yup key word is bond like bond out of jail, its just another contract for
your fiction to get out of jail. nothing on it about the human of flesh and
blood.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 3:57 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
United States Citizens are assumed. Looking at code for bonding someone
posted it stated that once the judge is told your under national
constitution he must immediately honor the fifth amendment of due process
of law. That is what article 1, section 8, clause 17 and three statement,
"I'm a state national and not an United States Citizen does. It claims your
status under the constitution and articles of confederation as a free
citizen. The case is over. The reason I and many others just send the
statement to the clerk of court as it goes in the court case and they can
do not more. Same as a state national passport that tells agents the same
thing.
On Feb 18, 2021, 12:10 PM -0700, Ray Greninger <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
citizens of what?
On Thursday, February 18, 2021, 3:17:08 AM MST, Don Mashak <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
With due respect, I think you do not understand that we are in the middle
of a nontraditional civil war.
It began under Progressive President Woodrow Wilson 1913 to 1921 with the
formation
of a 4th Branch of Government called the Administrative State
SCOTUS and DINOs and RINOs in Congress are Coconspirators
Peaceful Remedies must be exhausted before considering alternative
remedies...
I suggest either Citizen Grand Juries or a new Declaration of Causes
http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft
<CitizenGrandJuries02172021.jpg>
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
Rt 1 Box 231
Albertville MN 55301
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended
only for the use of the person or entity named above and is privileged and
confidential. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication other than to the person or entity named above is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify the sender by phone and by replying to this message and
then delete the message and any attachments from your system.
On Wednesday, February 17, 2021, 8:48:04 PM CST, Schaefer Carl <
schaeferfreight@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ZIP Codes are not required for [de] livery of mail or packages. ZIP Codes
are Federal Military Jurisdictions, that has little to do with moving mail
and contracts.
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
*From:* J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 17, 2021 8:29 PM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Stark County
restaurant facing civil action after not complying with Ohio's mask rules
no zip code eh? if so how will they deliver it
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 6:51 PM Schaefer Carl <schaeferfreight@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ask :Michael-Richard: Dewine for his Assumed Name Certificate, or
Fictitious Name Registration, for this fictitious business name called MIKE
DEWINE. After he fails to show it, write a foreign judgement, explaining
no man is authorized, to conduct business or contracts with us by an
unregistered fictitious name. State the total amount you require
$1,000,000.00 for damages. You write your own foreign judgement, from the
Joseph Beasley Court of Record.
Get an Assumed name certificate from Minnesota Secretary of State
website 24 hours online $50.00 fee, for all capital letter "JOSEPH
BEASLEY", and on application enter registrant name as Joseph :Beasley.
Care of: 300 Street Ave. City, State [00000] without US
Now you have legal and good standing, to conduct business, yourself.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy Tablet
-------- Original message --------
From: The Experts <experts303@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2/17/21 2:53 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Stark County restaurant
facing civil action after not complying with Ohio's mask rules
People, the corporations can not overthrought the constitution because it
is a contract between the people and the corporations.... AND nothing
more... The overpowering media can not make law, US congress can only make
law for themself and does not apply if you are not an employee
*Sincerely Enjoy life, By:Daniel Henderson Hornburg All rights reserved
UCC 1-308 "OUTSMART, OUTGUN & OUTLAST Your Competition!"*
*For entertainment Only/Not legal advice.* As a disclaimer, I am not a
Republican just an honest observer
without all the emotional baggage and social programming.
I do not take part in the pharmaceutical religion, My right to choose my
Spirituality!
If you don't know your rights, you don’t know your options and/or the
opportunities!
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:58 AM Victoria Ingram <147369258y@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Don, that is in Ohio.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:24 PM Victoria Ingram <147369258y@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
*LAKE TWP.* The owners of the Lake Varsity Diner have found themselves
in a court battle with Stark County officials because of the state's
policies on wearing masks.
Joe and Colleen Beasley are hoping to move the case out of Stark County
Common Pleas Court and into U.S. District Court, although that request
already has been rejected once.
The Beasleys haven't required employees of the Lake Varsity Diner, 13367
Cleveland Ave. NW, to wear masks since the restaurant reopened in July.
They also allow customers to skip on wearing a mask. Additionally, the
restaurant keeps condiment bottles at tables, which is a violation.
Joe Beasley cites several reasons for not requiring employees or customers
to wear masks in the restaurant.
"There is no law. It's the governor's request," he said. He also questions
whether masks help to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
*LAKE TWP.* The owners of the Lake Varsity Diner have found themselves
in a court battle with Stark County officials because of the state's
policies on wearing masks.
Joe and Colleen Beasley are hoping to move the case out of Stark County
Common Pleas Court and into U.S. District Court, although that request
already has been rejected once.
The Beasleys haven't required employees of the Lake Varsity Diner, 13367
Cleveland Ave. NW, to wear masks since the restaurant reopened in July.
They also allow customers to skip on wearing a mask. Additionally, the
restaurant keeps condiment bottles at tables, which is a violation.
Joe Beasley cites several reasons for not requiring employees or customers
to wear masks in the restaurant.
"There is no law. It's the governor's request," he said. He also questions
whether masks help to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
The couple's actions contradict orders issued by the director of the Ohio
Department of Health. The orders were issued and revised as part of the
state's attempt to curb the spread of the coronavirus.
That led to civil action filed against the couple and the business for
failing to comply with the regulations.
Compliance officers with the Stark County Health Department have tried to
work with the restaurant owners, said Deborah Dawson, an assistant Stark
County prosecutor who represents the health agency. The Beasleys have
declined to follow regulations and that led to the civil suit, she said.
*LAKE TWP.* The owners of the Lake Varsity Diner have found themselves
in a court battle with Stark County officials because of the state's
policies on wearing masks.
Joe and Colleen Beasley are hoping to move the case out of Stark County
Common Pleas Court and into U.S. District Court, although that request
already has been rejected once.
The Beasleys haven't required employees of the Lake Varsity Diner, 13367
Cleveland Ave. NW, to wear masks since the restaurant reopened in July.
They also allow customers to skip on wearing a mask. Additionally, the
restaurant keeps condiment bottles at tables, which is a violation.
Joe Beasley cites several reasons for not requiring employees or customers
to wear masks in the restaurant.
"There is no law. It's the governor's request," he said. He also questions
whether masks help to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
The couple's actions contradict orders issued by the director of the Ohio
Department of Health. The orders were issued and revised as part of the
state's attempt to curb the spread of the coronavirus.
That led to civil action filed against the couple and the business for
failing to comply with the regulations.
Compliance officers with the Stark County Health Department have tried to
work with the restaurant owners, said Deborah Dawson, an assistant Stark
County prosecutor who represents the health agency. The Beasleys have
declined to follow regulations and that led to the civil suit, she said.
Health officials have had similar disputes with other restaurants and
business owners during the course of the pandemic, but Lake Varsity Diner
and the Beasleys are the first taken to Common Pleas Court.
The goal is to get the restaurant waitresses, hosts and cashiers to follow
regulations and wear masks when interacting with customers, Dawson said.
After meeting with county health officials, other businesses have agreed
to comply with the state regulations, Dawson said. In some instances,
pressure from the public persuaded businesses to comply with the
regulations.
Court records show that in October a compliance officer with the Stark
County Health Department visited the restaurant at 13367 Cleveland Ave. NW
and discussed the violations with Joe Beasley. A complaint was filed in
November and the Beasleys were summoned to court in December.
In January, the couple filed to move the case to federal court, but the
request was denied. On Monday, the Beasleys asked U.S. District Court Judge
John Adams to reconsider that decision. In the meantime, a hearing is set
for March 1 before Stark County Common Pleas Court Natalie Haupt.
Wearing a mask could lead to serious problems for restaurant operators,
Joe Beasley said. He's concerned that speaking through the mask can jumble
communications. It's possible that special requests on food orders could be
confused, which could result in a customer becoming ill if they have an
allergic reaction.
He also said that masks are a medical device and he isn't licensed to
prescribe or require employees or customers to wear a mask. He believes it
would be a violation of the law for him to instruct people to use a medical
device.
Joe Beasley said he wants the case moved to federal court because it
involves the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He also contends
the complaint is unconstitutional because it involves selective
prosecution, and there are due process violations and violations of equal
protection laws.
The restaurant has remained open during the dispute, operating from 11
a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday.
Court records show that in October a compliance officer with the Stark
County Health Department visited the restaurant at 13367 Cleveland Ave. NW
and discussed the violations with Joe Beasley. A complaint was filed in
November and the Beasleys were summoned to court in December.
In January, the couple filed to move the case to federal court, but the
request was denied. On Monday, the Beasleys asked U.S. District Court Judge
John Adams to reconsider that decision. In the meantime, a hearing is set
for March 1 before Stark County Common Pleas Court Natalie Haupt.
Wearing a mask could lead to serious problems for restaurant operators,
Joe Beasley said. He's concerned that speaking through the mask can jumble
communications. It's possible that special requests on food orders could be
confused, which could result in a customer becoming ill if they have an
allergic reaction.
He also said that masks are a medical device and he isn't licensed to
prescribe or require employees or customers to wear a mask. He believes it
would be a violation of the law for him to instruct people to use a medical
device.
Joe Beasley said he wants the case moved to federal court because it
involves the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He also contends
the complaint is unconstitutional because it involves selective
prosecution, and there are due process violations and violations of equal
protection laws.
The restaurant has remained open during the dispute, operating from 11
a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday.
When Gov. Mike DeWine and the state health department ordered
non-essential businesses to close last March, the Beasleys continued to
offer carryout orders. Joe Beasley said carryout business was strong.
"Our customers were awesome," he said.
Slightly more than half of the restaurant's business still is carryout,
Joe Beasley said. Sales last year came in slightly less than two-thirds of
the 2019 sales, he said.
Meanwhile, the restaurant's battle with health department officials has
garnered the Beasleys some attention from groups around Ohio that oppose
restrictions put in place during the coronavirus pandemic.
Joe Beasley is set to address a meeting of Totally Engaged Americans (TEA)
in Lorain County and discuss how he has "experienced the wrath of those
carrying out DeWine's tyrannical policies."
The program begins at 9 a.m. at the former UAW Hall, 5300 Baumhart Road,
Lorain. It is open to the public.
