[access-uk] Re: Rationale for moderator decisions
- From: "Angel" <angel238@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:47:37 -0400
I apologize, I thought it was. As is the wheel.
----- Original Message -----
From: George Bell
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 5:13 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Rationale for moderator decisions
Hi Edward,
Speaking as a former moderator, the key here is in the term "access
technology".
A cane is hardly technology, and certainly kitchen appliances could be
considered more along the lines of daily living.
Please also bear in mind that its takes human intervention to moderate a
list, and it is simply not possible to do this 24/7. Hence some inappropriate
issues may make an appearance for time to time.
George.
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Edward Green
Sent: 02 October 2012 23:01
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Rationale for moderator decisions
Hi Barry,
I would be interested to understand more about the reasons for your closure
of the long cane discussion.
The description of the Access UK list at
//www.freelists.org/list/access-uk is as follows:
"This group is designed for blind and visually impaired computer users to
discuss all aspects of their specialist software used to enable them to access
their computer. It provides a support network where users and professionals in
the field can help support each other and discuss and hopefully, resolve,
issues or problems surrounding the access technology."
According to the first sentence in the terms of reference, the group is
therefore entirely restricted to the discussion of computer software. Why,
therefore, have you not closed down discussions relating to the Kindle
Keyboard, Penfriend, computer recommendations, braille displays or useful
kitchen devices, none of which can be described as software?
Given that you haven't closed down such threads, I assume you agree with me
that limiting the group to software would neither be constructive nor useful.
Are you therefore saying that the group should be limited to the discussion
of high tech solutions? Discussions of the long cane, if you accept it as a low
tech solution, would seem to be to be entirely on topic given that it helps
blind people with access!
I'm also not sure that people have had to read off topic emails if they don't
want to. As far as I am aware, the subject line of this thread has made it
clear what this is about, giving people the ability to skip over or delete
messages that they are not interested in. This is what I have done with
threads in which I don't have an interest.
I'd be interested to hear your rationale.
Thanks,
Ed
Other related posts:
