[administrating-your-public-servants] Exposing risklessly abusive unaccountable judges…by thinking and proceeding strategically to take advantage of significant recent developments in the federal and state judiciaries
- From: "dr.richard.cordero_esq" <dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ("dr.richard.cordero_esq")
- To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "arubyrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arubyrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "abuse-of-power-by-judges-private-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <abuse-of-power-by-judges-private-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "juliannemckinney@xxxxxxxxx" <juliannemckinney@xxxxxxxxx>, "predestined2succeed@xxxxxxxxx" <predestined2succeed@xxxxxxxxx>, "levt2002@xxxxxxxxx" <levt2002@xxxxxxxxx>, "Lisabennett418@xxxxxxxxx" <Lisabennett418@xxxxxxxxx>, "attorneydonbailey@xxxxxxxxx" <attorneydonbailey@xxxxxxxxx>, "nancbaren@xxxxxxxxx" <nancbaren@xxxxxxxxx>, "nancibaren@xxxxxxxxx" <nancibaren@xxxxxxxxx>, "ckeener20005=aol.com@xxxxxxxxx" <ckeener20005=aol.com@xxxxxxxxx>, "marxmail+owner@xxxxxxxxx" <marxmail+owner@xxxxxxxxx>, "cort.greene@xxxxxxxxx" <cort.greene@xxxxxxxxx>, "Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx" <CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:06:26 +0000 (UTC)
NOTES: I would be grateful if you wouldacknowledge receipt of this email.
Youare encouraged to share and post it to social media as widelyas
possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People;e.g., click
“Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <leftpanel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New or
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php ;.
The articlebelow had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities whenreceived, they crept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlookthem. A pdf version of this article -as such likely to
be free ofirregularities- is found here anddownloadable through the next link.
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely
as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g.,
click “Reply All” and “Send”.
To subscribe to emails similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New; or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php.
The email below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, e.g., joinedwords or different font sizes, they
crept in during transit and are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf
version of this email -as such likely to be free of irregularities- is found
here and downloadable through the next link.
Proposal to law and journalism professors, peers, and students
to expose judges' abuse of power
through a series of steps leading up to
transformative change in their own and their schools' role in society
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_presentation_
to_professors&students.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
The dean of the law school, the dean of students, and the clinical law
professors, andin their care to all other professors and the officers of the
student class and other appropriate organizationsThe law school Dear Deans,
Professors, and Officers, 1. This is a proposal for a presentation on how
through a series of steps and a public interest clinic you all can counter the
problems besieging law schools: dwindling enrollment, imperiled financial
viability, and diminishing chances of finding a law job upon graduation. It is
based on precedent.
a. In the civil suit Strickland v. U.S., the Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit held last April 26 that the Federal Judiciary and its officers,
including judges, can on constitutional grounds be sued and held liable in
their official and individual capacities.3
b. 90 gymnasts sued the FBI and agents for over $1 billion last June 8, for its
failure to act on the complaints against sexual predator Dr. Larry Nassar
brought to FBI agents and the FBI’s cover-up of their dereliction of duty.
c. A PA state court ordered judges who sent juveniles to government
paid/privately run detention facilities in exchange for kickbacks to pay
victims $206 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
2. The most recent and indisputable evidence of unaccountable judges’ abuse of
power is found in the series of articles that The Wall Street Journal began to
publish on September 28, 2021, under the initial title “131 [now 152] Federal
Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest”.
a. At last count, 58 of those judges had instructed their clerks of court to
notify the parties to those cases that those judges should have recused
themselves then, have done so now, and new judges will be assigned to their
cases.
b. However, to date, not a single of those judges has been investigated,
subjected to disciplinary measures, let alone referred for impeachment, or
forced to disgorge the gains that they made by resolving in their favor their
conflict of interests.
3. The presentation will center on three ongoing cases that can be further
prosecuted through the device that can gain the highest payoff for law schools
and compensate the largest number of victims: class actions including RICO
charges. They can provoke national outrage; open the floodgates of motions that
create a niche practice for law students; and lead schools to hold citizens
hearings that transform their role into We the People’s watchdog on
unaccountable judges and their judiciaries.
a. A person in an official capacity acquired knowledge firsthand about
prosecutors, NYPD officers and detectives, and judges of a NY criminal court
colluding to obtain an indictment against people charged with murder even
though their ‘supporting evidence’ revealed that no crime had even occurred.
1) A complaint was filed with the NYPD Internal Affairs Bureau (IAB) requesting
that it investigate its members’ participation in such wrongdoing. Its handling
by over a dozen officers for three months indicates that IAB has coordinated a
cover-up. A complaint against it has been escalated to NYPD Commissioner
Keechant Sewell.
2) The class action plaintiffs will be thousands of people who have been and
still are charged and/or prosecuted on false indictments and incarcerated. The
defendants will be the wrongdoers and the administrative judges, elected
officers, public defenders, and their institutions chargeable with dereliction
of duty for failing to investigate.
b. Medicare administers a budget of $100s of billion for the benefit of its
more than 33 million insureds. It works with hundreds of HMOs and other health
insurance entities. They have common interests: pay the fewest claims and
attract to, and maintain in their, networks the largest number of medical
services provider.
1) To advance their interests they deny and uphold the denial of as many of
their insureds’ claims as possible; disregard the legal obligation to accept as
total payment Medicare’s schedules of fees for services; and condone the
billing of insureds for the unpaid balance.
2) The majority of insureds who appeal denials and balance billing appear pro
se. Due to their ignorance of the law, they are abused. The recovery can be
huge and force transformative change.
c. Federal judges intercept people’s emails and mail to detect and suppress
those of their critics. They thus deprive the People of their most cherished
rights, i.e., those guaranteed by the 1st Amendment to “freedom of speech, of
the press, the right of the people peaceably to assemble [on the Internet], and
to petition the Government for a redress of grievances [e.g., compensation]”.
1) See the proposal for a forensic examination by Information Technology
experts of the computers of critics of judges; cf. former CBS reporter Sharyl
Attkisson in her suit against DoJ.
4. This proposal and its link -in the tweet next- can be shared widely;
distributed at the student organizations fair at the start of the academic
year, and posted to social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Plus, Pinterest,
Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsApp
Twitter: Proposal to professors & students of a Zoom/live presentation on a
series of steps to expose judges' abuse of power, demand compensation, and
become the watchdogs of the judicial system;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_presentation_to_professors&students.pdf.
5. The proposal is supported by my professional law research and writing, and
strategic thinking; they undergird the production of a three-volume study of
judges and their judiciaries titled thus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † ♣
♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
from OL3:1144-1540+
a. The study collects and discusses abundant evidence(OL:194§E) showing that
judges ensure each other’s unaccountability, which is also protected
connivingly by the politicians who put them in office, and for whom they are
‘our men and women on the bench’. As a result, judges engage in abuse of power
risklessly for their gain and convenience individually and as a coordinated
class.
b. Some of my articles have been posted to my website Judicial Discipline
Reform at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. That site has attracted ;
countless webvisitors and turned into subscribers 45,435 of them as of 6
November 2022. They are potential class members.
6. The professors and students participating in the proposed public interest
clinic can reasonably expect broad support: The MeToo! and BLM movements and
those against police brutality, and for racial and socio-economic equality are
expressions of the People’s self-assertive rallying cry:
Enough is enough!
We won’t take any abuse from anybody anymore.
7. So, the participants can give rise to a key midterm issue and be nationally
recognized as the People’s Champions of Justice.
8. I look forward to hearing from you.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.
Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx***********************
Exposing risklessly abusive judges
by thinking and proceeding strategically
to take advantage of significant recent developments
in the federal and state judiciaries
that have held judges accountable for their performance
and liable to compensate the victims of their abuse By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
JudicialDiscipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , ;
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , Corderoric@xxxxxxxxx Dear
Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, Thank you for your emails.
A. Contacting an organization to give rather than to ask for information: argue
their case
1. You need not have any specialqualification to address any private or public
organization to express interestin its activities and request additional
information. 2. In any event, to contact anorganization that defends the
interests of women, who are the most frequentvictims of sexual harassment, such
as "Law Clerks for Workplace Accountability,"you satisfy a key qualification if
you are a women; if you are not, you expressyour commitment to exposing any
form of abuse by judges and their judiciary. 3. If the organization declines
yourrequest, you argue why it is in their interest to provide you with
additionalinformation. 4. However, you need not askfor any information. On the
contrary, you can make an offer, that is, of theassistance of yourself and
other like-minded people. To that end, you can bringto its attention my study
and my website: 5. My study has judges and their judiciariesas the subject of
its three volumes. The product of professional law researchand writing, and
strategic thinking, it is titled and downloadable thus:
Exposing Judges'Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting*† ♣ ♣ Volume
3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
>from OL3:1144-1540+
6.The study collects and discusses abundant evidence(OL:194§E) showing that
judgesensure each other’s unaccountability. The latter is further
protectedconnivingly by the politicians who put them inoffice, and for whom
judges become ‘our men and women on the bench’. Asa result, judges engage in
abuse of power risklessly for their gain and convenience individually and as a
coordinated class.
a. The most recent and indisputable evidence of unaccountablejudges’ abuse of
power is found in the series of articles that TheWall Street Journal began to
publish on September 28, 2021, under theinitial title “131 [now 152] Federal
Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases WhereThey Had a Financial Interest”. At
last count, 58 of those judges hadinstructed their clerks of court to notify
the parties to those cases thatthose judges should have recused themselves
then, have done so now, and newjudges will be assigned to their cases.
b. However, to date, not a single of those judges has beeninvestigated,
subjected to disciplinary measures, let alone referred forimpeachment, or
forced to disgorge the gains that they made by resolving in their favortheir
conflict of interests.
c. The most powerful protector of judges is no doubt the formerChief Judge of
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, noneother than
Attorney General Merrick Garland. He will not dare investigate other judges for
fearthat in plea bargaining they trade up to ‘a bigger fish’: him. All judges
areaware of the threatening warning that they have etched on their forefront:
I and my friendsknow about all our wrongdoings that you covered up as an
accessory as well asthose that you committed as a principal for your own gain
and convenience. Ifyou bring me down, I’ll take you with me!
7.Some of my articles, such as those addressed to the media, have been posted
to my website JudicialDiscipline Reformat
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org.That site has attracted countless ;
webvisitors and as of 6 November 2022, had turned into subscribers 45,435 of
them. 8. Tell the organization that we are organizing currentand former law
and court clerks and judges so that together with journalists, professors and
students, they can expose openly or confidentially the abuse by judges that
they have witnessedor suffered. 9. Share with it my contact information and
myemails; and share with me their information. 10. Share with any
organizationinformation about how judges exonerate themselves from all
accountability andattendant liability by dismissing 100% of complaints against
them -including mine- and denying 100% of petitions for review ofthose
dismissals. That statement is based on the official statistics of the U.S.
courts filed with Congress inthe Annual Report of the Director of the
Administrative Office of the U.S.Courts(28 U.S.C. §604(a)(3) & (4)). See the
article hereunder.
B. The inform and outrage strategy to move the nationalpublic to action
11. Whining about how abusive judgesare is so easy but leads nowhere.
12. Helping individuals with cases in court does not change the system of
justice, never mind judges' unaccountability, at all. More than 50 million
cases are filed in the state and federal courts every year. 13. The objective
is to help the national public by exposing coordinated and individual abuse of
power by judges; obtain compensation for their victims; and bring about
transformative change in the system of justice.
14. My articles pursue that objective by laying outa concrete, realistic, and
feasible strategy for exposing judges’ unaccountabilityand consequent riskless
abuse of power: the inform and outrage strategy. 15. Hence, I respectfully
encourageyou all to participate in sharing my emailed articles by easily
clicking “ReplyAll” and “Send”. Doing that takes less than eight seconds per
email. Althoughyou may receive several from me bearing the same subject in the
Re: box, eachone has a different set of emails in the To: box.
16. Take action!
C. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
17. Put your money where your outrage at abuse and quest for justice are.
18. Support the professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking at
Judicial Discipline Reform
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org DONATE
by making a deposit or an online transfer through either the Bill Pay feature
of your online account or Zelle from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673;
or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089.
19. I look forward to hearing from you, your lawyers, and Advocates.
Dare trigger history!, and you may enter it. Sincerely, Dr.Richard Cordero,
Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ,
Corderoric@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE:Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accountsdescribed at
*>ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G, when emailinghim, copy the above bloc of his
email addresses and paste it in the To: line ofyour email so as to enhance the
chances of your email reaching him at least atone of those addresses.
***********************
NOTES: I would be gratefulif you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media
aswidely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We thePeople;
e.g., click “Reply All” and “Send”. To subscribeto articles
similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;
<left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New; or fill out the New
User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php .
The article belowhad a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received,such as joinedwords or fonts of different sizes,
they crept in during transitand are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A
pdf version of this article-as such likely to be free of irregularities- is
found hereand downloadable through the next link.
Proceeding strategically to
choose what to read; turn other abusees into informants; and
inform and outrage the most resourceful and the strongest:the media and the
national public
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_think_proceed_strategically_to_expose_abuse.pdf
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , ;
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , Corderoric@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Advocatesof Honest Judiciaries, A. Choosing what to read based on the
publisher’scommercial and reputational risk and potential gains
1. Thank you for the article thatyou sent me on judges that subject clerks to
outbursts of insults and threatsof termination. It was published by The
Washington Post. Similar reputablemedia outlets lose substantial advertisement
dollars and public esteem whenthey publish unverified and exaggerated news.
Hence, they adhere to professionalstandards of responsible journalism. That is
why I read the articles that yousend me and appreciate your sending them. 2.
By contrast, when the publishers are Joe Schmockand Jane Widget, who are mostly
people with no training in journalism, and havenothing and, thus, nothing to
lose, their articles are to be treated with greatcaution. Frequently, they
resort to hyperbole and sensationalism to attract theattention of uncritical
and uneducated readers. Investing effort and time readingthem is not warranted.
3. Other people send me materials and requests thatconcern only their local,
personal cases. However, your articles can be usedfor the benefit of the
national public. Indeed, they already caught theattention of reputable
journalists and media outlets. We need to join forceswith them as they have
what we lack but desperately need: the means ofdistributing articles
nationwide. They will only use those means to advancetheir own commercial and
professional interests, not ours. So, when we approachthem, we must persuade
them by arguing what they, not we, can lose or gain.
B. Judges protect each other, not their employees
4. Tenth Circuit Chief Judge Timothy Tymkovich daretake action against Ms.
Garza because she was not a member of the class of realjudges with a
life-appointment, bound by a complicit mutual assistanceagreement. She was only
an employee under contract to work as a magistrate foran eight-year term. It
was easy for him and his peers not to reappoint her dueto her misconduct. 5.
But Chief Judge Tymkovich did not dare takeaction against Then-Judge Brett
Kavanaugh, though he was the subject of 83complaints. Instead, he dismissed all
of them. My complaint, no. 18-90089, wasnot only against Judge Kavanaugh, but
also against Then-Chief Judge MerrickGarland of the US. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia District, whois now the U.S. Attorney
General.(OL2:748) Mycomplaint was precisely for abusively holding themselves
unaccountable bydismissing 100% of complaints filed against them and their
peers and colleaguesin their court and the rest of their circuit and dismissing
100% of petitionfor review of those dismissals. 6. Since C.J. Garland had to
recuse himself fromhandling my complaint, it was referred to Chief Justice John
G. Roberts, Jr., cf.(OL2:792),who in turn referred it to Chief Judge Ed Carnes
of the 11thCircuit. He and his colleagues in the Judicial Council dismissed
itand denied the petition for review. Their handling of my complaint and those
ofthe other complainants was an exercise in public deception because it was
aforegone conclusion that the complaints would be dismissed to protect
fellowjudges.
7. Magistrate Garza was investigated and thefindings of facts were revealed to
the public. That must have infuriated her.This provides an opportunity to apply
the strategic thinking principle, “Theenemy of my enemy is my friend”. It
serves our strategy to find her contactinformation: 8. Magistrate Garza now
has a motive to invokeequal protection of the law arguments to expose any abuse
of power by judges ofwhich she or other people were victims; and any abuse that
judges committed fortheir gain and convenience; e.g.:
a. information that judges received under seal or inchambers and thereafter
used to buy or sell shares or real estate;
b. their failure toreport their participation in seminars and conferences,
known as judicialjunkets, to which third parties, who litigate in their courts,
invited them andpaid their expenses;
c. their receipt of bribes by banks and other financial and commercial entities
writing off their credit card debts.
9. In the same vein, the clerks victimized bynot only other magistrates, but
also by judges, must now feel encouraged tofile their complaints. To that end,
they can apply the employee disputeresolution rules of their court, circuit, or
the Federal Judiciary.Additionally, they can publish their complaints as an
exercise of their 1stAmendment right to “freedomof speech, of the press, the
right of the people peaceably to assemble [byemail and on social media too],
and to petition the Government [of which judgesare the third branch] for a
redress of grievances [including their payment ofcompensation]”.
a. Even if clerks are afraid of the risk involved in publishing
theircomplaints, they can be encouraged to share their contents with us
asconfidential informants.(OL2:468)
10. Here is where you all come in. You can methodicallysearch for the email
addresses and telephone numbers of Magistrate Garza, herpeers, clerks, and
their associations to share with them my articles. We needtheir interest in
being vindicated and compensated to cause them to participatein turning the
issue of judicial abuse of power into a key issue of the midtermelections and
of the national political debate thereafter. Please, share withme the contact
information that you find.
C. Even if you are not a lawyer, you must be fair,realistic, and think
strategically
11. If you are not a lawyer, you will be hard put to write aknowledgeable and
coherent brief based on the legal points in my article on moving for the
recusal of one judge or all the judges of a court. 12. You may feel that the
judges in your case abused theirpower by denying you due process and equal
protection of the law or otherconstitutional and statutory rights. But that
does not mean that, in light ofthe facts and the law of your case, they
actually did so. A judge that deniesyou a right that given your limited
knowledge of the law you imagine that youhave but that you do not is not
abusing you: He or she is only applying thelaw. Your opposing party is entitled
to be treated "according to law". Thejudge is not there to protect you
regardless of the other party’s rights. 13. Even if you were abused, that does
not qualify you towrite a competent brief that follows the rules of procedure,
e.g., FederalRules of Civil and Appellate Procedure and the Rules of Evidence
in the Appendixof 28 U.S.C. These rules have been adopted practically word
forword by the states. 14. Do not waste your effort, time, and sanity in a
hopelesseffort to improvise yourself as a lawyer. Would it be realistic for you
to improvise yourself as a medical doctor and perform on you open heart
surgery? The three years that people must go to law school after having gone to
college for four years to earn a bachelor's degree are indispensable to learn
the law as well as something even more demanding and necessary: to learn how to
think and proceed like a lawyer. You cannot skip law school classes for three
years and thereafter pretend the folly that you are a pro se lawyer
nonetheless. 15. Instead, either retain an attorney and pay his/her feesor do
the following:
a. Dress up to look professional and be taken seriously-appearance counts, for
it gives the first impression of you-; go to your locallaw school and to the
office of the dean of students; and ask the dean to putyou in touch with an
appropriate clinic: the students taking a course whereunder the supervision of
a professor clients with real cases are served. Youmay be asked to pay a modest
fee, but the advice and assistance that you willreceive will be invaluable:
Those students need to prove to themselves andtheir peers how good they are.
Also, they are working for academic credit andmust prove to the supervising
professor that they deserve the highest gradepossible. They work for themselves
and you.
16. You may go to your local bar association and ask to beput in touch with a
pro bono attorney, to wit, a lawyer who will at least hearyou out, review some
documents, and give you free advice. 17. Doing that shows strategic thinking.
You can alsoproceed strategically by distributing my articles: Simply open one
email at atime and click “Reply All”and “Send”. Althoughseveral emails may bear
the same subject in the Re: box, each has a differentset of email addresses in
its respective To:box. Doing that takes less than eight seconds per email.
a. Yet, that is how youcan advance your own local, personal case as well as
your own interest in informingthe national public about judges’ abuse of power,
for only an outraged publicis strong enough to force politicians to hold judges
accountable for theirperformance and liable to compensate the victims of their
abuse.
18. To learn more about the law and judges', read as much as you can in my
three-volume study of judges and their judiciaries, the product of my
professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking. The study is
titled and downloadable thus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † ♣
♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
from OL3:1144-1535+
a. The study collects and discusses abundant evidence(OL:194§E) showing that
judges ensure each other’s unaccountability, which is also protected
connivingly by the politicians who put them in office, and for whom they are
‘our men and women on the bench’. As a result, judges engage in abuse of power
risklessly for their gain and convenience individually and as a coordinated
class.
b. Some of my articles have been posted to my website Judicial Discipline
Reform at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. That site has attracted ;
countless webvisitors and as of 6 November 2022, had turned into subscribers
45,435 of them.
D. Everymeaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, withoutmoney
19. Putyour money where your outrage at abuse and quest for justice are.
20. Support the professional law research and writing, andstrategic thinking at
JudicialDiscipline Reform
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org DONATE ;
by makinga deposit or an online transfer through either the Bill Pay feature
ofyour online account or Zelle from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing# 260 13 673;
or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing# 021 000 089.
21. I lookforward to hearing from you, your lawyers, and Advocates.
Dare trigger history!, and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero,Esq.
JudicialDiscipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s email ande-cloud storage accounts described at
*>ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G,when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his
email addresses and paste it inthe To: line of your email so as to enhance the
chances of your email reachinghim at least at one of those addresses.
***********************
Applying principles of recusal of judges
and holding them
accountable for their exercise of the power entrusted to them for the benefit
of We the People, and
liable to compensate the victims of their abuse of such power
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_recusal_principles.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for your emails.
A. Application in state and federal courts and in civil and criminal cases
1. Federal law is applicable nationwide.
2. In state courts, it can be applied whenever a case does not meet the
requirements for filing in federal court, e.g.:
a. the case does not meet the minimum amount in controversy, which is $75,000,
as provided for under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); or
b. diversity of jurisdiction -one party is a citizen of the state where the
court sits and the other party is not- is defeated by the addition of a state
party to the out-of-state party.
3. The principles of recusal due to the probability of a judge's bias are
applicable in civil and criminal cases, for they go to the essence of due
process, whose application in every judicial process is required by the 14th
Amendment, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution.
4. I respectfully encourage you to share my articles by simply clicking "Reply
All" and "Send". While the subject line of the emails that you receive from me
may be the same, each email has a different set of email addresses in the To:
box.
B. Cases holding that judges can be held accountable and liable
5. You will benefit from reviewing and having your lawyer review Strickland v.
U.S., a civil, rather than criminal, suit where the plaintiff, Ms. Strickland,
had all the judges, that is, "the bench", of the Court of Appeals for the
Fourth Circuit recuse themselves.
a. Moreover, plaintiff Strickland sued the United States and the Judicial
Conference of the U.S, the highest policy-making body of the Federal Judiciary.
The latter holds its twice a year meetings behind closed doors and never holds
a press conference. It is presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court. It includes all the chief judges of the 13 circuits and the two national
courts as well as representative federal district, bankruptcy, and magistrate
judges.
b. In addition, plaintiff Strickland sued the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts (AO). As its name suggests, it only provides administrative services to
all the federal courts through its 20 committees, all composed of judges
appointed by the Chief Justice, as are the AO director and the deputy director.
c. Plaintiff Strickland also sued judges, AO, and judicial circuit officers in
their official and individual capacities.
6. A Pennsylvania state court ordered judges who sent juveniles to government
paid/privately run detention facilities in exchange for kickbacks to pay
victims $206 million in compensatory and punitive damages. See also:
a. Brooklyn Beats Crime By Cleaning Record Tied To Dirty Cops: All of this
could have been prevented if they just made the cops pinky swear not to plant
evidence; Chris Williams; Above the Law; September 9, 2022;
cwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
b. Brooklyn district attorney [Eric Gonzalez] moves to dismiss nearly 400
convictions tied to dirty NYPD cops; John Annese; New York Daily News;
September 7, 2022.
7. A question that you and your lawyer should consider is whether without going
through all the appellate stages leading up to a final decision by the state
supreme court, as is normally required, your state judges and their judiciary
can be sued in federal court; e.g.:
a. filing a civil action under 42 U.S.C. §1983 –Title 42 of the U.S. Code of
federal law, section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871– for deprivation of
civil rights by state government employees and others acting "under color of
state law". Since §1983 does not create civil rights, plaintiff must identify
the civil right already in existence that was violated;
b. on the basis of "probable bias" of your state judges in favor of their state
colleagues and their own judiciary, which denies the fundamental element of due
process, that is, a fair and impartial tribunal;
1) The Supreme Court has indicated that recusal does not require proof of
actual bias, but rather a showing of circumstances “in which experience teaches
that the probability of actual bias on the part of the judge or decision-maker
is too high to be constitutionally tolerable.” Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35,
47 (1975). (emphasis added)
2) In Caperton v. Massey, slip opinion, 556 U. S. 868 (2009) -129 S. Ct. 2252
(2009)-, the Supreme Court “stressed that it was not required to decide whether
in fact [the judge] was influenced [by one of the litigants]. The proper
constitutional inquiry is whether sitting on the case then before [him] would
offer a possible temptation to the average judge to lead him not to hold the
balance nice, clear and true. [Where] the probability of actual bias rises to
an unconstitutional level [recusal is required].” (internal quotations omitted;
Caperton, pages 8-9, 16) “Circumstances and relationships must be considered.”
(id., 10); (emphasis added).
c. on an application by analogy of the principles underlying diversity of
citizenship, which allows a suit to be filed in, or removed to, federal court
where an out-of-state party sues, or is sued by, a state party and it is
necessary to avoid the possibility of bias by a state court in favor of the
state party.
C. Even if you are not a lawyer, you must be fair and realistic: how to do so
8. If you are not a lawyer, you will be hard put to make a knowledgeable and
coherent argument based on the legal points outlined above.
9. You may feel that the judges in your case abused their power by denying you
due process and equal protection of the law or other constitutional and
statutory rights. But that does not mean that they actually did based on the
facts and the law of your case. A judge that denies you a right that you
imagine that you have but that you do not really have is not abusing you: He or
she is only applying the law. Your opposing party is entitled to be treated
"according to law". The judge is not there to protect you, the rights of the
opposing party notwithstanding.
10. Even if you were abused, that does not qualify you to write a competent
brief that follows the rules of procedure, e.g., Federal Rules of Civil and
Appellate Procedure and the Rules of Evidence in the Appendix of 28 U.S.C.
These rules have been adopted practically word for word by the states. In
addition, you must follow the supplementary rules of the court where your case
will be or was filed...as well as the rules of the judge presiding over your
case!
11. Do not waste your effort, time, and emotional sanity in a hopeless effort
to improvise yourself as a lawyer.
12. Instead, either retain an attorney and pay his/her fees or do the
following: Dress up to look professional and be taken seriously -appearance
counts, for it gives the first impression of you-; go to your local law school
and to the office of the dean of students; and ask the dean to put you in touch
with an appropriate clinic, that is, the students taking a course where under
the supervision of a professor clients with real cases are served. You may be
asked to pay a modest fee, but the advice and assistance that you will receive
will be invaluable: Those students need to prove to themselves and their peers
how good they are. Also, they are working for academic credit and must prove to
the supervising professor that they deserve the highest grade possible.
13. You may likewise go to your local bar association and ask to be put in
touch with a pro bono attorney, to wit, a lawyer who will at least hear you
out, review some documents, and give you free advice.
D. Share the product of professional legal research and writing and strategic
thinking
14. I respectfully encourage you to share this email and the proposal below
with your lawyer and have him/her share with me any recusal motion filed in
your case.
15. Share my articles widely by simply clicking "Reply All" and "Send". While
the subject line of the emails that you receive from me may be the same, each
email has a different set of email addresses in the To: box. Doing that takes
less than eight seconds per email.
16. Share my offer of a presentation by emailing it as well as posting it to
social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google Plus, Pinterest,
Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsApp Twitter: Proposal to professors & students of a
Zoom/live presentation on a series of steps to expose judges' abuse of power,
demand compensation, and become the watchdogs of the judicial system;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_presentation_to_professors&students.pdf.
E. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
17. Put your money where your outrage at abuse and quest for justice are. 18.
Support the professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking at
Judicial Discipline Reform
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. DONATEby making a deposit or an ;
online transfer through either the Bill Pay feature of your online account or
Zelle from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673;
or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089.
19. I look forward to hearing from you, your lawyers, and Advocates.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
******************************
Other related posts:
