Thank you James,
i will read and study
________________________________
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of JAMES
RAMALHO <jmr3749@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2021 4:40 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 1-8-17 for false criminal
accusations
On 06/26/2021 4:32 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nelson
That helps much. Thank you for thinking I'm worthy.
Republic form of government is a legislative and common law or national and
federal System. UCC 1-103.3 states that code is complimentary to common law
which is still in effect. Federal and the National jurisdicton. The dividing
line is as a national or sovereign you take care of business. If you do not G
steps in. G often crosses the line and in common law we sue. Of course we need
first to stop G.
Now let's move forward.
I was arrested and charged with STALKING while I was on public property,
following a free church service that was conducted and open to all passers-by.
My local church has a free permit to use municipal property issued by the local
police chief under municipal law in the Summer to hold, and I was deprived of
the privilege of worship at the next service in 20 minutes since I was detained
, arrested and jailed.
This is totally out of bounds in both jurisdictions. When one enters public
ground the whole public is allowed to attend in a skimpy swimsuit if desired or
prison uniform. 1817 can win this without much explaination for defense.
I had advised the church via their same attorney in March of 2020 after the
February 2020 unlawful arrest without a warrant in a capias for an unpaid fine
from a municipal judge when I challenged jurisdiction and the judge proceeded
to find me guilty of trespassing, that the local trustees are free to sue me in
Superior Court and seek a TRO, otherwise leave me alone.
Your trying to dictate jurisdiction when you dishonored your own. Your
jurisdicton states that no is no on trespassing property and your beef
Should've been a llawsuit on the church.
After COVID, and after churches were ordered shut, and once the local church
reopened, I advised the pastor, trustees, and the local police on camera that
the local church was free to seek a TRO, otherwise leave alone.
Null and void. Your playing a fine line. Not a battle I would want.
All have been Noticed in writing of Jeff Sessions MEMO as AG of October 17,
2017, in which Sessions Guidance for ALL EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS was that any
act that legal in public cannot be made to be illegal on church property.
That also means that anything that is legal in church is legal in public
property. Reason to bar you on the beach. 1817 dishes with that statement.
Imo, since this is a civil matter, local trustees cannot demand that local
police forcibly remove me or ban me without probable cause of a crime or a
judge's order to stay away.
they can ban you with a simple NO! For their particular logic.
Me wearing a legal and lawful prison uniform on public property to a church
service that is open to the public is not probable cause of a STALKING charge
just because a police officer assumes that he witnessed me trespassing on my
local church property when no trespassing case that he is basing his
certification upon has been been heard in any court even though eight
trespassing charges were filed have never signed by a judge with a probable
cause finding
Not sure what your saying here. The public breach citation 1817 works.
But officers often add past charges that they put in dormant in file and now
activated and put on a citation. Hoping one or all stick. So it is problemmatic
in that each one has to be answered. Coming back to why did you not stop
violating private property? That is an issue that requires restitution.
The officer has certified that he witnessed me harass the pastor on multiple
occasions at church by just knocking on a locked door while church services
were being conducted and the doors unlocked to let members and the public in
and not me.
This is bogus unless he has video put a complaint from the church.
Then while at the beach service on June 6, 2021, while on public property,
after demeaning myself peaceably, lawfully, legally, and after making a
donation to the church while on public property, I was arrested and charged
with STALkING based on a verbal pastor complaint. Only after my arrest, did the
pastor sign a complaint as a victim.
This is void and 1817 can be used with a short statement vacate for lack of
jurisdicton for lack of property ownership.
I just wonder if Charley thinks private church property trustees have
unilateral power to remove a member with guns and ammo and handcuffs by local
police when the trustees have always had the ability to file in Superior Court
for a TRO,
Yes, and they have a right to call the police and file charges. The question is
do they have the right to file charges against you? My answer is no. Being a
private foreign corporation which is government acting as government but are
really private is a violation of the constitution and the law of equal. This
will not be settled in local courts. It must go to sovereigns court. Sovereigns
are you and state of G. Lawsuit on the state for violating article3 1817. To
do this you better really understand the situation or you lose. This centers on
the concept that government had encroached private to the point that everyone
thinks it's the way things are settled and is not. Because the inherent
sovereign is superior over the sovereign with granted sovereignty.
If you really want understanding let's talk 303-472-2219
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:46 PM NELSON DICE <
nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Thanks Charley.
I appreciate the need to tread lightly.
Local church property is held in trust for the worldwide Methodist Church by
nine trustees that are elected by our local membership and NJ State statutes
state that said trustees must govern property under worldwide Methodist bylaws.
A member becomes a member first of the WWMC and then holds and exercises his
membership in a local church.
Those bylaws allow any Methodist church or agency to sue a member or anyone to
sue any Methodist church or agency.
Imo, the trustees cannot unilaterally ban a member who is not committing a
crime, or if there is no signed order of a judge that is in force.
I was arrested and charged with STALKING while I was on public property,
following a free church service that was conducted and open to all passers-by.
My local church has a free permit to use municipal property issued by the local
police chief under municipal law in the Summer to hold, and I was deprived of
the privilege of worship at the next service in 20 minutes since I was detained
, arrested and jailed.
I don't want to sue the local church or the bishop yet.
I had advised the church via their same attorney in March of 2020 after the
February 2020 unlawful arrest without a warrant in a capias for an unpaid fine
from a municipal judge when I challenged jurisdiction and the judge proceeded
to find me guilty of trespassing, that the local trustees are free to sue me in
Superior Court and seek a TRO, otherwise leave me alone while I attend church
functions.
After COVID, and after churches were ordered shut, and once the local church
reopened, I advised the pastor, trustees, and the local police on camera that
the local church was free to seek a TRO, otherwise leave alone.
All have been Noticed in writing of Jeff Sessions MEMO as AG of October 17,
2017, in which Sessions Guidance for ALL EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS was that any
act that legal in public cannot be made to be illegal on church property.
Imo, since this is a civil matter, local trustees cannot demand that local
police forcibly remove me or ban me without probable cause of a crime or a
judge's order to stay away.
Me wearing a legal and lawful prison uniform on public property to a church
service that is open to the public is not probable cause of a STALKING charge
just because a police officer assumes that he witnessed me trespassing on my
local church property when no trespassing case that he is basing his
certification upon has been been heard in any court even though eight
trespassing charges were filed have never signed by a judge with a probable
cause finding or any signed order for me to appear anywhere
The officer has certified that he witnessed me harass the pastor on multiple
occasions at church by just knocking on a locked door while church services
were being conducted and the doors unlocked to let members and the public in
and not me.
Then while at the beach service on June 6, 2021, while on public property,
after demeaning myself peaceably, lawfully, legally, and after making a
donation to the church while on public property, I was arrested and charged
with STALkING based on a verbal pastor complaint. Only after my arrest, did the
pastor sign a complaint as a victim.
Are u free to comment on an opinion of if the Superior Court has jurisdiction
over me under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 on a Criminal Charge?
State of New Jersey statutes state that common law crimes in New Jersey are
abolished and all crimes are prosecuted by statute. Is that Superior Court
authority valid under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 or is there a lack of
jurisdiction like a civil matter?
I plan to file a 1-8-17 lack of jurisdiction claim and see what happens.
I just wonder if Charley thinks private church property trustees have
unilateral power to remove a member with guns and ammo and handcuffs by local
police when the trustees have always had the ability to file in Superior Court
for a TRO, when I have stated I agree to appear there and present myself and
the basis on why I believe the trustees must follow certain state civil
statutes and do not have the authority to order police to remove me from a
building built on land i have a right and privilege to worship upon and worship
Almighty God together with my friends and family and local members and enemies
as well, absent a TRO signed by a Superior Court judge or higher, a provide
guaranteed to me under Article 1 Paragraph 3 of the 1947 New Jersey
Constitution.
________________________________
From:
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
on behalf of Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2021 12:17 PM
To:
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 1-8-17 for false criminal
accusations
Nelson
I'm a lawyer of liberty and must be careful, less I be sued or officers
dragging me to court that I could most likely win but do not need the
aggravation.
I've told you before the church is private. Take them to court and sue them for
violating the contract you said you have with the church. You have no right to
step on their property when the officers of the church said no. Send a letter
in protest not your body.
I've only got one question. Did you or what have you done since last time you
talked to me? As a man, honesty is our law under the law of equal and as our
creator requires.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:41 AM NELSON DICE <
nelsondice@xxxxxxxx<mailto:nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Charley,
If a police officer bases his recent arrest of me for a felony of STALKING that
is being prosecuted by the State and not the victim, my current appointed
pastor, based upon the police officer claiming he witnessed me harassing the
pastor of my church because I knocked on the door of the church during multiple
worship hours, a door that was locked by the pastor and church trustees, in a
nutshell, does the State County Superior Court lack Jurisdiction under Article
1, Section 8, Clause 17?
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
