Found This ... here >>>>>>
https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/capias/#:~:text=A%20capias%20is%20a%20warrant%20or%20order%20for,issued%20for%20a%20failure%20to%20appear%20in%20court
.
A capias is a warrant or order for arrest of a person, typically issued by
the judge or magistrate in a case. A capias may be issued in different
forms. A capias is commonly issued for a failure to appear in court. A
capias may be based upon an affidavit alleging personal knowledge of the
offense. It must state:
1. The name of the accused, if known, and if not known, must give some
reasonably definite description of him.
2. It must show that the accused has committed some offense against the
laws of the state, either directly or that the affiant has good reason to
believe, and does believe, that the accused has committed such offense.
3. It must state the time and place of the commission of the offense, as
definitely as can be done by the affiant.
4. *It must be signed by the affiant by writing his name or affixing his
mark.*
The following is an example of a state statute dealing with capias:
"The process for arrest on an indictment shall be a capias, which shall be
issued immediately on the return of the indictment into court, and made
returnable instanter, unless otherwise ordered by the court, and if the
capias be not returned executed, the clerk shall issue an alias, returnable
to the next term, without an order for that purpose."
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:50 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Warrant is bringing one in for prosecution as a suspect and capias is
bringing you in for failing to follow the orders of the court. Color of
law? Strictly depends if the officer used the law in a crooked manner.
Could be an off duty officer at an sporting event but trying to flex his
authority by using the codes. Or color of law can be because your in the
wrong jurisdiction. So the wrong laws are being used against you.Either way
it must be proven by you in court which could be just exchange of papers
filled with the clerk of that court.
On Feb 24, 2021, 4:32 PM -0700, Winningham Fearn <winfearn@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
I guarantee you that their statutes will say that a Warrant is a paper in
writing that is signed by a Judge, therefore what they are telling you is
that it is a capias and they are calling it a warrant.
That is a color of law warrant, and that is a felony for them to violate
your rights under the color of law
Best Regards,
Win
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:25 PM jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx <jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Oh yeah..thanks soo much! !!--
I asked for a copy of the warrants and court said there is no paper
copy in existance. this was long ago.. i was going to see if they were
legally done....(anyway).. but there is a Warrant list. on the City
website.... I can check there and see if they disappear.. I doubt they
will write me....in the ALL CAPS NAME...which i have returned that
mail.... in the past. All i have tried before has failed....and its been
alot. I'll let you all know...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:53 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jonbondo
Recently a fellow had the same situation. That is outstanding traffic
warrants in Colorado and new Mexico. He sent to the court clerk where they
were created "article 1, section 8, clause 17 I'm not an United States
Citizen and I (your name) a state national. They disappeared. After sending
letter one can wait a few weeks and usually the court will tell you if
there is a warrant exists. The reason for this is that your stating the
jurisdiction your in. Jurisdiction can be challenged at anytime. Even after
conviction.
On Feb 24, 2021, 3:38 PM -0700, jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx <jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
after i posted i got this same .... message from tiajoli@phillipshq
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:09 PM jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx <jonbondo@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Charley
what can one do about old tickets..in which the the judgements were
guilty and there have been warrants out for several years..?? i do not
want to pay.. (thousands) Is there any recourse?
crooked judge and got sandbagged and steamrolled .. they want no one
off the plantation... and their hands on that cash. Its *their*
court.. but i would very much like these cleared off the record... all
at the same municipal court.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:12 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Vinner
The passport jurisdiction of Canada, and other places would apply in
that jurisdiction and agreements they have with United States jurisdicton.
We know diplomats of other jurisdictions give leniency or revised rules.
Most are required a driver's license. So I doubt it would work.
Mike, Fred, Roy, and J_B
To understand judges watch other sovereign you tuners in court. One of
my favorites are Marc Stevens. His approach is show me the constitution
applies to his client. The answer from judge is this is an administrative
court and constitution does not apply. The judge goes on to state. Give me
the evidence. To which Stevens always tells the judge the prosecutor must
prove. To me this is an circular argument and one will lose because it's
the prosecutor holding a administrative court before the judge.
Your sent a notice and demand (citation) to come to their
administrative court. That administrative court is for legislative law and
their government courts. Municipal court to supreme court are
administrative to settle Government issues.
We all can read the bill of rights and realize and know there is
common law, admirality law, maritime law and some speciality laws as
military law.
To me the question is how to switch the admirality administrative
court to common law court. Can we switch the court? I believe one can and
as I study this more and more or all points to article 1, section 8,
clause17 as it shows the limitations of that admirality legislative court.
It does not state what court your in but that your not in theirs. That is
all that really matters anyhow.
Someone posted this on this forum which I believe is When National
constitutionality comes before the judge. He must honor due process of law
or lose his bonding. This is handled by the internal functions of the
corporation and bonding company.
5.4 - Bonding of Judges
A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be
deemed unbondable:
1. if he fails to protect the U.S, national constitutionally
guaranteed remedies of due process and the equal protection of the laws of
any citizen appearing in his court of law, or of any citizen appearing in
any court of the county in which he works whose case may come to his
attention by any means.
Without a bond. One cannot hold a valid court. Will say this is what
I'm finding that works. Just more information keeps coming forth that
seems
to validate the idea.
Again if one uses their court cases. They are still in their
administrative court. I'm going to keep using article 1817 and that I'm
not
an United Stars Citizen but a state national. I'm trying to find a way to
settle compensation outside the court. A friend was given a document that
comes from state battorney general in Colorado with a different address to
settle claims against officers or employees that have caused harm. I
assume
every state has this.
The attorney general sends it to insurance to review and settle. That
sounds more common law to me. We settle with individual or their
insurance. Will see.
On Feb 23, 2021, 10:09 PM -0700, Roy Vinner <littlefilbert@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
Charley,
I wonder whether a foreign passport will work as well instead of a
State national passport? A Canadian or a European passport, perhaps?
On 2/21/2021 9:26 PM, Charley Dan wrote:
J_B
Proof? Well I've told close to eighteen now and Worked perfectly. So
they say.
When I got stopped here is my experience. I gave my normal passport.
He gave me a ticket.
I sent to the court as I told you. Two days after court hearing the
judges personal clerk sent me a note saying a live warrant was issued and
then offered me two court dates a month away. I sent back the same note of
article 1817 and I'm a national. Four business days later I called the
court and no warrant to be found.
I'm filing with the court for recompense. I've not had luck with
remedy though.
Proof beyond that? "If you cannot take a man's word. Then it's not
worth listening to him." The Constitution is the SupRene law (article 6)
of
the land and article 1, section 8, clause 17 states the limited
jurisdicton
of the United States.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To post to this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/administrating-your-public-servants?hl=en?hl=en
This is a private communication between living souls who are not
fictitious entities in any way. All communications in this group are
strictly confidential. If you have received this message and you are not a
member of the group, then you agree to keep it confidential, or delete the
message and let the owner of the group know. Your retention of this private
communication is your tacit agreement to these terms and conditions.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Administrating Your Public Servants" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to administrating-your-public-servants+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/administrating-your-public-servants/80644bb3-6fc5-4cec-ba57-637ee8d77356%40Spark
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/administrating-your-public-servants/80644bb3-6fc5-4cec-ba57-637ee8d77356%40Spark?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.
