https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nO8VDc9cZ5E
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 10:35 PM dr.richard.cordero_esq <
dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this
email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of *We the
People*; e.g., click “*Reply All*” and “*Send*”.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register or
+ New or Users >Add New; or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it
shows irregularities when received, e.g., joinedwords, they crept in
during transit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf
version of this article -as such likely to be free of irregularities- is
found here
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf>
and downloadable through the next link.
*Proposal to Reuters, WSJ, WP, and all other media outlets for a joint
venture at the most propitious time: when the Supreme Court’s leaked
abortion draft opinion has set the mood for national outrage to explode as
a result of the exposure of justices’ and judges’ participation in abuse of
power and financial criminality so coordinated and widespread as to amount
to their running the Federal Judiciary as a racketeering enterprise: *“Scandal
sells” and can win Pulitzer Prizes by leading to
the serial resignation of justices, judges, and courts;
the loss of public trust in the Federal Judiciary that brings it down;
the calling of the constitutional convention already petitioned by 34
states;
and a new constitution by today’s *We the People*
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2
/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf>
*By*
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. *Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform
.org , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
A. The foundation for exposing judges’ and justices’ abuse of power and
financial criminality
1. The leaked draft opinion by Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito
revealing that a majority of the Court is in favor of overturning *Roe v.
Wade* has caused national jubilation but even more outrage.
2. That outrage would pale by comparison to that which can be provoked and
overcome much jubilation by a series of responsible and principled
articles, such as those already written and available for review(Appendix
6§A
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf>
) or that can be written on commission(Appendix 6§B
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf>),
exposing how the justices, who are unaccountable and not even held to any
ethics code, run and condone the running of the Federal Judiciary as a
racketeering
enterprise
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-media_to_investigate_judges_financial_criminality.pdf>.
3. There is solid basis for raising these charges against justices and
judges. To begin with, there is the series
<https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-the-journal-found-judges-violations-of-law-on-conflicts-11632833775?mod=Searchresults_pos11&page=1>
of
articles that *The Wall Street Journal* (*WSJ*) began to publish on
September 28, 2021, under the initial title “131 Federal Judges Broke the
Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest”.
a. Another article in the series was published on November 2, 2021, titled
“Hidden Interests – Federal Judge Files Recusal Notices in 138 Cases After
WSJ Queries. [U.S. Chief District Judge of the Eastern District of Texas]
Rodney Gilstrap initially argued he didn’t violate financial-conflicts
law”; James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx, Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx, Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx,
Michael.Siconolfi@xxxxxxx.
b. The judges who failed to recuse themselves in order to grab money
necessarily engaged, lest they incriminate themselves, in inside trading,
fraud, concealment of assets, tax evasion, and money laundering. Those are
crimes. They are complex and require coordination. When judges committed
them as principals or condoned them as accessories, they became the
judicial class that turned the Federal Judiciary into a ‘racketeer
influenced and corrupt organization’(Cf. Title 18 of the U.S. Code of
federal law, section 1961 (18 U.S.C. §1961
<https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>)).
c. When a chief judge engages in such systematic abuse of power and
financial criminality, how strongly do his fellow judges feel justified and
encouraged by his example in committing any and all sorts of abuse
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judicial_abuse_forms.pdf>
and crimes so that abuse and criminality
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-media_to_investigate_judges_financial_criminality.pdf>
become their judiciary’s institutionalized way of doing business?
d. Today journalists must adapt and ask the famous question that Sen.
Howard Baker, the ranking minority member of the Senate Watergate
Committee, asked of every witness at the Watergate hearings:
1) What did Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., know about
it and when did he know it?
2) What did Justice Alito, the circuit justice assigned under 28 U.S.C.
§42 <https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>, to, and with
supervisory duties over, the Fifth Circuit, which includes Texas, know
about it, and when did he know it?
3) What did Justice Clarence Thomas know about his wife’s effort to
overturn the 2020 election results; and when did he know it? Let him “deal
with
it
<https://www.huffpost.com/entry/clarence-thomas-accept-roe-v-wade-bullied-live-with-critics_n_6276e62ce4b0b7c8f084fe16>”
and with his failure to report in his annual financial disclosure reports
her earnings(jur:72§b
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
)
4) What did Then-Judge, Now-Judge Sonia Sotomayor know about the
embarrassing *DeLano* case and its suppression from the Senate Committee
on Judicial Nominations; and when did she know it(jur:65§§1-3
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
)
5) What did President Joe Biden know through the FBI secret vetting
reports about the participation in judges’ abuse and criminality, or their
cover-up, by former Chief Judge Merrick Garland of the Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit, now his Attorney General, and Judge
Ketanji Brown Jackson, who sits in that Circuit; and when did he know it?
4. Thomson Reuters, on the strength of its 2,500+ journalists and 600+
photojournalists, can scoop the story of the justices’ abuse and
criminality. It already dare publish on June 30, 2020, the first of its
three-part report “The Teflon Robe” on its massive investigation
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Reuters_judges_investigation.pdf>
of state judges led by John.Shiffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and Michael.Berens
@thomsonreuters.com. It found that “hardwired judicial corruption”
intertwines state judges and the state commissions on judicial performance
that are duty-bound to supervise and discipline them.
a. Reuters asked readers to send it their stories
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_your_story_for_Reuters.pdf>
of abuse by judges…and it was “inundated” with them. This goes to showing
that people who have suffered or witnessed judges’ abuse want to tell their
story to the largest public possible.
5. The mood for exposing the justices’ unaccountability and their
consequent riskless abuse of power and financial criminality is manifest in
Congress. This is shown by *The Hill*
<https://thehill.com/news/house/3466200-house-panel-to-explore-impeachment-judicial-ethics-in-wake-of-ginni-thomas-texts/?email=dcd9182650c7057d9562f94b9683d2cb21956491&emaila=196e19bbfcda79590d53fee9f4e29783&emailb=3ec1a5012e1dfb515ec80cc7ab0f7d18aedc7608c79a990da27e4e0908e91fd4&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=04.26.22%20RZ%20The%20Hill%20News%20Alert%20SCOTUS%20impeachments&utm_term=News%20Alerts>,
in its article “House panel to explore impeachment [of Justice Clarence
Thomas], judicial ethics in wake of Ginni Thomas texts” by Emily Brooks
<https://thehill.com/author/emily-brooks/>, published on April 2, 2022.
It reported that:
a. “Representative Hank Johnson <https://thehill.com/people/hank-johnson/>
(D-Ga.), the chairman of the House Judiciary courts subcommittee, …last
year introduced the Supreme Court Ethics Act to implement a judicial code
of conduct that applies to the Supreme Court. Jones co-led the Twenty-First
Century Courts Act, which would similarly implement a code of conduct for
the justices.
b. “He said, “Recent reports that the text messages of a justice’s spouse
urging the overturning of a free and fair election may have been at issue
in a case in front [sic] the Supreme Court — but that the justice did not
recuse himself from the case — is just the latest and particularly
egregious example in an unfortunately long list of illustrations as to why
Supreme Court justices need to follow a formal code of ethics,” Johnson
told *The Hill*. “I have been calling for this sort of reform for years,
and I am encouraged to see a large, bipartisan majority of the public in
favor of this long overdue legislation…Johnson called for Thomas’s
resignation.”
6. *Strickland v. U.S.*, no. 21-1346, is a civil case where a decision
was handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit
<https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/> on April 26, 2022. It is unprecedented,
for it holds that the Federal Judiciary and its officials are suable on
grounds of the 5th and 14th Amendments due process and equal protection
of the law clauses, as well as specific acts of Congress. Hence, it
reversed the outright dismissal by the trial court, which had invoked
judicial immunity –a doctrine self-servingly conjured up
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_no_judicial_immunity.pdf>
by judges themselves in defiance of the Constitution– and remanded for
further proceedings.
a. *Strickland* opens the door for all abusees joining forces to
collectively demand compensation from the Federal Judiciary and the
justices themselves. Imagine the amount of business generated if Thomson
Reuters, I, and other media outlets showed the abusees how to demand such
compensation
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-join_demand_for_compensation_from_judges.pdf>
.
B. What I bring to the joint venture
7. I established *Judicial Discipline Reform*. Its website is at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>. There I post articles with
law research findings and legal strategy to which the national public has
access. Those articles have attracted so many webvisitors and appealed to
them so positively that as of June 2, 2022, the number of them who had
become subscribers was 44,142+.(Appendix 3
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-CIRS_&_trainees.pdf>
)
a. Do you know of any law firm, let alone a lawyer, that has so many
subscribers to their website?
8. The subscribers to my site have found my articles appealing although
the articles are intellectually demanding and written in long form. It is
reasonable to assume that the subscribers are mostly the type of highly
educated and well-off readers of such top publications as *The New York
Times* and its Sunday Edition, *The Washington Post*, *The New Yorker*,
TIME Magazine, *The Atlantic*, *The Boston Globe*, etc.
9. These subscribers can afford the books and services of Thomson Reuters
and other publishers, just as their lawyers can.
10. The general public too, including pro ses, is attracted to the website
and can patronize its sponsor’s advertisement there thanks to the concrete,
reasonable, and feasible ways in which I have proposed that people take
action in their own interest; e.g.:
a. the two-phase method
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf>
for writing their own story;
b. how to use legal sources
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_research_documents&sources.pdf>
for brief writing(see a list of them at Appendix 6§C
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf>);
c. the folly of pro ses
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_folly_of_pro_se.pdf>
improvising themselves as lawyers;
d. how to seek free legal assistance
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_forming_local_chapters&appealing_to_schools.pdf>
.
11.* Judicial Discipline Reform*, its articles, and its website rely on a
three-volume study*
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
†
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>
♣
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
of judges and their judiciaries, the product of professional law research
and writing, and strategic thinking. It is titled downloadable as follows:
*Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:*
*Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability
reporting**
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
†
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>
♣
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
i. Open the downloaded files using Adobe Acrobat Reader
<https://acrobat.adobe.com/us/en/acrobat/pdf-reader.html>, which is
available for free.
♣ Volume 3: http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3
/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
from OL3:1144-1480+
12. Moreover, I bring to the joint venture a plan
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_articles_actions_to_expose_judges.pdf>
of
also concrete, realistic, and feasible actions that media outlets and I can
undertake right away and that is reasonably calculated to be financially
and reputationally beneficial for all venturers. It includes an
investigative plan with an abundance of leads(OL:194§E
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_institutionalized_judges_abuse_power.pdf>
).
C. From judicial resignations, an institutional crisis, a constitutional
convention, to a new constitution by today’s *We the People*
13. Reuters, *WSJ*, *The Washington Post* (*WP*), and all other media
outlets can do so much better than merely sit back and watch as spectators
how other publishers and Congress scoop the exposure of judges’ and
justices’ commission or condonation of abuse of power
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judicial_abuse_forms.pdf>
and financial criminality
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf>,
just as Politico
<https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473>
scooped
the abortion draft opinion. They have the means to take the reins of the
investigative bandwagon and set out towards *Pioneering the news and
publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting.*
14. *The Washington Post* published with courage and persistence a series
of articles that set in motion a generalized media investigation of the
crimes that President Nixon and ‘All his Men’ committed by organizing and
covering up the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters
at the Watergate building in Washington, DC, on June 17, 1972, to commit
political espionage. *WP* was instrumental in forcing Nixon to resign and
causing ‘All his Men’ to go to jail. For that, *WP *became the symbol of
excellence in journalism in the public interest, in general, and
investigative journalism, in particular.
15. Today, Reuters, *WSJ*, *WP*, and all other media outlets can do so
much more than bring down a group of men who went rogue. Rather, they can
expose how a whole branch of government, the Federal Judiciary, has gone
rogue to become a racketeering enterprise.
16. They can inform the national public about, and so outrage it at,
judges’ and justices’ abuse and criminality as to stir up the public,
having lost its trust in their integrity and honesty, to demand the
resignation of judges, justices, and even a whole court, such as the
Supreme Court.
17. This inform and outrage strategy is realistic, for the public is
strongest during primaries and in view of elections. Then it wields its
enormous power to donate money, volunteer as campaign workers, spread
positive word of mouth, and vote.
a. Ironically, this strategy is unintentionally validated by Justice
Thomas
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/14/clarence-thomas-supreme-court-leak-roe-trust/>,
who recognized the dire impact on the Supreme Court of the loss of trust in
it when he said in connection with the leaked abortion draft opinion:
“"When you lose that trust, especially in the institution that I'm in, it
changes the institution fundamentally. You begin to look over your
shoulder…What happened at the court was tremendously bad,…I wonder how long
we’re going to have these institutions at the rate we’re undermining them.
And then I wonder when they’re gone or destabilized, what we’re going to
have as a country.” *Clarence Thomas
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/14/clarence-thomas-supreme-court-leak-roe-trust/>
says Supreme Court leak has eroded trust in institution*; Robert Barnes; *The
Washington Post*; May 14, 2022.
b. The likely answer to his rhetorical question is ‘we are going to have a
*summer
of rage*’. That is precisely the mood that can fuel the series of events
leading to those discussed hereunder.
18. There is also precedent for the inform and outrage strategy in the
forced resignations of(OL3:1423§c
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Reuters_journalists_lawyers_on_judges_power_abuse.pdf>
):
a. Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas on May 14, 1969;
b. Former Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski on December 18, 2017;
c. Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, the sister of President Donald
Trump, who resigned from the 3rd Circuit on February 11, 2019;
d. Circuit Judge Robert Bork of the Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit had his resignation preempted by the Senate’s rejection of
his nomination to the Supreme Court on October 23, 1987. He was doomed by
the public outrage that he had provoked more than a decade earlier when he
carried out President’s Nixon’s order to fire Special Watergate Prosecutor
Archibald Cox in the Saturday Night Massacre on October 20, 1973.
19. Indeed, public outrage is a powerful force very difficult to resist.
The outrage unleashed by the exposure of justices’ and judges’ abuse and
criminality can set off an institutional crisis.
20. In turn, it can force the occurrence of what 34 states have petitioned
Congress to do since April 2, 2014, but its members will not do
voluntarily, lest they lose their privileges and power: call a
constitutional convention in harmony with Article V of the Constitution
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/docs/US_Constitution.pdf>.
21. A constitutional convention ran away with its mandate and instead of
reforming the Articles of Confederation that the Second Continental
Congress approved on November 1, 1777, cast them aside. The convention,
likewise made up only of white landed Christian free men, drafted the
current Constitution, which was ratified by the 13 states in 1789.
22. Public outrage has been building up since the eruption of the *MeToo!*
and BLM movements, the protests against social and economic inequality, the
resentment against the Covid mandates and discrimination of Asian and
Pacific Islanders communities, the fast-intensifying animosity among
supporters and opponents of the abortion opinion.
23. That outrage can reach its paroxysm and clear the way to the
irrepressible will of the living today to break free from the now dead
hands of those who wrote the Constitution 233 years ago. Never conceived to
deal with a world that their heads could not even imagine, that
Constitution is twisted to read one way at one time and the opposite way at
another time by nine unelected justices…who even unaccountably and
risklessly participate in, or cover up, their and their colleagues’ abuse
of power and criminality.
*Enough is enough! We won't take any abuse by anybody anymore. *
24. Their outrage casting aside the current Constitution even before they
become assembled in a constitutional convention, today’s men, women, and
LBTGQ, rich and poor, those of faith and no faith, of any color, whether in
cities, suburbs, rural areas, and Indian land, workers at desks or with
tools in their hands, from young adults to senior citizens, all of them can
choose for themselves as the sovereign source of all public power the
fundamental rules by which they want to live. They can author the Code of
Governance of Today’s *We the People*.
D. First steps toward the key objectives of the business venture
25. The media outlets that are instrumental in launching this chain of
events can become for generations the symbol of excellence in journalism
and its power to bring about transformative change in the public interest.
Such recognition can begin with winning Pulitzer Prizes and making money,
for “Scandal sells”.
26. You all and I can in our own financial and reputational interest take
the lead by *Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial
unaccountability reporting*. Our audience will be, in general, the
national public in voting mood, and, in particular, the scores of millions
of people who have suffered or witnessed judges’ abuse of power and
financial criminality.
27. The first steps of the joint venture consist in the serial publication
by you of the following articles that I have written and can edit upon your
review of them(Appendix 6§A
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf>);
and others that I can write on commission on current events or along the
lines of my sample of subjects(Appendix 6§B
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf>);
and further investigation to follow the leads that they contain; e.g.:
a. judges’ interception
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_emails_mail_intercepted_by_judges.pdf>
of people’s emails and mail to detect and suppress those of their critics;
its investigation by forensic Information Technology experts;
b. the mathematical demonstration
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judges_do_not_read.pdf>
that
the overwhelming majority of briefs are not read by judges, but rather are
disposed of to lighten their workload by their having clerks rubberstamp
reasonless, unresearched, fiat-like 5¢ dumping forms; the statistical
auditing of judges’ opinions, most of which they post to their courts’
websites, whose addresses can be found through the federal court finder
<https://www.uscourts.gov/federal-court-finder/search>;
c. the development of advanced statistical, linguistic, and literary research
software
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_law_research_proposals.pdf>
to analyze all sorts and vast amounts of writings to detect the most
persuasive kind of evidence: patterns and schemes
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_how_fraud_scheme_works.pdf>
of abuse;
d. the *Follow the Money*! and *Follow the Wire!* investigations that
apply forensic research techniques(jur:102§a
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>;
OL:194§E
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_institutionalized_judges_abuse_power.pdf>)
to discover assets that judges have grabbed, concealed, evaded taxes on,
and money laundered(OL:1
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>);
and determine their illegal use therefor of their vast, national digital
network and expertise; cf. *CM/ECF
<https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/electronic-filing-cmecf>* (Case
Management/Electronic Case Filing) and PACER <https://pacer.uscourts.gov/>
(Public Access to Court Electronic Records;
e. judges’ abuse of the congressional grant to them of self-discipline
authority under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980(28 U.S.C.
§§351-364 <https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>) by dismissing
100%
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_complaint_dismissal_statistics.pdf>
of
complaints filed against any federal judge and denying 100%
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_JJ_Kavanaugh-Garland_exoneration_policy.pdf>
of
petitions to review those dismissals, thus institutionalizing judges’
implicit or explicit complicit agreement for reciprocal exoneration
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_JgACBarrett_condonation_judges_power_abuse.pdf>
from all complaints: ‘Today I exempt you from the complaint against you,
and tomorrow you exempt me and my friends from any complaint against us, no
matter the nature, extent, and gravity of the abuse complained-about’
f. the investigation of Supreme Court justices and congressional
leadership, which can benefit from the abundance of leads that I have
collected(OL:194§E
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_institutionalized_judges_abuse_power.pdf>
; jur:65§B
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
).
28. The business venture can also enhance my site technologically into a
clearinghouse and a research center. This will allow people to post their
stories of abuse by judges that they have suffered or witness as well as
their complaints against judges already or to be filed; and to research
them for the most persuasive type of evidence: patterns and coordinated
schemes
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_how_fraud_scheme_works.pdf>
of abuse of power and financial criminality.
29. The venture can enable people to tell their stories to the national
public at unprecedented citizens hearings
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_your_story_for_media&citizens_hearings.pdf>.
The latter will be organized by Reuters, *WSJ*, *WP*, other media
outlets, their journalists, and professors and students. They will be held
at university auditoriums, media stations, and via video conference to make
it inexpensive to the largest number of people to tell their stories and
virtually attend the citizens hearings.
a. Those hearings will be a source of invaluable leads for researchers to
further their investigation of justices’ and judges’ abuse and criminality.
Thus, the hearings can be expected to become a self-reinforcing mechanism
for further research that make any investment in mounting the learning
curve pay off and become long-term financially and reputationally
profitable.
E. My offer to make a presentation on this proposal for a joint venture
30. I offer to present this proposal for a joint venture via video
conference and, if in NY City, in person. Preview its key features by
reviewing my webinar
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_webinar_judges_abuse_compensation.pdf>
and its slides
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_webinar&story_workshop_slides.pdf>
.
31. To schedule the presentation use my contact information below.
32. To invite people to attend the presentation and send you their
complaints and stories of judges' abuse that they have suffered or
witnessed you can as widely as possible share this article with all your
friends, relatives, workmates, etc., and post it to social media, such as:
Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Plus, Pinterest,
Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsApp
Tweet: Tell journalists your story of justices' & judges' abuse, which
can lead to citizens hearings, their resignations, the Federal
Judiciary’s fall & Today's We the People constitution
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2
/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_from_abortion_decision_to_new_constitution.pdf>
33. To encourage the investigation of justices and judges by top
journalists(OL3:1452
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_articles_actions_to_expose_judges.pdf>
§1
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_articles_actions_to_expose_judges.pdf>)
and the law professors who were members of the Biden Commission
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-politicians_v_Biden_SCt_Commission.pdf>
on the Reform of the Supreme Court, place each of the following blocs of
email addresses in the To: and the cc: box, respectively, of this email so
that they too receive this article. Then *every day* go to your "Sent"
folder, where a copy of the emails that you sent is found, open it, click
"*Reply
All*" and "*Send*".
To: [journalists]
James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx, Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx, Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx,
michael.siconolfi@xxxxxxx, kate.davidson@xxxxxxx, john.shiffman@
thomsonreuters.com, michael.berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ,blake.morrison@
thomsonreuters.com, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
newstip@xxxxxxxxx, patricia.wen@xxxxxxxxx, brian.mcgrory@xxxxxxxxx,
spotlight@xxxxxxxxx, dbiscobing@xxxxxxxxx, adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
iteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, assignmentdesk@xxxxxxxxx, iteam@xxxxxxx,
cmartel@xxxxxxxxxxx, erik.ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx, Anna.Brand@xxxxxxxxxx,
Tim.Perone@xxxxxxxxxx, Jessica.Simeone@xxxxxxxxxx
<jessica.simeone@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jaquetta.White@xxxxxxxxxx
<jaquetta.white@xxxxxxxxxx>, adenney@xxxxxxx, pam.spector@xxxxxxxxxx,
insiders@xxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gryle@xxxxxxxx,
ginger.thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
marketresearch.thomsonreuters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
contact@xxxxxxxx, fshiel@xxxxxxxx, investigations@xxxxxxxx,
charles.ornstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, newsletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lisabennett418@xxxxxxxxx, mderienzo@
publicintegrity.org, watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, emily.holden@
theguardian.com, tips@xxxxxxxxxxx, ryan.grim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@
propublica.org, info@xxxxxx, corderoric@xxxxxxxxx, mcnulaj@xxxxxxxxxxx,
communication@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aturturro@xxxxxxx,
support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Opencourt@xxxxxxx, aj.cameron1@xxxxxxxxx,
wpmagazine@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Evan.Allen@xxxxxxxxx, Brendan.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx,
colorofmoney@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
cc: [professors]
robert.bauer@xxxxxxx, cristina.rodriguez@xxxxxxxx,
dana.fowler@xxxxxxxxxxxx, caroline.fredrickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
kandrias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack.balkin@xxxxxxxx, baude@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
madams@xxxxxx, charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx, acrespo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgoldsmith@
law.harvard.edu, bross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wdellinger@xxxxxxx,
levi@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ecb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, justin.driver@xxxxxxxx,
development@xxxxxxxxxxxx, rfallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, heather.k.gerken@
yale.edu, tgrove@xxxxxxxxxx, ngertner@xxxxxxxxxxx, tgriffith@
law.harvard.edu, bhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojohns@
law.columbia.edu, awhite36@xxxxxxx, lacroix@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lemos@
law.duke.edu, trevor.morrison@xxxxxxx, cnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
rick.pildes@xxxxxxx, d-strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://sandiego.edu/>, tribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, krooseve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
kewhitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.waldman@xxxxxxx,
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
34. This is an opportunity for you and the rest of the media, so unjustly
denigrated as “the enemy of the people”, to redeem yourselves by informing
the people and channeling their outrage so as to enable them to assert
their status as the Masters of all public servants, including justices and
judges, entitled to exercise their authority as such to hold them
accountable for their abuse of the public power entrusted to them and
liable to compensate the victims of their abuse.
35. By so doing, we can become financially and reputationally rewarded not
only with Pulitzer Prizes, but also by being nationally recognized by a
grateful *People* as their Champions of Justice.
F. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
36. Lip service advances nothing; but it continues to enable the abusers.
Put your money where your
outrage at abuse and
quest for justice are.
37. Support the professional law research and writing, and strategic
thinking at
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
* <http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>*
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>.
38. *DONATE* by making a deposit or an online transfer through either the
Bill Pay feature of your online account or Zelle from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673;
or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089.
*Dare trigger history!*...and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform <http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, NY 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
**************************
