[administrating-your-public-servants] Proposal for a webinar on lawyers, clients, and pro ses obtaining compensation for judges' abuse of power and concealment of financial interests and holding unprecedented citizens hearings
- From: "cordero" <dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ("dr.richard.cordero_esq")
- To: "arubyrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arubyrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "abuse-of-power-by-judges-private-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <abuse-of-power-by-judges-private-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of thisemail.
You are encouraged to share and postit to social media as widely as
possible in your own interest and that of therest of We the People; e.g.,click
“Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register or +New
or Users >Add New.
The article belowhad a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received,they crept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them. Proposal for a webinar
on the implications for lawyers, their clients, and pro ses
of recent exposure by top media of
judges’ abuse of power and concealment of financial interests:
collective demand for compensation by applying
judges’ own decisions on Catholic Church pedophilia liability and
the principle “[dishonesty] Too big [for the judiciaries] to fail to know”; and
the expansion by Continued Legal Education companies of
their business by promoting the holding of
unprecedented citizens
hearingshttp://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_webinar_judges_abuse_compensation.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero,Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Continued Legal Education companies, Lawyers, Clients, Pro ses, Media
Outlets and Journalists, Graduate Schools, Professors, and Students, and
Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Kindly find below my proposal for awebinar-cum-presentation that is founded on
current extraordinary journalistic articlespublished by top media outlets; a
professional study of judges and theirjudiciaries; and my website, namely,
Judicial Discipline Reform, at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, which ;
as of today,October 29, has 40,037 subscribers. Do you know of any law firm,
letalone a lawyer, who has a website with so many subscribers? I bring to the
table something foundof value by the highly educated and well-off people that
read law journals and long-formarticles, like the one below. The proposed
webinar will appeal tothem because it lays out a concrete and realistic
strategy for obtaining what lawyers,their clients, pro ses, and everybody else
want: compensation for the waste and harmthat have been inflicted on them.
Therefore, I look forward todiscussing this webinar proposal with you and your
colleagues.
A. Proposal for a webinar on compensation for judges’harmful conduct 1. The
first part of this webinar dealswith the exposure by top media outlets and a
VIP of judges' abuseof power and concealed financial interests in cases before
them andhow lawyers, their clients, and pro ses can collectively demand
compensation byapplying the judges’ own decisions on Catholic Church pedophilia
liability; and aprinciple with a very familiar ring to it: “[dishonesty] Too
big [for thejudiciaries] to fail to know”;while Continued Legal Education
companies (hereinafter CLEs) can expand theirbusiness by facilitating such
demand. 2. Indeed,The Wall Street Journal, in itsarticle “131 Federal Judges
Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had aFinancial Interest”, published
initially on September 28, 2021, andsubsequently updated with judges’ reactions
to it, wrote thus: "[Federal] judges failed to recuse themselvesfrom 685
lawsuits from 2010 to 2018 involving firms in which they or theirfamily held
shares, a Wall Street Journalinvestigation found...Alerted to the violations by
the Journal, 56 of the judges have directed court clerks to notifyparties in
329 lawsuits that they should have recused themselves. That meansnew judges
might be assigned, potentially upending rulings." 3. One need not be a lawyer
to beimmediately assaulted by questions like these: a. Who is going to pay for
the new trial? b. Who is going to bear the enormous cost duringan uncharted
process of disentangling the contractual relations based ondecisions now
tainted with judges’ bias toward their own financial interestsregardless of
whether the decisions are formally voided? c.i. The judges submitted their
mandatory annualfinancial disclosure reports under the Ethics in Government
Act(5 U.S.C. §101(f)(11) etseq.) to the Committee on Financial Disclosure of
the Judicial Conferenceof the U.S. That Conference is presided over by the
Chief Justice of the SupremeCourt, who appoints the Committee members, all of
whom are also federal judges. The Conference includes all the chief judges of
the 13 circuits as well as representativedistrict, bankruptcy, and magistrate
judges.(28 U.S.C. §331-332) c.ii. Hence, the Federal Judiciary has been in
aposition and has had the duty of due diligence to ascertain that there was
noconflict of financial interests requiring judges’ recusal from cases as to
whichthe Judiciary had all public documents and even confidential ones, as well
astotal control over its procedure. It follows that the Judiciary has had
actualand imputed knowledge of the judges’ illegal conduct. c.iii. The
practice ofconcealing financial interests is so widespread and involves such
pitcher-catchercoordination between judges and a complicit Committee of peers,
colleagues, andfriends as to render applicable the principle “[dishonesty] Too
big [for the Judiciary] to fail to know”. Therebyliability has become
institutionalized, attaching to the Federal Judiciaryitself, which covered up
for its judges, just as it was institutionalized whenjudges held the Catholic
Church liable for the crimes of pedophilic priests andits cover-up thereof.
c.iv.How can harmed lawyers, clients, and pro se hold the Federal Judiciary
liablefor compensatory and even punitive damages when the Judiciary is the
judge inevery case against it? The Judiciary is incriminated by its record of
self-disciplinedishonesty: Chief circuit judges abuse their power to
dismiss100% of complaints filed against judges in their respective circuit,
asdo the circuits’ judicial councils, which deny100% of the petitions to review
those dismissals.
1) So did Then-Chief Judge Merrick Garland of the Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit, Now-Attorney General; and Then-Judges,
Now-Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Connie
Barrett, and John Roberts, as shown by the official statistics submitted to
Congress as a public document in the Annual Report of the Director of the
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, who is appointed by the Chief
Justice(28 U.S.C. §§1,3(a)(3-4), (h)(2)). c.v.The prosecution of collective
demands for compensation can give rise to a nichepractice. Lawyers will soon
invoke the equal protection clause to require that anyapplicable statute of
limitations be pushed back or lifted just as “lookback”laws have done with
those statutes that would have barred claims againstpedophilic priests and the
Catholic Church. c.vi. Such demands can have grave non-pecuniary consequences.
Discovery andfurther journalistic(OL:194§E) exposures can so inform and outrage
the public and make it demonstrate its loss oftrust as to make inevitable the
resignation of judges, justices, courts,and even bring down, not only the head
of a branch and “All the President’s Men”, but rather a government branch
itself. c.vii.Such imaginative and courageous prosecution requires lawyers and
students madeof the ‘stuff’ of which nationally recognized and historic
Champions of Justiceare made. It can be set in motion by CLEs, unless they want
to cede theopportunity to media outlets.
1. The webinar’s foundation provided by top mediaoutlets and a study of judges
and their judiciaries
4. This webinar has a solid foundation in the recentarticles and reports that,
as discussed in myarticle related hereto, have been published by: a. The Wall
Street Journal b. Thomson Reuters c. The Boston Globe d. International
Consortium ofInvestigative Journalists, headquartered in D.C, with the
participation of The Washington Post e. Senator Elizabeth Warren 5. In
addition, the webinar is supported by mythree-volume study of judges and their
judiciaries, the product of myprofessional law research and writing, and
strategic thinking. The study istitled and downloadable thus: Exposing
Judges'Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:Pioneering thenews and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability and abuse reporting* † ♣ ♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf ;
fromOL3:1144-1386+
B. Proposal for CLEs to expand their businessand transformatively change the
system of justice 1. CLEs expanding their business to the 40,037+ subscribers
to a website, and to students and schools
6. I have posted my relatedarticle and many others to my website JUDICIAL
DISCIPLINE REFORM at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. They have ;
attracted so many webvisitors that 40,037 and counting have become subscribers
as of October 29, 2021(see thearticle’s Appendix3). 7. These subscribers are
highly educated andwell-off people, the kind that read articles in long form
appearing inpreeminent publications such as The NewYork Times Sunday Edition,
The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, TheNew Yorker, The Atlantic,
TIME, etc. They have the potential for becomingthe CLEs’ new non-lawyer client
base.
8. CLEs can also expand their client base to another constituency that
ifattracted early on in their careers can remain with the CLEs for a very
longtime, namely, students. They are driven by idealism and need to prove
themselvesto prospective employers.
a. Students, in general, will be presented with a proposal for learning and
providing–while in school and thereafter– the legal, journalistic, business,
and Information Technology services that so many parties,including lawyers,
will need to become part of, and pursue, the collective demandfor compensation
for the harm caused by unaccountable judges’ and theirjudiciaries’ abuse of
power and concealed financial interests.
b. Law students, in particular, who currently are confronted with diminishing
chances of finding a job in the legal field, will be interested in this
proposal for acquiring the knowledge and expertise necessary to develop their
own niche practice. 9. Consequently, law schools are facing dwindling
enrollment. They will be interested in the proposal for offering courses,
clinics,and internships dealing with the exposure of judges’ abuse of power
andconcealed financial interests. These educational offerings are apt to
restorethe luster of the schools and lawyers in the eyes of scores of millions
ofcurrent and former parties by assisting them in obtaining compensation.
a. Theycan also provide the means for schools, in general, and their students,
inparticular, to become the citizens inspectors general of the Federal
Judiciary,the model for its state counterparts, the creation of which that
Judiciary hasso adamantly and effectively opposed.
2. A tour of schools to pioneer unprecedented citizens hearings 10. The above
justifies a physical and virtual tour(OL:197§G) of presentations at law schools
as well as journalism, business, andInformation Technology schools, for they
teach subjects vitally necessary toexpose judges’ financial criminality. The
latter includes not only the concealmentof financial interests that require
recusal, but also otherforms of illegal acquisition of assets, evasion of
taxes, and the electronic transfer of money to be hidden, laundered, and
invested. This multidisciplinary approach is epitomized by a course in
Investigative Journalism, Fraud and Forensic Accounting, and Statistical
Analysis.
11. The tour can lay the foundation forthe most promising proposal from a
publicity and commercial point of view: unprecedentedcitizens hearings. They
will enable manylawyers, their clients, pro ses, and others to tell the
national public their stories of the abuseof power by judges that they have
suffered. Those who have witnessed abuse, forinstance, court or law clerks and
even judges, will also be enabled to whistle-blowtheir stories...as have done
employees of Facebook disgusted by their company’sabuse of their client base
and its betrayal of what they felt to be theiridealistic mission as its
employees. 12. The citizens hearings will be organized bystudents, professors,
top media outlets, and VIPs, including principled andopportunistic politicians
running in the mid-term elections. They are to takeplace at university
auditoriums, media stations, and via video conference. Thatway people will be
able to give and hear testimony wherever they are, thussparing themselves
costly travel and room and board expenses.
3. A CLE that leads the way to a new system ofjustice 13. The unprecedented
citizens hearings can occuras the debate is taking place nationally over how to
implement the report ofthe Biden Commission for the reform of the Supreme
Court. The testimony of somany victims of, and witnesses to, judges’ abuse of
power and financial criminality canallow the detection of patterns. The latter
can show abuse and criminality sopervasive and coordinated as to function as
unaccountable judges’ institutionalizedmodus operandi through which they run
their judiciary as a racketeeringenterprise. As a result, the hearingscan
reveal the need to reform, not merely the Supreme Court, but rather all
thecourts and the system of justice itself. 14. By agreeing to offer my
webinar, a CLEcan expand its business well beyond that of its competitors,
which simply offer webinars and perhaps also bar exam preparatory courses.
Where would Amazon be today if it had rejected every opportunityto venture into
new businesses “’cause we only sell books from a garage”? 15. By setting in
motion the unprecedented citizens hearings, a CLE can also become a pioneer
inattaining what Ms.CarolynCaccese, thepresident of the NYS Academy of Trial
Lawyers, states in her comments at thebeginning of the Academy’s webinars: "the
objective of ATL is to protectand defend the civil justice system".
16. That is the objective of my webinar too. Through it, a CLE can lead that
system into a processof change from which it comes out transformed into a
different entity. Therein,We the People, the Masters of all public servants,
will be able toexercise our right to hold judicial public servants accountable
for the publicpower entrusted to them and liable to compensate the victims of
their abuse andcriminality.
C. My offer to present this proposal
17. Therefore, I respectfully offer to make apresentation to you and your
colleagues and guests on how it is in our common commercial and reputational
interest tooffer my webinar...and in joining forces to implement my plan for
thejournalistic investigation of judges(OL:194§E). 18. The presentation can
take place via video conference and, if it is here in NY City, in person.
19. Toassess my capacity to make a presentation you may view my video and
follow it on its slides. 20. Toset the presentation's terms and scheduling use
my contact information below. 21. To contact your potential guests you may
sharethis proposal with all your friends, relatives, and neighbors. 22. Youcan
also post it to social media such as the following so that it may go viral:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn,
Instagram, GooglePlus, Pinterest,
Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsApp, Twitter a.
Send this tweet: Tell your story of judges’ abuse of power& ask for
compensation at unprecedentedcitizens hearings; demand that the Biden
Commission on SCt reform hearyou; invite your audience, the People;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf
D. Every meaningful cause needs resources for itsadvancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money: Lip service
advances nothing;
but it continues to enable the abusers. You can help continue and advance the
cause of
a justice system where all are equally held
accountable for their performance and liable to compensation. DONATE
to Judicial DisciplineReform to support its professional law research and
writing,
and strategic thinking by making a deposit or an onlinetransfer to
Citi Bank, routing number 021 000 089, account 4977 59 2001 through Zelle
through Paypal
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJby
or
by mailing a check to the address below. Dare trigger history!...and you may
enter it. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero,
Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Giventhe ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accountsdescribed at
* >ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G, whenemailing him, copy the above bloc of
his email addresses and paste it in theTo: line of your email so as to enhance
the chances of your email reaching himat least at one of those
addresses.*****************************************
Other related posts:
- » [administrating-your-public-servants] Proposal for a webinar on lawyers, clients, and pro ses obtaining compensation for judges' abuse of power and concealment of financial interests and holding unprecedented citizens hearings - cordero
