Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest”,
published initially on September 28, 2021, and subsequently updated with
judges’ reactions to it, wrote thus:
"[Federal] judges failed to recuse themselves from 685 lawsuits from 2010
to 2018 involving firms in which they or their family held shares, a *Wall
Street Journal* investigation found...Alerted to the violations by the
*Journal*, 56 of the judges have directed court clerks to notify parties
in 329 lawsuits that they should have recused themselves. That means new
judges might be assigned, potentially upending rulings."
3. One need not be a lawyer to be immediately assaulted by questions like
these:
a. Who is going to pay for the new trial?
b. Who is going to bear the enormous cost during an uncharted process of
disentangling the contractual relations based on decisions now tainted with
judges’ bias toward their own financial interests regardless of whether the
decisions are formally voided?
c.i. The judges submitted their mandatory annual financial disclosure
reports under the Ethics in Government Act(5 U.S.C. §101(f)(11) et seq.
<https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>) to the Committee on
Financial Disclosure of the Judicial Conference of the U.S. That Conference
is presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who appoints
the Committee members, all of whom are also federal judges. The Conference
includes all the chief judges of the 13 circuits as well as representative
district, bankruptcy, and magistrate judges.(28 U.S.C. §331-332
<https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>)
c.ii. Hence, the Federal Judiciary has been in a position and has had the
duty of due diligence to ascertain that there was no conflict of financial
interests requiring judges’ recusal from cases as to which the Judiciary
had all public documents and even confidential ones, as well as total
control over its procedure. It follows that the Judiciary has had actual
and imputed knowledge of the judges’ illegal conduct.
c.iii. The practice of concealing financial interests is so widespread and
involves such pitcher-catcher coordination between judges and a complicit
Committee of peers, colleagues, and friends as to render applicable the
principle *“*[dishonesty] *Too big *[for the Judiciary]* to fail to know”*.
Thereby liability has become institutionalized, attaching to the Federal
Judiciary itself, which covered up for its judges, just as it was
institutionalized when judges held the Catholic Church liable for the
crimes of pedophilic priests and its cover-up thereof.
c.iv. How can harmed lawyers, clients, and pro se hold the Federal
Judiciary liable for compensatory and even punitive damages when the
Judiciary is the judge in every case against it? The Judiciary is
incriminated by its record of self-discipline dishonesty: Chief circuit
judges abuse their power to dismiss 100% of complaints
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_complaint_dismissal_statistics.pdf>
filed against judges in their respective circuit, as do the circuits’
judicial councils, which deny 100% of the petitions to review
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/statistics&tables/statistical_tables_complaints_v_judges.pdf>
those dismissals.
1) So did
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_JJ_Kavanaugh-Garland_exoneration_policy.pdf>
Then-Chief
Judge Merrick Garland
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_JJ_Kavanaugh-Garland_exoneration_policy.pdf>
of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Now-Attorney
General
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_exposing_Judge_Garland&judges.pdf>;
and Then-Judges, Now-Justices Sonia Sotomayor,
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_complaint_dismissal_statistics_jur9-20.pdf>Neil
Gorsuch
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_hearings_JGorsuch_complainants&parties.pdf>,
Brett Kavanaugh
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_table_exonerations_by_JJ_Kavanaugh-Garland.pdf>,
Amy Connie Barrett
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_JgACBarrett_condonation_judges_power_abuse.pdf>,
and John Roberts
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_collected_statistics_complaints_v_judges.pdf>,
as shown by the official statistics
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/statistics&tables/statistical_tables_complaints_v_judges.pdf>
submitted to Congress as a public document in the Annual Report
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/analysis-reports/directors-annual-report>
of the Director of the Administrative Office <https://www.uscourts.gov/>
of the U.S. Courts, who is appointed by the Chief Justice(28 U.S.C. §§1,
3(a)(3-4),
(h)(2) <https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>).
c.v. The prosecution of collective demands for compensation can give rise
to a niche practice. Lawyers will soon invoke the equal protection clause
to require that any applicable statute of limitations be pushed back or
lifted just as “lookback” laws have done with those statutes that would
have barred claims against pedophilic priests and the Catholic Church.
c.vi. Such demands can have grave non-pecuniary consequences. Discovery
and further journalistic(OL:194§E
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_institutionalized_judges_abuse_power.pdf>
) exposures can so inform and outrage
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_inform_outrage_be_compensated.pdf>
the public and make it demonstrate its loss of trust as to make inevitable
the resignation of judges, justices, courts, and even bring down, not only
the head of a branch and “*All the President’s Men*”, but rather a
government branch itself.
c.vii. Such imaginative and courageous prosecution requires lawyers and
students made of the ‘stuff’ of which nationally recognized and historic
Champions of Justice are made. It can be set in motion by CLEs, unless they
want to cede the opportunity to media outlets.
1. The webinar’s foundation provided by top media outlets and a study of
judges and their judiciaries
4. This webinar has a solid foundation in the recent articles and reports
that, as discussed in my article related hereto
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-media_to_investigate_judges_financial_criminality.pdf>,
have been published by:
a. *The Wall Street Journal*
b. Thomson Reuters
c. *The Boston Globe*
d. International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, headquartered in
D.C, with the participation of *The Washington Post*
e. Senator Elizabeth Warren
5. In addition, the webinar is supported by my three-volume study of
judges and their judiciaries, the product of my professional law research
and writing, and strategic thinking. The study is titled and downloadable
thus:
*Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:*
*Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability and
abuse reporting***
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>*
*†
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>*
♣
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
♣ Volume 3: http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3
/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaxstlPTE$>
>from
OL3:1144-1386+
i. Open the downloaded files using Adobe Acrobat Reader
<https://acrobat.adobe.com/us/en/acrobat/pdf-reader.html>, which is
available for free.
B. Proposal for CLEs to expand their business and transformatively change
the system of justice
1. CLEs expanding their business to the 40,155+ subscribers to a website,
and to students and schools
6. I have posted my related article
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-media_to_investigate_judges_financial_criminality.pdf>
and many others to my website JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE REFORM at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>. They have attracted so many
webvisitors that 40,155 and counting have become subscribers as of November
6, 2021(see the article’s Appendix 3
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-media_to_investigate_judges_financial_criminality.pdf>).
7. These subscribers are highly educated and well-off people, the kind
that read articles in long form appearing in preeminent publications such
as *The New York Times Sunday Edition, The Wall Street Journal, The
Washington Post, The New Yorker, The Atlantic*, TIME, etc. They have the
potential for becoming the CLEs’ new non-lawyer client base.
8. CLEs can also expand their client base to another constituency that if
attracted early on in their careers can remain with the CLEs for a very
long time, namely, students
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Professors_students_lawyers.pdf>.
They are driven by idealism and need to prove themselves to prospective
employers.
a. Students, in general, will be presented with a proposal for learning
and providing –while in school and thereafter– the legal, journalistic,
business, and Information Technology services that so many parties,
including lawyers, will need to become part of, and pursue, the collective
demand for compensation for the harm caused by unaccountable judges’ and
their judiciaries’ abuse of power and concealed financial interests.
b. Law students, in particular, who currently are confronted with
diminishing chances of finding a job in the legal field, will be interested
in this proposal for acquiring the knowledge and expertise necessary to
develop their own niche practice.
9. Consequently, law schools are facing dwindling enrollment. They will be
interested in the proposal for offering courses, clinics, and internships
dealing with the exposure of judges’ abuse of power and concealed financial
interests. These educational offerings are apt to restore the luster of the
schools and lawyers in the eyes of scores of millions of current and former
parties by assisting them in obtaining compensation.
a. They can also provide the means for schools, in general, and their
students, in particular, to become the citizens inspectors general of the
Federal Judiciary, the model for its state counterparts, the creation of
which that Judiciary has so adamantly and effectively opposed.
2. A tour of schools to pioneer unprecedented citizens hearings
10. The above justifies a physical and virtual tour(OL:197§G
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_institutionalized_judges_abuse_power.pdf>
) of presentations at law schools as well as journalism, business, and
Information Technology schools, for they teach subjects vitally necessary
to expose judges’ financial criminality. The latter includes not only the
concealment of financial interests that require recusal, but also other
forms
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_how_fraud_scheme_works.pdf>
of illegal acquisition of assets, evasion of taxes, and the electronic
transfer of money to be hidden, laundered, and invested. This
multidisciplinary approach is epitomized by a course in Investigative
Journalism, Fraud and Forensic Accounting, and Statistical Analysis.
11. The tour can lay the foundation for the most promising proposal from
a publicity and commercial point of view: unprecedented citizens hearings
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_citizens_hearings_by_students&journalists.pdf>.
They will enable many lawyers, their clients, pro ses, and others to tell
the national public their stories of the abuse of power by judges that they
have suffered. Those who have witnessed abuse, for instance, court or law
clerks and even judges, will also be enabled to whistle-blow their
stories...as have done employees of Facebook disgusted by their company’s
abuse of their client base and its betrayal of what they felt to be their
idealistic mission as its employees.
12. The citizens hearings will be organized by students, professors, top
media outlets, and VIPs, including principled and opportunistic politicians
running in the mid-term elections. They are to take place at university
auditoriums, media stations, and via video conference. That way people will
be able to give and hear testimony wherever they are, thus sparing
themselves costly travel and room and board expenses.
3. A CLE that leads the way to a new system of justice
13. The unprecedented citizens hearings can occur as the debate is taking
place nationally over how to implement the report of the Biden Commission
for the reform of the Supreme Court. The testimony of so many victims of,
and witnesses to, judges’ abuse of power and financial criminality can
allow the detection of patterns. The latter can show abuse and criminality
so pervasive and coordinated as to function as unaccountable judges’
institutionalized modus operandi through which they run their judiciary as
a racketeering enterprise
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Reuters_judges_investigation.pdf>.
As a result, the hearings can reveal the need to reform, not merely the
Supreme Court, but rather all the courts and the system of justice itself.
14. By agreeing to offer my webinar, a CLE can expand its business well
beyond that of its competitors, which simply offer webinars and perhaps
also bar exam preparatory courses. Where would Amazon be today if it had
rejected every opportunity to venture into new businesses “’cause we only
sell books from a garage”?
15. By setting in motion the unprecedented citizens hearings, a CLE can
also become a pioneer in attaining what Ms. Carolyn Caccese, the
president of the NYS Academy of Trial Lawyers, states in her comments at
the beginning of the Academy’s webinars: "the objective of ATL is to
protect and defend the civil justice system".
16. Th
