This is true, when the beneficiary elects to have his legal person treated as
a United States citizen that person has only one right. Correct. The question
is what rights, duties and obligations does a state national, American national
or any other status of the ens legis have? Man has no obligations to the
fictional world what so ever.
On Friday, November 26, 2021, 06:06:18 a.m. PST, veritas ghost
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
a state citizen is not in their scope, only US citizens are. the only
unqualified rights of a US citizen is residence within the territorial
boundaries of the US. us v valentine. theres a difference between the whole and
the part..the sovereignty that the people of a single state posses gamble v us
(2019).
If an offense cannot be accurately and clearly described without an allegation
that the accused is not within an exception contained in the statutes, an
indictment which does not contain such allegation is defective. United States
v. Cook, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 168, 174.
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion of
the Court: "And, first, the law ascribes to the king the attribute of
sovereignty, or pre-eminence... . Hence it is, that no suit or action can be
brought against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can have
jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of power ...."
1 Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 234-235 (1765). ALDEN v.
MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999)(2). [See also: M'Carty v. Nixon, 1 U.S. 77]
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021, 10:12 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Creative
I read a couple of your Webb postings. I want to address jurisdicton. Which you
and I agree that It's important and why. That is he who has jurisdiction
controls the court.
Duress definition: If it is lawful to do something, it is lawful to threat one
you will do it.
Only if it is unlawful to do can one claim duress with bearing on the matter.
The officer rules are threatening to we the people, but not considered illegal
to do. Till one proves his behavior was in violation of jurisdicton.
Scenario
The officer approaches your car and sees state plates. Officer assuming your a
citizen, drivers license assuming your a state citizen, or files on record a
year back and your license expired. Insurance is evidence. All signs your a
state citizen. Then you go to court and that implies that you agree to their
authority by your presence. Requiring one to dispute it by showing proof your
not in the prosecutors jurisdiction. All this needs addressed in court
proceedings.
So in common law the officer and prosecutor has only done is monetary damages.
The United States has plenty of printed currency to cover damages. But a crime
begins when intent is proven. The very reason to try and establish jurisdicton
at all points of encounter.
In my opinion it is very important to challenge jurisdicton with the officer.
Moreso if one writes it on the ticket as that is evidence or recording that you
talked about it. On ones license plate or a paper you hand him. State national
passport. Stating that "art. 1, sec.,8, cl.17" which defines officers limited
jurisdiction. Because his evidence is his and he can dispose as their law
allows. Create your own evidence. Now in court, physical or paper one can
reference this as proof the officer knew that jurisdicton was challenged or
stated. That establishes intent. Intent makes many things a crime; Treason,
counterfeiting, and piracy. Now these agents are fearful of jail.
It's about building a case on the officer and everyone involved. It's about
Intent to do you harm that gets everyone to take notice. The same is addressed
in court. To establish jurisdicton is to make it criminal.
Charley
On Nov 25, 2021, 7:52 AM -0700, Creative Contours <colleen90@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
They will assume "what" other? Please answer what I asked-if it's put in a
court of record, isn't THAT the notice needed before they CAN file
anything?Simple! If they don't and they AND send you an offer? YOUR BUSINESS
can ignore it! We do it all the time!
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 08:42 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles.... well, duh !
yes. Point is your putting the court on notice of such. If its not on notice,
they will assume the other.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:27 AM Creative Contours <colleen90@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Put a notice of status and point out it’s a court of record * that’s if you
actually did it right
Wouldn't the court of record have your status in the records?
The bank and their laws were given the responsibility of finding out what/who
THEIR customer's status is. Our info is easily found online. THE banks all have
to do that. When they do, they lie about the name and change it when billing or
charging your business. Aren't all courts banks?So, What is your opinion of
"your status being right?"From:
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jb
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 08:09 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles.... Put a notice of
status and point out it’s a court of record * that’s if you actually did it
right
On Nov 25, 2021, at 7:38 AM, The Experts <experts303@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So what is the best way to identify your status to bring the suit for damages
as an injured party?
Sincerely Enjoy life,
By: Daniel Henderson Hornburg
"OUTSMART, OUTGUN & OUTLAST Your Competition!"
For entertainment Only/Not legal advice.
As a disclaimer, I am not a Republican just an honest observer
without all the emotional baggage and social programming.
I do not take part in the pharmaceutical religion, My right to choose my
Spirituality!
If you don't know your rights, you don’t know your options and/or the
opportunities!
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:02 PM Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can I make a humble suggestion?
If you're going to put something out to the group that you know has NOT worked,
please preface that fact prior to anything else....
Just remember that I am a pretty researcher in some respects...and I will do my
best to check out what someone says...
I ain't from Missouri, but you better show me that you got it to work!!
When I post I try to tell all: the good, the bad and the ugly....regardless of
what Colleen thinks or says after the fact...
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Charley
Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 5:13 PM
To: Administrating-Your-Public-Servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles.... LMAO
YES, most likely they are mind. There should be seven of them that failed.
Testing a concept and they failed. But, remember; Charles said he has no issues
with government. So why is Charles filing as plaintiff? Why would Charles do
that?
Good luckOn Nov 24, 2021, 3:46 PM -0700, Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
So I see you have 3 cases....if these are all you....at the court of claims...
<image.png>
The results of the first two are the first two pages of the PDF with the stuff
you sent earlier to include the "free court" page.....would you like to confirm
that these are your cases?
