[access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.

From: "kevin and emma" <kream@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 23:00:57 +0100
hi all, i think some of the problems we come across with websites is due to
confusion about what is considered *accessible* and what isn't. by this i
mean, a line needs to be drawn when we criticise websites between, what is
*inaccessible* and what's simply *difficult* to use. just because a website
is a little difficult to use, does that make it inaccessible? personally i'd
say no it doesn't. but there will be a lot of people out there who say it
does. also, i wonder sometimes just how much time folks spend on a website
before declaring it inaccessible. and my final thought for now, what exactly
do we all mean by inaccessible? how about folks provide examples of websites
they consider inaccessible? this'll give us all an idea of what exactly
we're getting at! there's a lot of people on this list all with varying
abilities, so that should provide some interesting results.
Kevin - co-owner/moderator of the blind gamers discussion list
contact me via email/msn:
kream@xxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Catherine Turner" <catherineturner2000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 3:20 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.


> Steve I think you over-simplify the issues.
>
> Re people's competence levels, non-VI people have a variety of levels of
> incompetence too.  They, too, complain about not being able to use
software,
> websites, whatever.  Obviously in an ideal world everyone would be perfect
> at using their screen readers, but that's not going to happen.  Everyone
> here knows the problems there are about cost of training etc.  Plus, let's
> be honest, the amount of effort a VI person has to put in with their
screen
> reader to get information out is considerably more than a non-VI does with
a
> mouse and their eyes.  I know it's like this for VI people and a whole
range
> of tasks/issues, but at the same time I say it's perfectly reasonable to
> expect designers to design for accessibility by following guidelines and
> building on their knowledge/experience of these issues, which will help
that
> gap to be minimised.
>
> Re the percentage of accessible sites.  Well various studies have been
done.
> I don't know the ins and outs of all of them, and I expect if I looked
into
> it I would find some faults with them as I would with studies of all
types.
> I do know, however, that the study conducted for the DRC by City
University
> was done by people with considerable knowledge of accessibility/usability
> and related issues; used a representative sample of testers in terms of
age,
> experience, technology used etc; and looked at a massive variety of
websites
> from different sectors.  That study found 81% of sites tested lacked
> evidence of any attempt to make their site accessible.  I don't want to
get
> into trading figures or criticising individual studies, I don't like to do
> so unless I research the subject properly and I don't have the time right
> now; but we must remember that we here are individual users (most of us
> pretty experienced); we probably tend to look at certain websites or
certain
> types of websites time and time again; studies like the one done by City
for
> the DRC take into account and  properly measure/investigate the experience
> of users, not Steve or Catherine or whoever.
>
> Re people who "won't" upgrade I'm sure we all know that there are issues
of
> affordability here.  Most VIs are unemployed, and we know the cost of
access
> technology is high.  Also, designers should and often do take into account
> how their page will render on different platforms/browser versions; they
> draw a line somewhere in terms of browser versions they will design for;
and
> I think they should do the same for access technology.
>
> Catherine
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
> > Of Steve Nutt
> > Sent: 01 September 2005 11:54
> > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.
> >
> >
> > Hi Tink,
> >
> > Trouble is, there are people with influence saying these sites are
> > inaccessible, due to their lack of competence, so other people
> > believe them.
> >
> > All the best
> > --
> > Computer Room Services:  the long cane for blind computer users.
> > Telephone Voice:  +44(0)1438 742286, Fax/BBS:  +44(0)1438 759589
> > mobile:  +44(0)7956 334938,
> > Email:  Steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Web site:  http://www.comproom.co.uk
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of
> > Tink Watson
> > Sent: 01 September 2005 10:25
> > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.
> >
> > Kevin,
> >
> >     I think you're absolutely right when you say that sites are not
always
> > as inaccessible as people believe them to be, but that leads to the
> > supposition that it isn't the accessibility of the web site that is
> > subjective, but the degree of competence displayed by the user that is.
> >
> > Tink.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "kevin and emma" <kream@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 10:12 AM
> > Subject: [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.
> >
> >
> > > hi steve, agreed totally! i get fed up with people screaming about
> > > inaccessible websites, and blaming the company whose site it is. has
it
> > > not
> > > ever occurred to someone, "hang on, maybe i'm the problem
> > here?" not only
> > > do
> > > different screen readers perform differently with the same sites, but
> > > different versions of the same SR do. it's just too easy to
> > blame someone
> > > else for a website you struggle with instead of admitting that
> > maybe your
> > > not using your access technology to the best of it's ability.
> > and no i'm
> > > not
> > > saying all websites are accessible, i just don't think there's as many
> > > *inaccessible* sites as people seem to claim. buyt this is all
> > subjective
> > > and down to personal opinion, which is why i don't think the
> > whole website
> > > accessibility thing will ever be nailed down.
> > > Kevin - co-owner/moderator of the blind gamers discussion list
> > > contact me via email/msn:
> > > kream@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:07 PM
> > > Subject: [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Hi Tink,
> > >>
> > >> I think I am going to disagree with you, accessibility is
> > subjective.  If
> > >> you try a web site with one screen reader, and it isn't
> > accessible, does
> > >> that make it inaccessible?  Only for that person using that screen
> > >> reader.
> > >> If you then find another screen reader renders it perfectly
> > accessible to
> > >> that same user, after training, for example, does that
> > suddenly make that
> > >> web site accessible?  Accessibility is as subjective as usability in
my
> > >> view.
> > >>
> > >> All the best
> > >> --
> > >> Computer Room Services:  the long cane for blind computer users.
> > >> Telephone Voice:  +44(0)1438 742286, Fax/BBS:  +44(0)1438 759589
> > >> mobile:  +44(0)7956 334938,
> > >> Email:  Steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Web site:  http://www.comproom.co.uk
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf
> > > Of
> > >> Tink Watson
> > >> Sent: 31 August 2005 20:11
> > >> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.
> > >>
> > >> DJ,
> > >>
> > >> Good question. I'll measure each site against the Web Content
> > >> Accessibility Guidelines from the W3C, but will also take into
account
> > >> how
> > >> each site feels to use in practical terms.
> > >>
> > >> I should stress that I won't be writing the piece for In Touch, but
> > >> am just conducting some investigations for one of their team
> > for a piece
> > >> ther hoping to do later this Autumn. I'll recommend that care
> > is taken to
> > >> keep everything in perspective, but I know they are an
> > experienced team.
> > > The
> > >> In Touch team member I'm working for is also visually
> > impaired, so again
> > >> there is good knowledge there.
> > >>
> > >> I'm going to disagree with the suggestion that accessibility is
> > >> subjective though. *Smile.
> > >>
> > >> Ensuring that everyone has access to something is objective, the
> > >> subjective part is it's usability.
> > >>
> > >> It's a question of where the responsibility lies. I believe that it
> > >> is the responsibility of the site owner to ensure that it is as
> > >> accessible
> > >> and usable as possible. It is the responsibility of the user to
ensure
> > > they
> > >> have the right skills and technology to use it.
> > >>
> > >> I don't want to wade into discussions about the availability and
> > >> cost of assisstive technology, that's not what I'm meaning.
> > I'm thinking
> > >> more along the lines of motorways only being accessible if you
> > have a car
> > >> and you are licenced to drive it.
> > >>
> > >> Accessibility is about making sure someone, anyone, can access
> > >> information. Usability is about how easy that information is to
access
> > >> and
> > >> that's where it becomes truly subjective. It's one of the reasons why
> > > there
> > >> is so little in the way of guidelines for usability, although the
WCAG
> > >> metnioned above do sway a little in that direction as you near the
> > > Priority
> > >> 3 level checkpoints.
> > >>
> > >> The end goal of what I'm doing now, is to produce some information
> > >> about sites that have special offers online, but not available over
the
> > >> phone or in person, Sites that are accessible and easy to use,
> > Companies
> > >> that make special offers or discounts to people with disabilities, in
> > >> fact
> > >> anything that focuses on the whole area of disability, web sites,
> > >> iscounts
> > >> and so forth.
> > >>
> > >> Tink.
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf
> > > Of
> > >> Dj Paddy
> > >> Sent: 31 August 2005 15:07
> > >> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.
> > >>
> > >> Hi Tink.
> > >>
> > >> How will you determine what is a, "Accessible", web site?
> > >>
> > >> I am not wanting to be argumentative here.  smiles
> > >>
> > >> Will you refer to W3C?
> > >>
> > >> I hope that in any conclusion and/or opening it is stressed that,
> > >> "Accessible", is still a subjective term.  And that lack of
> > knowledge, (I
> > >> don't personally believe training is always the answer ,
> > although this is
> > >> something that can help but I don't believe it's called for as much
as
> > > it's
> > >> suggested)  Bottom line in tech support mainstream or otherwise the
end
> > > user
> > >> is allot more at fault than the site in this case.  Often due
> > to them not
> > >> having the skills for whatever reason to use their
adaptive/mainstream
> > >> and
> > >> general operating system to it' sfull capacity to gain access.
> > >>
> > >> OK, now I've made those big sweeping remarks I should include
> > a website
> > >> or
> > >> few I suppose?
> > >>
> > >> Although I don't think there's many sites that are
> > inaccessible in their
> > >> entirety.
> > >>
> > >> N'ways why not include
> > >>
> > >> www.thinkgeek.com
> > >>
> > >> www.paypal.co.uk
> > >>
> > >> www.google.com (.co.uk)
> > >>
> > >> My hosting company
> > >>
> > >> www.dhosting.co.uk
> > >>
> > >> The guys even got keyboard shortcuts on there.
> > >>
> > >> www.ebay.co.uk
> > >>
> > >> Who actually have buttons you can hit on to have standard web forms
on
> > >> instead of Java.  But who have no audio authentication system in
place
> > >> but
> > >> paypal that they push and partner with do?
> > >>
> > >> Anyways it's a place I spent a small fortune on over the past few
weeks
> > > and
> > >> was quite miffed that I had to get a mate to change my email
> > address for
> > > me
> > >> because of the graphical auth system.
> > >>
> > >> I could go on....
> > >>
> > >> You may wish to look at the links on Tom's site
> > whitestick.co.uk and even
> > >> the favourites page on jfwlite as well.
> > >>
> > >> Dj Paddy
> > >> "It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, It is by the beans
of
> > > Java
> > >> that thoughts acquire speed, The hands acquire shaking, the shaking
> > > becomes
> > >> a warning, It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion."
> > >> -- Popular Usenet Sig
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Tink Watson" <tink@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> To: "Access UK" <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Vi Gen Access"
> > >> <vi-genaccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:00 PM
> > >> Subject: [access-uk] Really good, accessible web sites.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > Good afternoon,
> > >> >
> > >> >    Continuing with my research on behalf of Radio 4's In Touch
> > >> > program, I'm hoping you can help with recommendations for really
good
> > >> > accessible web sites.
> > >> >
> > >> >    I know that a perfectly accessible and usable web site is still
> > >> > something of a rarity, but certainly in my own experience, there
are
> > >> > shops
> > >>
> > >> > online where I can carry out my shopping without too much grief.
> > >> >
> > >> >    If anyone can recommend a web site from the following categories
> > >> > that is easy to use, that would be great:
> > >> >
> > >> > Travel
> > >> > CD's etc
> > >> > Food Supermarkets
> > >> > Finance,Insurance
> > >> > Entertainment
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >    The idea is to praise those companies who appear to be making an
> > >> > effort
> > >>
> > >> > or who have taken steps in the right direction.
> > >> >
> > >> >    Please reply off list to tink@xxxxxxxxxx or on list if you feel
> > >> > others would benefit from sharing your recommendations.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Tink.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > http://www.tink.co.uk/
> > >> > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> > >> > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> > >> > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> > >> > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> > ** and in the Subject line type
> > >> > ** unsubscribe
> > >> > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> > >> > ** immediately-following link:-
> > >> > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> > >> > ** or send a message, to
> > >> > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > __________ NOD32 1.1205 (20050830) Information __________
> > >> >
> > >> > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > >> > http://www.eset.com
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> > >> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> > >> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> > >> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> ** and in the Subject line type
> > >> ** unsubscribe
> > >> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> > >> ** immediately-following link:-
> > >> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> > >> ** or send a message, to
> > >> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> > >> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> > >> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> > >> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> ** and in the Subject line type
> > >> ** unsubscribe
> > >> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> > >> ** immediately-following link:-
> > >> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> > >> ** or send a message, to
> > >> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> > >> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> > >> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> > >> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> ** and in the Subject line type
> > >> ** unsubscribe
> > >> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> > >> ** immediately-following link:-
> > >> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> > >> ** or send a message, to
> > >> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> > > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> > > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> > > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ** and in the Subject line type
> > > ** unsubscribe
> > > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> > > ** immediately-following link:-
> > > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> > > ** or send a message, to
> > > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ** and in the Subject line type
> > ** unsubscribe
> > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> > ** immediately-following link:-
> > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> > ** or send a message, to
> > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
> >
> >
> >
> > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ** and in the Subject line type
> > ** unsubscribe
> > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> > ** immediately-following link:-
> > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> > ** or send a message, to
> > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
> >
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>


** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
Follow-Ups:
- [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.
  - From: Steve Nutt
- [access-uk] Accessible or not accessible? (Was: Really good, accessible web sites.)
  - From: Tink Watson
References:
- [access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.
  - From: Catherine Turner
[access-uk] Re: Really good, accessible web sites.

Other related posts:
