well, duh ! yes. Point is your putting the court on notice of such. If
its not on notice, they will assume the other.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:27 AM Creative Contours <colleen90@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Put a notice of status and point out it’s a court of record * that’s if
you actually did it right
Wouldn't the court of record have your status in the records?
The bank and their laws were given the responsibility of finding out
what/who THEIR customer's status is. Our info is easily found online. THE
banks all have to do that. When they do, they lie about the name and change
it when billing or charging your business. Aren't all courts banks?
So, What is your opinion of "your status being right?"
------------------------------
*From:* administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jb
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 25, 2021 08:09 AM
*To:* administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles....
Put a notice of status and point out it’s a court of record * that’s if
you actually did it right
On Nov 25, 2021, at 7:38 AM, The Experts <experts303@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So what is the best way to identify your status to bring the suit for
damages as an injured party?
*Sincerely Enjoy life, *
*By: Daniel Henderson Hornburg "OUTSMART, OUTGUN & OUTLAST Your
Competition!" *
*For entertainment Only/Not legal advice. *As a disclaimer, I am not a
Republican just an honest observer
without all the emotional baggage and social programming.
I do not take part in the pharmaceutical religion, My right to choose my
Spirituality!
If you don't know your rights, you don’t know your options and/or the
opportunities!
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:02 PM Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can I make a humble suggestion?
If you're going to put something out to the group that you know has NOT
worked, please preface that fact prior to anything else....
Just remember that I am a pretty researcher in some respects...and I will
do my best to check out what someone says...
I ain't from Missouri, but you better show me that you got it to work!!
When I post I try to tell all: the good, the bad and the
ugly....regardless of what Colleen thinks or says after the fact...
------------------------------
*From:* administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 24, 2021 5:13 PM
*To:* Administrating-Your-Public-Servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Charles....
LMAO
YES, most likely they are mind. There should be seven of them that failed.
Testing a concept and they failed. But, remember; Charles said he has no
issues with government. So why is Charles filing as plaintiff? Why would
Charles do that?
Good luck
On Nov 24, 2021, 3:46 PM -0700, Mike P <mike_p_5@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
So I see you have 3 cases....if these are all you....at the court of
claims...
<image.png>
The results of the first two are the first two pages of the PDF with the
stuff you sent earlier to include the "free court" page.....would you like
to confirm that these are your cases?
