Yes, me too. Sometimes it is plain that they have replicated problems and informed S and S about them, for precisely no result. Do not judge Sight and Sound by the product, apart rom that they are wise to be the sole dealer from a business point of view! Cheers Dave -----Original Message----- From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of chris hallsworth Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 5:17 PM To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: My experiences moving over to Window Eyes Same here. Had no issues with Sight and Sound and they've dealt with my concerns or queries very well. Chris Hallsworth E-mail and Facebook: christopherh40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx MSN: ch9675@xxxxxxxxxxx Skype: chrishallsworth7266 Twitter: http://twitter.com/christopherh40 On 12/05/2010 14:07, Barry Toner wrote: > Hi Jackie and all, > > I often think that Window Eyes not only gets a low market hit World Wide > compared to JAWS because in aprt of it's early hook-ins with Rehab places > but it's awful over here in the UK. > > System Access and NVDA very much have their place. However, I truly believe > that Window Eyes should be touted allot more than it is. I'm just not sure > how to do it. Re: The guys at Sight And Sound, I've never had a bad word > to say about them. I'd rather speak to them in allot of instances than FS. > Smiles > > Barry. > > -----Original Message----- > From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Jackie Cairns > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 1:13 PM > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [access-uk] Re: My experiences moving over to Window Eyes > > Hi Barry > > As you have initiated the thread on this list, I will just echo my personal > frustrations and say that I too am about to defect full-time to Window-Eyes > for exactly the same reasons as yourself. I would go further by saying that > I know at least three others who are doing likewise. > > As you know, I am leaving Sight and Sound next week as an employee, and I > have no animosity towards my employers as I have enjoyed two very happy > years with them. But, as an end user, and a JAWS person for 11 years, I > feel it is time to move because I am also against the practices of Freedom > Scientific, the bugginess of the program itself, and its licensing gravy > train. There just comes a point when you feel enough is enough! > > Thank you for sharing your thoughts, I'll remember them when I too hurl bad > language at my PC, (smile). > > > Jackie Cairns > Braille Specialist > Email: jackie.cairns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sight and Sound Technology Ltd > Welton House North Wing > Summerhouse Road > Moulton Park > Northampton > NN3 6WD > Tel: 01604 798024 > Mob: 07887 883815 > www.sightandsound.co.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Barry Toner > Sent: 11 May 2010 12:17 > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [access-uk] My experiences moving over to Window Eyes > > Hi all, > > I started writing this late last night and ran out of steam. I posted it to > the GWMICRO-INFO list under the thread of I've Something To Say. > > It's not the best piece I've ever written but I wanted to share my > experiences with you all as a long-term JAWS user. > > Messege Starts > > " I can also chime in on this thread with a personal tale. > > I have been using Window Eyes on and off for around 6 years. > > I lost my sight in an accident when I was18 years old. I frustrated myself > with Hal for about 2 years and then I found JAWS. Whilst it did not replace > being able to use Windows with sight it was a breath of fresh air compared > to Hal 4.2. Especially when it came to surfing the Internet. This would > have been JAWS 3.7 I started with. > > I've watched the decline of JAWS over the years in terms of problems not > being fixed, new ones being introduced and generally allot of half-baked > product development going through out onto the market. Not to mention as I > see them very fluffy plug ins and the nightmare that has always existed JAWS > licensing. > > Despite these failings I was not prepared to move outside of my comfort > zone. Even at the time when my peers where doing so and I would have most > benefited from their support and vice versa. > > In saying this I completed two Computer Science Degrees using JAWS. Though > having learnt what I have in the past weeks things just as a fact would have > been allot easier with Window Eyes. What's that old saying though? About > heinsight being twenty twenty. > > Just over three weeks back I decided I wanted to learn to use Window Eyes. > I didn't' say too much to friends who would only think that we'd been there > before. When they tried to get me to see the light, so to speak. > > I sat down and thought how best to approach Window Eyes this time. > Something that would be different from previous half-hearted attempts to > give the product a fair go. > > So, I decided I would use Window Eyes and no other screen reader for 1 full > week. No matter what task I needed to do on the computer. I made a > commitment despite my tasks priority to use Window Eyes. I was determined > to learn how to do it with Window Eyes. > > This was allot harder than it may sound. Especially as I'm really not that > much of a committed person when it comes to Window Eyes. Or rather I > wasn't. > > So I unloaded JAWS and installed Win Eyes v7.11 onto my Windows 7 32Bit > Desktop. > > I really needed to make this a genuine attempt. I decided to make it a > social experiment instead of a hardcore, I'm going to do this and if I go > back to JAWS I've failed. So I announced on my twitter and Face Book feeds > what I was going to do. I then sent updates several times a day including > @gwmicro in the thread of the good, bad and ugly. > > > Let me tell you the language I through at the computer for the first three > days was disgraceful! But when I learned how to use the Mouse Keys, started > to read sections of the excellently layed out manual, joined this list and > discovered Script Central I started to get a bit excited. > > One of my main frustrations was the amount of times v7.11 would do odd > things. By this I mean it would clip words in Outlook 2K7. Scripts would > crash, Window Eyes would crash if set to load upon log-in. I discovered > that Window Eyes wasn't as infallible as the fan boys and girls made it out > to be. Oh yes and I got a healthy taster that no doubt End_users I've > supported as a Systems Engingeer have gotten from me a time or too. That > of, "uh that's weird" "It doesnt' do it on my machine like that". This > maybe true but it's not a helpful response! > > So for me it's not been an experience of "The most stable Screen Reader". > JAWS for me still holds that trophy on my system. Well, it would if it was > still installed. > > It's been over three weeks and I've not went back despite user error > problems and bugs with Window Eyes. > > Now, it is fair to say that a new user of a product will often make mistakes > through just not knowing. I'm not exceempt from this. However, there's > allot going on in a person learning a new thing. Whither that is a computer > program, folding lawndry etc. > > So why might you ask despite the problems I had and in some cases like the > clipping words didn't' I just do the easy thing and switch back? Simple, > I'd decided I'd rather put up with some problems that can either be worked > round or ignored until they are either fixed or I'm told of something I'm > not doing to get Window Eyes to do what I want. In doing so I get the > wonderful functionality and fresh approach Window Eyes has given to my > computing. This compared to the stale product that did, serve me well for a > time but has frankly become a bit of a farse in comparison. I.E. JAWS. > > I used to believe that JAWS and Window Eyes both had their place. I > believed this kept me nutral and made me unlike The Zellots, (as I saw them > at the time), who sat in each camp throwing muck back and forth. > > I find myself looking on at other people in my life who are using JAWS and > struggling and want to cry out to them. Look, you dont' need to carry on > with those bad habits you learned with JAWS. Tabbing all over the screen > and not using keystrokes in say,and Installer Wizard of alt n for Next. > > It's incredible the amount of JAWS users who are not aware of how to use the > JAWS Cursor. that's a real bug bear of mine now having used Window Eyes > mouse Keys. the fact you need to completely switch to a different mode then > back to the PC Cursor mode. no wonder people get confused! > > I could detail my own feelings on a lengthy list of JAWS short comings not > to mention the iresponsable way Freedom Scientific treat customers. I'd > only be preaching to the crowd and end up falling into the camp of "My ones > bigger than yours". > > I'd like to think i can lead by example to people I know that use JAWS and I > see struggling with the mindset it forces on people of the old and > comfortable. By letting them see my completley fresh approach and no longer > fear of trying something new just for fun. Sadly though I'm a geek and I > believe most of my friends will discount what I'm doing as down to that. > rather than, "I could be having that much fun and productivity as well". > > Trailing off a bit as I need to get out before the rain starts here!" > > Barry Toner > > > BCS Belfast Branch > YPG Representative& Disability Group > > http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=nav.10444 > > > > Contact me @ > > Professional: barry.toner@xxxxxxxxxx > > Personal Email: barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > MSN/Live: djpaddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > AIM/FB: barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > TWITTER: dj_paddy > > Skype: djpaddy > > Mobile: (UK) +44 (0) 7921 611 253 > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 5104 (20100511) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > ** and in the Subject line type > ** unsubscribe > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the > ** immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] > ** or send a message, to > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > ** and in the Subject line type > ** unsubscribe > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the > ** immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] > ** or send a message, to > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 5104 (20100511) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 5104 (20100511) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 5105 (20100511) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 5107 (20100512) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 5107 (20100512) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > ** and in the Subject line type > ** unsubscribe > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the > ** immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] > ** or send a message, to > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq > > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq