Hi,Do you have the correct link to this article as the below one doesn't work and, on searching the site there are nearly 100 results for Disability Living Allowance returned.
Many thanks, Kevin -------------------------------------------------- From: "David Griffith" <d.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:12 AM To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Incapacity and DLA
As far as I am aware nothing has been announced on DLA, apart from the planannounced in the spending review, to withhold the mobility component from people living in residential care.Under the previous government there were however, proposals to re-locate thecare component of DLA from individual allowances to become part of the social care budget that could be accessed by local authorities. I am notaware of these proposals becoming concrete plans beyond Green paper talk yetbut it is likely that this will be a fight to come It should be remembered that the original policy remits of these benefits were to address the extra costs of living with a disability and certainlynot a simple care allowance. . The government of the day came under pressure to introduce these benefits after the famous OPCS survey identified multiplesources of increased expenditure of living with a disability. The eligibility criteria for the Care Component has, over the years, drifted the understanding of this benefit from addressing the extra costs of disability to a benefit focussing on care. This, however, is a completely incorrect interpretation of the policy pressures for the introduction for these benefits. Care was only one of the multiple living costs identified. This is after all why it was called disability Living Allowance as opposedto the earlier Attendance allowance. Attendance Allowance was branded forpeople over 65 only as for this age group it suited the government to present this as a largely care element. The OPCS survey identified heavy lifelong costs of living with a disability which the government had torespond to. So effectively Attendance allowance was re-branded as disability Living Allowance for people under 65 to provide politicians of the time witha argument that they had responded to the poverty caused by living with a disability identified in the survey. Nowadays it suits politicians to completely ignore this original policy context and pretend that DLA was after all simply introduced as a Care Allowance. It is important to remindthem that this is simply not true . The continuing issues of increased costs of disability living, that the benefit was designed to respond to , are aspresent today as they were then. By the way, Have you seen the disability Now article ? http://www.disabilitynow.org.uk/latest-news2/news-focus/concern-grows-over-d la-future Although sadly it does not discuss the need to remind politicians of the original policy remit of DLA, it is nevertheless interesting. Regards David Griffith -----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfANDY COLLINS Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 16:48 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Incapacity and DLA Hi all - Don't want to get a thread going on here, but have been searching the online press, trying to get clarification as to whether incapacity and DLA benefits are now to be means tested, following Ozzie Osborne's spending review. I know that Incapacity is going to be replaced, it's the means testing I want to know about. Can anybody give me a link where I can get some answers to such questions? No good looking at the .gov website as yet, so maybe this info isn't yet available? Anybody know? - Andy__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signaturedatabase 5561 (20101025) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signaturedatabase 5561 (20101025) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signaturedatabase 5562 (20101025) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signaturedatabase 5562 (20101025) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3216 - Release Date: 10/24/10 07:34:00
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq