Humm city council
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021, 12:48 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seldom does an oath taker get convicted of violating a free citizens
constitution. I assume that is because we are approaching it wrong. So here
is what I'm leaning to.
The state of.... Is responsible to run the public codes and make sure the
state is constitutional. Looking at several state attorney general websites
states that is so. I've had recent experience of success not on crimes but
financial remedy. Not sure if it was a fluke or something that will work
consistently. Once financial proven then I would say they would handle the
crimes. So once the court is filed or served on the record article 1817
Status time for remedy. Judge will grant it sometimes. Especially if
charge is very low. So go to attorney general who is the responsible party.
I've recently had success here but not enough cases to say it is reliable.
It may be the answer. If I start having issues there I have two choices. Go
to United States attorney general or court.
Court: I've had success sending agencies a claim to which they do not
answer. Go to the court and ask for a court date on the matter for default
judgement. That requires sending agency involved another notice to appear
in court. They do not show up you win. No one has shown up so far but not
done enough for me to say it is reliable. Not done with large sum cases but
working on that now. So that maybe another answer.
That is my experience and knowledge and your research may find the answer
your looking for.
On Apr 14, 2021, 8:55 AM -0600, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
If a public servant officer commits a crime, like witholding evidence of a
crime by failing to report a private citizen of a crime, and evidence of
that crime is presented to city council who have a correct oath to the
Constitutions, is city council obliged to formally charge said public
servant officer? Or can a curt council ignore evidence of a crime once
noticed?
