[access-uk] Re: iGlasses

  • From: "Annabell" <annabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:11:37 -0000

I agree with you totally, Amro. In this day and age they don't have to be made 
to look unattractive.   Do let us know how you get on with them next month. 
 
Annabell.

Find me on Twitter:  johnssinger
Website:  planetannabel.com
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Amro Bilal 
  To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:40 PM
  Subject: [access-uk] Re: iGlasses


  Sorry but I disagree. The white cane is not attractive nor unattractive. You 
don't wear it if you get what I mean. Those glasses are better compared to 
tactile watches, which by the way, another thing that is hideously designed. 
Just because it's adaptive device doesn't mean it has to be ugly. IMHO, 
bringing the cost down is an argument that can be more valid. However, from how 
cheep things can be manufactured nowadays in China and the far east even this 
argument is rapidly wearing thin.

  I asked my wife to have a look at them and she said, though not in so many 
words, that they are not very elegant. But she said they look like special 
glasses and not like an ordinary ones. Anyway, we're going away on a forest 
weekend brake next month so I may get a pair and use it as my night vision when 
exploring the forest then! *smile* You see, in this context they can be viewed 
as a crash helmet but I am not sure I fancy have them on when I have my best 
suit on!

  Cheers,
  Amro
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: martin wilsher 
    To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 5:50 PM
    Subject: [access-uk] Re: iGlasses


    In my view, they can't be so hideous as all that.  Some people would say the
    white cane or anything that signals you out as disabled is not socially
    attractive, so I say, if you don't feel comfortable I use a cane when
    outside, I don't want to hear it.  I'd much rather wear a set of glasses
    that keep my head safe than do myself damage which will take longer to heal.
    Why not View the glasses like a crash helmet ?-----Original Message-----
    From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
    Annabell
    Sent: 21 March 2011 16:36
    To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: [access-uk] Re: iGlasses

    Hi, I'm told by a sighted friend that they're not at all attractive, if that
    matters to people.  Why can't they make these things a little more socially
    acceptable to look at.
    Annabel.

    Find me on Twitter:  johnssinger
    Website:  planetannabel.com
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Peter Beasley" <pjbeasley23@xxxxxxxxx>
    To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:04 PM
    Subject: [access-uk] iGlasses


    >
    > I await with interest to see how people find these before getting a pair 
    > for
    > myself. I remember the ones that were around in the early 70s which were
    > rather large and relied on sound whereas these new ones use vibration.
    > Compare to the Ultracane which used to cost about £500, these glasses 
    > sound
    > like a bargain. One queerey though, why can't they supply them without any

    > lenses at all if that is what individuals want.
    >
    >
    > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
    > signature database 5971 (20110321) __________
    >
    > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
    >
    > http://www.eset.com
    >
    >
    >
    > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
    > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
    > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
    > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    > ** and in the Subject line type
    > ** unsubscribe
    > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
    > ** immediately-following link:-
    > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
    > ** or send a message, to
    > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
    >
    > 



    ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
    ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
    ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
    ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    ** and in the Subject line type
    ** unsubscribe
    ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
    ** immediately-following link:-
    ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
    ** or send a message, to
    ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

    ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
    ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
    ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
    ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    ** and in the Subject line type
    ** unsubscribe
    ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
    ** immediately-following link:-
    ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
    ** or send a message, to
    ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq


Other related posts: