NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media
aswidely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We thePeople;
e.g., click “Reply All” and “Send”. To subscribeto articles
similar to the one hereunder go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;
<left panel↓Register or + New or Users >Add New; or fill out the New
User form at https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php .
The text below had a consistent format when sent. If it
shows irregularities when received, such as joinedwords or fonts of different
sizes, they crept in during transit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook
them. A pdf version of this article -as such likely to be free of
irregularities- is found here and downloadable through the next link.
In search of one or more knowledgeable, experienced, andfinancially capable
law firms, investigative journalists, and IT experts
with whom to join forces to further prosecute
cases with national scope ripe for class action‡ ‡
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_proposal_for_class_actions.pdf
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, ;
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Attorneys, Journalists, IT experts, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
1. I am searching for qualified parties among you to whom to propose a joint
venture to further prosecute any or all of the three cases that I1 have brought
to ripeness for class action2.
2. This search is an exercise of the rights most cherished by We the People,
namely, those guaranteed by the 1st Amendment to the Constitution to “freedom
of speech, of the press, the right of the people [the sovereign source of all
public power in a democracy] peaceably to assemble [on the Internet too], and
to petition [also through class actions] the Government [such as its third
branch, the judiciary, and its agencies, e.g., Medicare; as well as private
parties] for a redress [through accountability and compensation] of
grievances”.
3. If after reading the cases' brief description below you determine that you
do nothave any conflict of interests, you can go to the file at ‡, which has
linksto detailed information.
a. Medicare administers $100s of billions for the benefit of its more than
33million insureds. It works with hundreds of HMOs and other health
insuranceentities. They have common interests: paythe fewest claims and attract
to, and maintain in their, networks the largestnumber of medical services
providers.
1) To advance their interests they:
a) deny anduphold the denial of as many of their insureds’ claims as possible;
b) disregardthe legal obligation to accept as total payment Medicare’s
schedules of feesfor services; and
c) condone the billing of insureds for the unpaid balance.
2) Mostinsureds who appeal denials and balance billing appear pro se. Due to
their ignorance of the law, they are abused.
3) I appealed to the Medicare Appeals Council. After I appeal to the
MedicareBoard, the class action can be filed in a federal district court.3 The
recovery can be huge and force transformative change in the health insurance
system.
b. Walgreens is described as havinghad $139.5 billion in revenue in 2020 and
277,000 employees in 2021. Itspurchase-incentivizing program is Cash Rewards.
It is a misnomer, for rewardsare not earned by paying in cash and cannot be
redeemed for cash despite itsfalse advertisement: “Save time. Redeem your
rewardsinstantly at checkout”. Butat checkout you cannot pay the total cost of
the purchase with your CashRewards. You can only apply a single “tier” of $1,
$3, $5, or $10 if it is equal toor less than the purchase cost. You must pay
the balance with your money. Yourrewards, though earned, are not yours, for
they expire. The program is a baitand switch scam.
1) This is a test case for suing big businesses that makeenormous gains by
defrauding millions of customers of small amounts that do notjustify the
substantial cost of individual prosecution.
c. While servingas a grand juror, I witnessed how prosecutors and New York
Police Department (NYPD) officers charged peoplewith a murder that the latter
could not have committed because no evidence of acrime was presented: No
footage of the crime or photos of the victim or thestreet crime scene, or
incident or autopsy report. The indictment was sought forplea bargain leverage
in reliance on grand jurors’ indifference and uncriticaljudgment. When I asked
critical questions, the presenting and the supervisingprosecutors referred me
to the grand jury judge, who discharged me.
1) I describedthese events in a 4,743-word, 8-page sworn statement and
submitted itto the administrative judge. Late enough, he sent it to the grand
jury judge, who with no discussiondismissed it on the trivial fact that the
grand jury term had expired. I fileda complaint with the NY State ChiefJudge,
the NYS andNYC administrative judges, the NYPD Internal Affairs Bureau chief
and the Commissioner, the Bronx council members, public advocates, et al., who
have not replied.
2) They formthe defendant class: They do not investigate judges to avoid
retaliation4. Their dereliction of duty is apolicy and a systemic cover-up
based on actual or constructive complicitcoordination. Acting under color of
law, they have violated the civil rights ofthe likely thousands of people whom
they have, and allowed to be, indicted on false accusations,thus causing them
injury in fact resulting from their having to bear the cost of bail,
incarceration, and a criminal record.
3) Thosepeople’s class action can earn their attorneys vast rewards, including
treble damages, attorney's fees, and national recognitionas Champions of
Justice.5
4. Ioffer to make a presentation on these cases via video conference or, if in
New York City, in person.
Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money Put your money
where your outrage at abuse and
quest for justice are. Support the professional law research and writing, and
strategic thinking conducted at Judicial Discipline Reform
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. DONATE by making a deposit or ;
an online transfer through
either the Bill Pay feature of your online account or Zelle
from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673; or Citi Bank
account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner BlvdBronx, New York City 10472-6506 tel.
+1(718)827-9521Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b ;
***************************************
ENDNOTES
1 This letter and its above-stated link‡ can be shared withothers who are
potentially interested in joining any of the class actions under FRCP Rule 23
andattending my presentation on this proposal. The latter is supported by
myprofessional law research and writing, and strategic thinking; they are
theskills that undergird my three-volume study* † ♣ of judgesand their
judiciaries, which is titledand downloadable thus:
ExposingJudges' Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field ofjudicial unaccountability reporting*
† ♣
a. The study collects and discusses abundantevidence(OL:194§E) showing
thatjudges ensure each other’s unaccountability. They are also
protectedconnivingly by the politicians who put themin office and for whom they
are ‘our men and women on the bench’. Judgesengage in abuse of power risklessly
for their gain and convenience individually and as a coordinatedclass. Their
patternof conduct shows that theyrun their judiciary as a racketeering
enterprise.
b. Some of my articleshave been posted to my website Judicial Discipline Reform
at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. That site has attracted ;
countlesswebvisitors and as of 9 December 2022, had turned into subscribers
45,801 ofthem. They are potential class members.
2 Theclass actions can expect sympathetic juries. Indeed, since the advent of
the MeToo!and BLM movements, and the demonstrations against police brutality,
andracial and socio-economic inequality, the national public has become ever
moreintolerant of all forms of abuse, as expressed in its self-assertive
rallyingcry:
Enough is enough!
We won’t take any abuse from anybody anymore.
a. Trump lawyers settled a case on their way tothe first trial day rather than
risk a huge verdict from one of the bluecollar juries in the Bronx, NY City,
known for their distrust of, and resentment toward, big companies
andgovernment; and more ready than others to "stick it to them".
3 Victims of abuse byMedicare officers, including administrative law judges,
can share their storywith the Medicare Appeals Council. The latter is the
fourth of five levels ofappeal in the Medicare system (the fifth level appeal
lies with the MedicareAppeals Board). Hence, if you have not gone through the
previous appeal levels,which begins with your HMO or other medical services or
equipment provider, theCouncil will not treat your story as a complaint on
appeal. However, you togetherwith as many victims as possible can submit your
story in order to inform the Councilof the nature, frequency, and gravity of
abuse within the Medicare system.
a. By writing your story, you take the first steptoward showing that you have
questions of law or fact and claims common to theclass suing Medicare and
providers, and qualify as a member of it(R.23(a)), entitled to share in any
compensation that the action may win for it. b. Your story must be brief,
written in only up to 500 words. Never-endingrambling and whining sagas are
wasteful of your and everybody else’s effort andtime. They are not read to the
end or taken seriously. c. By contrast, a brief story is more likely to be
impactful ifit consists only of the most outrageous, accurate, and verifiable
facts, names,and addresses identifying only the most relevant events that
occurred duringmonths or years of abuse. To learn how to write such a story,
read and applythe two-phasemethod for writing your story in up to 500 words.
You will be happilysurprised by how helpful that method is in writing an
informative and usefulstory. d. Indeed, your story can contribute to detecting
the mostpersuasive type of evidence of abuse: patterns of conduct of the same
orrelated officers and their cronies that harm many unrelated individuals
insimilar ways. A pattern of similarities may show that officers and cronies
actedin coordination and that an individual should be considered a member of
theclass action. e. By writing your story, you too will be asserting the
mostcherished rights of We the People, to wit, those guaranteed by the
FirstAmendment to “freedom of speech, of the press, the right of the people
peaceablyto assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances [including the payment of compensation]”.
f. Add at the topof your story the following reference; and mail and email it
to the following addresses:
Reference: for consideration by the MedicareAppeals Council and the Board in
appealM-23-386
1) Go to https://dab.efile.hhs.gov/, register, and“File correspondence…and ;
otherwritten material in pending case” M-23-386.
2) Department of Health and HumanServices
Departmental Appeals Board
Medicare Appeals Council, MS 6127 Cohen Building Room G-644 330
Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20201
3) DABMODHotline@xxxxxxx, appeals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
4 Developments in the judiciary establish strong precedents that support a
favorable expectation:
a. Inthe civil suit Stricklandv. U.S., the Judicial Conference of the U.S., the
Administrative Office of the U.S., et al., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Fourth Circuit held on April 26, 2022, that the Federal Judiciary and its
judgesin their official and individual capacities can on due process and
equalprotection grounds be sued and held liable. The plaintiff’s exposure of
4thCircuit judges’ complicit coordination caused the bench to recuse
themselves! Judgesfrom other circuits were seated by designation on the
three-judge appellate panel.
b. Ninety gymnasts sued the FBIand agents for over $1 billion last June 8 for
its failure to act on the complaints against sexual predator Dr. Larry Nassar
broughtto FBI agents and the FBI’s cover-up of their dereliction of duty. This
is in addition to the $380 million that USAGymnastics and the U.S. Olympic
Committee had to pay to Nassar sexual abusevictims.
c. A PA state court ordered judges who sent juvenilesto government
paid/privately run detention facilities in exchange for kickbacks to pay $206
million in compensatory and punitive damages.
5 The Wall Street Journal revealed that federal judges hear cases in which
they have a financial interest,thus breaking the law.
a. Led by their motive of protecting their illegal gains, they intercept(18
U.S.C. §§2511) people’s emails and mail to detect and suppress those of their
critics.
b. The Federal Judiciary has themeans of doing so, as it runs one of the
largest national computer networks andhas the Information Technology (IT)
expertise necessary therefor: It handles dailythe filing, retrieval, and
storage of hundreds of millions of briefs, motions,applications, records,
reports, dockets,calendars, orders, decisions, certificates, etc., through its
Public Access toCourtElectronic Records (PACER)system.
c. Judges have the opportunity to also compel such interception by
theintelligence agencies to which in a quid pro quo they grant 100% of their
secretrequests for secret orders for secret surveillance under the Foreign
IntelligenceSurveillance Act(50 U.S.C §§1801-1885c).
d. There is proposed to hire ITexperts to examine the communications and
computers of judges’ critics. Theexposure of judges’ interception in a suit
with RICO(18 U.S.C. §1961) counts on behalf of theirvictims can generate
national outrage, treble damages, and attorneys’ fees. Seeformer CBS reporter
Sharyl Attkisson’s suit against the Department of Justicefor $35 million. The
examination can be announcedat a press conference intended to capture national
attention and to interest criticsand victims of judges’ abuse in sharing their
stories with the IT experts.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b ;
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloudstorage
accounts described at *>ggl:1 etseq.and † >OL2:1114§G, when emailing him,copy
the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of youremail
so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at oneof those
addresses.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.
***************************************
