can i ask you why five copies ?
THIS EMAIL TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED, AND MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION THAT IS COVERED BY THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS PRIVACY ACT (18
USC §§ 2510-2521). IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE
TO DELIVER THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT
ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED.. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR; PLEASE NOTIFY BY
EMAIL AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AND THANK YOU
**********PUBLIC NOTICE***********
Not Legal or Tax Advice - seek competent counsel where needed. Opinions
expressed are just options, not advice.
PRIVATE: This is Not A Public Communication! This is Private!
This private email message, and any attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and is for the sole use of
the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential information.
To all public servants, including but not limited to Federal, State, or Local
corporate government(s): I accept your oath of office as your firm and binding
contract between you and me, one of the People, whereby you have promised to
serve, protect, and defend me, guarantee all of my unalienable rights, and
defend the Constitution for the united States of America. Any/all political,
private, or public entities, International, Federal, State, or Local corporate
government(s), private International Organization(s), Municipality(ies),
Corporate agent(s), informant(s), investigator(s) et. al., and/or third
party(ies) working in collusion by monitoring My (this email) email(s), and any
other means of communication without My express written permission are barred
from any review, use, disclosure, or distribution. With explicit reservation of
all My rights, without prejudice and without recourse to any of My rights. Any
omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or all intellectual property
rights or reserved rights.
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent / Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.
IMPORTANT MESSAGE:
All email sent and offered to Me is accepted for value. All email sent by Me is
private, non-negotiable, exempt from levy,
confidential, and is for the intended recipient only. I reserve all of My
rights with prejudice, without recourse, and waive none.
Whatever is authored by Me is copy protected and remains as My property.
Access, disclosure, distribution, copying of and or copying by any means by any
device or retrieval systems is prohibited without the explicit written
permission of the author.
Violations, infringements, and or offenses may result in civil and or criminal
actions, and or tried by common law. : Elliot-Travis: Hasse©, TTEE.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2021, at 12:14 PM, Schaefer Carl <schaeferfreight@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Stop the Judge, Prosecutor, Governor, Policy-Police, Cop, Sheriff,
immediately, anywhere, anytime. Demand their Assumed Name, or Fictitious Name
Registration Certificate, then tell them to call their supervisor, if they
don't understand. Without it, they must leave. Also, get your own Assumed
Name Certificate, (best one is from Minnesota Secretary of State-check box as
Nameholder). The website lets you register names online, and system will
email back, your certificate upon CCard payment, immediately. If you go to
court, you take (5) copies to time stamp at Clerk of Court window, before
going into courtroom. You will be treated totally different. Many magistrates
will see the Certificate, and understand the you figured out the matter of
standing. They have no standing, but you do, and you are a fact. The courts
have a motto, and it is that their quasi-court, will try no fact and no law.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy Tablet
-------- Original message --------
From: J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2/17/21 7:09 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Stark County restaurant
facing civil action after not complying with Ohio's mask rules
evidence of said statement ? "does not apply if you are not an employee" i
think if we told the judgemeame or the cop that, they would laugh without
evidence that i can point to via their USC Code
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 2:54 PM The Experts <experts303@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
People, the corporations can not overthrought the constitution because it is
a contract between the people and the corporations.... AND nothing more...
The overpowering media can not make law, US congress can only make law for
themself and does not apply if you are not an employee
Sincerely Enjoy life,
By:Daniel Henderson Hornburg
All rights reserved UCC 1-308
"OUTSMART, OUTGUN & OUTLAST Your Competition!"
For entertainment Only/Not legal advice.
As a disclaimer, I am not a Republican just an honest observer
without all the emotional baggage and social programming.
I do not take part in the pharmaceutical religion, My right to choose my
Spirituality!
If you don't know your rights, you don’t know your options and/or the
opportunities!
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:58 AM Victoria Ingram <147369258y@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Don, that is in Ohio.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:24 PM Victoria Ingram <147369258y@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
LAKE TWP. The owners of the Lake Varsity Diner have found themselves in a
court battle with Stark County officials because of the state's policies
on wearing masks.
Joe and Colleen Beasley are hoping to move the case out of Stark County
Common Pleas Court and into U.S. District Court, although that request
already has been rejected once.
The Beasleys haven't required employees of the Lake Varsity Diner, 13367
Cleveland Ave. NW, to wear masks since the restaurant reopened in July.
They also allow customers to skip on wearing a mask. Additionally, the
restaurant keeps condiment bottles at tables, which is a violation.
Joe Beasley cites several reasons for not requiring employees or customers
to wear masks in the restaurant.
"There is no law. It's the governor's request," he said. He also questions
whether masks help to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
LAKE TWP. The owners of the Lake Varsity Diner have found themselves in a
court battle with Stark County officials because of the state's policies
on wearing masks.
Joe and Colleen Beasley are hoping to move the case out of Stark County
Common Pleas Court and into U.S. District Court, although that request
already has been rejected once.
The Beasleys haven't required employees of the Lake Varsity Diner, 13367
Cleveland Ave. NW, to wear masks since the restaurant reopened in July.
They also allow customers to skip on wearing a mask. Additionally, the
restaurant keeps condiment bottles at tables, which is a violation.
Joe Beasley cites several reasons for not requiring employees or customers
to wear masks in the restaurant.
"There is no law. It's the governor's request," he said. He also questions
whether masks help to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
The couple's actions contradict orders issued by the director of the Ohio
Department of Health. The orders were issued and revised as part of the
state's attempt to curb the spread of the coronavirus.
That led to civil action filed against the couple and the business for
failing to comply with the regulations.
Compliance officers with the Stark County Health Department have tried to
work with the restaurant owners, said Deborah Dawson, an assistant Stark
County prosecutor who represents the health agency. The Beasleys have
declined to follow regulations and that led to the civil suit, she said.
LAKE TWP. The owners of the Lake Varsity Diner have found themselves in a
court battle with Stark County officials because of the state's policies
on wearing masks.
Joe and Colleen Beasley are hoping to move the case out of Stark County
Common Pleas Court and into U.S. District Court, although that request
already has been rejected once.
The Beasleys haven't required employees of the Lake Varsity Diner, 13367
Cleveland Ave. NW, to wear masks since the restaurant reopened in July.
They also allow customers to skip on wearing a mask. Additionally, the
restaurant keeps condiment bottles at tables, which is a violation.
Joe Beasley cites several reasons for not requiring employees or customers
to wear masks in the restaurant.
"There is no law. It's the governor's request," he said. He also questions
whether masks help to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
The couple's actions contradict orders issued by the director of the Ohio
Department of Health. The orders were issued and revised as part of the
state's attempt to curb the spread of the coronavirus.
That led to civil action filed against the couple and the business for
failing to comply with the regulations.
Compliance officers with the Stark County Health Department have tried to
work with the restaurant owners, said Deborah Dawson, an assistant Stark
County prosecutor who represents the health agency. The Beasleys have
declined to follow regulations and that led to the civil suit, she said.
Health officials have had similar disputes with other restaurants and
business owners during the course of the pandemic, but Lake Varsity Diner
and the Beasleys are the first taken to Common Pleas Court.
The goal is to get the restaurant waitresses, hosts and cashiers to follow
regulations and wear masks when interacting with customers, Dawson said.
After meeting with county health officials, other businesses have agreed
to comply with the state regulations, Dawson said. In some instances,
pressure from the public persuaded businesses to comply with the
regulations.
Court records show that in October a compliance officer with the Stark
County Health Department visited the restaurant at 13367 Cleveland Ave. NW
and discussed the violations with Joe Beasley. A complaint was filed in
November and the Beasleys were summoned to court in December.
In January, the couple filed to move the case to federal court, but the
request was denied. On Monday, the Beasleys asked U.S. District Court
Judge John Adams to reconsider that decision. In the meantime, a hearing
is set for March 1 before Stark County Common Pleas Court Natalie Haupt.
Wearing a mask could lead to serious problems for restaurant operators,
Joe Beasley said. He's concerned that speaking through the mask can jumble
communications. It's possible that special requests on food orders could
be confused, which could result in a customer becoming ill if they have an
allergic reaction.
He also said that masks are a medical device and he isn't licensed to
prescribe or require employees or customers to wear a mask. He believes it
would be a violation of the law for him to instruct people to use a
medical device.
Joe Beasley said he wants the case moved to federal court because it
involves the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He also contends
the complaint is unconstitutional because it involves selective
prosecution, and there are due process violations and violations of equal
protection laws.
The restaurant has remained open during the dispute, operating from 11
a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday.
Court records show that in October a compliance officer with the Stark
County Health Department visited the restaurant at 13367 Cleveland Ave. NW
and discussed the violations with Joe Beasley. A complaint was filed in
November and the Beasleys were summoned to court in December.
In January, the couple filed to move the case to federal court, but the
request was denied. On Monday, the Beasleys asked U.S. District Court
Judge John Adams to reconsider that decision. In the meantime, a hearing
is set for March 1 before Stark County Common Pleas Court Natalie Haupt.
Wearing a mask could lead to serious problems for restaurant operators,
Joe Beasley said. He's concerned that speaking through the mask can jumble
communications. It's possible that special requests on food orders could
be confused, which could result in a customer becoming ill if they have an
allergic reaction.
He also said that masks are a medical device and he isn't licensed to
prescribe or require employees or customers to wear a mask. He believes it
would be a violation of the law for him to instruct people to use a
medical device.
Joe Beasley said he wants the case moved to federal court because it
involves the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He also contends
the complaint is unconstitutional because it involves selective
prosecution, and there are due process violations and violations of equal
protection laws.
The restaurant has remained open during the dispute, operating from 11
a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday.
When Gov. Mike DeWine and the state health department ordered
non-essential businesses to close last March, the Beasleys continued to
offer carryout orders. Joe Beasley said carryout business was strong.
"Our customers were awesome," he said.
Slightly more than half of the restaurant's business still is carryout,
Joe Beasley said. Sales last year came in slightly less than two-thirds of
the 2019 sales, he said.
Meanwhile, the restaurant's battle with health department officials has
garnered the Beasleys some attention from groups around Ohio that oppose
restrictions put in place during the coronavirus pandemic.
Joe Beasley is set to address a meeting of Totally Engaged Americans (TEA)
in Lorain County and discuss how he has "experienced the wrath of those
carrying out DeWine's tyrannical policies."
The program begins at 9 a.m. at the former UAW Hall, 5300 Baumhart Road,
Lorain. It is open to the public.
