Yeah I know but what did you put that in and what was the outcome
On Jul 8, 2021, at 8:11 PM, Bill (Redacted sender "billdealsre" for DMARC)
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The DBA makes me the authorized agent for the all caps name.
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 05:59:42 PM CDT, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill- what are you talking about? as in what are you putting that on? Thanks
Yes Doing business as makes sense.. separating ones self
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 5:29 PM Bill <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I used only a DBA with the ss# number written on top with no dashes. They
accepted it with no argument.
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 04:16:14 PM CDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not saying it is impossible. I Was bringing my wife out of the hospital
and they insisted a payment. Like $300 plus monthly payments. I told them ten
days I'll post in full. They insisted and I finally told them that I got ten
dollars in wallet and they accepted.
So I paid ten dollars a month for about Fourteen Months and they wrote and
told me it was paid in full. That was back in the eighties.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 2:17 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charly No issue discharging debt.. I know of someone who did it a few years
back when they had their appendix removed.. it got charged off. The entire
Bill. No knock on that persons credit or what/not
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 4:06 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The program stopped providing funds in 1997, but about 140 health care
facilities nationwide are still obligated to provide free or reduced-cost
care.
Hill-Burton facilities must post a sign in their admissions and business
offices and emergency room that notifies the public that free and
reduced-cost care is available. When you apply for Hill-Burton care, the
obligated facility must provide you with a written statement that tells you
what free or reduced-cost care services you will get or why you have been
denied.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:55 PM Skye Dymond <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill%E2%80%93Burton_Act
The Hill-Burton Act was meant for discharging hospital debt for the
inability to pay.
It is still in force today but rarely used. Most hospital administrators
will file a claim of lien in the
county where the "resident" or responsible party resides in the NAME OF THE
PATIENT
for not paying the hospital charges.
Hospitals get federal funding and they must treat every "patient" who
walks though their doors regardless of
their ability to pay although they can discharge you if they want you to see
your doctor as they have done all they
can do for you and make the decision not to admit you into their system. I
was admitted for a traffic accident
and I never paid their bill and I had pneumonia and never paid that bill.
I just write across the "statement" "Hill-Burton Act" for discharge
"The reality, however, did not nearly meet the written requirement of the
law. For the first 20 years of the act's existence, there was no regulation
in place to define what constituted a "reasonable volume" or to ensure that
hospitals were providing any free care at all.[4] This did not improve until
the early 1970s, when lawyers representing poor people began suing hospitals
for not abiding by the law. Hill-Burton was set to expire in June 1973, but
it was extended for one year in the last hour. In 1975, the Act was amended
and became Title XVI of the Public Health Service Act. The most significant
changes at this point were the addition of some regulatory mechanisms
(defining what constitutes the inability to pay) and the move from a 20-year
commitment to a requirement to provide free care in perpetuity. Still, it was
not until 1979 that compliance levels were defined".
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 10:38:16 AM EDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Taxes is one thing. Hospital bill is another. So explain a bit more on that.
Hospital is a private business. Even if incorporated. You signed into the
hospital. Then what? Because if one can write off a hospital bill. Why not
utility bills? Or groceries? Try to explain further
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:23 AM Ray Greninger <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Charley, everyone is still talking as though “they” don’t owe that tax. WE
don’t owe anyone in gov anything, the debtor does. For whatever reason
people get into trouble because they have somehow put themselves into the
position of surety for the debtor, or they think they have. It looks like
they go after the man because they figure you are the trustee and it’s your
job to settle the account. I don’t know if it matters whether or not you are
in their jurisdiction it’s your estate and you haven’t assigned a trustee so
they figure you are that guy. What I did worked, I think, is because I told
the hospital that the estate did not wish to be surety for their securities.
It’s my estate and they know it. Only I can speak for it. Everything you
sign is a security. I’m guessing here, but, that probably forced them to go
to the United States and press them to cover their obligation. The point is
the sovereign doesn’t owe anything and they know that. They are just looking
for the “tax payer” and they figure they can con you into that role. I don’t
think it’s about jurisdiction over you so much as it’s about jurisdiction
over the debtor. For some reason people have a tough time wrapping their
heads around that.
On Jul 8, 2021, at 3:41 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know many who have done that including me. Just stopped paying. Afterall
I was not paying property taxes already. My great uncles saw to that. Very
few get called in on income tax by just not paying. What happens if your
one of the few? Chaulk it up to just the chosen one? What is the back up
plan?
For those who use their codes and do not pay? Never seen any success at all
from it. No matter how sensible it was interpreted by the common man. Even
the sound statement; "Show me the law" is left up to a jury of twelve to
decide. Some win, some lose. I've not lost yet.
I'll still stand on the basis I'm not in your jurisdicton and I've got the
proof. As a son of a sovereign who created the constitution and stated I'm
not involved in it. It tells me your United States limitations. Why would I
use any thing created from their forward in time of history? It is just
admitting I'm not a sovereign. I'm part of the system. I'm a United States
citizen. No thanks
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:04 AM Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And the call ins are where ?
I worry not about any section. I don’t pay any of the voluntary taxes. Point
is folks stop paying it already!
On Jul 8, 2021, at 3:55 AM, brian (Redacted sender "bhaz2" for DMARC)
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, you will notice that in that 3rd paragraph, the IRS states that their
legal right to inquire about your taxes falls within Title 26 USC Sections
6001, 6011 and 6012(a), (and NO OTHER Section -emphasis mine!) Study ONLY
those 3 sections!
So, if you get ANY letter from a lowly IRS Agent (NOT the Commissioner) and
they mention ANY OTHER IRC Code (Title 26) Section outside of Sections
6001, 6011 or 6012(a), then it is ILLEGAL for them to inquire! Know too,
that Title 26 comprises Sections 1-6999.
Title 27 USC (for the IRS) begins at Section 7000 and up, HOWEVER, Title 27
USC is ONLY for Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms! Sweeeeeeeet, eh!?!
Get in on Cary's Tuesday night call-ins at 7:30pm - 9pm CST, to learn what
you wont ever learn anywhere else!
peace, all!
b
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021, 3:18:54 PM HST, Rick Paris
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you for the info everyone!
On Jul 7, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am familiar w/all that. Just thought the guy that asked for the
information was not sure where to look.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 2:03 PM ejartz <ejartz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rick,
I think what carries referring to is the 1040 instructions. There's a page
called disclosure, privacy act, and paperwork reduction act notice, and it
used to be on page 100, but the last two years they moved it to 105 and
108. Just by scanning through the instruction manual between pages 100 and
108. The statement he usually refers to is in the first column, third
paragraph and it's the first two or three statements. And what a refers
to is the IRS has the legal right to ask for a returner statement and then
they go on to mention something about filing. What you need to do is go to
Black's law dictionary and look up the definition of file. You'll be
surprised what it is
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021, 1:24 AM Rick Paris <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Does anyone know what page and paragraph of the 1040, where Cary points
out where he spoke in court about Statements and files, (filing)?
With Life, Liberty, and Happiness,
Rick Sousa
rickparis23@xxxxxxxxx
With Life, Liberty, and Happiness,
Rick Sousa
rickparis23@xxxxxxxxx
----
Life in one word--LOVE
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
