On 06/26/2021 4:32 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nelson
That helps much. Thank you for thinking I'm worthy.
Republic form of government is a legislative and common law or national
and federal System. UCC 1-103.3 states that code is complimentary to
common law which is still in effect. Federal and the National jurisdicton.
The dividing line is as a national or sovereign you take care of business. If
you do not G steps in. G often crosses the line and in common law we sue. Of
course we need first to stop G.
Now let's move forward.
I was arrested and charged with STALKING while I was on public
property, following a free church service that was conducted and open to all
passers-by. My local church has a free permit to use municipal property
issued by the local police chief under municipal law in the Summer to hold,
and I was deprived of the privilege of worship at the next service in 20
minutes since I was detained , arrested and jailed.
This is totally out of bounds in both jurisdictions. When one enters
public ground the whole public is allowed to attend in a skimpy swimsuit if
desired or prison uniform. 1817 can win this without much explaination for
defense.
I had advised the church via their same attorney in March of 2020 after
the February 2020 unlawful arrest without a warrant in a capias for an unpaid
fine from a municipal judge when I challenged jurisdiction and the judge
proceeded to find me guilty of trespassing, that the local trustees are free
to sue me in Superior Court and seek a TRO, otherwise leave me alone.
Your trying to dictate jurisdiction when you dishonored your own. Your
jurisdicton states that no is no on trespassing property and your beef
Should've been a llawsuit on the church.
After COVID, and after churches were ordered shut, and once the local
church reopened, I advised the pastor, trustees, and the local police on
camera that the local church was free to seek a TRO, otherwise leave alone.
Null and void. Your playing a fine line. Not a battle I would want.
All have been Noticed in writing of Jeff Sessions MEMO as AG of October
17, 2017, in which Sessions Guidance for ALL EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS was that
any act that legal in public cannot be made to be illegal on church property.
That also means that anything that is legal in church is legal in public
property. Reason to bar you on the beach. 1817 dishes with that statement.
Imo, since this is a civil matter, local trustees cannot demand that
local police forcibly remove me or ban me without probable cause of a crime
or a judge's order to stay away.
they can ban you with a simple NO! For their particular logic.
Me wearing a legal and lawful prison uniform on public property to a
church service that is open to the public is not probable cause of a STALKING
charge just because a police officer assumes that he witnessed me
trespassing on my local church property when no trespassing case that he is
basing his certification upon has been been heard in any court even though
eight trespassing charges were filed have never signed by a judge with a
probable cause finding
Not sure what your saying here. The public breach citation 1817 works.
But officers often add past charges that they put in dormant in file and
now activated and put on a citation. Hoping one or all stick. So it is
problemmatic in that each one has to be answered. Coming back to why did you
not stop violating private property? That is an issue that requires
restitution.
The officer has certified that he witnessed me harass the pastor on
multiple occasions at church by just knocking on a locked door while church
services were being conducted and the doors unlocked to let members and the
public in and not me.
This is bogus unless he has video put a complaint from the church.
Then while at the beach service on June 6, 2021, while on public
property, after demeaning myself peaceably, lawfully, legally, and after
making a donation to the church while on public property, I was arrested and
charged with STALkING based on a verbal pastor complaint. Only after my
arrest, did the pastor sign a complaint as a victim.
This is void and 1817 can be used with a short statement vacate for lack
of jurisdicton for lack of property ownership.
I just wonder if Charley thinks private church property trustees have
unilateral power to remove a member with guns and ammo and handcuffs by local
police when the trustees have always had the ability to file in Superior
Court for a TRO,
Yes, and they have a right to call the police and file charges. The
question is do they have the right to file charges against you? My answer is
no. Being a private foreign corporation which is government acting as
government but are really private is a violation of the constitution and the
law of equal. This will not be settled in local courts. It must go to
sovereigns court. Sovereigns are you and state of G. Lawsuit on the state
for violating article3 1817. To do this you better really understand the
situation or you lose. This centers on the concept that government had
encroached private to the point that everyone thinks it's the way things are
settled and is not. Because the inherent sovereign is superior over the
sovereign with granted sovereignty.
If you really want understanding let's talk 303-472-2219
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:46 PM NELSON DICE < nelsondice@xxxxxxxx
mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx ;> wrote:
> > Thanks Charley.
Life in one word--LOVE
I appreciate the need to tread lightly.
Local church property is held in trust for the worldwide Methodist
Church by nine trustees that are elected by our local membership and NJ
State statutes state that said trustees must govern property under
worldwide Methodist bylaws. A member becomes a member first of the WWMC
and then holds and exercises his membership in a local church.
Those bylaws allow any Methodist church or agency to sue a member
or anyone to sue any Methodist church or agency.
Imo, the trustees cannot unilaterally ban a member who is not
committing a crime, or if there is no signed order of a judge that is in
force.
I was arrested and charged with STALKING while I was on public
property, following a free church service that was conducted and open to
all passers-by. My local church has a free permit to use municipal
property issued by the local police chief under municipal law in the Summer
to hold, and I was deprived of the privilege of worship at the next
service in 20 minutes since I was detained , arrested and jailed.
I don't want to sue the local church or the bishop yet.
I had advised the church via their same attorney in March of 2020
after the February 2020 unlawful arrest without a warrant in a capias for
an unpaid fine from a municipal judge when I challenged jurisdiction and
the judge proceeded to find me guilty of trespassing, that the local
trustees are free to sue me in Superior Court and seek a TRO, otherwise
leave me alone while I attend church functions.
After COVID, and after churches were ordered shut, and once the
local church reopened, I advised the pastor, trustees, and the local
police on camera that the local church was free to seek a TRO, otherwise
leave alone.
All have been Noticed in writing of Jeff Sessions MEMO as AG of
October 17, 2017, in which Sessions Guidance for ALL EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS
was that any act that legal in public cannot be made to be illegal on
church property.
Imo, since this is a civil matter, local trustees cannot demand
that local police forcibly remove me or ban me without probable cause of a
crime or a judge's order to stay away.
Me wearing a legal and lawful prison uniform on public property to
a church service that is open to the public is not probable cause of a
STALKING charge just because a police officer assumes that he witnessed me
trespassing on my local church property when no trespassing case that he
is basing his certification upon has been been heard in any court even
though eight trespassing charges were filed have never signed by a judge
with a probable cause finding or any signed order for me to appear anywhere
The officer has certified that he witnessed me harass the pastor on
multiple occasions at church by just knocking on a locked door while church
services were being conducted and the doors unlocked to let members and the
public in and not me.
Then while at the beach service on June 6, 2021, while on public
property, after demeaning myself peaceably, lawfully, legally, and after
making a donation to the church while on public property, I was arrested
and charged with STALkING based on a verbal pastor complaint. Only after my
arrest, did the pastor sign a complaint as a victim.
Are u free to comment on an opinion of if the Superior Court has
jurisdiction over me under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 on a Criminal
Charge?
State of New Jersey statutes state that common law crimes in New
Jersey are abolished and all crimes are prosecuted by statute. Is that
Superior Court authority valid under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 or is
there a lack of jurisdiction like a civil matter?
I plan to file a 1-8-17 lack of jurisdiction claim and see what
happens.
I just wonder if Charley thinks private church property trustees
have unilateral power to remove a member with guns and ammo and handcuffs
by local police when the trustees have always had the ability to file in
Superior Court for a TRO, when I have stated I agree to appear there and
present myself and the basis on why I believe the trustees must follow
certain state civil statutes and do not have the authority to order police
to remove me from a building built on land i have a right and privilege to
worship upon and worship Almighty God together with my friends and family
and local members and enemies as well, absent a TRO signed by a Superior
Court judge or higher, a provide guaranteed to me under Article 1 Paragraph
3 of the 1947 New Jersey Constitution.
---------------------------------------------
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ;> on behalf
of Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx ;>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2021 12:17 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ;>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 1-8-17 for false
criminal accusations
Nelson
I'm a lawyer of liberty and must be careful, less I be sued or
officers dragging me to court that I could most likely win but do not need
the aggravation.
I've told you before the church is private. Take them to court and
sue them for violating the contract you said you have with the church. You
have no right to step on their property when the officers of the church
said no. Send a letter in protest not your body.
I've only got one question. Did you or what have you done since
last time you talked to me? As a man, honesty is our law under the law of
equal and as our creator requires.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:41 AM NELSON DICE < nelsondice@xxxxxxxx
mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx ;> wrote:
> > > Charley,
> > >
If a police officer bases his recent arrest of me for a
felony of STALKING that is being prosecuted by the State and not the
victim, my current appointed pastor, based upon the police officer
claiming he witnessed me harassing the pastor of my church because I
knocked on the door of the church during multiple worship hours, a door
that was locked by the pastor and church trustees, in a nutshell, does
the State County Superior Court lack Jurisdiction under Article 1,
Section 8, Clause 17?
> >
Life in one word--LOVE
> > --
> --
Attachment:
FALSE ARREST.doc
Description: MS-Word document
