Contours duh it’s about juris diction. You just proved it below
On Dec 1, 2021, at 1:25 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Driving is only one issue. Couple of stops and they know to leave alone. Now
how does that method work to get one out of jail?
On Nov 30, 2021, 10:25 PM -0700, Just A User Name <sean23jd@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
That font is really hard on the eyes...
On Friday, November 26, 2021, Creative Contours <colleen90@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
CreativeIf you had read a few more of my postings, you wouldn't need to address
I read a couple of your Webb postings. I want to address jurisdicton.
jurisdiction. It's the "action" that proves OR DISPROVES authority!
Scenario, the car gets stopped by assumption. There is NO dual discussion.
The traveler simply hands a copy of the unincorporated business NAMED
record COPY from any county, and the cop goes back to his public vehicle,
calls in about it, and comes back 30 seconds or so later handing the copy
back with an apology-simple
It's the understanding of the incident that you're having difficulty
getting...when you're in the public, it's acting and when in the private
it's living.....
You don't "work" for any "gov." agency. They work for YOU!
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 08:26 AM
To: Administrating-your-public-servants
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles....
"Residence inn their territory"
"Territory" is not talking of the island's. It's talking of the law called
territorial jurisdiction and defined in article 1;8;17. Even the courts in
DC recognize that and moreso the DOJ agrees on that.
On Nov 26, 2021, 7:05 AM -0700, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
a state citizen is not in their scope, only US citizens are. the only
unqualified rights of a US citizen is residence within the territorial
boundaries of the US. us v valentine. theres a difference between the
whole and the part..the sovereignty that the people of a single state
posses gamble v us (2019).
If an offense cannot be accurately and clearly described without an
allegation that the accused is not within an exception contained in the
statutes, an indictment which does not contain such allegation is
defective. United States v. Cook, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 168, 174.
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: "And, first, the law ascribes to the king the attribute of
sovereignty, or pre-eminence... . Hence it is, that no suit or action can
be brought against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can
have jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of
power ...." 1 Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 234-235
(1765). ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999)(2). [See also: M'Carty v.
Nixon, 1 U.S. 77]
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021, 10:12 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Creative
I read a couple of your Webb postings. I want to address jurisdicton.
Which you and I agree that It's important and why. That is he who has
jurisdiction controls the court.
Duress definition: If it is lawful to do something, it is lawful to threat
one you will do it.
Only if it is unlawful to do can one claim duress with bearing on the
matter. The officer rules are threatening to we the people, but not
considered illegal to do. Till one proves his behavior was in violation of
jurisdicton.
Scenario
The officer approaches your car and sees state plates. Officer assuming
your a citizen, drivers license assuming your a state citizen, or files on
record a year back and your license expired. Insurance is evidence. All
signs your a state citizen. Then you go to court and that implies that you
agree to their authority by your presence. Requiring one to dispute it by
showing proof your not in the prosecutors jurisdiction. All this needs
addressed in court proceedings.
So in common law the officer and prosecutor has only done is monetary
damages. The United States has plenty of printed currency to cover
damages. But a crime begins when intent is proven. The very reason to try
and establish jurisdicton at all points of encounter.
In my opinion it is very important to challenge jurisdicton with the
officer. Moreso if one writes it on the ticket as that is evidence or
recording that you talked about it. On ones license plate or a paper you
hand him. State national passport. Stating that "art. 1, sec.,8, cl.17"
which defines officers limited jurisdiction. Because his evidence is his
and he can dispose as their law allows. Create your own evidence. Now in
court, physical or paper one can reference this as proof the officer knew
that jurisdicton was challenged or stated. That establishes intent. Intent
makes many things a crime; Treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. Now these
agents are fearful of jail.
It's about building a case on the officer and everyone involved. It's
about Intent to do you harm that gets everyone to take notice. The same is
addressed in court. To establish jurisdicton is to make it criminal.
Charley
On Nov 25, 2021, 7:52 AM -0700, Creative Contours
<colleen90@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
They will assume "what" other? Please answer what I asked-if it's put in
a court of record, isn't THAT the notice needed before they CAN file
anything?
Simple! If they don't and they AND send you an offer? YOUR BUSINESS can
ignore it! We do it all the time!
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 08:42 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles....
well, duh ! yes. Point is your putting the court on notice of such. If
its not on notice, they will assume the other.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:27 AM Creative Contours <colleen90@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Put a notice of status and point out it’s a court of record * that’s if
you actually did it right
Wouldn't the court of record have your status in the records?
The bank and their laws were given the responsibility of finding out
what/who THEIR customer's status is. Our info is easily found online. THE
banks all have to do that. When they do, they lie about the name and
change it when billing or charging your business. Aren't all courts banks?
So, What is your opinion of "your status being right?"
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 08:09 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles....
Put a notice of status and point out it’s a court of record * that’s if
you actually did it right
On Nov 25, 2021, at 7:38 AM, The Experts <experts303@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So what is the best way to identify your status to bring the suit for
damages as an injured party?
Sincerely Enjoy life,
By: Daniel Henderson Hornburg
"OUTSMART, OUTGUN & OUTLAST Your Competition!"
For entertainment Only/Not legal advice.
As a disclaimer, I am not a Republican just an honest observer
without all the emotional baggage and social programming.
I do not take part in the pharmaceutical religion, My right to choose my
Spirituality!
If you don't know your rights, you don’t know your options and/or the
opportunities!
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:02 PM Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can I make a humble suggestion?
If you're going to put something out to the group that you know has NOT
worked, please preface that fact prior to anything else....
Just remember that I am a pretty researcher in some respects...and I
will do my best to check out what someone says...
I ain't from Missouri, but you better show me that you got it to work!!
When I post I try to tell all: the good, the bad and the
ugly....regardless of what Colleen thinks or says after the fact...
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 5:13 PM
To: Administrating-Your-Public-Servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles....
LMAO
YES, most likely they are mind. There should be seven of them that
failed. Testing a concept and they failed. But, remember; Charles said
he has no issues with government. So why is Charles filing as plaintiff?
Why would Charles do that?
Good luck
On Nov 24, 2021, 3:46 PM -0700, Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
So I see you have 3 cases....if these are all you....at the court of
claims...
<image.png>
The results of the first two are the first two pages of the PDF with
the stuff you sent earlier to include the "free court" page.....would
you like to confirm that these are your cases?
--
This communication is meant for private communication only. If you are not
the intended recipient, please delete without saving any email, information
or attachments. Any use is prohibited.
