Dave Heeley, (was ) Hope to be interviewing Dave again for our local Sandwell VI group. I already have an interview we did by phone on Sandwell Visually Impaired's website. I always have mixed feelings on the idea of role models, but I wouldn't take anything away from the guy, and he is a brilliant public speaker. Not sure if he isn't considering going into business, and I for one wish him well if he does. Cheers, From Ray I can be contacted off-list at: mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- Darren Brewer Subject: [access-uk] Re: Web Radio again - on In Touch Hi Jackie I used to know Dave back around 2000 when we were both doing a woodworking course at Q A C. I was so surprised when I heard he was doing these marathons. I think they are expecting to raise around a million pounds and that would obviously be a marvellous achievment. Darren. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jackie Cairns" <cairnsplace@xxxxxxx> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:55 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: Web Radio again - on In Touch > Hi Darren > > Like you, I think the David Healey story is an absolutely marvellous > achievement. I saw it on the ITV Evening News last night, and thought it > was truly amazing. > > As for In Touch, I'd best say no more as at least one person I know will > throw a tantrum and stomp off in a huff ... (smile.) > > We'll just have to see what happens with the Web Box venture. > > Jackie > > Email: cairnsplace@xxxxxxx > Skype Name: Cairnsplace > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Darren Brewer" <darren.m.brewer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:14 PM > Subject: [access-uk] Re: Web Radio again - on In Touch > > >> Trouble is they wouldn't have been able to discuss it very much as they >> would probably only allocate something like an 8 minute slot. >> >> I'm not being funny, which makes a change.lol. But they dedicated quite a >> chunk last night to the report from Africa. Then right at the end they >> quickly mentioned about Dave Healey. He has achieved what only 4 other >> people in the world have managed. Plus of course he is blind. I think it >> is fantastic what he has done and hopefully it should get the media >> attention it deserves. you would think a programme like in touch, which >> is supposed to be about the visually impaired world would make a big >> thing of this, but sadly no. Maybe next week they will talk about it for >> 20 seconds. >> >> Darren. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jackie Cairns" <cairnsplace@xxxxxxx> >> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:13 AM >> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Web Radio again - on In Touch >> >> >>> Ray, they could have invited two or three of the original trialists onto >>> the programme and had a really constructive debate about where it goes, >>> how to get additional content onto the Orion without the intervention of >>> SoundTalking, and what kind of support one might expect to receive after >>> shelling out £279 or £315 for it? At least I tried to be fair and >>> balanced when I did the review. Another opportunity lost for the >>> visually impaired community to get involved! (smile.) >>> >>> Jackie >>> >>> Email: cairnsplace@xxxxxxx >>> Skype Name: Cairnsplace >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Ray's Home" <rays-home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 11:28 PM >>> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Web Radio again - on In Touch >>> >>> >>>> Iain, apart from not being probing enough, as Paul put it, I fear that >>>> In Touch sometimes ers on the side of being a little simplistic and, in >>>> this case, seeming to give the impression that there might be people >>>> who'd have separate devices for every different format they would want >>>> to play. >>>> >>>> Maybe Jackie should have been invited as a counter balance to the two >>>> organisation representatives, but then, as I say, In Touch doesn't seem >>>> to look that far in some of its research. That's not meant as a >>>> generalisation about the programme, but only that it seems to have been >>>> the case here. >>>> >>>> From Ray >>>> I can be contacted off-list at: >>>> mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> Iain Lackie >>>> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Web Radio again - on In Touch >>>> >>>> >>>> Surely it should be known that you can play commercial CDs on a Daisy >>>> machine. >>>> >>>> Iain >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Paul Leake" <paul.leake@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:02 PM >>>> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Web Radio again - on In Touch >>>> >>>> >>>> of course ted davis was disingenuous and did not acknowledge that users >>>> could not programme in their own station choices. In Touch, were not >>>> probing >>>> enough to ask this very obvious question. tomorrow I will contact >>>> wireless >>>> for the blind and let them know of the severe limitations of this >>>> product. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> paul.leake@xxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Ray's Home" <rays-home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: "Access-Uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 8:54 PM >>>> Subject: [access-uk] Web Radio again - on In Touch >>>> >>>> >>>>> Just heard the guy from TNAUK on In Touch being interviewed about the >>>>> web radio. >>>>> >>>>> Confused a little by one thing he said, that someone's web box was >>>>> seemingly updated over night to get a local station. So, is it >>>> possible >>>>> after all to do this remotely? Or have I mis-heard this. bit of the >>>>> programme? >>>>> >>>>> Seems though that Wireless for the Blind fund is now interested so >>>> many >>>>> might stand to get it for free, so we're led to understand. >>>>> >>>>> I must say though that In Touch and those taking part seem to live in >>>>> splendid isolation re. comments on this list over the last month or >>>> so. >>>>> You'd think this is "Thee Solution" to hear them talk on the >>>> programme, >>>>> but we all know it isn't. It will be all the more interesting to hear >>>>> what RNIB decides. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq