[access-uk] Re: Which software
- From: "Jim" <jwbr33694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:40:37 -0000
Hi Ron,
Thanks for the info, I must admit I hadn't noticed anyone referring to 2013
but bad news is just as important as good.
Jim
_____
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Ron Sears
Sent: 27 November 2013 12:09
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Which software
I mistakenly bought 2013 and found it difficult to use. I got a refund and
I am now in the same position as you. The jury is still out.
Cheers
Ron
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim <mailto:jwbr33694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:58 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Which software
Hi Lists,
First, apologies for cross posting but I need as many opinions as possible
before making my decisions.
I am looking to have a new computer built in the near future but I need some
views on software to install.
I am currently using Office 2003 and XP Homebut I am not sure whether to
install Office 2010 or 2013 along with Windows 7 or 8.1 on the new machine.
I have shied away from ribbons so far but I have to bow to the inevitable.
Is it too much of a jump from Office 2003 to 2013 or should I try 2010
first?
I keep hearing conflicting reports about Windows 8.1 as to whether its user
friendly for VI users.
I currently use JAWS 13 but have 2 SMA's, 14 and 15 disks available to
install. I have tried NVDA in the past but couldn't get on with its voice
because of my hearing but I understand there many more choices regarding
voices.
That's enough for now, thoughts please.
Jim Williams
Other related posts:
