My belief of this. SSI in many cases are paid by you into a fund. Now is
your choice to sue and recover or accept benefits. It has nothing to do
with your other choices of paying taxes etc. You can be a sovereign here
and not there. Your choice. The reason is that government (servant) can't
contract with inherent sovereign. To do so it requires you to write the
contract or they assume authority over you. They can not habe authority
over you as a limited granted sovereign. We inherited our sovereignty from
the King kings.
I professionally get SSI and exercise my inherent sovereign in other
matters. Nine years an non issue So far.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 9:50 AM Sarah King <sarahking504@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Micah posted a question yesterday about SSI benefits. I responded to his--
post with the message below. We would love feedback from anyone with a
better understanding of the ramifications of accepting assistance. Thanks
in advance!
I'm a bit confused about government assistance. My research with
Sovereignty started with Albert Barcroft's The Greatest Story Never Told
Until Now. It's a great book (and the audio book is available for free on
www.citizenchains.com) and really explained where our country went wrong
and how we ended up where we are today. I then found Glen's videos and this
group. My understanding is that once you become a sovereign citizen, you
gain freedom but loose the benefits. I thought that you had to choose
between the benefits and freedom. From what I researched, if we accept any
benefits, we are agreeing to be their fictitious entity by offer of
contract. This would allow a kangaroo court to show jurisdiction over us as
a U.S. Citizen slave. We are basically agreeing to represent the strawman.
I could have misunderstood so I'd love incite on this topic. In my case, I
am in the process of challenging jurisdiction in Texas for a "criminal"
charge. So perhaps if someone is not facing legal matters like mine,
accepting assistance might be safe? As of right now, I'm too scared to take
any assistance for fear that it would nullify my efforts to challenge
jurisdiction. That being said, I have a medical issue and really need a
surgery that I can't afford. So Medicaid would be really helpful at this
time. But if I had to choose, I choose freedom over assistance. I would
love any feedback and clarification. Thanks in advance!
