Hey, Don, et al,
We, including Dr. Richard Cordero (and/or whoever, whatever) should, more
seriously consider developing and/or establishing a "School of Justice,"
(where we are truly about as much, and up to as much, and not so much of
politics if not politics, otherwise) and take the matter of our needs, to what
is deserved (of serving justice) to our personal and administrative development
from there -- to put it succinctly, (more simply, as to what there is to the
matter) if not merely to the way of truthfully constituting things going
forward if not merely to such forwardness.
Champion of as much
School of Justice, So to Speak, Control, Govern, Rule, Etc., whatever else
should matter, how I figure it does
I Control, Accordingly. I wish if not do as much for everything, of such
everything.
With such "school" (Interactive, Communication based School, if not merely like
this one, but better organized, etc.) I believe we will more logically and
reasonable gain the support we need and deserve in such respect, for who and
what we most care about in such regard, and in dealing with everything,
otherwise. So Logically I Go, and Serve.
Best wishes, So true
Michael Glavic
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022, 11:58:34 p.m. EDT, Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello DBFly Danny:
I understand what you are saying.
Sure, I would love it if our government would just give up if they see citizens
governing themselves in a superior way.
Power, almost never willingly surrenders power.
They will fight to keep their power.
Further, I have seen groups go through a similar process of creating some
demands with a deadline.The deadline comes and goes and nothing happens because
they lack the power, and standing topress their claims. Law Enforcement and the
Military stand with the status quo.
10M was picked because only 3% of the American Colonists actively participated
in the American Revolution.At the time, the population of the US was 300M
But also, during the process, I propose (taken from the Founders roadmap for
dealing with tyranny),by having Committees of Correspoindance we create public
awareness and gain credibility and power.And begin growing our numbers.
I have seen others try similar strategies over the last 20 years.Some have been
deficient in numerical size, some in credibility and somebecause their demands
were not derived via Democratic Process...
In the end they all fail because they presume law enforcement or the
Militarywill enforce there demands...
Right now, the Freedom Trucker Convoy is circling DC waiting for Governmentto
come out and negotiate with them. Government wont come out.As government does
all to often, they will wait until they get bored or go broke and go homeOr
worse, they attack the Capital...
God love these folks but the did not plan out the end stage of this roadmap.
If you have seen the movie Argo, you recall US Embassy Marines in Tehran,
Iranchose to negotiate rather than fire in a defensive manner.There reasoning
was that if they shot even one, the crowd would over well themand the emotions
of the crowd after the death of one of their own would
cause the mob to kill them all.
10M in DC from April to November should be sufficient to cause the government
to
capitulate to our Democratically determined grievances.But 10M of us need to
remain in DC until the government capitulates, whether that
turns into staying over winter or not.
I don't think their is time to make this happen this year,unless you know10M
people willing to drop everything and start
drafting a Declaration of Causes Immediately.
I think a more doable time line is complete the DOC by October and giveCongress
6 months to comply.(Further, States should draft DOCs and serve them on their
Legislatures.)
Again, I don't need to lead this... please someone else step up.here is a rough
draft of a DOC that goes back to 2015 created by
a small group of people.
I provide it only as an idea of what to include.... it got too longbut the nuts
and bolts are in there....We tried to explain them in terms of the Bill of
Rights and Natural LAw.http://rebrand.ly/DOCDraft
Again, I treat these interactions as mutual learning opportunities.I always
warn about not becoming mutual admiration societies.At the same time, the
Founders fought like cats and dogs.I would hope to avoid that, but it it comes
to be... who are we to not emulate the founders.
Proof of Treason, Sedition and Conspiracy Against Rights
http://rebrand.ly/ProgsLaugh
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022, 11:59:59 AM CDT, <dbflys@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don, thank you so much for laying all of that out. I’m new to this group and
I have to say that I became excited about what you are doing and encouraging
others to do.
The part that doesn’t seem to make as much sense is the part where we go to DC.
Why bother?
The United States Corporation doesn’t care about anything but profit. What
would be in it for them to cooperate with us?
Why not get the local townspeople to “switch over” from the corporation to
something that serves them by way of the Committees of Correspondence, for
example, and let the old skin (U.S. Corp.) shed itself naturally? If we all
decide to stop paying taxes and buying their corporate products and services,
they should die off fairly quickly, don’t you think? Why, we could even decide
to jail them with the full support of We the People.
I know that I am putting myself out there vulnerably to a few people that could
be ready to bite my head off because of what I DON’T know. Please be
respectful, everyone, when you respond to my sincere query.
Kindly,
Danny
On Mar 23, 2022, at 11:14, Don Mashak ("donmashak")
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello:
Perhaps the Founder's labeling it Committees of Correspondance is misleading.
I realize we have other means of communication. But here is a snippet from an
article I am currently writing
to make it clear the Committees of Correspondance were so much more than means
of communication.
(Also there were 2 additional "Committees", eg Committees of Safety)
In 1764 & 1765, the forerunners of Committees ofCorrespondence were created in
Boston, MA & NY, NY, in opposition to theCurrency Act and the Stamp Act,
respectively.
In 1772, Samuel Adams founded the first official Committeeof Correspondence
(COC). The COC concept spread throughout the colonies.
In 1774, All but one of the colonies had COCs. Theexisting COCs established The
First Continental Congress to organizeopposition to the Coercive Acts, known to
American Colonists as the IntolerableActs. This was an age before mass
communications and in a time of BritishCensorship of the few newspapers that
existed. Thus, another PARADIGM SHIFT occurred, as COCs became& served as a
necessary & effective method of sharing information.
By 1775, All of the Colonies had COCs & therevolution PARADIGM PARADIGM SHIFT
of COCs serving as “shadowgovernments, occurred. The COCs were seen by the
American Colonists ashaving more power than the colonial legislatures and local
British officials.The exchange of information between the COCs coordinated
their efforts and builtthe patriots’ resolve and solidarity & created a common
‘Perspective ofReality’
Committees of correspondence meeting in person also build resolve and
solidarity.They began making official demands on the Government.
It gets the general public comfortable with seeing them and leads to public
popular support.
They lead to the general public preferring them over our tyrannical government
(shadow government).It gets our own members used to leaving the house to attend
events.
At some point we must draft a new DECLARATION OF CAUSES by Democratic Process
to validate ourlegitimacy, and serve on government, with a deadline to redress
our grievances.
When that deadline expires, we need at least 10 million people to go to DC to
Protest, and NOT leaveuntil the government complies.
You can't go from people sitting around in their underwear, to showing up for a
long protest in DC in one leap.You must incrementally move them to that huge
step. You do that by building familiarity and trust.You build trust and
commitment to the goals by having each person participate in establishing those
goals.And the grievances we choose to pursue by the Democratic Process in
drafting a New DECLARATION OF CAUSESis a huge opportunity to encourage
participation i setting our goals.
I am still a NATIONALIST, and each country is going to have to organize its
citizens as a group to
to have stood with their own government.
Fuck the New World Order.
To close, I have no intention of usurping this group.
I have my hands full building a Committee of Correspondance that meets in
person in MN.
I am saying that each of you should start or encourage someone in your
geographic areato be meeting together in person at least once per month.... to
get them used to attending
political events that into to force change rather than be polititainment.
Those were my thoughts.
<PlanB700x700_03272021.jpg>
But when we meet in person,
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Tuesday, March 22, 2022, 10:34:41 AM CDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don, et al.,
We already have a means of corresponding with each other with the internet,
and, yes, doing much good by it, (to wit, what you provide/d) as invasive and
compromised (as to the prying/spying eyes of the state) as it is.. . I suppose
for the political, such, committee would have to be protected from exploitation
(kept secret from the enemy or abuser? What there primarily is to them if not
the problem) by those not, true "to as much," re., government by reason for
justice, of Understandingmore (as of communication, or correspondence) but how
else, if not better?. I suspect we can still if not must achieve what we are
aspiring to "out in the open," as under the light of day.... whatever comes of
as much, my not wanting to be part of secrecy, of a secretive society or cult,
as of politics and our corrupt and corrupting, manipulating way, to what we are
beholding and beholden of, otherwise
You have, indeed, provided very helpful information in such respect, (to our
clarifying The matter! Yes) on where we need to go from here, if not merely how
it is served if not ever done.
With respect to your interest in such, rule, (of example!) I propose to my
original submission, that we introduce for social acceptance, and for a
constituency and government So true, a, "National [if not Universal] Day of
Language Formation and Evolution," (to the primary right, of communication and
such, administration, as to Understandingmore, and what comes of as much, but
what else) say, rather than every day of the year supporting our "subjugation
by the official/prescriptive and/or abusive," otherwise. Yeah. If you can think
of a better name for it I'd like to hear it. I'm pretty open to what matters in
such respect.. .
If you'd like to identify us as the [Universal?] Internet Committee of
Correspondence for a/the reasonable and justice evolving world order, or
something like it, I'd be OK with that, to support being identified with and at
least tolerant (if not yet embracing) of as much, as to being open and akin to
such, things (what better, if not best to be akin to, not a question for me, So
alone) as to what else I, and like-minded soles, speak of and for, So true just
and justifying, whatever else should matter, how it more intelligently does.. .
Of such choices, are We?.
Best to you and ours, So true
Champion of Justice
So really..
On Monday, March 21, 2022, 08:21:47 p.m. EDT, Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
I just heard of Parallel Societies yesterday....
It sounds a lot like the Committees of Correspondance of our Founders.
As time went by, the rank and file Colonists stopped going to the King's
appointed Judges, Sheriffs, Mayors & Governors,the colonists started going to
the Founder's Committees of Correspondance to resolve disputes, etc.
In some areas, the COC's virtually replaced the Kings local designated
authorities before the war even broke out.
Might I suggest Committees of Correspondance could serve a similar dual role of
Communicated Grievances to our tyrant, unaccountable Progressive rogue
government andbegin incrementally providing governmental services to rank &
file Americans...
COMMITTEES OF
CORRESPONDANCEhttps://www.thoughtco.com/committees-of-correspondence-definition-and-history-5082089The
Committees of Correspondence were provisional governments formed by patriot
leaders in the Thirteen American Colonies as a means of communicating with each
other and their agents in Britain on the verge of the American Revolution.
After first being established in Boston in 1764, Committees of Correspondence
spread throughout the colonies, and by 1773, they served as “shadow
governments,” seen by the people as having more power than the colonial
legislatures and local British officials. The exchange of information between
the committees built the patriots’ resolve and solidarity that encouraged the
formation of the First Continental Congress in 1774 and the writing of the
Declaration of Independence in 1776.
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Brief History of the Declaration of Independence
A brief chronicle of events leading up to the official adoption of the
Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. |
|
|
<PlanB700x700_03272021.jpg>
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Monday, March 21, 2022, 02:29:56 PM CDT, Just A User Name
<sean23jd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Could parallel societies be an answer? Why do we even care what they do? Why
not use our energy to free ourselves?
On Monday, March 21, 2022, Don Mashak <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<NYT Admits problem with Free Speech 03202022.jpg>
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Sunday, March 20, 2022, 10:05:31 PM CDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quebec introduced new plan to support the French language across other
provinces
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Quebec introduced new plan to support the French language across other p...
Quebec aims to reinforce French across Canada |
|
|
I can't support this initiative, to the prescriptive-authoritarian use of
language. Better, we should be supporting "communication" encompassing how
Canadians use words (and whatever) in such regard, re., in determining what
language, etc., people are using and want to use to communicate as to the more
legitimate, descriptive, as to a/the enlightening way (and what most
dictionaries if not language style authorities are based on, to be accurate) as
being of & to the authority of the "people" as to our most fundamental right,
(whatever other we may have, to as much, yes) if not to all rights as to
meaning, reason and justice inherent to understanding-more.
I take issue with governmental authorities not recognizing and supporting
freedom of speech (of communication) in its prioritizing the prescriptive
(absolutist, to an authoritarianism of sorts) if not political, if not an abuse
to reasoning in such regard, in what I see of politics if not our subjugation
(inherent to language qualifications) in Quebec and Canada.
I see the English and French language as but a "platform" (not etched to law)
for where we need to go from here, to the more reasonable-logical and just in
such regard.
Champion of Meaning, Justice and Communication, Etc.
Yeah, consider me brave and activistic (not accepted by spellchecker? F-it!.)
enough to say So, please do. Of no cult, and/or abusive entity, Am I, I'm, So
pretty sure, if not validated (What that makes anything else if not otherwise..
I figure I do Better in such regard, um, than those who don't.. .
It really doesn't matter all that much to me that no one else "gets" this, if
not yet? .. .
I'm On The way, to "Justice," Etc., whatever else should matter, how it does,
in such respect
This being, no contest.
| | Virus-free. www.avast.com |
--
This communication is meant for private communication only. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete without saving any email, information or
attachments. Any use is prohibited.
<PlanB700x700_03272021.jpg><PlanB700x700_03272021.jpg><NYT Admits problem
with Free Speech 03202022.jpg>
