Canada’s carbon pricing is constitutional, Supreme Court rules
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Canada’s carbon pricing is constitutional, Supreme Court rules
In a 6-3 decision, the court stressed Ottawa’s authority under Canada’s 1867
Constitution to legislate on matter...
|
|
|
They'll probably use the money to deal with the tar-sands mess and derelict oil
wells littering the West, and other hot spots/difficult fixes despite what they
say, how politicians operate, if not also the legal profession/SCC, and/or,
co., and for what, "not of as much"
Hey, if we as a group/country/organization were truly about "justice"
(entailing the truth, of the data) we wouldn't have to pay privately for it..
(And fight our, laws as an adversary in such respect, if even be heard and
understood, and duly represented, as we should be, to be a true or more
reasonable, democracy) as of the data, of the facts, of the information that
matters or should, but doesn't, (So really) in a political if not criminally
abusive (competitive) world, otherwise.
I liken our/every political state as an organized danger if not criminal
entity, otherwise, and behave, accordingly.
I find we're still more about speaking English, and French correctly, (Huh?.)
to whatever, "style," or the way the courts would prefer, (to be heard, as
understood?) than anything meaningful and just, how little effort we seem to be
putting into that and upholding what is more reasonable and works in such
respect.
Michael Glavic
So championing what is better if not best
