[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: How journalists and you can seize on the abortion draft opinion to investigate justices' and judges' abuse of power, leading to resignations, their Judiciary's downfall, a constitutional convention, and Today's We the People Constitution

From: "tokrichevsky1@xxxxxxxxx" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ("tokrichevsky1")
To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:37:12 +0000 (UTC)

Dear brother Richard Cordero:
I read and, as paralegal, like your paperwork. I learn from you. I like your
relentless pursuit to help people to obtain Justice.
However, in real life I learned that the whole judiciary, mainstream media and
law enforcement is criminal enterprise consisting of other small ones - the
'wheel and spokes enterprise'. So, do you really think that mafia soldiers will
ago against mafia bosses?
If you are interested in your "academia studies" or someone else interested
just check out my bankruptcy individual chapter 11 case 22- 71045-ast and RICO
adversary complaint No. 1-21--01013-ess in Eastern District of New York. There,
since 2019, 3 judges recused. Now, I am against Chief Judge Alan S. Trust (what
an irony to trust), big bunch of vermins including US Trustee.
This is private email message and any attachment(s) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2410-2521, and is for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Third parties, by reading this email you enter
into binding contract between you and me, one of the People of Posterity. All
agents or informants working to monitor My email(s) and any other means of
communication without My express written permission, are barred from any use,
disclosure, or distribution. I reserve all My rights without prejudice
including all intellectual property rights. If you read any of the contents of
My E-Mails, you agree to pay a user fee of $325,000.00 US payable in gold or
silver coin, per hour or any fraction thereof, tracked by your IP address. If
you copy any of my posts, you agree to pay a user fee of $125,000.00US per use.
Your use is binding contract to pay. All user fees are immediately due and
payable upon use.

    On Tuesday, July 26, 2022, 10:49:02 PM EDT, dr.richard.cordero_esq
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of thisemail.
                You are encouraged to share and post it to social media
aswidely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We thePeople;
e.g., click “Reply All” and “Send”.
                To subscribeto articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register    or   + New
or  Users >Add New; or fill out the New User form
athttps://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php.
               The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it
showsirregularities when received, e.g., joinedwords, they crept in during
transit and are beyond mycontrol. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of this
article -as such likely tobe free of irregularities- is found here and
downloadable through thenext link.
Proposalto Reuters, WSJ, WP, and all other media outlets
for a joint venture at the most propitious time:
when the Supreme Court’s leaked abortion draft opinion
has set the mood for national outrage to explode as a result of
the exposure of justices’ and judges’ participation in
abuse of power and financial criminality
so coordinated and widespread as to amount to
their running the Federal Judiciary as a racketeering enterprise:
“Scandal sells” and can win Pulitzer Prizes by leadingto
the serial resignation of justices, judges, and courts;
the loss of public trust in the Federal Judiciary that brings it down;
the calling of the constitutional convention already petitioned by 34 states;
and a new constitution by today’s We the People
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf
  By
Dr. Richard Cordero,Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx  A. The foundation for exposing judges’ andjustices’
abuse of power and financial criminality 1. The leaked draft opinion by Supreme
Court JusticeSamuel A. Alito revealing that a majority of the Court is in favor
ofoverturning Roe v. Wade has caused national jubilation but even more outrage.
2. That outrage would pale by comparison to thatwhich can be provoked and
overcome much jubilation by a series of responsibleand principled articles,
such as those already written and available forreview(Appendix 6§A) or that can
be writtenon commission(Appendix 6§B), exposing how thejustices, who are
unaccountable and not even held to any ethics code, run andcondone the running
of the Federal Judiciary as a racketeering enterprise.  3. There is solid
basisfor raising these charges against justices and judges. To begin with,
there isthe series of articles that TheWall Street Journal (WSJ) began to
publish on September 28, 2021,under the initial title “131Federal Judges Broke
the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a FinancialInterest”.  a.
Anotherarticle in the series was published on November 2, 2021, titled
“HiddenInterests – Federal Judge Files Recusal Notices in 138 Cases After WSJ
Queries.[U.S. Chief District Judge of the Eastern District of Texas] Rodney
Gilstrapinitially argued he didn’t violate financial-conflicts law”;
James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx, Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx, Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx,
Michael.Siconolfi@xxxxxxx.
b. The judges who failed to recusethemselves in order to grab money necessarily
engaged, lest they incriminatethemselves, in inside trading, fraud, concealment
of assets, tax evasion, andmoney laundering. Those are crimes. They are complex
and require coordination.When judges committed them as principals or condoned
them as accessories, they becamethe judicial class that turned the Federal
Judiciary into a ‘racketeerinfluenced and corrupt organization’(Cf. Title 18 of
the U.S. Code of federallaw, section 1961 (18 U.S.C. §1961)). c. When a chief
judge engages in suchsystematic abuse of power and financial criminality, how
strongly do his fellowjudges feel justified and encouraged by his example in
committing any and allsorts of abuse and crimes so that abuse and criminality
become their judiciary’s institutionalizedway of doing business?  d. Today
journalists must adapt and askthe famous question that Sen. Howard Baker, the
ranking minority member of theSenate Watergate Committee, asked of every
witness at the Watergate hearings:  1) What did Supreme Court Chief JusticeJohn
G. Roberts, Jr., know about it and when did he know it? 2) What did Justice
Samuel A. Alito,the circuit justice assigned under 28 U.S.C. §42, to, and with
supervisory duties over, theFifth Circuit, which includes Texas, know about it,
and when did he know it? 3) What did Justice Clarence Thomasknow about his
wife’s effort to overturn the 2020 election results; and whendid he know it?
Let him “deal with it” and with his failure toreport in his annual financial
disclosure reports her earnings(jur:72§b) 4) What did Then-Judge, Now-Judge
SoniaSotomayor know about the embarrassing DeLano case and its suppressionfrom
the Senate Committee on Judicial Nominations; and when did she know
it(jur:65§§1-3) 5) What did President Joe Biden knowthrough the FBI secret
vetting reports about the participation in judges’ abuseand criminality, or
their cover-up, by former Chief Judge Merrick Garland ofthe Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit, now his AttorneyGeneral, and Judge
Ketanji Brown Jackson, who sits in that Circuit; and whendid he know it? 4.
Thomson Reuters, on the strength of its 2,500+journalists and 600+
photojournalists, can scoop the story of the justices’abuse and criminality. It
already dare publish on June 30, 2020, the first ofits three-part report
“TheTeflon Robe” on its massive investigationof state judges led by
John.Shiffman@thomsonreuters.comand Michael.Berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx found
that “hardwired judicial corruption” intertwines state judges and thestate
commissions on judicial performance that are duty-bound to supervise
anddiscipline them.  a. Reuters asked readers to send it their storiesof abuse
by judges…and it was “inundated” with them. This goes to showing thatpeople who
have suffered or witnessed judges’ abuse want to tell their story tothe largest
public possible.  5. The mood for exposing the justices’unaccountability and
their consequent riskless abuse of power and financialcriminality is manifest
in Congress. This is shown by The Hill, in its article “House panel to
exploreimpeachment [of Justice Clarence Thomas], judicial ethics in wake of
GinniThomas texts” by Emily Brooks, published on April 2, 2022. It reported
that: a. “Representative Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), the chairmanof the House
Judiciary courts subcommittee, …last year introduced the SupremeCourt Ethics
Act to implement a judicial code of conduct that applies to theSupreme Court.
Jones co-led the Twenty-First Century Courts Act, which would
similarlyimplement a code of conduct for the justices.  b. “He said, “Recent
reports that thetext messages of a justice’s spouse urging the overturning of a
free and fairelection may have been at issue in a case in front [sic] the
Supreme Court —but that the justice did not recuse himself from the case — is
just the latestand particularly egregious example in an unfortunately long list
ofillustrations as to why Supreme Court justices need to follow a formal code
ofethics,” Johnson told The Hill. “I have been calling for this sort ofreform
for years, and I am encouraged to see a large, bipartisan majority ofthe public
in favor of this long overdue legislation…Johnson called forThomas’s
resignation.” 6. Strickland v. U.S.,no. 21-1346, is a civil case where a
decision was handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit on
April 26,2022. It is unprecedented, for it holds that the Federal Judiciary and
itsofficials are suable on grounds of the 5th and 14thAmendments due process
and equal protection of the law clauses, as well asspecific acts of Congress.
Hence, it reversed the outright dismissal by thetrial court, which had invoked
judicial immunity –a doctrine self-servingly conjured upby judges themselves in
defiance of the Constitution– and remanded for furtherproceedings.  a.
Strickland opens the door for allabusees joining forces to collectively demand
compensation from the FederalJudiciary and the justices themselves. Imagine the
amount of business generatedif Thomson Reuters, I, and other media outlets
showed the abusees how to demand such compensation.  B. What I bring to the
joint venture 7. I established JudicialDiscipline Reform. Its website is at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. There I post articles with ;
lawresearch findings and legal strategy to which the national public has
access.Those articles have attracted so many webvisitors and appealed to them
sopositively that as of July 26, 2022, the number of them who had
becomesubscribers was 44,503+.(1Appendix 3)   a. Do you know of any law firm,
let alone alawyer, that has so many subscribers to their website? 8. The
subscribers to my site have foundmy articles appealing although the articles
are intellectually demanding andwritten in long form. It is reasonable to
assume that the subscribers are mostlythe type of highly educated and well-off
readers of such top publications as The New York Times and its Sunday
Edition,The Washington Post, The New Yorker, TIME Magazine, The Atlantic, The
Boston Globe, etc. 9. These subscribers can afford the booksand services of
Thomson Reuters and other publishers, just as their lawyerscan.  10. The
general public too, including pro ses,is attracted to the website and can
patronize its sponsor’s advertisement therethanks to the concrete, reasonable,
and feasible ways in which I have proposed thatpeople take action in their own
interest; e.g.: a. the two-phase methodfor writing their own story;  b. how to
use legal sourcesfor brief writing(see a list of them at Appendix 6§C);  c. the
folly of pro sesimprovising themselves as lawyers; d. how to seek free legal
assistance.  11. Judicial Discipline Reform, its articles, and its website rely
on a three-volume study* † ♣ of judges and theirjudiciaries, the product of
professional law research and writing, andstrategic thinking. It is titled
downloadable as follows: Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news andpublishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † ♣ i.Open the downloaded files using
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available for free. ♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf ;

from OL3:1144-1480+

12. Moreover, I bring to the joint venture aplan of also concrete, realistic,
and feasibleactions that media outlets and I can undertake right away and that
isreasonably calculated to be financially and reputationally beneficial for
allventurers. It includes an investigative plan with an abundance of
leads(OL:194§E).
C. From judicial resignations, an institutionalcrisis, a constitutional
convention, to a new constitution by today’s We thePeople  13. Reuters, WSJ,
TheWashington Post (WP), and all other media outlets can do so muchbetter than
merely sit back and watch as spectators how other publishers andCongress scoop
the exposure of judges’ and justices’ commission or condonationof abuse of
power and financial criminality, just as Politico scooped the abortiondraft
opinion. They have the means to take the reins of the investigativebandwagon
and set out towards Pioneeringthe news and publishing field of judicial
unaccountability reporting. 14. The Washington Postpublished with courage and
persistence a series of articles that set in motiona generalized media
investigation of the crimes that President Nixon and ‘Allhis Men’ committed by
organizing and covering up the break-in at the DemocraticNational Committee
headquarters at the Watergate building in Washington, DC, onJune 17, 1972, to
commit political espionage. WP was instrumental inforcing Nixon to resign and
causing ‘All his Men’ to go to jail. For that, WPbecame the symbol of
excellence in journalism in the public interest, ingeneral, and investigative
journalism, in particular.  15. Today, Reuters, WSJ, WP,and all other media
outlets can do so much more than bring down a group of menwho went rogue.
Rather, they can expose how a whole branch of government, theFederal Judiciary,
has gone rogue to become a racketeering enterprise.  16. They can inform the
nationalpublic about, and so outrage it at, judges’ and justices’ abuse and
criminalityas to stir up the public, having lost its trust in their integrity
and honesty,to demand the resignation of judges, justices, and even a whole
court, such asthe Supreme Court.  17. This inform and outrage strategyis
realistic, for the public is strongest during primaries and in view
ofelections. Then it wields its enormous power to donate money, volunteer
ascampaign workers, spread positive word of mouth, and vote.
a. Ironically, this strategy isunintentionally validated by JusticeThomas, who
recognized the dire impact on theSupreme Court of the loss of trust in it when
he said in connection with theleaked abortion draft opinion: “"When you lose
that trust, especially inthe institution that I'm in, it changes the
institution fundamentally. Youbegin to look over your shoulder…What happened at
the court was tremendouslybad,…I wonder how long we’re going to have these
institutions at the rate we’reundermining them. And then I wonder when they’re
gone or destabilized, whatwe’re going to have as a country.” Clarence Thomas
says SupremeCourt leak has eroded trust in institution; Robert Barnes;
TheWashington Post; May 14, 2022. b. The likely answer to his rhetorical
questionis ‘we are going to have a summer of rage’. That is precisely the mood
that can fuel the series of events leading to those discussed hereunder.
  18. There is also precedent for the inform and outragestrategy in the forced
resignations of(OL3:1423§c): a. Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas onMay 14,
1969;  b. Former Ninth Circuit Chief JudgeAlex Kozinski on December 18, 2017;
c. Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry,the sister of President Donald Trump, who
resigned from the 3rd Circuit onFebruary 11, 2019; d. Circuit Judge Robert Bork
of the Courtof Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit had his resignation
preemptedby the Senate’s rejection of his nomination to the Supreme Court on
October 23, 1987. He was doomed by the public outrage that he had provoked more
than a decade earlierwhen he carried out President’s Nixon’s order to fire
Special WatergateProsecutor Archibald Cox in the Saturday Night Massacre on
October 20, 1973.  19. Indeed, public outrage is apowerful force very difficult
to resist. The outrage unleashed by the exposureof justices’ and judges’ abuse
and criminality can set off an institutionalcrisis.  20. In turn, it can force
theoccurrence of what 34 states have petitioned Congress to do since April 2,
2014,but its members will not do voluntarily, lest they lose their privileges
andpower: call a constitutional convention in harmony with Article V of the
Constitution. 21. A constitutional convention ranaway with its mandate and
instead of reforming the Articles of Confederationthat the Second Continental
Congress approved on November 1, 1777, cast themaside. The convention, likewise
made up only of white landed Christian freemen, drafted the current
Constitution, which was ratified by the 13 states in1789.  22. Public outrage
has beenbuilding up since the eruption of the MeToo! and BLM movements,
theprotests against social and economic inequality, the resentment against
theCovid mandates and discrimination of Asian and Pacific Islanders
communities, thefast-intensifying animosity among supporters and opponents of
the abortion opinion.  23. That outrage can reach itsparoxysm and clear the way
to the irrepressible will of the living today tobreak free from the now dead
hands of those who wrote the Constitution 233years ago. Never conceived to deal
with a world that their heads could not evenimagine, that Constitution is
twisted to read one way at one time and the oppositeway at another time by nine
unelected justices…who even unaccountably andrisklessly participate in, or
cover up, their and their colleagues’ abuse ofpower and criminality.  Enough is
enough!
We won't take any abuse by anybody anymore.
24. Their outrage casting aside thecurrent Constitution even before they
become assembled in a constitutionalconvention, today’s men, women, and LBTGQ,
rich and poor, those of faith andno faith, of any color, whether in cities,
suburbs, rural areas, and Indianland, workers at desks or with tools in their
hands, from young adults tosenior citizens, all of them can choose for
themselves as the sovereign sourceof all public power the fundamental rules by
which they want to live. They canauthor the Code of Governance of Today’s We
the People.  D. First steps toward the key objectives of thebusiness venture
25. The media outlets that areinstrumental in launching this chain of events
can become for generations thesymbol of excellence in journalism and its power
to bring about transformativechange in the public interest. Such recognition
can begin with winning PulitzerPrizes and making money, for “Scandal sells”.
26. You all and I can in our ownfinancial and reputational interest take the
lead by Pioneering the news andpublishing field of judicial unaccountability
reporting. Our audience will be, in general, the national public in voting
mood,and, in particular, the scores of millions of people who have suffered
orwitnessed judges’ abuse of power and financial criminality.  27. The first
steps of the jointventure consist in the serial publication by you of the
following articles thatI have written and can edit upon your review of
them(Appendix 6§A); and others that I can write oncommission on current events
or along the lines of my sample ofsubjects(Appendix 6§B); and
furtherinvestigation to follow the leads that they contain; e.g.: a.
judges’interception of people’s emails andmail to detect and suppress those of
their critics; its investigation byforensic Information Technology experts; b.
themathematicaldemonstration that the overwhelming majority of briefs are not
readby judges, but rather are disposed of to lighten their workload by their
havingclerks rubberstamp reasonless, unresearched, fiat-like 5¢ dumping forms;
thestatistical auditing of judges’ opinions, most of which they post to their
courts’websites, whose addresses can be found through the federal court finder;
c. thedevelopment of advanced statistical, linguistic, and literary
researchsoftware to analyze all sorts and vast amounts of writings to detectthe
most persuasive kind of evidence: patterns andschemes of abuse; d. theFollow
the Money! and Follow the Wire! investigations that applyforensic research
techniques(jur:102§a;OL:194§E) to discover assets thatjudges have grabbed,
concealed, evaded taxes on, and money laundered(OL:1);and determine their
illegal use therefor of their vast, national digital networkand expertise; cf.
CM/ECF (Case Management/Electronic Case Filing) and PACER (Public Access to
Court Electronic Records; e. judges’abuse of the congressional grant to them of
self-discipline authority under theJudicial Conduct and Disability Act of
1980(28 U.S.C. §§351-364) by dismissing 100% of complaintsfiled against any
federal judge and denying 100% of petitions toreview those dismissals, thus
institutionalizing judges’ implicit or explicit complicit agreement for
reciprocalexoneration from all complaints: ‘Today I exempt you from
thecomplaint against you, and tomorrow you exempt me and my friends from
anycomplaint against us, no matter the nature, extent, and gravity of the
abusecomplained-about’
f. the investigation of Supreme Courtjustices and congressional leadership,
which can benefit from the abundance ofleads that I have collected(OL:194§E;
jur:65§B). 28. The business venture can alsoenhance my site technologically
into a clearinghouse and a research center.This will allow people to post their
stories of abuse by judges that they havesuffered or witness as well as their
complaints against judges already or to befiled; and to research them for the
most persuasive type of evidence: patternsand coordinated schemes of abuse
ofpower and financial criminality. 29. The venture can enable people totell
their stories to the national public at unprecedented citizens hearings.The
latter will be organized by Reuters, WSJ, WP, other mediaoutlets, their
journalists, and professors and students. They will be held atuniversity
auditoriums, media stations, and via video conference to make it inexpensiveto
the largest number of people to tell their stories and virtually attend
thecitizens hearings. a. Those hearings will be a source of invaluableleads for
researchers to further their investigation of justices’ and judges’abuse and
criminality. Thus, the hearings can be expected to become aself-reinforcing
mechanism for further research that make any investment inmounting the learning
curve pay off and become long-term financially andreputationally profitable.
E. Myoffer to make a presentation on this proposal for a joint venture
30. Ioffer to present this proposal for a joint venture via video conference
and, ifin NY City, in person. Preview its key features by reviewing my webinar
and its slides.
31. To schedule the presentation use my contact information below.

32. To invite people to attend the presentation and send you their complaints
and stories of judges' abuse that they have suffered or witnessed  you can as
widely as possible share this article with all your friends, relatives,
workmates, etc., and post it to social media, such as:
Facebook,   YouTube,   LinkedIn,   Instagram,   Google Plus,   Pinterest,
Reddit,   Snapchat,   WhatsApp  Tweet: Tell journalists your storyof justices'
& judges' abuse, which can lead to citizens hearings, their resignations, the
Federal Judiciary’s fall & Today's We the People constitution
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf
33. Toencourage the investigation of justices and judges by top
journalists(OL3:1452§1) and the law professors whowere members of the Biden
Commission on the Reform ofthe Supreme Court, place each of the following blocs
of email addresses in theTo: and the cc: box, respectively, of this email so
that they too receive thisarticle. Then  every day go to your "Sent" folder,
wherea copy of the emails that you sent is found, open it, click "Reply All"and
"Send". To: [journalists]James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx,Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx,
Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx, michael.siconolfi@xxxxxxx, kate.davidson@xxxxxxx,
john.shiffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
,blake.morrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, newstip@xxxxxxxxx,
patricia.wen@xxxxxxxxx,brian.mcgrory@xxxxxxxxx, spotlight@xxxxxxxxx,
dbiscobing@xxxxxxxxx, adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
assignmentdesk@xxxxxxxxx, iteam@xxxxxxx,cmartel@xxxxxxxxxxx,
erik.ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx, Anna.Brand@xxxxxxxxxx, Tim.Perone@xxxxxxxxxx,
Jessica.Simeone@xxxxxxxxxx, Jaquetta.White@xxxxxxxxxx,
adenney@xxxxxxx,pam.spector@xxxxxxxxxx,  insiders@xxxxxxxx,
tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gryle@xxxxxxxx, ginger.thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,marketresearch.thomsonreuters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, contact@xxxxxxxx,
fshiel@xxxxxxxx,investigations@xxxxxxxx, charles.ornstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
newsletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Lisabennett418@xxxxxxxxx, mderienzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, emily.holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxx,
ryan.grim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
info@xxxxxx,corderoric@xxxxxxxxx, mcnulaj@xxxxxxxxxxx,
communication@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aturturro@xxxxxxx,
support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Opencourt@xxxxxxx,
aj.cameron1@xxxxxxxxx,wpmagazine@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
Evan.Allen@xxxxxxxxx,Brendan.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx, colorofmoney@xxxxxxxxxxxx, cc:
[professors]robert.bauer@xxxxxxx, cristina.rodriguez@xxxxxxxx,
dana.fowler@xxxxxxxxxxxx, caroline.fredrickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
kandrias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack.balkin@xxxxxxxx,baude@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
madams@xxxxxx, charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx,acrespo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
jgoldsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wdellinger@xxxxxxx,
levi@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ecb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
justin.driver@xxxxxxxx,development@xxxxxxxxxxxx, rfallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
heather.k.gerken@xxxxxxxx, tgrove@xxxxxxxxxx,ngertner@xxxxxxxxxxx,
tgriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
ojohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, awhite36@xxxxxxx,
lacroix@xxxxxxxxxxxx,lemos@xxxxxxxxxxxx, trevor.morrison@xxxxxxx,
cnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rick.pildes@xxxxxxx, d-strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
mramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx, tribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, krooseve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
kewhitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.waldman@xxxxxxx,
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
34. This is an opportunity for youand the rest of the media, so unjustly
denigrated as “the enemy of the people”,to redeem yourselves by informing the
people and channeling their outrage so asto enable them to assert their status
as the Masters of all public servants, includingjustices and judges, entitled
to exercise their authority as such to hold themaccountable for their abuse of
the public power entrusted to them and liable tocompensate the victims of their
abuse.
35. By so doing, we can become financiallyand reputationally rewarded not only
with Pulitzer Prizes, but also by beingnationally recognized by a grateful
People as their Champions ofJustice.     F. Every meaningful cause needs
resources for its advancement;
    none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money     36. Lip
service advances nothing; but it continues to enable the abusers.   Put your
money where your
outrage at abuse and
quest for justice are.   37. Support the professional law research and
writing, and strategic thinking at

  Judicial Discipline Reform
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org.  38. DONATE by making a deposit or ;
an online transfer through either the Bill Pay feature of your online account
or Zelle from your account   to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260
13 673;   or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.    Sincerely, Dr.Richard
Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, NY 10472-6506
      tel. +1(718)827-9521Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx ,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx**************************

References:
- [administrating-your-public-servants] How journalists and you can seize on the abortion draft opinion to investigate justices' and judges' abuse of power, leading to resignations, their Judiciary's downfall, a constitutional convention, and Today's We the People Constitution
  - From: dr.richard.cordero_esq

[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: How journalists and you can seize on the abortion draft opinion to investigate justices' and judges' abuse of power, leading to resignations, their Judiciary's downfall, a constitutional convention, and Today's We the People Constitution

Other related posts: