Hi jackie,
Talks does indeed rule, but at the moment, Mobile Speak is the only game
in
town if you want a Windows phone, apart from Smart Hal, which to be honest
is not good at all.
All the best
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of
Jackie Cairns
Sent: Sunday 9 March 2008 14:20
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Mobile Speak
Hi Chris
Thanks for your thoughts on Mobile Speak.
I don't have a decision to make on which to go for. I am a TALKS lover,
and
think it's the best thing to happen this century! (smile). I just wanted
to
try out Mobile Speak as a comparison, but so far, not so good, in respect
of
its voices. I just can't get used to them at all, and I personally find
Mobile Speak a lot slower when arrowing through menus and things.
No, TALKS rules, but it's each to their own, and rather like the screen
reader scenario.
Jackie
Email: cairnsplace@xxxxxxx
Skype Name: Cairnsplace
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hallsworth" <christopherhallsworth71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 10:38 AM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Mobile Speak
Hi Jackie, thanks for agreeing with me about Eloquence. It's very sad,
and, as a result, I'm sticking with Talks for the rest of my life
<smiles>. Seriously, when I tried MobileSpeak on my N70, I found it to be
sluggish compared to Talks, however I did like the fact that one can
customize it exactly to their needs, which you can't really do with
Talks.
Also some of the voices, like Lequendo Simon, was very good and in fact
was louder compared to Eloquence, however since Talks doesn't support
Lequendo voices as far as I know I had to persuade myself that
MobileSpeak
wasn't the programme for me, and to stick with Talks. In regards to the
10
minute demo limitation, this is true for both MobileSpeak and Talks,
however you can request a 30 day licence for both programmes, so in
theory
you've got 60 days to try each screen reader. This should allow you way
enough time to try them out and make your decision. I hope this helps,
and
good luck in your decision-making.
Jackie Cairns wrote:
Well thanks for your feedback people on the various voices, and Nuance's
apparent unwillingness to licence Eloquence to Code Factory. How sad!
like Chris, I'm just used to it.
But of those who use Mobile Speak as well as TALKS, what is your overall
opinion of it? Do you find Mobile Speak slower than TALKS, for example?
So far, I certainly do when I am cursoring up and down menus and going
into various applications on the phone. And of course I'm frustrated by
the fact it runs out after 10 minutes because I've just got a demo.
Any feedback appreciated as I am genuinely interested in a comparison
between the two really, and how people find them.
Jackie
Email: cairnsplace@xxxxxxx
Skype Name: Cairnsplace
----- Original Message -----
From: orhan deniz To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, March 07,
2008 4:35 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Mobile Speak
well Dec access 32 sounds way better than that garbage DECtalk that
mobile speak offers. sick DECtalk for mobile speak!
orhan.
----- Original Message -----
From: James Scholes To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, March
07,
2008 4:23 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Mobile Speak
No, Eloq is not available for Mobile Speak users, as Code Factory
acted
quite childishly and had a bit of an argument with Nuance, the makers of
Talks, so the voice was removed.
James Scholes
http://www.jamesscholes.com
From: Jackie Cairns Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:56 PM
To: Access UK Mailing List Subject: [access-uk] Mobile Speak
Hi All
I've downloaded a demo version of Mobile Speak, and am beginning to
have a mess around with it, just to see how it compares to my beloved
TALKS.
But, so far, I hate the voices that come with it. I mean, you
wouldn't
want to lust after any of them would you? (smile.) Anyway, is there an
Eloquence voice that can be run on Mobile Speak like there is with
TALKS?
Please tell me there is!! (grin.) I'm not saying you would want to lust
after Eloquence either but ... it's better than these other lads and
lassies.
I am running this software on a phone that doesn't have TALKS
installed, just to be on the safe side, so any help would be sincerely
appreciated.
Thanks in advance good people.
Jackie
Email: cairnsplace@xxxxxxx
Skype Name: Cairnsplace
__________ NOD32 2924 (20080305) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
