[access-uk] Re: Why I hate Word - from a JAWS user

  • From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:35:57 -0000

Hi Damon,

 

The only other thing I would add to Tristram's excellent post, is Control-Z
is your friend.  If you format something wrong, then undo is just a
Control-Z away.

 

All the best

 

Steve

 

From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Damon Rose
Sent: Thursday 14 January 2010 09:38
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Why I hate Word - from a JAWS user

 

Microsoft Word is meant to be brilliantly accessible. And indeed you can
tell that Freedom Scientific have put a lot of work into it to make it as
accessible as possible, it being a fairly indispensible part of the software
port folio in your average office. 

Tables are accessible. You can increase font and change colours. You can
alter margins, add page numbers, use hyperlinks, there's a hundred things
you can do with it and they're all accessible. However, if you aren't a
mouse user and can't whizz your way across the screen and appreciate the
results once you've altered them, then it takes absolutely blinking ages to
read and create documents that your sighted colleagues take minutes to
create. 

Want to make your heading a bit bigger? And perhaps embolden it too? Well if
you're not too careful, you might accidentally do same to the text below it
in a last minute change of heart about the content. Result: it looks
embarrassingly rubbish. 

Create a bullet point list and find yourself playing around with it for
several minutes because you've got one too many bullet points and you can't
get rid of the unnecessary bullet, or Word decides it wants to bullet point
things that you didn't want. 

The best most accessible documents are the ones you create. You know them,
you know your way round them. But it's still difficult. The documents that
your colleagues like the most because they're 'at a glance' user friendly,
are the ones you find most difficult to access. 

Access to Word is a myth because it's so time consumingly unusable. 

When you launch Word it takes 20 seconds before a blank document opens,
longer if you're clicking on a pre-existing document. There's so much lag
and there's a lack of control that makes me want to scream. 

So that's why I use Metapad and .txt files for as much of my work as
possible, only transferring to Word if I need to spellcheck or format it in
a fancy way. It's faster, unbelievably faster. Or that's my finding. 

And yes, I have had Word training, I do understand how it works, but there's
so much darn pussyfooting around when creating documents that I can't help
but think there must  be a better way. 

That's all I wanted to say. Do have a nice day. Xxx 

























Damon Rose 
Senior Content Producer bbc.co.uk/ouch 
BBC Vision Learning 

Tel: 020 8752 4427 (x0224427) 
email: damon.rose@xxxxxxxxx 

Have you heard the award-winning Ouch Podcast yet? A razor sharp disability
talk show presented by Mat Fraser and Liz Carr:
<file:///\\www.bbc.co.uk\ouch\podcast> www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/podcast

 


http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance
on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this. 

Other related posts: