[access-uk] NVDA V Thunder
- From: "Saqib" <saqib500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:47:14 -0000
Hi recently I have been evaluating both Thunder paid version with British
Daniel voice and the free NVDA current release. It seems to me that NVDA does
far more than Thunder which cost me £59.99 2 years ago. My question is here is
why can't the producers of Thunder make Thunder accessible with the current
Internet browser such as IE7. I find that NVDA reads e-mails quite well in
Windows mail and Windows Live Messenger.
Why is it that a free open sourse screen reader is more user friendly and
accessible with a wider range of programs than Thunder which cost me money.
Other related posts:
