There is no legitimate justice system compromised of issue and things not of
justice, as with politics, etc.
The justice system must be established "independent" (separate) of or from the
political (political, to anything else other than justice, how that logically
doesn't make it political or of our conflicts) system of, all the other things,
if not of our problems to our conflicts and abuses (wants, otherwise, of what
is essential...) in such regard.
There, that should be simple and easy enough to understand, to how I behave and
what at least I'm about and for.. . Accept me for as much or, not, whatever? ..
.
We need an "independently elected/prevailing" (if not directly, actively and
openly elected) Chief Justice or leader, if sany at all.. .
I Go, accordingly.. (What the US and Canada, etc., has, especially as regards
justice or such, service/s, otherwise, I consider of a "farce," [deflection?]
if not worse, yeah, and behave, accordingly
Michael Glavic
Champion of as much.
I'd be OK with "Richard" being a/our leader in such respect. We all could or
should be, perhaps, if not, Logically, that also, or especially involving,
"following," (etc.) as we should.. .
I'm not here to speak English or mainly speak English, etc.. .
BWE
On Friday, June 25, 2021, 01:58:16 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello?
The justice system, if not us in such respect... need to take responsibility
for all the political abuse and politics enabling abuse going on. That's a
period, of Understanding.. Or what?
The "justice" system needs to initiate legal/reasonable action against all the
abuses of the state (of politics) or it is implicated, if not of politics, and
not of a constitution or the constitutional worth a crap, is what I'm, "easier"
saying, for understanding more and corresponding justice? Hello?. Screw
language bigots, too, otherwise) for those who need things (if not everything)
both (more?) simple and easy, what that says about, our, if not our
social-political limitations, and restrictions..
Where the "justice system" (what justice system?/) doesn't take responsibility,
including leadership in such regard, it remains left to us or whoever is left
of us to do So in such respect, and that could get messy, as it tends to, of a
deeper or more thorough analysis of true history, oh, and The facts/data, if
not merely in such regard
I'm saying So, 'cause I'm not seeing many if any of us actually understanding
as much (So truly up For The Job) and getting It, what matters, and should, So
truly. So, what
The head of the judiciary (if not the true head of our nation, beyond our
wanton desires encompassed in politics, including vote buying) probably should
be elected in such respect, with no other job but to serve justice if not
communicate "real," true Information (of reason and reasoning, what else the
law should be based on to win more intelligent being's respect and
cooperation...) in such respect. I understand who follows as much if not me in
such regard, oh, and behave, accordingly.. .
Michael Glavic
"Champion" of Justice.
Politics is conflicting and of the problem, (of our desires, if not many
wanton, not attenuated to justice most primarily) where justice is totally
"good" (by Definition, of Understandingmore, encompassed by the truly
Communicative, of meaningful "Information," beyond garbage knowledge or law and
government) and not "whatsoever" of any real conflict, of interests, and
whatever, where you take the time and/or put your focus on as much, (Yes) as
there is, if not merely, somewhat, "God," included, (if not especially of as
much) if there is or should be one, it would have to be of as much, I'm very
sure. Time for us all to do our homework, where we haven't, in such respect, of
our true gift and service to each other and All
I Do Get It And Serve, like it or, not.. . I Go, accordingly, figuring I'm
doing my best if not our best in such regard
I can see the constitutional change needed (as deserved) in such respect.
Here's more than hoping WE all can, too, if not, Thereof.. .
Your choice? Of such choices, (including Freedom and Liberty, if not all that
we can be) of Justice (Etc.) Am I, believe It or not.. .
So boldly and faithfully and factually I Go. I more than just wish as much for
everyone and everything
"We" (if not merely me) are the heads of the "justice system" (beyond mere
America, alone?.) until a real or better one, ascends, and does The job, vs.,
crime and abuse and the unreasonable and unjust, or what have we, otherwise,
I'm So sure, and On The Way.. .
On administrating all servants and leaders, if not everything, So true
Oh, "I Do Get It," and here's another chance for everyone to, however else, not
So much a question for me, So alone.. . I figure I can very well continue
"alone" in such respect, So, you might want to "Get It," (where you haven't?.
Try to understand more for your self.. . beyond mere stupefying language as you
were taught?!.) and show/represent/whatever ( ) that you Do, or at least
appreciate, more what I do offer in such respect, logically even more than you,
have, So far.. . Say something more meaningful about as much
Have a nice day in such regard, or, whatever, like I don't Know.. . How I Do.
BWE On Thursday, June 24, 2021, 02:17:10 a.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello, Dr. Richard Cordero, and Co., if not everyone,
The Constitution and Constitutional is (by my definition, of Understanding,
More, if not merely of Communication and corresponding justice ~ not so much of
Richard's depth, of knowledge, that would probably take me the rest of my life
to, thoroughly read, [given what else I have, and would have on my plate..]
before I would get a chance to, Communicate.. .) what comes of being "active,
direct and open/honest" about it, things, if not everything (like with your/the
old, American constitution, somewhat, yes) and where you can't or won't be
open/honest, (true) you ain't of no constitution or Constitutionality (to
Justice, of such justice, encompassing oversight and the evidence, whatever
else should matter) to me.. . and you logically shouldn't be here and/or you
probably won't be for long, but might become a cog in a wheel (of another, if
not the abusive) if not a bug in a swarm as without a mind (if not universe) of
your own.. .
I like your presentation, if not your, constitutionality, yes, that the
Constitution of the United States needs to be developed, further, (or made tea
of?!) that we might see politics and the problem (of abuse) put under better
control "of justice," (Reason) encompassing, the better justices and what is
just and reasonable, if not merely in such respect
You might be a good candidate (best candidate?) for Chief Justice or, President
in such regard.. . Seriously.
[Oh] It should be justice and the truly judicial initiating if not calling the
shots, (what I'm not seeing enough of, of the official or political and
compromised, class, of which you speak..) and not the political, (the wanton of
easily bought and typically Unconstitutional votes, especially where closed to
inspection/oversight, the evidence... and of too many conflicts and
incongruities, if not lies, of lies and abuse, to mention here) or it will be
about merely what people want (easy to buy, to the detriment of justice and
true liberty, liberty from politics and abuse) to the detriment of truth and
just and a/the, Life of "Meaning".. .
Of such, meaning, Am I..
Your stuff, received and, value-added, "acknowledged"?. It's how true
communication and Understanding (More) Works, and/as for what, "Justice" (if
not merely, vs., the "law," otherwise) coming to mind.. . I find most if not
everything abusive and part of the problem (of politics and what is wrong?)
"otherwise," and truly behave, accordingly
Michael Glavic
Champion of Justice, whether considered a hero (by whatever?.) or not.. . I go
for justice (Etc.!) in such respect.
Keep up your good work in such respect. I really would like to see you as a
judge, of more things if not merely of the law, as it is written, but
preferable of justice, more specifically..
Keep at it and I'm sure you'll become the leader/justice, if not a better
one... that we should all aspire to be, if not in behaving, accordingly
An, Individual of your analytical skills, talents, resources and nature...
should be able to get that. Here's more than just hoping you receive it, get
it, and go for it, but unlike others, politicians, encompassing the political,
and abusive... actually do it for "justice," and not for politics (encompassing
the lesser...) and where politics takes things or goes, otherwise. Serve
justice, how you can... and don't count on anyone, or anything to do it, if not
merely for you, otherwise, including God. I understand God or something great
if not smart expects as much, demands as much from us, that justice would
prevail, if not merely here and now
I find true value in as much. Oh, thanks for being at least a part of as much..
On Tuesday, June 22, 2021, 11:58:24 a.m. EDT, cordero
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receiptof this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it tosocial media as widely as
possible in your own interest and that of the rest ofWe the People; e.g., click
“Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to theone hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org<left panel ↓Register or + New or
Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent formatwhen sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, they crept in duringtransit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them. Exposing the Biden Commission
on reforming the Supreme Court
by applying the strategic thinking principle
“The enemy of my enemy is my friend”,
whereby you can become a key influencer of your party
and a nationally recognized reluctant hero of Justice
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_politicians_v_Biden_SCt_Commission.pdf
By Dr.Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge,England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx Dear Ato Aby, politicians, journalists,academics, and
Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you so much for your kind wordsabout, in general, my work. A. Iand my
work are apolitical and aimed at exposing judges’ abuse of power
1. Because you read, in particular, my article on exposing the Biden Commission
on reforming theSupreme Court (to which Section Letter refer hereunder), you
were able to affirm correctly, “Your work is actually not related to any
politicalparty or any particular political beliefs.” 2. In fact, my work aims
to form an apolitical,single issue, national civic movement for:
a. exposing judges’ unaccountability and consequentriskless abuse of power;
b. holding judges accountable and liable tocompensate their victims; and
c. reforming the system of justice throughtransformative change:
1) The system that goes into change emerges different as part ofa new relation
between We the Peopleand our public servants, including judicial ones, under
the rules of a newconstitution(SectionA) that we, the living today, adopt
ourselves.
3. The apolitical, non-partisan nature of my workis evidenced in my
three-volume study* † ♣ of judges andtheir judiciaries. The study is based on
professional law research and writing,and strategic thinking. It is titled and
downloadable thus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability
and Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering thenews and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability and abuse reporting* † ♣ * Volume 1, >all prefixes:#
up to OL:393; † Volume 2, >from OL2:394-1143; ♣ Volume 3, >fromOL3:1144 (this
article is there at OL3:1323) i.Open the downloaded files using Adobe Acrobat
Reader, which is available for free.
4. Many articles that I have written are postedto my website JudicialDiscipline
Reform at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org.They have attracted so many ;
webvisitors and the latter have reacted to them sopositively that 38,883+ have
become subscribers to it as of June 22, 2021(Appendix 3).
a. Howmany law firms, never mind lawyers, do you know who have a website with
so manysubscribers?
b. Youcan join the subscribers thus: go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register or +New
or Users >Add New.
c. You can invest in the commercial developmentof the site according to its
business plan, which isguided by the motto “Making Money While Doing Justice”.
It would turn the sitefrom an informational platform into:
1) a clearinghouse for complaints(OL2:918)about judges that anybody can upload;
and
2) a research center forfee-paying people auditing(OL:274-280,304-307) many
complaints, decisions, andother writings in search of(jur:131§b,OL:255) the
most persuasive type of evidence, i.e.,patterns(OL2:792§A),
trends(OL2:455§§B,D), and schemes(OL2:614,OL2:929) of abuse of power, including:
a) judges’ interceptionof people’s emails and mail to detect and suppress
those of their critics(OL2:781);
b) judges’ having clerks dump most cases due tojudges’ failure to read
them(OL2:608);
c) judges’ filing of misleading mandatoryannual financial disclosure
reports(jur:102§aand fn. 213b);
d) judges’ abusive self-enrichment, which Sen. Elizabeth Warren dare
denounce(OL2:1003); etc.
B.Your qualifications and my proposal to you based thereon
5. Your qualifications as a government officer lays the foundation for the
concrete, realistic,and feasible proposal made herein to you: 6. The proposal
is for you to influence yourpolitical friends to expose in their own interest
how the Biden Commission iscomposed of former law clerks to justices and
judges, and current lawprofessors(Tableunder ¶65), who are compromised by their
conflict ofinterests(SectionD¶¶37-40). 7. Their conflict is between, on the one
hand,their duty to study and report on how the Supreme Court operates in
practice,as opposed to the theory of constitutional law, that justifies
reforming itand, on the other hand, their self-interest in not allowing any
discussion ofits operation in practice, which would implicate them in the
commission andcover-up of judges’ abuse of power. 8. In brief, each
commissioner needs to:
a. maintain concealed his (or her) individual role during his law clerkship as
enforcer of the justices’ and judges’ abuse of power as their modus operandiso
that at the end of his clerkship his respective justice or judge would givehim
a glowing recommendation in support of his job application. Such
arecommendation would earn the clerk a sign-up bonus worth even $250,000 or
moreand a job with a prestigious law firm(Section1¶¶41-55);
b. avoid giving any reason to the justice or judge forwhom he clerked for
holding him in breach of the confidentiality agreement thathe had to sign to be
allowed to work as his clerk. The agreement may requirethe former clerk to
disgorge benefits that he received thanks to his clerk statusand even pay the
equivalent of punitive damages(id.); and
c. prevent any retaliation from the law school whereshe (or he) teaches for
exposing a federal judge, who has a life-appointmentand the long memory for
holding grudges that goes along with it; and belongs toa judicial class whose
members would close ranks to send that school and allothers an unambiguous and
threatening warning: “Don’t you ever let any of your hire hands mess with
anyone of us!”(Section2¶¶56-62).
C. Your and your politicalfriends’ interest in exposing the Biden Commission
9. Exposing the Biden Commission because itscommissioners are compromised by
their conflict of interests requires strategicthinking. One of its principles
is applicable here: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. 10. The exposure
needs friends. Amongthem are those who in their own political interest may
consider the BidenCommission their enemy. 11. The enmity is provoked by
thefact that President Biden is using the Commission as part of his scheme
toimplement his foregone decision to “pack the Supreme Court” byincreasing the
number of justices from nine to 15; and to reduce their appointmentto a term of
years. This would give him the opportunity to nominate six newjustices. 12.
If confirmed, ‘the packed Court’would be in a position to uphold the
constitutionality of every piece oflegislation favorable to his party and
declare the unconstitutionality of everyone unfavorable to it. The party that
has the Court as its “friend” holds agrip on power. 13. The top officers of
your party havemade it clear that their first priority is to defeat all the
initiatives of theBiden Administration. No initiative can provoke more intense
enmity thanpacking the Court. 14. It follows that nothing is moreimportant to
them than to discredit the Commission and thereby defeat thescheme for packing
the Court. If the Commission is discredited, especially onthe factual grounds
summarized above, it will appear as the President’s clumsy,embarrassing effort
to have it give him non-binding, pro forma recommendationsfor Supreme Court
reform. They will be embedded in a report that neither he normost Americans
will ever read but that he will use as the pretext for “packing the Court”.
D. Exposing the Biden Commission withoutbecoming the judges’ enemies
15. There are discreet ways for you and your political friends to defeatthe
Biden Commission by exposing its members as compromised by their conflictof
interests. 16. To that end, you and/or your politicalfriends may approach your
contacts in the media and universities to convincethem that it is in their own
commercial and reputational interest to expose thecommissioners because
“Scandalsells” and “Thosewho want a Pulitzer pull out all the stops to a great
story”. 17. Youmay remain in the background to avoid the risk of becoming
the enemy of judges.Even so, you can persuade your media and university
contacts to:
a. publish myarticle on the Biden Commission and follow it with a series of
articles by me onjudges’ abuse of power, which they can choose from thelist of
those that I have already written, especiallythose mentioned in paragraph
4.c.2. above or commission me to write for them.
1) There is precedent for the transformative change that anarticle can bring
about: The New York Times and The New Yorkerpublished their exposés of the
sexual abuse by Harvey Weinstein on October 5and 10, 2017, respectively. Within
a week the MeToo! movement eruptedworldwide. Public accountability in practice
began to change substantiallyeverywhere and in every aspect of society.
b. investigate judges’ abuse, which journalists andthe media can do in a
focused and cost-effective way by taking advantage of theabundance of leads
that I have gathered(OL:194§E).
1) There are leads to expose Then-Vice President Biden’sparticipation in the
cover-up of the abuse of power, including concealment of assets and taxevasion,
by Then-Judge, Now-Justice Sonia Sotomayor after President Obamanominated her
to the Supreme Court and Senator Chuck Schumer and SenatorKirsten Gillibrand
shepherded her through the confirmation process in theSenate. This
investigation can be guided by a question that can pierce theirpretense to
being honest, law-abiding public servants: What did Then-Vice President
Bidenknow and when did he know it?
2) The investigation can be pursued by publicly and repeatedly making
aninnovative demand: Let President Biden release the secret FBI vetting
reportson Then-Judge Sotomayor as well as all those on the other justices and
judges.The President cannot claim a commitment to transparency while
simultaneouslyhiding information that implicates him in the connivance between
him and theSupreme Court that he pretends to want to reform; cf. the connivance
between him and his Attorney General Merrick Garland, who until becoming AG was
ajudge and a former chief judge at the Court of Appeals for the District
ofColumbia Circuit.
c. hold theproposed unprecedented citizens hearings
1) The Biden Commission ismandatedto “hold public meetings to hear the views
of other experts, and groups andinterested individuals with varied perspectives
on the issues it will beexamining”.
2) Those “issues” will inall likelihood be limited to the ivory tower theory
of constitutional law onreforming the Supreme Court as opposed to unaccountable
justices’ and judges’ practice of riskless abuse as their institutionalized
modus operandi to run the Federal Judiciary asa racketeeringenterprise.
a) The commissioners will need to sift those “experts, and groups and
interested individuals” toexclude those with testimony incriminating them in
executing thejustices’ and judges’ abuse when they were their law clerks as
well as incovering it up while they have been law professors. That sifting will
becarried out by requiring people to submit in advance an offer of proof-like
writtenpreview of their testimony.
b) If thecommissioners were interested in not giving even “the appearance of
impropriety”due to their concealed conflict of interests(NY Rulesof
Professional Conduct, Rule 1.11(b)(2); Codeof Conduct for U.S. Judges, Canon
2), they would be the first to testify towhat they did and witnessed during
their clerkships, thus setting the examplefor all other law clerks and people
similarly situated.
c) The ensuingcover-up through manipulation of witnesses warrant the holding
of unprecedentedcitizens hearings(SectionE). They are intended to be organized
by journalists, media outlets,and universities to give people the opportunity
to tell the national publictheir story of the abuse by judges that they have
suffered or witnessed.
3) The panels taking intestimony at the citizens hearings will be composed of
journalists and professors and experts inmultidisciplinary fields, such as
journalism; forensic fraud and accounting(FFA); forensic statistics;
Information Technology; concealment of assets-taxevasion-money laundering;
bankruptcy fraud; etc.
4) The citizens hearings can be heldat university auditoriums and media
stations. Attuned to our times, they willalso be held via video conference so
as to make it inexpensive for people totestify and make their testimony
universally available to the public life,streaming, and through podcasts.
5) The citizens hearings organizers willmake it a point to:
a) invite everycurrent and former law clerk –including the commissioners and
judges themselves!-to testify orally and/or in writing;
b) request thatSupreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., release the
close to 700hundred letters from current and former law clerks that he received
around thetime that the MeToo! movementexploded in October 2017, where they
complained about judges’ abuse(OL2:645);and
c) ask that allthose who ever filed a complaint against a judge exercise their
right under theFirst Amendment of the Constitution to “freedom of speech, of
the press, theright of the people peaceably to assemble [through the Internet
and on socialmedia too], and to petition the Government [of which judges are
the thirdbranch] for a redress of grievances [including
compensation]”(OL2:792¶1)by sending them a copy of their complaint and/or
testifying at the citizenshearings.
d. contactthose who produce their campaign videos to reach out to those who
can producein time for an effective impact on the 2022 mid-term elections the
documentary BlackRobed Predators!:when judges are the abusers;
e. persuadea top university to establish the Institute of Judicial
Unaccountability Reporting and Reform Advocacy.
E. The citizens hearings can steal the thunder of the Biden Commission's
“publicmeetings”
18. The citizens hearings are boundto produce a flow of additional leads useful
for the investigation into judges’abuse of power, which will likely be underway
by the time they are held. As aresult, the investigative bandwagon can become
ever more attractive, forcingever more journalists and media outlets to jump on
it, lest they be left behindby their competitors and abandoned by an outraged
audience in search of the latest news from the investigators.
19. The citizens hearings can lead tothe composition of a report, to be
publicly available on the citizens hearingssite together with all the submitted
written testimony and supportingdocuments. 20. The report may be presented
atthe first-ever and national conference on judicial unaccountability and
abuseof power. This conference can be sponsored by media outlets and
universitiesand held at physical venues. It will also be available viavideo
conference as a national event that grips the attention of the publichere and
abroad.
21. As a recurrent event, thecitizens hearings can provide the material for
journalists and universities topublish the Annual Report on Judicial
Unaccountability and Abuse of Power.Hence, the citizens hearings and the Report
can become key means for We the People to hold our judicial publicservants
accountable for their exercise of the public power entrusted to themfor the
People’s benefit; and liableto compensate the victims of their abuse of it.
22. The President will find itsubstantially more difficult to “pack the Court”
if those who have suffered orwitnessed abuse by judges appointed by either
party are telling the nationalpublic at citizens hearings how judges abuse
their power risklessly for theirown gain and convenience because they are loyal
to the only people –never mindthe law– that matter to them: their fellow
judges. As then-Judge, now-Justice Neil Gorsuch put it: "Anattack on one of our
brothers and sisters of the robe is an attack on all of us".What an
unambiguous, unabashed expression of judges' gang mentality! 23. As gang
members do, judges have entered into animplicit or explicit mutual survival
agreement. Under it they hold each otherunaccountable, dismissing 100%of
complaints against federal judges and denying 100% of the petitions toreview
dismissals(SectionC). 24. After being informed by theabove-described events,
politicians, particularly newcomers, may decide eitheropportunistically or out
of genuine outrage to run in the next mid-termelections as a posse in defense
of the hood that take on the bullies on thebench and become reluctant heroes.
F. The events can magnify your and your political friends’ efforts and enhance
your standing
25. My articles; the findings of the mediainvestigation into judges and their
judiciaries; the citizens hearings, theReport, and the conference for its
presentation; the documentary; and thecampaigning of reluctant heroes can so
inform the national public about, andoutrage it at, judges’ unaccountability
and consequent riskless abuse of power, and the politicians/judgesconnivanceas
to stir it up to join forces with the 34 states that since April 2, 2014,have
petitioned Congress to call a constitutional convention in accordance withthe
amending provisions of Article 5 of the Constitution.
26. Congressional leaders are most unlikely toput at risk their privileges and
power by convening such convention. Nevertheless,their reluctance cannot
prevent thePeople and the states to stage a peaceful but intransigently
self-assertiveversion of the Boston Tea Party. At that event or period of
popular upheaval whatwould be thrown into the archives of history would be a
Constitution written bypeople of another era and enacted by them in 1789, 232
years ago! 27. Then the People could usher into the harbor of our lives and
modern worlda new relation between the governed and government. It will
recognize that the People are the sovereign source ofall public power and as
such, they are the Masters of all public servants. The People are entitled to
hold all theirpublic servants, including judicial public servants, accountable
for theirexercise of entrusted public power and liable to compensate the
victims of their abuse. 28. The MeToo! and BLM movements, and the
demonstrations against policebrutality and for socio-economic equality have
spread all over the world. Socan each and all of the above-described events of
this proposal. They can be promoted in a way that neither you nor your
political friends need appear taking the lead inorganizing or conducting them.
Yet, your initial effort in contacting your friends can set in motion this
reasonably expected chain of events.
G. My offer to present this proposal to you and your politicalfriends
29. When on April 9, 2021, the WhiteHouse announced the formation by President
Biden of the Commissionon reforming the Supreme Court, it stated that “The
Executive Order directsthat the Commission complete its report within 180 days
of its first publicmeeting”. Accordingly, it is imperative to proceed with due
haste to expose thecommissioners as compromised by their conflict of interests,
if possible beforethey hold their first “public meeting”, and in any case
before they tendertheir pro forma report.
30. Similarly, the jockeying for position in the next mid-term elections has
already started. Soon thereafter the 2024 presidential campaign will begin.
Each of the many candidates that will run needs to advocate an issue that
catches the attention and participation of as many voters and volunteers as
possible. That issue can be the exposure of unaccountable judges’ riskless
abuse of power, which requires the compensation of abusees and a new
constitution that recognizes that all public servants, including judicial ones,
are accountable and liable to We the People.
31. It follows that this is the right time to take action on this proposal.
Therefore, in the interest of expediting yourand your political friends’ action
thereon, I offer tomake a presentation on it to all of you. It can take place
via video conference,and if all my expenses are paid, in person too.
32. You may assess my capacity tomake such presentation by watching my video
and following it on its slides.
H. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money Put your moneywhere
your outrage at abuse andpassion for justice are. Support Judicial
DisciplineReform in its professional law research and writing, andstrategic
thinking;operation of its website; anddevelopment according to its businessplan
guided by themotto“Making Money While Doing Justice”. DONATE by making a
depositor an online transfer to Citi Bank,routing number 021 000 089, account
4977 59 2001 through
Paypal,https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ
or by mailing a checkusing the address bloc below. Do you have the stuff of
areluctant hero? If so, Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it. Ilook
forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Dr. RichardCordero, Esq.
JudicialDiscipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, NY 10472-6506
tel. (718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’semail and e-cloud storage accounts described at
*>ggl:1 et seq. and †>OL2:1114§G, when emailinghim, copy the above bloc of his
email addresses and paste it in the To: line ofyour email so as to enhance the
chances of your email reaching him at least atone of those addresses.
