Colin. Thanks for setting out succinctly the cold business calculations which drive the access market. One could say, in a business like, and uncharitable fashion, that most on this list aren't worth bothering with, (smile) In a way I can say that I was thinking along the right lines regarding Employment/education being the core earners for suppliers. What I hadn't before now realised is the importance of older customers in these calculations. The present role of charities will probably remain obscure as we ordinary punters are unlikely ever to know the exact position of RNIB and maybe a handful of other large players in their relationship with suppliers. The corporate hybrid charity/business nature of RNIB and others blurs nicely any distinction that could be drawn between business and providing service to those who cannot afford to be served by the market. Markets provide choice for those with money; those without must, for the most part, accept what charity has to offer, or go without. Probably RNIB has it both ways; it can be self-serving and be of 'service' to us, depending on which face it wants to show. A consortium or buyers co-op is an interesting idea. It is interesting to speculate on what the eve-droppers on this list think about that. They are probably confident that no one will get it together and so can maintain their aloofness and indifference to our needs. In a sense if the solution Colin suggests in his message were ever to bear fruit, then it would itself have to be something of a chimera; business analysis and methods allied to a notion of ethical service to a less well-placed section of the VI community. Ray. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin @ New Vision" <cph.newvision@xxxxxxxxxx> Having talked about CCTV's and there uses in Employment, Education and the elderly where cost does not seem to be an issue. This being the core business of most manufacturers. Most larger manufacturers will stick to these markets on the 80/20 principle. For example 80% of their business comes from 20% of their customer database. From this it can be concluded that prices are unlikely to come down. It makes financial sense to them and their accountants that they concentrate on their core business. For those people who are not employed and do not attend school or college price is going to be the main issue. Using the same 80/20 principle, then 80% of all VI and blind people will fill this category. What can be done to help these people ? Lower the cost of equipment lower the cost of training ? How can this be done without lowering standards ? I am sure that everyone wants the answers to these questions. One thing is for sure you cannot expect any help from the larger manufacturers. One answer would be to get together as a consortium and do it yourself, maybe even get charity status. You can then buy products in bulk and offer them at a discount. I hear some of you saying isn't this what some of our charities are doing anyway. For instance buy lost cost camera modules and adapt them to your own requirements. By buying in a modular form you can use the basic building block format and only use the parts that are going to be of use to you. This keeps both the cost of the parts down and you are providing your own labour. You can then draw on the expertise of other members of the consortium for the things you don't understand. The training can then also come from the same group. The manufactures and suppliers have an association called BHTA. Which stands for the British Healthcare Trades Association. Maybe you could form an association of users. Regards Colin ** Going on holiday and want to halt messages? Send a message to:- ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** vacation ## d ** where ## is the number of days followed by d for days. ** For other things like digest mode, send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq