my knowledge of the term understand is just we agree to stand under someone
else's concept of the event/actionI now use the term 'comprehend'
On Wednesday, April 7, 2021, 1:18:05 AM CDT, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
right, im just stating as you know the word game works differently in the
legal sense and the same goes in common court law courts
Example of the Judges scam game in the Court * Keep in mind its right in front
of you the word "court" take a moment and think of what "GAMES" uses in courts.
Ding ding.. its a game .. Do you know how to play in the Kangaroo courts they
have?
Here’s how the scam may work:
- The judge asks, “Do you understand the charges?”. The judge really means,
“Do you agree to the charges?” And charges means a charge for a service or a
charge on a bill.
- The man mistakenly answers, “Yes.” because he thinks he merely said that
he comprehended what has been said.
- Then the judge asks, “Do you plead guilty or non-guilty?” As noted above,
this means is thou going pay the charge?
- The man who has already agreed to the charges, then says “Non-guilty”
which means he is not going to pay for the charges he agreed to. Off to
(debtors) jail!
Avoid all this by not understanding the charges. Say “I don’t understand.”
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:48 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Even in a common law status motion means request as a noun and a verb is a
command and the judge will try to treat it as a request. I've gone the word
requireOn Apr 6, 2021, 12:38 PM -0600, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Pleading or motioning the court. You just gave jurisdiction. Vs you being a man
standing on the land unless your in. A common law court
On Apr 6, 2021, at 9:42 AM, Don Mashak (Redacted sender "donmashak" for DMARC)
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is already an existing Initial Pleading that delineates causes of action.
This Motion is just meant to ensure resolution of the Matter pursuant to the
organic Constitution of "The United States of America" and the Rule of Law.
And I don't mind learning at the school hard knocks as lawyers and judges won't
discuss such things in casual conversation.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021, 1:38:04 AM CDT, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don Mashak-
RE: Looking for input on this proposed boilerplate for a Minnesota State
District Court matter...
Fail !!! Failure to state a claim upon which release can be granted or
Frivolous argument and without merit. Let’s take a second to see who else sees
a fault in this boilerplate? I would not submit what you got if your go to
represent your self as a MAN of Flesh and blood and not pass the bar. You have
a jurisdictional issue in ur proposal.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 4:04 PM Don Mashak <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello:
Looking for input on this proposed boilerplate for a Minnesota State District
Court matter...
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that XXXX shall bring on for hearing on JAN 2, 2022, a
Motion requiring this Court acknowledges XXXXs Standing as a State National,
and will abide by his order for these matters to be heard in accordance with
the Supreme Law of the Land.
ARGUMENT
XXXX is a State National pursuant to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the
Organic Constitution of the United States of America, a social compact agreed
upon among its inhabitants under Natural Law upon which our country was founded.
"to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, First
Paragraph, Declaration of Independence"
Per this Supreme Court case, there are 2 national governments
“Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution,
with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and
independently of that instrument” Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall
Harlan. Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 1901
As a State National, XXXX' orders that the government maintained by Congress
outside and independent of the "organic social compact Constitution" instrument
is Null and Void pursuant to Marbury vs Madison.
"All Laws repugnant to the Constitution are Null and Void" Marbury vs Madison,
5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)
Pursuant to the organic social compact Constitution which is the Supreme Law of
the Land, XXX order this Court to decide these matters only upon the Supreme
Law of the Land.
As this Court receives its authority from the demonstrated Null and Void
Government, State National XXXS orders this matter be reconvened under a Court
and with a jury in compliance with the Organic Social Compact Constitution of
our Country.
Failing this Court abiding by this State Nationals Order to do so, this State
National XXXX order that these matters be heard in accordance, and resolved in
a manner consistent, with the Organic Social Compat Constitution.
NOTICE TO ALL The United States of America INHABITANTS, Failing this Court
abiding by State National XXX's order to recognize, proceed and abide by the
Organic Social Compact Constitution of our country, BE IT KNOWN TO YOU THAT
THIS IS AN OPEN ACT OF INSURRECTION, TREASON, AND SEDITION. Be it further know
that is litigation was NOT decided on the Merits per the RULE OF LAW but rather
was a battle and act of Insurrection in the Progressive Globalists
unconventional revolution by slow, covert infiltration that began circa 1913,
with the formation of an unconstitutional, Fourth Branch of Government, known
as the Administrative State. (Pages 40-52, 66, 25, 102-102 Exhibit 25, from
First Pleading, "Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in
the Progressive Era") In this event, this litigation should be recorded as yet
the exhausting of yet another Peaceful Remedy of WE THE PEOPLE.
CONCLUSION
This Court must comply with State National XXXX's Order, remove itself for, at
a minimum, a lack of jurisdiction, and refer this matter to a Court whose
authority arises with the Organic Social Compact Constitution of our Country,
and with whom said Court has taken an oath to abide by, support and defend said
Constitution.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Sunday, April 4, 2021, 2:02:05 AM CDT, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I've always said, article 1, section 8, clause 17; I'm not an United States
Citizen. I'm a state national. On Apr 3, 2021, 9:07 PM -0600, Fred Wind
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
hello, I think we are making this ctuzenship deal harder than it needs to be,
how about renouncing our federal US citizenship, if thats possible, making us
stateless in the federal zone?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 5:34 PM, Charley Dan<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Don
Mashak
When free states were free states you could not sue the state. Because all
claims came from a man. Since fiat currency and Clearfield doctrine of 1943
they are private corporation and can be sued.
On Mar 29, 2021, 12:40 PM -0600, Don Mashak <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
Hello:
Can someone tell me the history and foundation of the Rule/Lawthat says, Before
you can sue a State, you must have the permission of Congress"?
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Monday, March 29, 2021, 9:50:06 AM CDT, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Glenn, one has to be a Texan to participate, correct?
Get Outlook for Android
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Me
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 12:03:44 AM
To: Administrating-your-public-servants
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Administrating-your-public-servants
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Grand Jury in DFW area We are
convening a Grand Jury on Thursday 8 April 2021 at 307 US Hwy 67 Frontage road
East starting at 11am in the morning
We need people to participate if you are in the DFW area.
This is a way to get a remedy and put a stop to the corruption
It is time for "we the people" to step up and assert ourselves
Map images attached
Please let m know if you are planning on attending because there is a minimum
number that we need
Best Regards, Glenn
