too bad WETHPEOPLEShareholders is not around. Patrick Devine did several
articles on how to do that
On Sunday, April 18, 2021, 4:24:03 PM CDT, K Smith
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Interesting but I am not selling anything as a business I would like to know
more about being tax excempt from any trading profits one mght make
On Friday, 16 April 2021, 06:46:08 pm GMT-7, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Target sovereign citizen
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 2:51 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I made up a sign and put it on the dash, or taped to side window
I INVOKE THE LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC, ALSO PUT THAT ON HEADER OF ANY DOCUMENT to a
gov't agency
On Tuesday, April 13, 2021, 3:37:04 AM CDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Got a few minutes so will start. Prove? As many you know I seldom bring forth
the proof you desire. Rather I put the seeds there to grow. That is faith. That
faith can grow or be built by testing or research on your own. Those close to
me. Know I'm honest and that takes time to grow also. There is many out there
that are desperate and that is where I operate. They need no proof. They care
less for proof they want help. I use to try and convince people and come to the
conclusion that if your researching then research. I've given you my basis to
get it done and I know how to stop them and getting very close to consistent
wins.
Tribunal? First one has to understand we have a compact between the people in
the articles of confederation. I promised to you to defend your life, liberty
and property as you do mine. That is a free citizen or state national
guarantee. Only United States Citizens think they have no obligation of love
for their neighbor to be honest and needs government to resolve problems that
one should handle on their own.
. That compact is the reason in a haebeaus corpus they say a friend can
file on another's behalf. Your truth that the agreement exists. It's the bases
one can represent another.
. Here is what I know and not sure of. One should sent claim to those
involved but not always needed. Most often they will not answer and if they
reject, Good. If they bring a valid claim back one needs to address it (none so
far have done it). The highway patrol and others will tell you where to send
the claim of asked or sending letter of claim to them.
. Then send this to the attorney general as evidence of the issue for the
claim that the constitution was violated.
The attorney general of every state is responsible for constitutional
issues in the state of.. It ends here has been my short experience.
My opinion:
. Now if going to court. One needs the proof there was no reply or the
reply not showing proof of jurisdiction. The no reply you also need the proof
they received the letter. Use method of choice. Send that proof of default or
no proof of jurisdiction to the court and ask for a court date on the matter.
Discovery is over as far as state national is concerned. Agency can not stop
anything without proof of jurisdiction. That is my experience and research
tells me to do. I'm sure one can modify this and do fine as this is the basis
I'm finding that works efficiently.
Good luck to all.
Yes, Forest Queen: I'll accept the title of "law of the hand" approach. It's
pretty accurate description.
On Apr 12, 2021, 2:41 PM -0600, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
This tribunal thing. Is actual or name only. Much more details please. I’m more
of a visual person. How does this tribunal work. When faced with this. They
don’t give up and might want you to prove this
On Apr 12, 2021, at 2:55 PM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tribunal.
I've been talking about our position as a state national and how it stops then.
I've and others have found it very effective. Close to fifty now reported. I'm
not counting anymore. Article 1, section 8, clause 17 works to stop the court
judge but how does one precede from there for justice.
How does the state national, sovereign, and free citizen tribunal procedure
work. I'll say the procedure looks very promising and won three cases now.
I'll be moving my clients to it as I like 8-9 before I say it works. In the
near future when I've got time I'll write about the procedure for others to
consider.
Charley On Apr 12, 2021, 10:32 AM -0600, Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
https://secure.newegg.com/account/taxexemption
I was needing some computer-related supplies when, I noticed, upon the
check-out procedure, I saw a link (the one above this line) to the text...:
«Apply For Tax Exemption * Require up to 2 business days for status to be
approved.»
Decided to go through it in order to see more details. Unfortunately, upon
reaching the «Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement Cert. of Exemption»
portion, even when I selected «No Tax ID number» (I am not a Federal Employee
after all), another three options displayed as a required field (i.e.: ①Federal
Identification Number [FEIN], ②State Driver's License Number, ③Foreign Diplomat
Number). Not that I am running any business at the moment selling anything on
NewEgg (although I do plan to re-active listings on Amazon after I get various
key areas at my place re-organised [but, even then, I do not wish to become too
dependent upon Amazon, but, prefer a more independent-system developed
eventually]).
I suppose it is possible to perhaps «administrate» the «records» that the
Commercial-Entity/Straw-Man/Corporate-Person/etc. is Tax-Exempt (I prefer not
to even have to bother with such paper-work at all if it can so be helped). For
someone like myself, I obviously have a «religious» objection to taxation
(because it's deeply tied to extortion, human-trafficking, rights-violations,
genocide, war-crimes, etc.), but, I can also back up my reasoning with
«science» (the real version), not that the typical brain-washed sheeple have
any ability to distinguish between genuine science versus pseudo-science (and
often conflate the two to mean their opposites like would be expected in an
Orwellian-Society !).
Anyway, for as far as I am concerned, God already «tax-exempts» someone like
myself, and I need NO «(pending) government-approval» for such tax-exemptions.
I do know that there are still quite a number of group-members who are seeking
to become «tax-free» (and Joe Skelton periodically posts information about
becoming tax-free by referring to a particular web-site with said information),
but, ultimately, I think the «key wording» that people may wish to look for is
called «exemption» depending on the method that anybody may be choosing to try
going about being so-called tax-free.
I don't even view the «(connected to any form of extortion-activity) rules» set
in place as even having any «legitimacy» even in the first place and so I do
not even give any legitimacy/authority/credence/etc. to such «institutions»
(corporate de facto governments) anyway.
--
Life in one word--LOVE
