[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: No warrant arrest, i can use lethal force to prevent

From: Leroy Smith <badhabit40366@xxxxxxxxx>
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:23:55 -0400

Bad Elk v United states
177 US 529 1900

*Plummer v. State*, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893).

On Sat, Apr 17, 2021, 4:38 PM Me <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Do you happen to know those cases? I would love to have them!

Best Regards, Glenn

On Saturday, April 17, 2021, 01:51:02 PM CDT, Charley Dan <
charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There is a court case that states if one fights to protect their
constitutional rights. The officer is killed it is only involuntary
man-slaughter. Another that states one has a right to fight for
constitutional rights of another as if they were being raped. Another
reason I've gone strictly constitutional, law of the land

On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 11:05 AM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_Elk_v._United_States

--
Life in one word--LOVE

Follow-Ups:
- [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: No warrant arrest, i can use lethal force to prevent
  - From: veritas ghost

References:
- [administrating-your-public-servants] No warrant arrest, i can use lethal force to prevent
  - From: NELSON DICE
- [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: No warrant arrest, i can use lethal force to prevent
  - From: Charley Dan
- [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: No warrant arrest, i can use lethal force to prevent
  - From: Me

[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: No warrant arrest, i can use lethal force to prevent

Other related posts: