aeius, i would like to point out somethin you did but may not have known,
and many dont know. the bible needs to be discerned almost even in the
manner you stated, thats why it had been pointed out a few times in the
bible how important discernment is. they (the roman cult) and many others
had come together and mess with the bible, and created the 1611 king james
bible that is next to every judge on the "bench" (in latin bench means
bank). there is also land mines they put into it to further attempt to
trick people such as the noahide laws, which are not from God (when the 10
commandments were given, what happened? he broke the stone tablet).
going further, it doesnt click to most the bible is called "the living
testament", which would be a trust and blackstone's commentaries on the
laws of england point out directly "the holy scriptures (states its
directly referring to the bible) is the law, its what makes up common law"
(slight paraphrase, direct meaning)
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 2:19 PM Aéius Cercle (Quantum-Note : Law-Division) <
Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am not faulting you for anything. I know you to be a fairly astute
member of this group so for all I know the fault may have been on my part
for not having made it clear enough from the beginning. Certain words
most-certainly *need* to be be *bolded* and/or high-lighted, increased in
font-sizes, etc., depending on the importance of the subject. If the
bible had a colour-scheme, I would go about putting in red-coloured text
all of the passages that I thought were contaminated with corruption or
manipulated into existence by dictatorial-threats, such as pretty much all
of Romans 13 that promote obedience to following every single last
government order/edict to a T without question. The passages in which I
would *enbolden* would be from things like 2 Peter 3:16, Galatians 6:7,
and especially the parts from Revelation(s) referring to how *the dead
shall be judged* (for «judgement» is *not solely* from what does in a
*mortal *life but *also* from what one does *post-mortem* [and, believe
it or not, some of the willingly and *intentionally* engages in acts of
«possession» over humans even though the biblical-records of this
phenomenon seems to be limited to the pigs that ran into the sea/ocean and
drowned]).
------ Исходное сообщение ------
От: "veritas ghost" <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
Кому: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Отправлено: 14.12.2020 7:39:55
Тема: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Apparently this is the
year 2020
aeius, my bad that i missed your meanin. i hope i didnt come off as a know
it all, i just try to help keep people on track
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020, 7:04 AM Aéius Cercle <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
That was practically what I was saying; religious-freedom does *not*
apply to those who are *complicit to harm* upon others (i.e.:
*cough*such-as*cough*via-paying*cough*taxes*cough*). If anybody needs
this to be put into perspective, I would be responsible for the crime of
murder (or kidnapping, human-trafficking, holding hostages, extortion,
sedition, treason, inciting civil-unrest, insurrection, etc.) if I hired
(*cough*wagefundingviataxation*cough*) a hit-man to assassinate someone;
even if I gave him a badge to carry around, our conspiratorial-activity
would still be criminal; even if I gave him a uniform to wear, our
conspiratorial-activity would still be criminal; even if we «voted» that it
was a legitimate-activity, our conspiratorial-activity would still be
criminal; even if we «wrote down on pieces of paper» that said activity was
a «legitimate» or «authorised» action (*cough*legislation*cough*), our
conspiratorial-activity would still be criminal; even if we recruited a
large number of hit-men
(*cough*likeamilitarysenttomurdermultitudesofinnocents*cough*), our
conspiratorial-activity would still be criminal; re-naming the activity
(euphemisms, double-speak, legalese, etc.) from «assassination/murder» to
«neutralise» also would not change the fact that said
conspiratorial-activity is still a criminal-activity; whilst there is much
truth to be found in «biblical» writings, muddied waters also exist within,
and is pointed out by authors like Nathaniel J. Merritt in his book :
Jehovah Unmasked (what people fail to realise is that God holds *both*
powers;
that of creation/honesty *and destruction/deception*).
------ Исходное сообщение ------
От: "veritas ghost" <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
Кому: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Отправлено: 13.12.2020 4:31:05
Тема: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Apparently this is the
year 2020
religious freedoms apply to everyone, regardless of what religion not
limited to atheism, as long as your not doing harm to someone else it
applies. to deny religious freedoms is not only a violation of both
constitutions, "human" rights, and "civil" rights, its a war crime, hate
crime, and discrimination. the 1611 king james bible is the law in their
court, it wouldnt make much sense for them not to observe religious
freedoms, even more so when they are performin a religious ceremony. thats
what the black robe is about, and thats why they use terminology such as
"summon".
they could just as easily have put in their fraudulent instruments
"warrant" or "i demand you come here on this day for our kangaroo court
(insert "name" here) cesti que trust"
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020, 12:09 PM Aéius Cercle (Quantum-Note : Law-Division)
<Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The freedom-of-adherence-to-religious-observations still only applies to
NON-tax-payers, NON-voters, and what are essentially the «pacifist»
versions of religious-practices/beliefs, whom are not aligned with nor
engage in the activities of «war-mongers» and/or other «war-oriented»
entities... such as government; you become a «party» to the «institution»
and its «rules» otherwise if you are funding, condoning, supporting, voting
for, and essentially acknowledging or identifying yourself as said
«institution» member (whether said institution is a government or
corporation or corporate-government or otherwise).
------ Исходное сообщение ------
От: "P Morz" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Кому: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Отправлено: 12.12.2020 10:33:01
Тема: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Apparently this is the
year 2020
Our forefathers gave us a form of government designed to honor and to
protect all the freedoms that God gave to humankind, including the freedom
to worship Him according to our individual lights.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, Dec 11, 2020 4:33 pm
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Apparently this is
the year 2020
Good for her but our forefathers gave us freedom that allows us to
worship or do anything else as long as one does not hurt another. I see
worship freedom is just another permission slip to freedom we already have.
On Dec 11, 2020, 2:26 PM -0700, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
i just shared a video from peggy yesterday about the win about religious
freedoms in the supreme court a couple of days ago, a few of us already
know about her. thank you for spreading the info though, as the best
defense is a good offense
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020, 10:01 PM LowBlowDojo <lowblowdojo@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Down with the tyrants!!! Everyone who wants to "survive" the
"scamdemic" please go to The Healthy American.com and on YouTube. This
organization is the Tyrant Slayer!!!! Plenty of answers and forms to fight
back and keep your business open LEGALLY. As this is an ILLEGAL
OPERATION!!! De Facto Gov. is going down in their private capacity. and for
treason and sedition.
Linda McFadden
The form 56 dispenser ;)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:48 PM Mark Reynold <
dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Remove
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:20 AM, Winningham Fearn
<winfearn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That email is not on the list, so I am guessing it is being forwarded
from another email address.
You need to give me the original email address to get it removed.
Best Regards,
Win
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:16 AM Victor <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Vmswope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
-------- Original Message --------
On Dec 8, 2020, 10:00 AM, Winningham Fearn < winfearn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The list that was migrated from Yahoo was full of a lot of dead email
addresses.
This freelists.org is NOT very user friendly and I have had to remove
hundreds of email addresses that were bouncing
If anyone wants to be removed, I need to know the email address that I
need to remove. There are no names associated with the email addresses, so
a name will not help me.
Carl is history!
Best Regards,
Win
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:06 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
carl, you have to remove yourself or ask glenn to block you. or block
who ever you dont want to hear from
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 6:37 PM carl effort <letmeincarl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Remove me from this email list please.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 16:24 surfboate <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Civil rights are for those in the Roman Cult of the dead.
On Monday, December 7, 2020, 07:33:06 a.m. PST, Charley Dan <
charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fred
I agree. I go every where with out a mask. Well, hospitals and Doc
office are exceptions. But even then when in a room it's off.
Surprised how many obey just because they are told and ignore the
warning of Attorney General William Barr. "This is the greatest violation
of civil rights since the civil war". He went on to state that the American
people are smart enough and capable enough to know when they need
protection to protect themselves. I decided for myself.
To that, I have to disagree. We do not have self thinkers, and
analytical Americans but a bunch of sheep followers.
The word is they will pay you to take the vaccine. How many will
surrender for a buck? At present the surveys say 50 plus a few percent will
not. I bet it will be far less with a buck involved.
Christ says your bought and paid for with a price. So does the United
States.
On Dec 7, 2020, 5:18 AM -0700, Fred McCauley <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
<nnbbmkmiklhhjbdh.png>
<aaciclkfoffpakoi.png>
