[administrating-your-public-servants] Fwd: Re: refreshers

  • From: Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:07:22 -0600

Hit wrong reply button; meant for this to go to list...
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Re: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:47:47 -0600
From:   Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:     Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx>



Yes, correct, better-understood after listening to some of this George Carlin about...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMwXR-1oajE&fmt=18


On 15.09.2021 10:40, Mike P wrote:

yes....
😂

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2021 11:18 AM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers
Did I just read right below “PENIS”?

On Sep 15, 2021, at 11:37 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


The Articles of Conferring is alive and operating. If not, there is no The United Stars of America. Read the articles of confederation and it talks of this being a friendship agreement and we honor each other, protect life, liberty, and property. Northwest Ordinance Article 14 describes one has to have a claim etc. That whole thing is a private compact or agreement to honor and that is the law of the country. Article 6 states penis agreements and article of Confederation is servings statue at large a lawful document

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:44 AM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Charly, i am getting most of what you are stating.

    However, i am a little sense.

    How foes Article VI of the Constitution make what the law
    enforcement officer does by issuing a summons or ticket Color of Law?

    *Article. VI. *

    *[1.] All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before
    the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the
    United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. *

    *[2.] This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which
    shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or
    which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States,
    shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every
    State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or
    Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding*.**


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
    behalf of Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
    *Sent:* Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:36 PM
    *To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    *Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: refreshers
    I'm a United States of America National
    Article 1, section 8, clause 17
    Not an United States Citizen
    Vacate for lack of jurisdicton
    Article 6 color of law.

    Send and forget. That notice makes it a crime if violated.
    I'm going to be trying and anyone can volunteer but I believe
    when one signs the ticket put next to signature: Article 6 color
    of law
    Then tell officer I just served you notice when you hand ticket
    back. If the officer turns the ticket in to the court. One could
    file immediately for damages and he should be charged with a
    crime. That would be done in DC.

    I just receive from a friend a COL form. Color of law form. It
    was a notice to whoever you gave it to that also stated you are
    committing an felony and you might consider getting an attorney.
    So it backs up what I've thought but now know. I would say this
    is more important then filing bar complaints.  If it fails file
    in DC and I'll help with that because it's not as simple or I
    have not got it simple yet.

    On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 6:01 PM Emb Had
    <ecclesia.rockheights@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

        Can I get a copy of Charlie constitional claim doc?

        On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, 4:51 PM Charley Dan
        <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

            The Constitution of the United States of America is law
             as in by-laws. It references the organic law which
            includes three more documents: Declaration of
            Independance, Articles of Confederation and Northwest
            Ordinance. Article 1, section 8, clause 17 defines
            jurisdiction; Article 6 first paragraph defines law.

            If they are hell  bent on one constitutional law to
            violate.  It does not how many laws you mention but still
            bring them up because they are now crimes and not just
            financial Restitution.

            Hell bent means the whole County and state will deny your
            constitutional rights and these employees are enjoying
            the party of ignoring their company by-laws granted to
            them to exist. Enjoying you struggle in frustrating. One
            may want to inform these lower employees that you will or
            are reporting to corporate. Corporate office is via:
            United States Court of Federal Claims. Make sure you
            approach the court as a sovereign with a petition to
            government for the by-law laws being violated. By-laws is
            the Constitution of the United States of America. If done
            right the Corporate office/United States will send you a
            letter of apology of the employees hurting you.
            Compensation is also going to happen and if incarcerated,
            released. That is your back up and last strategy to win.
            In that USCFC it is you a creation of God as a sovereign
            and the United States a crayon of man a sovereign. Acct
            accordingly when conversing. Treat the United States as
            an corporatiin  you want to keep around but want the
            employees to straighten up.


            On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:30 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

                yes but that also puts you into a position though
                also.  yes since the ticket or whatever is on them.
                The burden of proof is on them you want to fix your
                status so you have and can back up your Article 1
                Section 8 Clause 17 in the event they decide to go
                around that.

                On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:46 PM NELSON DICE
                <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

                    wouldnt charley's claim of no Jurisdiction under
                    Constitution Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 working??

                    VACATE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.....

                    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    *From:*
                    administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                    <administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    on behalf of J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
                    *Sent:* Monday, September 13, 2021 4:44 PM
                    *To:*
                    administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                    <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    *Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants]
                    Re: refreshers
                    you should have fixed your status buddy. No
                    ticket in most cases.. depends if the pigs want
                    to ignore the status

                    On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:36 PM Mike P
                    <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

                        I will tell you WHO gets away with these
                        "niceties" - the ILLEGALS they have NO status
                        and as such they are considered "sovereign."
                        I found this out when a freggin illegal
                        mexican cause my accident AND I had
                        witnessess. NOTHING was done to her as she
                        was illegally here with NO license and NO
                        registration so she got off scott free while
                        I was threatened WITH a ticket BECAUSE I
                        damaged MY auto over $500.00

                        WHAT a JOKE!!!!  But I wasn't surprised
                        because I have been doing long enough to know
                        exactly what was happening AND why.

                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        *From:*
                        administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                        
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                        on behalf of Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
                        *Sent:* Monday, September 13, 2021 3:19 PM
                        *To:*
                        administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                        <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                        *Subject:*
                        [administrating-your-public-servants] Re:
                        refreshers
                        All of these cases are great, but what court
                        would actually recognize them and apply real
                        law to a man or woman?  The courts are as
                        corrupt as the rest of this planet.

                        On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:13 PM NELSON DICE
                        <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

                            *“_The rights of sovereignty extend to
                            all persons and things, not privileged
                            that are within the territory_. They
                            extend to all _strangers_ _resident_
                            therein; not only to those who are
                            naturalized, and to those who are
                            domiciled therein, having taken up their
                            abode with the intention of permanent
                            residence, but also to those whose
                            residence is transitory. All _strangers
                            _are under the protection of the
                            sovereign while they are within his
                            territory and owe a temporary allegiance
                            in return for that protection.”*Carlisle
                            v United States 83 U.S. 147, 154 (1873)

                            *__*

                            *“Let a State be considered as
                            subordinate to the People: But let
                            everything else be subordinate to the
                            State.” *Chisholm v Georgia 2 US 419
                            
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fmaps%2Fsearch%2FGeorgia%2B2%2BUS%2B419%3Fentry%3Dgmail%26source%3Dg&data=04%7C01%7C%7C96e35df20cc944f34ac908d977e94b3e%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637672666149754820%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=AM9bG%2FI5GjQTp0MGJSP6q9WjKSvvzRV4Zp2pQBVqo20%3D&reserved=0>
                            at 455

                            **

                            *"The term resident and citizen of the
                            United States is distinguished from a
                            Citizen of one of the several states, in
                            that the former is a special class of
                            citizen created by Congress."*U.S. v.
                            Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)


-- Life in one word--LOVE

-- Life in one word--LOVE

--
Life in one word--LOVE

Other related posts:

  • » [administrating-your-public-servants] Fwd: Re: refreshers - Law-Division