Many ways to stop B/S, only a few effective ones to not waste others mental
power, energy, time. I chose effective way at all times when
mind-overreaching with untrue dogma and senseless accusations.
This is freewill planet, either you serve-others or serve-selves, but not
at expense of others.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022, 12:56 Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <
Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*@Emperor :* Let us not be «critical/judgemental» towards group-members,
even if you think they are in the wrong or even if they are unaware of how
they may come across unto others, instigating potentially «provoking»
remarks is also something from which we should probably refrain. Are you
expressing «love» or are you expressing «contempt» for your
neighbour/group-member ?
*@Emp & various other relevant readers *: I remember reading, from
Winston Wu, that he asked us to go easy or not be too harsh on
fundamentalists/evangelicals, for he was one himself, and, remembers that
he did what he did out of genuine concern for the eternal-destinies of
others' souls (and there is the possibility that those who've decided to
become «empirical» with their research/reading may end up becoming
*former**ly* religious themselves, for which there are «support»
groups/site linked by that author at
https://www.debunkingskeptics.com/DebunkingChristians/Page4.htm ;).
The «empiricism» that I had gone through during the first few thousand
hours of when I first began reading/researching these and various other
related subjects brings me to where I am now; why should we not take the
«empirical» path and study *everything* that is presented by *both* the
«scientists/atheists/materialists» *and* the
«Christians/theologians/religious» ? Mind you, and everyone, I was a former
*Atheist* in my past (not always), but, life-experiences pushed me back
into Atheism a total of four (4) times, I *thought* I had «all the
answers» when I came across Neo-Tech's original-writings, but, due to its
«materialist» oriented bent, I *thought* that I was «smart» and *wondered
why* all of those scientists, doctors, university professors,
researchers, etc., could «fall for» something so «ridiculous» as to
«believe in the existence» of psychic-abilities, para-normal phenomena, the
spirit-world, etc., thus, I took myself to «task» via trying to read up on
all of their books/publications in order to be able to find and «point out
their errors» to them, *thinking* that it would be «easy» to «debunk» the
claims of these para-psychologists...
...result ? I *wondered* what in the world could be so convincing to them
that even doctors/scientists/professors/etc., would be «fooled» by
«religious-sounding» nonsense. Turned out that they were *far more*
«scientific» than even the so-called «skeptics/debunkers» *themselves*,
*despite* the fact that the self-proclaimed skeptics/debunkers call
themselves scientific and/or scientists (when in reality they are actually
pseudo-skeptics & pseudo-scientists despite referring to para-psychology as
a pseudo-science). Now here's a big kicker : Para-Psychology is both
heavily rejected and *vehemently opposed* by *both* the «religious» *and*
the «scientific» communities, but, out of *all* sources I have taken the
time to examine in an effort to remove the log out of my own eye, I have
found that the para-psychologists have been the *most thorough* and
*honest* of «authors» who do NOT «avoid the "hard questions"» but do
actual scientific-experiments in order to try to answer these important
questions about life/existence/reality. Anyway, this is a *brief* part of
the history of my past-transitions from Christian to Atheist back to
Christian then again to Atheist then to something else which was more like
bible-believing Atheist (contradictory as that sounds), something
Pantheistic where we were viewed as godlings who eventually grow/evolve
into Godship or what men once called gods, some sort of
Perceptionism/Perceptionist take where we're just going to believe what we
believe based on what particular angle/vantage-point we are at in life in
regards to that multi-coloured, multi-shaped, multi-dimensional dice, which
everyone is describing differently, despite all looking at the exact same
damn thing, Godless-Spiritualism, and, now, finally unto here after I had
gone through the near-entire Testament of Truth writings...
On 2022/08/10 10:58, Shining Emperor wrote:
Lance,
You need to stop accusing others using this site with your petty, tiny
mind and very limited, distorted bible intepretation.
No domination of .....no dogma, no boundaries of truth, respect tor others
and direct research, experience.
Your undue accusations are repelling.....
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022, 04:04 lance hagen <lancehagen15@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
God cares enough that he sent his son to redeem you He who honors the Son
honors the father from the promise from God is eternal life which is in his
son Jesus Christ. The gift from God is eternal life by faith in Jesus that
he was sent from the father and he is with the father so you have eternal
life
As for the book of Enoch I put that in reference for you or anyone else
who seeks to talk the Dead so you understand who you are dealing with The
offspring of the fallen Angels
New Testament?
*A short section of 1 Enoch (1:9) is cited in the New Testament Epistle
of Jude, Jude 1:14–15*, and is attributed there to "Enoch the Seventh
from Adam" (1 Enoch 60:8), although this section of 1 Enoch is a midrash on
Deuteronomy 33:2.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022, 5:39 AM Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <
Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are you truly concerned about the destiny of my soul or are you more
interested in modern-day «inquisition» style interrogation of whether I am
a «heretic» ? I most-certainly do «fear» for the destiny of *your*
soul, and, for your sake, all I can do is attempt to respond and try to set
the «best example» possible for anybody else who may be reading, that they
may have «inspiration» for how to respond in a «calm/peaceful» manner when
on the receiving end of *accusative*-expressions (and many of us here
already experience that from corrupt cops who automatically insist on
calling us criminals even without any objective-evidence).
I am still finishing up the source you linked in regards to an
examination of the Book(s) of Enoch (
https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/watch55.html#sdfootnote367anc ;), a
great biblical-scholar source by the way, reaching its completion soon
(near the end of the page now), but, did you read through all of it for
yourself ? Are you aware that the author of that page refers to the
Enochic-Texts as «Jewish Mythology» ? Here is also another direct-quote
from that page... : «Moreover, it appears that the appropriation of the
Adamic lore in *2 Enoch *is not limited solely to the figure of the
main positive protagonist – the seventh antediluvian patriarch, but also
extended to the story of the negative angelic counterparts of the Enochic
hero – the Watchers whose portrayals in the Slavonic apocalypse also become
enhanced with novel features of the Adamic mythology of evil, and more
specifically, with the peculiar traits of the account of its infamous
heavenly rebel - Satan.»
The «source» you «quoted» from is literally referring to the «stories»
within these books as «lore/mythology» (and attributed to
Jewish/Adamic-Origin). When even «bible-scholars» are quoting from texts
that some people seem to take as «gospel/scripture» and yet call such books
stories of «mythology» then how do you think we are supposed to interpret
their interpretations ? I do very much enjoy reading the works of most
biblical-scholars, but, I most-certainly find it quite striking how very
much differently biblical-scholars view biblical-writings (most of which
are in fact much closer to my own views/paradigm), does that not then, via
your own logic, make them «satanic» authors ? (Rhetoric-Question : I am not
expecting you to answer this as I have more to say)
Mortals have, unfortunately, over-complicated the idea of what
constitutes good versus evil, what is deemed holy versus satanic, but it is
really not that complicated. The «Holy/Good/Righteous/etc.» are involved in
the following...:
Creation, Peace, Non-Punitive Rehabilitation, Mercy, Forgiveness,
Understanding, Honesty, Integrity, Good-Will Unto Others, Benevolence,
Generosity, Harmony, Improving Life-Quality, Helping Others, Co-Operating
for the Net-Good of the Society/Population/Civilisation,
Truthful-Education, Honesty, De-Escalating Potentially
Confrontational-Situations, Solving Problems that Actually Exist, etc.
The «Unholy/Bad/Evil/Satanic/etc.» on the other hand are involved with
the following...:
Malevolence, Greed, Dis-Harmony, Destroying Life, Bullying Others,
Operating for the Destruction of the Society/Population/Civilisation,
Propaganda, Dishonesty, Escalating Peaceful-Situations into
Aggressive-Confrontation, Creating Problems That do Not Actually/Yet Exist,
etc.
It's quite simple : Creative/Kind/Benign/Peaceful/etc is Light/Holiness
in Action/Word/Deed...
Destructive/Unkind/Malignant/Hostile/etc is Dark/Unholiness/Satanism.
Can you not «see» that your «expressions» unto me lean in the «hostile»
direction ? I do not believe that God permits *any*
«Spiritual-Darkness» within His Pure-Realm of Heaven; do you really
think/believe that you will be permitted therein, *even if* you believe
that Jesus-Christ already saved you, *despite* the things I am pointing
out here...? I only write this for *your* sake... perhaps now you will
re-consider whether I am speaking «truth» or not after I have pointed out
the fact that the author of that web-page literally refers to the
Enoch-texts as Jewish/Adamic «lore» and even «mythology» ? (Implying that
they, the biblical-scholar authors, view them as fairy tales rather than an
instruction-manual upon which to base our livelihoods)
I hope you can see at least *some* «reason» and respond in a
«reasonable» manner rather than *automatically* using terms like
«satanic» without even establishing clear-cut concrete
objective-definitions. Why do I read everything you read...?
Spiritual-Brother, the whole entire purpose is that I make *sure* that
I do my utmost in order to «remove the beam out of my own eye» *before*
I try to help you clear that speck of dust from yours... even you should be
able to see that observers/onlookers can read our dialogues/exchanges for
themselves and determine whether any «sincerity» cometh from either. I have
taken significant time out of my otherwise often busy day and this is the
result of my attempt to respond with sincerity (p.s. : One's Physical-Age
has little to know bearing on one's Spiritual-Age as one does not get wiser
with Age if one never bothers to learn anything)...
On 2022/08/09 20:56, lance hagen wrote:
It says shame you use the resources of this community for your satanic
activity
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022, 9:54 PM lance hagen <lancehagen15@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022, 9:35 PM Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division)
<Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What you/I/we believe about the after-life most-certainly affects our
after-life condition; unfortunately, for those with erroneous-beliefs
about
the nature of the Spirit, they literally get themselves «stuck» for their
stubbornness/dogmatism, or even worse, continue to descend towards the
Eternal-Abyss; and I can see that you do not even bother to read anything
that I have referenced even though I take the time to read/re-read/review
the «bible» material you present even though I had already gone over much
of it before back in my earlier days of extensive-research.
Here is some homework... search-term : «Cherry Picking the Bible»
(find out *why* people make «memes» about this)...
On 2022/08/09 19:20, lance hagen wrote:
I don't know how old you are you seem like you do not listen very well
so I'll make this simple God sent his son to save all of us his name is
Jesus
I've posted numerous times you could go back and read them what you
post is men's words and fantasy whether you're right or I'm right we shall
find out .
As you will admit it is your 2022 that should say something in your
mind right there
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022, 8:12 PM Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
According to Scott McKay (better known as PatriotStreetFighter),
mentioned in one of his recent PodCasts, the Patriot-Insiders
(Anti-Deep-State Military) have already eliminated the nefarious «Alien»
presences who have been secretly ruling over this earth for centuries;
inter-galactic organisations have apparently refused to help/intervene in
earth-dweller affairs because, rather than *actually evolving*, the
people of earth ended up turning such «saviour» events into some sort of
religion, rather than learning how to fix their own problems/systems in
order to prevent the corruption from simply repeating, and, this
apparently
happened *every single time* they intervened to «save humanity» from
itself; the reason given was because of how humans have been genetically
engineered *specifically* to *seek something/someone* to «worship»
(I guess it must be similar to dog-breeding or any other type of
animal-breeding where animals are bred for specific purposes; just in
this
case it's more like the humans are the animals and these nefarious aliens
are the tamers... humans, you are on your own, fight your *own*
fight rather than waiting for a «saviour» to get you out of your
predicament; yes, they do bleed, and, can indeed die, according to Phil
Schneider).
Not putting in any links this time as anybody who wishes to verify
this can put in the appropriate search-terms into Rumble/BitChute/etc.
On 2022/08/09 18:26, Shining Emperor wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35OV3CEatbA8 I would say you don't
know because you haven't died yet it's a pointed on to man once to die
and
then judgment Jesus said, “For judgment I have come into this world,
so that the blind will see and those who see will become blind
