They acknowledged with a letter and have not heard from them since.
That's all the proof I need.
On 3/7/2022 10:31 PM, Jacob Minalga (j.minalga) wrote:
Did you send them a follow up notice of default for not responding in a timely manner? So everything in your letter stands as accepted truth by both parties, and can be used against them if they ever were to come at you later on down the road. Just asking if you guys do that process or not, and if it's necessary?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 8:27 AM, Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A friend got a 3176C letter. That is a frivolous filing letter.
We sent Charlie's letter to the agent and the commissioner
by certified mail. That was last November. So far nothing in
response. Thank God.
Even if they respond we will reply and remind them that they are
limited in their jurisdiction by Article 1; Section 8; Clause 17.
That is Charley's response to any of the district of criminals
contract offers. The IRS is a complete fraud and they know it.
Now, so do we.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 5:18 AM J Ming <oneofgodselect@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
May I ask what happened regarding IRS and how did u handle it?
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022, 1:04 PM Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Great stuff Charlie. My friend still has heard nothing
back from the IRS when using the letter you helped me
w/last November. I attached a generic version of your
letter for Finny to use if he chooses. Please keep us all
in the loop as your case in Denver unfolds. Thanks again
Charley.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:39 AM Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here is my approach and will be testing again on April
4 in Denver, Colorado tax court. This particular case
started in Nov. In the United States federal court of
Claims asking them to just pay the bill. This case is
requesting every dollar my client has paid in since
1970 to be returned.
Case:
Article 1, section 8, clause17 that United States
legislation of creating the IRS does not apply outside
the United States purchased land. My clients income
was not on United States property or as an employee.
Federalist paper 22 is that Consent is required which
is based on articles of confederation that are honored
by Article 6, clause 1 of the Constitution that the
national government can only ask one to fight or
participate in national government, therefore must
volunteer which is consent. It also establishes common
law that requires a contract.
Two attorneys have resigned and on number 3 at this
point and this case started in the Federal claims
court and brought to Denver for trial.
I sent this to each attorney that has entered the
scene. The third attorney will see it in two weeks.
Your honor, the attorney must know that there is a
fine line between defending the constitution granted
limited sovereignty of the IRS and the United States
constitutional authority, that is lawful. That actions
claiming authority outside of the charter is TREASON!.
Will the attorney produce the document of consent that
my client signed and where the constitution grants IRS
authority outside the geographical limited
jurisdiction described in article 1, section 8, clause 17?
That is the IRS case in its totality. I'll wait till
middle of March and present again this statement to
the court and United States DOJ attorney. See if the
attorney wants to represent the United States and the
IRS in this matter.
My opinion is that it is treason by participants,
including the judge if they claim any authority beyond
the constitution granted sovereignty of those two
points sated above. This is true of all cases with
government employees making unconstitutional claims.
TREASON!
County courts not being federal are not required
report but required to honor. The reason to use
federal courts.
Or one could use declaratory judgement/relief as 'win'
stated that David straight does. Personally I've not
tried it, but will file a case this weekend to try and
figure that process out and if I can get it to work
for me.
I wish you well in your case.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 5:26 AM Christopher Markham
<1stcarguy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The first thing to do, before you validdate their
claim by discussing " what you owe" and. " how
you.arre going to pay it" or "a payment plan" (all
of which admit to all kinds of things that
secretly exist in their presumptions) , is to make
them validate the debt. Theirs all kinds of easily
found IRS debt validation letters on the internet
or maybe a tax expert in the group has one
prepared. That outfit is well-known for making
false claims. They get away with it because most
of us . myself included, get scared and just pay
it so they go sway. I did , but now I realize
there was no court order, so no due process. If
thats the case , then they dont have anything and
need to go away. They put a lien on my house when
they did not have a court judgement. I did not
know what I know now and paid it. On the other
hand , I was veery aggressive with write offs and
figured I was still ahead and did not need
trouble. After all , i got their attention somehow
and did not want more. If you think you owe it ,
there is nothing wrong with working with them .
maybe they will cut you a break. If you dont owe
it or just prefer not to pay it , make them prove.
Many times, Ive heard they cant. I pussied out
when confronted, so Im telling what has worked for
others , not my personal experience. Good Luck.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022, 10:30 Finny
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I could definitely use some help. One question
I have is if I do a revocation could I still
file 1099a or 1099c?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 0:01, Finny
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They contacted me and scheduled a meeting
for this coming Tuesday. They say I owe
them about 23k. I'm concerned because I'm
not clear how to transition out from the
old way of doing things and becoming who I
am now. It's not enough to change ones
status but the unlearning part is a slog.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 22:50, Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you haven't filed and you haven't
heard from our beloved friends. Don't
file at all. No need to rock the boat
for now. You don't have to do the
revocation if you haven't heard from
them. If they should start bothering
you, just let me know and I will help
you out. Just do your business, move
on and thank God for every day you
don't hear from those creeps.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:39 PM Finny
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I didn't file for a couple of
years. Can I do a revocation
despite past returns missing?
Also, I'm not sure how to go about
doing the revocation either.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 22:30,
Rick Miller
<ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since you are not having any
withholding taken out, and
don't have to try and get your
money back, why don't you do a
revocation of election and
stop filing tax returns at all?
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:23
PM Finny
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'm looking for help in
filing a 1040NR. I have a
small sandwich shop and
before I changed my status
I used to file 1040's.
Anyone able to help??
Thanks
John
Sent from Yahoo Mail on
Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
-- Life in one word--LOVE
